🔫 Should be Confiscated!
Forums › General Discussion › 🔫 Should be Confiscated!-
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
I can see that you guys are not ready to face the truth of gun violence in America.Shake-N-Bake👊🔨💀 wrote:
Can we share public guns?
Now there's a GREAT concept. We could have racks at the Bus stops like they do with bikes in seattle. Imagine how many guns we could take out of circulation.
Guns should be for governments only.
I hereby declare all property within a 3 foot radius of me to be Charlieville. I held a vote this morning to set up our government and nominate myself as fearless leader. The vote was unanimous. 1-0 in favor.
The Government of Charlieville is fully armed. Invasion is NOT recommended.
-
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
No they wouldn't. Committing murder in alot of states is a death sentence & that hasn't persuaded them not to do that.wreckingcrew wrote:
They would give up guns if possession was a death sentence.Even if guns were banned, it's only the responsible law abiding citizens that would turn their guns in. I doubt the criminals would change thier actions and give up all thier guns. Leaving a society in which only the criminals are armed. I have protected myself from being robbed twice with my legal gun and concealed weapon permit.
-
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
??????? LolThere is no legitimate need for privately owned guns in a modern society. Guns in the hands of the people only leads to excessive violence and death. Over 800 Americans die accidentally each year by guns. This devastating statistic demonstrates that private citizens are incapable of safely using or securing their firearms. Make guns illegal!
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
People have progressed significantly over the last several years. It's safe to assume that without the temptation of the easy kill, violence will drop substantially. Furthermore, if violent crime were punishable by death, we would see extreme reductions in fatalities over trivial sums of money.If it weren't a gun, it would be knife. If not a knife, then a club. The measures that a man (or woman) will take to get what they want are endless. The evil is man's heart and not in his weaponry.
As long as there is evil in this world.....I will bear arms to defend myself and those that I hold dear.
All that would happen by confiscating all of the "legal" guns in the private sector is that crime would explode to levels yet unseen. The bad guys will still have them and do with them what they wish. -
I'm glad I have my CCW, I'm glad I compete in IDPA, I'm glad I can and know how to protect me and my family....this thread is silly.
-
Im guessing Brown was just showing glman the proper way to start a debate in the forums.
-
itchy area wrote:
No, dude. Hitler was right on the money with gun confiscations. He disarmed every population he ruled over, and as a result, violent criminal activity was drastically reduced. You can hate the man for his war crimes, but he wasn't an idiot. He knew public possession of firearms was a terrible thing.Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
All that would happen by confiscating all of the "legal" guns in the private sector is that crime would explode to levels yet unseen. The bad guys will still have them and do with them what they wish.
Yeah, just look at the crime rate in Japan were guns are outlawed. Oh wait...oops.
Also, you're worse than Hitler.
-
"don't think. dumb is strength. never shot at a living thing. glorified version of a pellet gun. feel so manly when armed..."
-
Murderer and rapists are rarely put to death even if they do recieve the death penalty. Do you really think the government would execute citizens in possesion of a firearm?
-
Timothy Mcviegh took 186 souls from this earth....
The 9/11 hijackers killed thousands
Niether one of the fired a single shot.......
-
The world is overcrowded already.... Thin the heard. Let the stupid people kill eachother.
I'm sure there are many things besides guns that kill many more than 800 innocent people a year...
-
BlindLuck🔫🌊🗻 wrote:
Don't you see? The reason criminals have guns is because YOU have guns! This is just an evil cycle of violence that can easily be mitigated with harsh penalties for gun possession.I understand where ur coming from brown, but with a military family, gun safety is of the utmost importance for us. My family would like to keep our guns
-
Trollin'
On da river😜 -
Guns for the government only is about the scariest statement I've ever heard...
-
Mr. Wallace wrote:
Guns for the government only is about the scariest statement I've ever heard...
Scarier than mandatory porcupine rectal insertions?
Interesting. You are clearly worse than the Nazis.
-
Chriss rock had the right ideas, give everybody a gun just make the ammo really really expensive. Guns are here to stay, I don't like it but most owners are responsible people, the real trouble is you can't spot the idiots untill it's too late and with people like that if there were no guns they would just use something else.
-
Hitlers purpose for confiscating guns was not for public safety but for hostile government takeover. Which by the way was a huge success....that kind of government power in the hands of an administration that has proven it's ability to care less about the will of the people would not be good at all.
For me, I'll keep my guns and the responsibility of owning them. -
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
Well, OK, but you can just forget about any federal funding, mister!BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
I can see that you guys are not ready to face the truth of gun violence in America.Shake-N-Bake👊🔨💀 wrote:
Can we share public guns?
Now there's a GREAT concept. We could have racks at the Bus stops like they do with bikes in seattle. Imagine how many guns we could take out of circulation.
Guns should be for governments only.
I hereby declare all property within a 3 foot radius of me to be Charlieville. I held a vote this morning to set up our government and nominate myself as fearless leader. The vote was unanimous. 1-0 in favor.
The Government of Charlieville is fully armed. Invasion is NOT recommended.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
Hitlers purpose for confiscating guns was not for public safety but for hostile government takeover. Which by the way was a huge success....that kind of government power in the hands of an administration that has proven it's ability to care less about the will of the people would not be good at all.
For me, I'll keep my guns and the responsibility of owning them.Huge success? Perhaps you should read your history books. He LOST.
-
Stupid post...
-
I meant in controlling his people and ensuring no domestic uprising. And yes, he lost but was very close to attaining victory. So in context ofrhis conversation on "Gun Control", he was a success.
-
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
I wouldn't be to sure I know there is this group called the Taliban who would jump at the chanceΟ u 8 | 2 wrote: Actually if governments did not have guns there would be no wars either. Once the focus on war is gone we can then get rid of everything else that may hurt you and live happily ever after smelling the roses 🌹 and farting rainbows 🌈
It's hard to argue with that. Just because other countries have guns, doesn't mean we have to. We should set a good example as leaders of the free world. It's not like we are going to be invaded. -
Ο u 8 | 2 wrote:
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
Actually if governments did not have guns there would be no wars either. Once the focus on war is gone we can then get rid of everything else that may hurt you and live happily ever after smelling the roses 🌹 and farting rainbows 🌈ChainsawCharlie wrote:
I can see that you guys are not ready to face the truth of gun violence in America.Shake-N-Bake👊🔨💀 wrote:
Can we share public guns?
Now there's a GREAT concept. We could have racks at the Bus stops like they do with bikes in seattle. Imagine how many guns we could take out of circulation.
Guns should be for governments only.
Man has been killing man since the dawn of time.
-
Ban guns, they'll use knives.
Ban knives they'll use sticks.
Ban sticks, they'll use stones.
Then you will have to cut off every bodies hands so they can't make fists.
Eventually, an arms ban will become a true arms ban.But man will STILL find new and inventive ways to kill each other.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
I meant in controlling his people and ensuring no domestic uprising. And yes, he lost but was very close to attaining victory. So in context ofrhis conversation on "Gun Control", he was a success.
Successful in losing. Thus proving citizens don't need guns.
You just need to wait for the American army to show up.
The American army, btw, being a GOVERNMENT run force. I didnt see any "militias" showing up to help in any war.
-
YOU wrote:
hiTrollin'
On da river😜 -
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote: Furthermore, if violent crime were punishable by death, we would see extreme reductions in fatalities over trivial sums of money.
WE HAVE A WINNER, FOLKS!!!!
-
I've always thought it takes way more balls to kill a man with your bare fists than pull a trigger.
-
SirWasteAlot👊🔨💀 wrote:
BrownNoise👊🔨💀 wrote:
No they wouldn't. Committing murder in alot of states is a death sentence & that hasn't persuaded them not to do that.wreckingcrew wrote:
They would give up guns if possession was a death sentence.Even if guns were banned, it's only the responsible law abiding citizens that would turn their guns in. I doubt the criminals would change thier actions and give up all thier guns. Leaving a society in which only the criminals are armed. I have protected myself from being robbed twice with my legal gun and concealed weapon permit.
The death penalty is too weakly enforced. And far too drawn out. THAT needs to change.
-
Wow... Now that's something else... As a life long gun owner (many guns), hunter, and country boy I would like to take this opportunity to slap you in the mouth 👎👎👎👎👎
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC