A question for deep thinkers and simple thinkers!
Forums › General Discussion › A question for deep thinkers and simple thinkers!-
What do you believe?
Do the Laws of logic exist and are they absolute?
-
Of course I would say these laws of logic do exist and they are absolute.
Laws of logic, mathemtics, and morality undergo absolutes to estabilish it's existance. -
Been down this road... Spent like a year convinced we were living in a simulation... I only think simple thoughts now...
-
SacDaddy wrote:
😂Been down this road... Spent like a year convinced we were living in a simulation... I only think simple thoughts now...
-
SacDaddy wrote:
Been down this road... Spent like a year convinced we were living in a simulation... I only think simple thoughts now...
Hahahah
I can make sense of these laws. We obey them we assume it's Validity. Another question would be why? -
SacDaddy wrote:
Tron?Been down this road... Spent like a year convinced we were living in a simulation... I only think simple thoughts now...
-
The golden ratio...
-
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality
-
They are called the nature of the laws. It's how we can do science, math and everything else that requires a mind to give it it's meaning.... Its a constant meaning. A=A and never B. That is a true statement... But by faith be trust in our validity of this truth. But if this truth is absolute then regardless of our validity, the statement is still true... But there is still a mind to make it still exist even we cease to exist.
-
No law is absolute.
-
YOU wrote:
Assuming that you need a mind to make truth statements.They are called the nature of the laws. It's how we can do science, math and everything else that requires a mind to give it it's meaning.... Its a constant meaning. A=A and never B. That is a true statement... But by faith be trust in our validity of this truth. But if this truth is absolute then regardless of our validity, the statement is still true... But there is still a mind to make it still exist even we cease to exist.
-
Tony10Thumbs wrote:
So they are absolute?No law is absolute.
-
Tony10Thumbs wrote:
So the law of non contrdiction isn't absolute? How do you carry a conversation without contradicting yourself?No law is absolute.
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
I don't ever contradict myself, unless I doTony10Thumbs wrote:
So the law of non contrdiction isn't absolute? How do you carry a conversation without contradicting yourself?No law is absolute.
-
Tony10Thumbs wrote:
So you do contrdict yourself₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
I don't ever contradict myself, unless I doTony10Thumbs wrote:
So the law of non contrdiction isn't absolute? How do you carry a conversation without contradicting yourself?No law is absolute.
-
For the sake of feelings. I'm not trying to confuse you, I just want to see if you can catch on to what these laws are for :)
-
Yes the laws of logic exist. Are they absolute, no. That's a good thing.
-
How are they not absolute?
-
Laws of logic are created and change as our collective knowledge grows
-
While I often come to the conclusion, as others here seem to have also come to, that I cannot prove anything with absolute certainty, I fight that conclusion.
I fight it because even the conclusion that nothing is certain, this conclusion itself is also included in the conclusion itself. And since I am certain I don't know everything, I know I could depending on what is.
This possibility itself would make one concl.... BOOOOOOOMMMMMM!!!!!
Sorry about that. My head exploded, and now I'm dead. Thanks a lot Aug!
P.S. This is the song that never ennnnds! It goes on and on my friend. Some people, started singing it forever just because this is the song that never ends, it goes on and ....If you were over the age of three in American during the mid 80s I just got you back... Hard.
-
Lmfao nice! Just got Rick rolled but not
-
Kozy wrote:
Back in my day all we had to troll people with, was a sketchy old woman with her hand up a lamb puppet's ass! And we were lucky to have that! You kids are spoiled with your rick astleys and your U toobs!Lmfao nice! Just got Rick rolled but not
-
*42
-
SacDaddy wrote:
So how do you tell who's a simulation and who's not?http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality
-
Superyan wrote:
A punch in the face is how I normally figure it out...SacDaddy wrote:
So how do you tell who's a simulation and who's not?http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality
-
SacDaddy wrote:
Good advice! I'll try it out on everyone I know!Superyan wrote:
A punch in the face is how I normally figure it out...SacDaddy wrote:
So how do you tell who's a simulation and who's not?http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality
What's the reaction I should get if their not a simulation? -
C = Pi * d
-
The shortcut is this; supernatural phenomena is illogical. But, if supernatural entity(s) exist, and are capable of limiting our knowledge, perception, or reasoning, then we could never become aware of that. In fact we can repeatedly prove they do not exist... Wouldn't change the fact that they do.... I don't believe in supernatural things- but it is an omnipotent factor in any discussion involving human's definition of logic or reality.
-
Kozy wrote:
So the laws of logic is subject to man? If they are then they can not be absolute thus debunking the Concept of them being a "law"Laws of logic are created and change as our collective knowledge grows
-
GreenMan/x/🇺🇸💀🔫 wrote:
While I often come to the conclusion, as others here seem to have also come to, that I cannot prove anything with absolute certainty, I fight that conclusion.
I fight it because even the conclusion that nothing is certain, this conclusion itself is also included in the conclusion itself. And since I am certain I don't know everything, I know I could depending on what is.
This possibility itself would make one concl.... BOOOOOOOMMMMMM!!!!!
Sorry about that. My head exploded, and now I'm dead. Thanks a lot Aug!
P.S. This is the song that never ennnnds! It goes on and on my friend. Some people, started Hard.Haha good one.
I would then ask how would you come to know how the conclusions in your head are now valid with the thoughts in your head 6 mins ago. On what reason do you trust your reasoning?
-
💀Ƭʊ٣ғ🌹ཞ∉λ༲∉/⁀💀™ wrote:
And that is the presupposition that makes your Conclusion. You assume the thing that your trying to prove. We see the laws as absolute and as just fact, they exist. It's not that we limit this knowledge, it's that we suppress that knowledge which is completely logical. That's what makes it illogicalThe shortcut is this; supernatural phenomena is illogical. But, if supernatural entity(s) exist, and are capable of limiting our knowledge, perception, or reasoning, then we could never become aware of that. In fact we can repeatedly prove they do not exist... Wouldn't change the fact that they do.... I don't believe in supernatural things- but it is an omnipotent factor in any discussion involving human's definition of logic or reality.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC