Missouri stand up and fight house bill 545
Forums › General Discussion › Missouri stand up and fight house bill 545-
*facepalm*
-
Ghost Rider wrote:
So with your logic we shouldn't outlaw anything?Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
So what your saying is if outlaw assault rifles then criminals won't have them? Last time I checked drugs are illegal but what do ya know criminals have those too.If you plan on hunting do you take a 50 round assault rifle or shit? No. What do use it for then? The average hard working American doesn't need it. But a criminal can use it to kill dozens of people at once. Why so we need it?
Listen I am not a gun guy. Never owned one doubt I ever will. That said I am against the idea of outlawing all guns. But there isn't a need for someone to own an assault rifle.
-
✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
Oh really? An automatic rifle versus a knive? Or brass knuckles?Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
I think that "effectively" isn't a proper word for the argument. Either way, yes, they can.✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
True but can that criminal use knives, hammers, drills, rocks, brass nuckles to kill even nearly as effectively as a assault rifle?✠Ⓖ❽✠ wrote:
Ribbet. And if ALL guns are banned, you still have knives, brass knuckles, hammers, drills, rocks, all kinds of shit to use is a weapon. Taking away our rights isn't the answer. Criminals ALWAYS find a way to commit crimes. That's their nature.🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
MeowWoof
-
Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
Two questions for you, why didn't the 90's assault weapon ban stop the Columbine massacre? And, since felons aren't legally allowed to own guns in many states already, how are they still committing crimes with guns? Dont they know its against the law?!((Emotional and illogical liberal rhetoric that has pure motives but recklessly little forward thinking))
I figured real life examples might puncture that idealist and ideological bubble you're living under.
-
More people were killed with hammers and baseball bats last year in crimes than guns lets outlaw them to👍
-
🔥Ðع∆Ƭℋ⌖Ðع∆ℒعཞ🔥 wrote:
Made up internet facts are made up.More people were killed with hammers and baseball bats last year in crimes than guns lets outlaw them to👍
-
Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
Knife*✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
Oh really? An automatic rifle versus a knive? Or brass knuckles?Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
I think that "effectively" isn't a proper word for the argument. Either way, yes, they can.✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
✠Ⓖ❽✠ wrote:
🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
MeowWoof
And yes. Chances are, if someone is coming at you with a knife, or any weapon, you're not going to have the presence of mind to react before you get stabbled or hurt. Would a knife take longer to hurt a larger group of people, yes. But it is just as "effective" as a gun
-
🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
All felons are federally banned from owning firearms.Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
Two questions for you, why didn't the 90's assault weapon ban stop the Columbine massacre? And, since felons aren't legally allowed to own guns in many states already, how are they still committing crimes with guns? Dont they know its against the law?!((Emotional and illogical liberal rhetoric that has pure motives but recklessly little forward thinking))
I figured real life examples might puncture that idealist and ideological bubble you're living under.
-
YOU wrote:
18 USC 922🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
All felons are federally banned from owning firearms.Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
Two questions for you, why didn't the 90's assault weapon ban stop the Columbine massacre? And, since felons aren't legally allowed to own guns in many states already, how are they still committing crimes with guns? Dont they know its against the law?!((Emotional and illogical liberal rhetoric that has pure motives but recklessly little forward thinking))
I figured real life examples might puncture that idealist and ideological bubble you're living under.
-
ℜagɳar Loðbrók wrote:
I slept through my federal firearms ATF class. Fixed it.🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
All felons are federally banned from owning firearms.Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
Two questions for you, why didn't the 90's assault weapon ban stop the Columbine massacre? And, since felons aren't legally allowed to own guns in the states already, how are they still committing crimes with guns? Dont they know its against the law?!((Emotional and illogical liberal rhetoric that has pure motives but recklessly little forward thinking))
I figured real life examples might puncture that idealist and ideological bubble you're living under.
-
✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
But u made the point there. Yes knives can kill people easily, but I haven't once heard of a massive school "knifing".✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
Knife*Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
✠Ⓖ❽✠ wrote:
🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
MeowWoof
And yes. Chances are, if someone is coming at you with a knife, or any weapon, you're not going to have the presence of mind to react before you get stabbled or hurt. Would a knife take longer to hurt a larger group of people, yes. But it is just as "effective" as a gun
-
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/14/1169847/-Eerie-knife-attack-in-Chinese-school-also-today-22-wounded-your-move-MSM
Just because you haven't seen or heard about it, doesn't mean it hasn't happened.
-
Turf Warrior and others who have never heard of mass killings with knives and/or blunt objects, check it out. Imagine the evil is inside the people and not the objects they use.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_attacks_in_China_(2010–2012)
-
🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
I bet he didn't even get it from the internet. He heard someone else say it and just assumed that it was true.🔥Ðع∆Ƭℋ⌖Ðع∆ℒعཞ🔥 wrote:
Made up internet facts are made up.More people were killed with hammers and baseball bats last year in crimes than guns lets outlaw them to👍
-
Lol. I'm so happy I live in Canada.
-
Turf🐑Warrior wrote:
Osaka school massacre, I think 8 dead, 15 injured.✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
But u made the point there. Yes knives can kill people easily, but I haven't once heard of a massive school "knifing".✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
Knife*Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
✠Ⓖ❽✠ wrote:
🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
MeowWoof
And yes. Chances are, if someone is coming at you with a knife, or any weapon, you're ✂
-
No ones answered my question yet. I am in support of the 2nd amendment, although I will probably never have a gun. Why should anyone need an assault rifle? I fail to see the purpose. I may be missing something obvious, and if so, correct me
-
Turf🐑Warrior wrote:
I'm not saying we shouldn't only anything but my point was banning assault rifles will do nothing to prevent school shootings.Ghost Rider wrote:
So with your logic we shouldn't outlaw anything?Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
So what your saying is if outlaw assault rifles then criminals won't have them? Last time I checked drugs are illegal but what do ya know criminals have those too.If you plan on hunting do you take a 50 round assault rifle or shit? No. What do use it for then? The average hard working American doesn't need it. But a criminal can use it to kill dozens of people at once. Why so we need it?
Listen I am not a gun guy. Never owned one doubt I ever will. That said I am against the idea of outlawing all guns. But there isn't a need for someone to own an assault rifle.
-
I don't care what y'all say. (That's for Mayhem)
I want my guns. And I'll eat cheeseburgers and drink shitty American beer and watch good ol' fashioned lesbian porn while I shoot em. 🇺🇸 -
ƑƦཇཇ☠ཀaʂ٥ท wrote:
NoIs this a joke?
-
༺☠Ꮹཞ༏ཀཀ☠༻ wrote:
I could do with a cheese burger right now actually :/I don't care what y'all say. (That's for Mayhem)
I want my guns. And I'll eat cheeseburgers and drink shitty American beer and watch good ol' fashioned lesbian porn while I shoot em. 🇺🇸 -
Lil' Al Dwayne wrote:
Collectors , they aren't taking them from criminals, they will be taking them from persons that have legally purchased these weapons. Me personally ill die standing up before I die on my kneesWhy would you ever need an assault weapon? This sounds like a good idea to me.
-
〓ＦＡＬＬＡＣＹ〓 wrote:
Where greyhound passengers have their heads cut off with dull knives are canabalized, while the other passengers watch.Lol. I'm so happy I live in Canada.
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
I answered this already.No ones answered my question yet. I am in support of the 2nd amendment, although I will probably never have a gun. Why should anyone need an assault rifle? I fail to see the purpose. I may be missing something obvious, and if so, correct me
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Because, Wegsies, it's an incrementalist strategy to ban guns, first. Second, because we have a constitutional right to own AR's. Third, because most home invasions occur with more than one person, so I'm happy I have something with 30 rounds that can defeat Kevlar. Fourth, because an assault weapon ban was already tried and had negligible impact on crime. Practically speaking, this is an emotion-driven witch hunt in which a bunch of sheep don't want people to protect themselves under the guise of "OH THE CHILDREN, WONT SOMEONE SAVE THE POOR CHILDREN"No ones answered my question yet. I am in support of the 2nd amendment, although I will probably never have a gun. Why should anyone need an assault rifle? I fail to see the purpose. I may be missing something obvious, and if so, correct me
-
✠Ⓖ❽✠ wrote:
Dead wrong🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
Less assault guns= less schools shooting and other shootings.The mighty and all-knowing federal government will protect us all from guns, and sickness, and evil. And once all the guns are rounded up, it will protect us from tyranny. And tuck us into our cocoons a night and provide for all of our needs.
Once again only military needs assault weapons anyway..... -
ƑƦཇཇ☠ཀaʂ٥ท wrote:
Can't this just be used as an argument to how easy it is to get a gun? There are too many incidents for it to be a few that slipped through the cracks. Gun ownership is too entrenched in the US for it to vanish in one go. The big argument for concealed and military style rifles always seems to always be self defence. Everyone wants to shoot an intruder.You are all absolutely correct. It's the gun's fault. Not the mentally unstable individuals behind them. 👍
-
✯Ꮲ༙ᏐᏟᎪ༙ᏕᏕᏫ༙✯ wrote:
The law is called the castle law, also in kentucky we don't have a duty to retreat either, we can stand our ground. I'm very well trained in use if for e in kyIt's not about NEEDING a gun. It's about having the RIGHT to own a gun. In KY, if someone breaks into your home, you have the right to shoot the burglar. Now, the chances of someone breaking into my home? Slim. But I sleep easy at night knowing that if someone ever tries to harm my family, I'll be able to shoot the bastard who attempts to harm me or mine
-
YOU wrote:
Keep* their shotguns lolHey lefties. Shotguns were used in Aurora, Virginia Tech, Newtown, and Littleton. Why don't you want to ban shotguns? Let's hear a good argument from the left in support of allowing people to kill their shotguns, which are just as deadly as assault rifles.
-
🌾ᏦᎻᎪᏞ🌾 wrote:
I'd happily ban shotguns as well. What's your point?YOU wrote:
Keep* their shotguns lolHey lefties. Shotguns were used in Aurora, Virginia Tech, Newtown, and Littleton. Why don't you want to ban shotguns? Let's hear a good argument from the left in support of allowing people to kill their shotguns, which are just as deadly as assault rifles.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC