Face eater!!
Forums › General Discussion › Face eater!!-
Look, b, the police are trained to use deadly force to protect the public. If an innocent person's life is in danger, the police are supposed to kill to protect them. Cops make judgment calls every day. If the cop doesn't judge that what you did was criminal, you would never stand before an actual judge to hear a verdict.
The victim's life was in immediate danger, and the cop made the decision to us deadly force to save that victims life. Keep in mind, he was also the first responder to a medical emergency. He can't tend to the wounded man and subdue a drug addled crazy at the same time. And he was using his teeth as a pretty effective weapon against that homeless man. I don't see how this is any different than if the subject was cutting the victim with a knife. -
I don't disagree with you, he (hopefully 😜) was trained in how to do that, but he also had to take into account the man with blood gushing from his face. The head has the most surface blood vessels of any body part because of the skull; he needed to be treated immediately. A 5 minute fight with a crazed cannibal would allow more time for the wounded ma to bleed out. Plus, he would have to wait for backup to keep the face-eater subdued while he took care of the wounded man. You can't just handcuff a man, then proceed to set him down on a park bench while you help a wounded person.
-
Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
We have procedure so they don't need to make judgement calls. Those procedures should remain strict.Look, b, the police are trained to use deadly force to protect the public. If an innocent person's life is in danger, the police are supposed to kill to protect them. Cops make judgment calls every day. If the cop doesn't judge that what you did was criminal, you would never stand before an actual judge to hear a verdict.
The victim's life was in immediate danger, and the cop made the decision to us deadly force to save that victims life. Keep in mind, he was also the first responder to a medical emergency. He can't tend to the wounded man and subdue a drug addled crazy at the same time. And he was using his teeth as a pretty effective weapon against that homeless man. I don't see how this is any different than if the subject was cutting the victim with a knife. -
I find it sad that you guys have come to the conclusion that the victims life was more valuable than the ALLEGED suspect
-
Easily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger. Not only trying to take down a man on drugs that sometimes takes about ten men to do anyway, but with all The blood all over the place, that is putting the officer in danger of contracting HIV, aids, hepatitis and other disease. If the officer got scratched during the scuffle or the attacker so much as spits blood on his face, how much are you asking from a guy to give a guy like that a trial?
-
If the cop was not alone, then I would agree that this man should not have been killed. But he was alone. He made the only logical decision to made here. If he didn't shoot the guy, then the homeless man would be dead instead, and you and brown would be saying that the cop should have shot the guy.
-
༺☣ℳཞ71ᏤཡℬüᎦ☣༻ wrote:
I agree. But I just think it would have been better if the guy with the club knocked the psychotic in head, concussion and all, thereby protecting the victim, and allowing the assailant at least a chance to stand up in court. (again).True but when an assailant will not stop inflicting injury to his victim, lethal measures may be called for. That is why the police are trained. To know HOW to deal with the situation. I'm sure the cop wasn't playing judge. He saw, he reacted based on his training. Police are taught to use brute force IF necessary. In this case, the officer felt it was necessary. I can't say I disagree.....
7⃣1⃣🔨🚌
-
I'm not trying to say I think the cop's decision was the best, but I do believe he made a decision that was perfectly acceptable.
Also B, I'm darn sure the police doesn't have a strict procedure to take care of a drugged man eating the face off another man. These are the times judgment calls HAVE to made. -
Queen Nicole wrote:
that's what he's payed forEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger.
-
Queen Nicole wrote:
He deserved a trial. It's obvious he was insane an deserved a chance for treatmentEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger. Not only trying to take down a man on drugs that sometimes takes about ten men to do anyway, but with all The blood all over the place, that is putting the officer in danger of contracting HIV, aids, hepatitis and other disease. If the officer got scratched during the scuffle or the attacker so much as spits blood on his face, how much are you asking from a guy to give a guy like that a trial?
-
Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
He didn't tend to the wounded man. They waited for paramedics. I just wish this went down like almost every other encounter with an unarmed, drug-crazed attacker.Look, b, the police are trained to use deadly force to protect the public. If an innocent person's life is in danger, the police are supposed to kill to protect them. Cops make judgment calls every day. If the cop doesn't judge that what you did was criminal, you would never stand before an actual judge to hear a verdict.
The victim's life was in immediate danger, and the cop made the decision to us deadly force to save that victims life. Keep in mind, he was also the first responder to a medical emergency. He can't tend to the wounded man and subdue a drug addled crazy at the same time. And he was using his teeth as a pretty effective weapon against that homeless man. I don't see how this is any different than if the subject was cutting the victim with a knife. -
👿Belial wrote:
He's paid to protect the people, which he did. You couldn't pay me enought to possibly contract a deadly disease that I would have to fight the rest of my life for, to give a man so obviously guilty a trial, that we all would have to pay for anyway.Queen Nicole wrote:
that's what he's payed forEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger.
-
👿Belial wrote:
ever drive by a cop while going 5 mph over the speed limit and not get pulled over? Are you saying that if a guy puts a gun to someone's head, the cop can't make a judgment that that person is in imminent danger? If a cop rolls up on a scene and the witnesses are giving conflicting stories, he can't use logic and experience to judge who is telling the truth in order to apprehend a possibly dangerous suspect? A police officer making appropriate judgment calls is the most important part of standard police procedure.Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
We have procedure so they don't need to make judgement calls. Those procedures should remain strict.snipped
-
Queen Nicole wrote:
It's our civic duty to pay for such trials. The guy would've most likely received treatment and have been released as a productive healthy citizen👿Belial wrote:
He's paid to protect the people, which he did. You couldn't pay me enought to possibly contract a deadly disease that I would have to fight the rest of my life for, to give a man so obviously guilty a trial, that we all would have to pay for anyway.Queen Nicole wrote:
that's what he's payed forEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger.
-
👿Belial wrote:
I would be appalled if they let someone like this out. I, for one, would not feel safe if the courts kept letting out murderers. If he has done it once, what makes you think he won't do it again?Queen Nicole wrote:
It's our civic duty to pay for such trials. The guy would've most likely received treatment and have been released as a productive healthy citizen👿Belial wrote:
He's paid to protect the people, which he did. You couldn't pay me enought to possibly contract a deadly disease that I would have to fight the rest of my life for, to give a man so obviously guilty a trial, that we all would have to pay for anyway.Queen Nicole wrote:
that's what he's payed forEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger.
-
Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:
Well of course they waited for the paramedics to take care of him. Police officers aren't trained to handle that kind of trauma. But part of police procedure would be to relay to dispatch the condition of the victim. And I'm sure he stayed with the victim. Probably applied a little pressure to his wounds. Saving the lives of innocent people is always the priority.Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
He didn't tend to the wounded man. They waited for paramedics. I just wish this went down like almost every other encounter with an unarmed, drug-crazed attacker.snipped
-
Like how prior we paid for his jail when he attempted to kill his mother? When he went through a divorce because the girl said he got violent? Productive citizen? Sometimes you need to stop and take a cold hard look at what's in front of us. A man got his face eaten. A homeless man where I guarantee you has no medical insurance. How about instead of fighting for a druggies trial. Donate money to the poor guy who got his face tore off.
-
👿Belial wrote:
Of course it is. That guy Made te CHOICE to do drugs. He deserved those bullets. He had those thoughts in his head already. Let's see....allow a INNOCENT man bleed to death while I hand cuff a crazy piece of shit?..........or shoot the fucker who is a pathetic waste of life an save an INNOCENT human being? Not that hard.I find it sad that you guys have come to the conclusion that the victims life was more valuable than the ALLEGED suspect
-
And in most of those other cases of unarmed drug crazed attackers, the suspect is not actively in the process of murdering someone, and there are multiple cops on scene.
-
👿Belial wrote:
How many convicted killers end up back in jail within their first year of release?Queen Nicole wrote:
It's our civic duty to pay for such trials. The guy would've most likely received treatment and have been released as a productive healthy citizen👿Belial wrote:
He's paid to protect the people, which he did. You couldn't pay me enought to possibly contract a deadly disease that I would have to fight the rest of my life for, to give a man so obviously guilty a trial, that we all would have to pay for anyway.Queen Nicole wrote:
that's what he's payed forEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger.
-
Carpenter wrote:
Same peope don't behave in such a way. Insane people should not be treated the same as people who knowingly commit crimes as someone suffering an insanity is salvageable with psychiatric treatment👿Belial wrote:
I would be appalled if they let someone like this out. I, for one, would not feel safe if the courts kept letting out murderers. If he has done it once, what makes you think he won't do it again?Queen Nicole wrote:
Iased as a productive healthy citizen👿Belial wrote:
anyway.Queen Nicole wrote:
that's what he's payed forEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger.
-
Kevster 🇺🇸💀🔫 wrote:
We aren't talking about a normal killer. A sane man doesn't do what he did. He needed treatment. Not execution👿Belial wrote:
How many convicted killers end up back in jail within their first year of release?Queen Nicole wrote:
It's our civic duty to pay for such trials. The guy would've most likely received treatment and have been released as a productive healthy citizen👿Belial wrote:
fight the rest of my life for, to give a man so obviously guilty a trial, that we all would have to pay for anyway.Queen Nicole wrote:
that's what he's payed forEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger.
-
Kevster 🇺🇸💀🔫 wrote:
So you're saying anyone who does drugs should be executed?👿Belial wrote:
Of course it is. That guy Made te CHOICE to do drugs. He deserved those bullets. He had those thoughts in his head already. Let's see....allow a INNOCENT man bleed to death while I hand cuff a crazy piece of shit?..........or shoot the fucker who is a pathetic waste of life an save an INNOCENT human being? Not that hard.I find it sad that you guys have come to the conclusion that the victims life was more valuable than the ALLEGED suspect
-
👿Belial wrote:
This man didn't have any mental disorders, it was all side effects of the drug. If he were to do it again, the drug would act the same way and he would go back into a violent state and would go about doing the same things again.Carpenter wrote:
Same peope don't behave in such a way. Insane people should not be treated the same as people who knowingly commit crimes as someone suffering an insanity is salvageable with psychiatric treatment👿Belial wrote:
Queen Nicole wrote:
Iased as a productive healthy citizen👿Belial wrote:
anyway.Queen Nicole wrote:
that's what he's payed forEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger.
-
👿Belial wrote:
This wasn't an execution anymore than killing a hostage taker, about to kill his hostages, is an execution. This cops's actions saved an innocent victim's life.Kevster 🇺🇸💀🔫 wrote:
We aren't talking about a normal killer. A sane man doesn't do what he did. He needed treatment. Not execution👿Belial wrote:
How many convicted killers end up back in jail within their first year of release?Queen Nicole wrote:
Snipped👿Belial wrote:
Snipped.Queen Nicole wrote:
Snippedsnipped.
-
Carpenter wrote:
👿Belial wrote:
Then he still deserved treatment for drug abuse. It falls under temporary insanity. And besides being addicted to drugs is in itself a mental condition.Carpenter wrote:
the same things again.👿Belial wrote:
Queen Nicole wrote:
Iased as a productive healthy citizen👿Belial wrote:
anyway.Queen Nicole wrote:
that's what he's payed forEasily subdued? It would have directly put the officer in mortal danger.
-
Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
And you know for sure the victim was innocent how?👿Belial wrote:
This wasn't an execution anymore than killing a hostage taker, about to kill his hostages, is an execution. This cops's actions saved an innocent victim's life.Kevster 🇺🇸💀🔫 wrote:
We aren't talking about a normal killer. A sane man doesn't do what he did. He needed treatment. Not execution👿Belial wrote:
How many convicted killers end up back in jail within their first year of release?Queen Nicole wrote:
Snipped👿Belial wrote:
Snipped.Queen Nicole wrote:
Snippedsnipped.
-
Do you seriously believe that? Productive, healthy citizen? He was 31, no job, no car, drug abuser and I believe he lived with his parents. What makes you think that's gonna change?
We aren't talking about a 12 year old who stole a candy bar.
-
👿Belial wrote:
He wasn't eating anyone's face. There is no justification for eating someone's faceTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
And you know for sure the victim was innocent how?👿Belial wrote:
This wasn't an execution anymore than killing a hostage taker, about to kill his hostages, is an execution. This cops's actions saved an innocent victim's life.Kevster 🇺🇸💀🔫 wrote:
Snipped👿Belial wrote:
SnippedQueen Nicole wrote:
Snipped👿Belial wrote:
Snipped.Queen Nicole wrote:
Snippedsnipped.
-
ffmedic4143 wrote:
So someone who is 31 and lives with their parents deserves to be executed?Do you seriously believe that? Productive, healthy citizen? He was 31, no job, no car, drug abuser and I believe he lived with his parents. What makes you think that's gonna change?
We aren't talking about a 12 year old who stole a candy bar.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC