🔫 Should be Confiscated!
Forums › General Discussion › 🔫 Should be Confiscated!-
There is no legitimate need for privately owned guns in a modern society. Guns in the hands of the people only leads to excessive violence and death. Over 800 Americans die accidentally each year by guns. This devastating statistic demonstrates that private citizens are incapable of safely using or securing their firearms. Make guns illegal!
-
Here here
-
Wow. I'm gonna sell my guns and use the money to buy a swimming pool. Unforunately, I don't have enough guns to buy a fence for the pool.
I hope my pool doesn't contribute to the thousands of drowning deaths each year.
-
Can we share public guns?
-
Drugs are illegal. Does this stop people getting hold of them?
-
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
Yes, but swimming pools were never intended to kill people.Wow. I'm gonna sell my guns and use the money to buy a swimming pool. Unforunately, I don't have enough guns to buy a fence for the pool.
I hope my pool doesn't contribute to the thousands of drowning deaths each year.
Eliminating guns will absolutely save lives. Why does it have to be all or nothing? Isn't it good to find ways to reduce accidental death?
-
Shake-N-Bake👊🔨💀 wrote:
Can we share public guns?
Now there's a GREAT concept. We could have racks at the Bus stops like they do with bikes in seattle. Imagine how many guns we could take out of circulation.
-
Eliminate smoking and alcohol and you will save alot more then 800 a year
-
Just try and take my guns!! Statistically speaking, crime is lower in states that allow conceal carry permits. People should have to go through a safety course before purchasing a firearm. That goes for rifles and pistols alike.
-
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
I can see that you guys are not ready to face the truth of gun violence in America.Shake-N-Bake👊🔨💀 wrote:
Can we share public guns?
Now there's a GREAT concept. We could have racks at the Bus stops like they do with bikes in seattle. Imagine how many guns we could take out of circulation.
Guns should be for governments only.
-
Great Game Dev wrote:
Yet they are still illegal. It reduces drug use when drugs are illegal. Same with guns. Use England as an example of this.Drugs are illegal. Does this stop people getting hold of them?
-
And for the most part Brown....I agree. Stupid people should not be allowed to own guns. They are not toys...they are tools and should be treated as such. People die accidentally from gun fire because they do not give them the proper respect.
-
!Big Time🌇🌊3 wrote:
Not a bad idea, actually. Think about it... Is there a legitimate reason to drink alcohol or smoke?Eliminate smoking and alcohol and you will save alot more then 800 a year
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
That's only because populations are much lower where carry is permitted. Crime would be reduced there compared to urban areas anyway.Just try and take my guns!! Statistically speaking, crime is lower in states that allow conceal carry permits. People should have to go through a safety course before purchasing a firearm. That goes for rifles and pistols alike.
-
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
Actually if governments did not have guns there would be no wars either. Once the focus on war is gone we can then get rid of everything else that may hurt you and live happily ever after smelling the roses 🌹 and farting rainbows 🌈ChainsawCharlie wrote:
I can see that you guys are not ready to face the truth of gun violence in America.Shake-N-Bake👊🔨💀 wrote:
Can we share public guns?
Now there's a GREAT concept. We could have racks at the Bus stops like they do with bikes in seattle. Imagine how many guns we could take out of circulation.
Guns should be for governments only.
-
Brown....the gun violence in America cannot be blamed on the millions of legit gun owners who act responsibly with them.
And as for legitimate need....just last week a grandmother was shot in her home by a burglar right next door to my father-in-laws house. Repeat that story a thousand times over across the country and tell me there is no legitimate need to protect my family and my property.
-
Ο u 8 | 2 wrote: Actually if governments did not have guns there would be no wars either. Once the focus on war is gone we can then get rid of everything else that may hurt you and live happily ever after smelling the roses 🌹 and farting rainbows 🌈
It's hard to argue with that. Just because other countries have guns, doesn't mean we have to. We should set a good example as leaders of the free world. It's not like we are going to be invaded. -
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
!Big Time🌇🌊3 wrote:
Not a bad idea, actually. Think about it... Is there a legitimate reason to drink alcohol or smoke?Eliminate smoking and alcohol and you will save alot more then 800 a year
It helps the ugly procreate. Or are you saying the ugly shouldn't procreate? Are you anti-ugly? Do you know who else was anti-ugly? Hitler. Think about it.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
But if there were no guns here, the guy would have just come in, grabbed a beer, (or whatever he was after), and left without incident. Insurance would cover the loss of beer. Because the dude was worried she might have a gun, he had to act. And where did he get that gun? Probably stole if from a legal, responsible owner.Brown....the gun violence in America cannot be blamed on the millions of legit gun owners who act responsibly with them.
And as for legitimate need....just last week a grandmother was shot in her home by a burglar right next door to my father-in-laws house. Repeat that story a thousand times over across the country and tell me there is no legitimate need to protect my family and my property.
-
What'll happen when the inevitable zombie apocolypse occurs? Without guns we'll have to resort to shanking zombies to death! (just kidding. I think that guns should be much more difficult to get.)
-
Even if guns were banned, it's only the responsible law abiding citizens that would turn their guns in. I doubt the criminals would change thier actions and give up all thier guns. Leaving a society in which only the criminals are armed. I have protected myself from being robbed twice with my legal gun and concealed weapon permit.
-
itchy area wrote:
Maybe it would strengthen our gene pool if we eliminated the unnatural beer goggle effect. Let natural selection work as intended. It can only be good for America to eliminate vice and irresponsibility wherever we can.BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
!Big Time🌇🌊3 wrote:
Not a bad idea, actually. Think about it... Is there a legitimate reason to drink alcohol or smoke?Eliminate smoking and alcohol and you will save alot more then 800 a year
It helps the ugly procreate. Or are you saying the ugly shouldn't procreate? Are you anti-ugly? Do you know who else was anti-ugly? Hitler. Think about it.
-
Ok. In the ENTIRE of Britain there were 42 deaths that were gun related.(2009)
About the same percentage as getting hit by lightening.
Guns are not banned. It is still a sport under very strict controls.
If we want to play with BIG guns. We join the forces. I don't live in America so can't really comment. Really good thread to see peoples thoughts👍 -
I understand where ur coming from brown, but with a military family, gun safety is of the utmost importance for us. My family would like to keep our guns
-
wreckingcrew wrote:
Even if guns were banned, it's only the responsible law abiding citizens that would turn their guns in. I doubt the criminals would change thier actions and give up all thier guns. Leaving a society in which only the criminals are armed. I have protected myself from being robbed twice with my legal gun and concealed weapon permit.
I'll ignore, for the time being, your overt homo-erotic allusions to Hitler as they are not germane to this debate.
It is thusly without pomp and/or circumstance that I reach the inevitable conclusion that you, sir, indeed are worse than the Nazis.
-
If it weren't a gun, it would be knife. If not a knife, then a club. The measures that a man (or woman) will take to get what they want are endless. The evil is man's heart and not in his weaponry.
As long as there is evil in this world.....I will bear arms to defend myself and those that I hold dear.
All that would happen by confiscating all of the "legal" guns in the private sector is that crime would explode to levels yet unseen. The bad guys will still have them and do with them what they wish. -
Iggy 🌊 wrote:
Why do you need a gun against an unarmed zombie with impaired mental ability and movement issues? Are you compensating for something?What'll happen when the inevitable zombie apocolypse occurs? Without guns we'll have to resort to shanking zombies to death! (just kidding. I think that guns should be much more difficult to get.)
-
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
I disagree, carry is allowed in every southeast state including Georgia, Florida, & the Carolinas. I wouldn't call atlanta, Tampa, Orlando, or Charlotte rural.Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
That's only because populations are much lower where carry is permitted. Crime would be reduced there compared to urban areas anyway.Just try and take my guns!! Statistically speaking, crime is lower in states that allow conceal carry permits. People should have to go through a safety course before purchasing a firearm. That goes for rifles and pistols alike.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
Amen to that. And some two day course that shows you which end is the business end.Just try and take my guns!! Statistically speaking, crime is lower in states that allow conceal carry permits. People should have to go through a safety course before purchasing a firearm. That goes for rifles and pistols alike.
At least 40 hours and intensive/graphic media as well.
People need to made to understand what they are buying.
Dick and Jane homeowner buying a gun for home defense need to understand what they are getting into. They need to understand that if DO NOT take a life, that they may very well lose theirs.
Criminals need to know that the good guys are getting proper training and understanding. They need to know that if they break into a house, and run up against an armed defender, the defender knows exactly what he is doing, and is prepared to the fullest.
There's nothing more dangerous than an improperly trained and ignorant gun owner.
-
wreckingcrew wrote:
They would give up guns if possession was a death sentence.Even if guns were banned, it's only the responsible law abiding citizens that would turn their guns in. I doubt the criminals would change thier actions and give up all thier guns. Leaving a society in which only the criminals are armed. I have protected myself from being robbed twice with my legal gun and concealed weapon permit.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
All that would happen by confiscating all of the "legal" guns in the private sector is that crime would explode to levels yet unseen. The bad guys will still have them and do with them what they wish.
Yeah, just look at the crime rate in Japan were guns are outlawed. Oh wait...oops.
Also, you're worse than Hitler.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC