Face eater!!
Forums › General Discussion › Face eater!!-
Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:
You seemed to have missed the part about clubbing him could kill him. There were 2 separate statements.ffmedic4143 wrote:
Now you are getting weird. Shooting is better than beating him and dragging him off to what... Jail? Obsurd! We don't do that here. Just kill him. Better for everyone involved. We'll just pretend you had no choice. Judges, bah. Who needs them. As soon as we get Judge Dredd in place in this country, the better.So police brutality (or a good old fashioned ass whipping as you put it) is better than shooting him? So the cop belts him in the head, handcuffs him and takes him to jail. Now what?
To suggest clubbing him with a shotgun (which most certainly could have killed him in a much slower and painful way) is better is kind of ignorant.
-
Fizzone wrote:
Well no, it's not cause they were "on ma properteh". It's cause they smashed out a window or kicked in a door to enter the place where their wife and children are. Two of the instances, the intruder had a gun. The third, sure that guy may be a little trigger happy. But I would not take kindly to someone endangering my family, and I would only draw my gun on a person if I intended to kill them.
I agree..holding your ground at your home and to protect your family. Just make sure not to shoot them in the back!
-
Just saw the photo of this mans face, the man was in danger of dying and still is. This isn't simple assault but attempted murder.
Search live leak for it, be forewarned it is a pretty brutal photo. -
And to justify brutality over shooting is like trying to justify driving drunk, causing and accident but not killing anyone. The root cause should not have happened and the end result wouldn't have happened. Don't drink and drive and you won't cause a drunken accident. Dont chew someone's face off and you won't get shot.
-
Brown Note you also against the Death Penalty? Seems like you would be from reading all your comments
-
§αʋcɛ☠BʘՏՏ wrote:
Just saw the photo of this mans face, the man was in danger of dying and still is. This isn't simple assault but attempted murder.
Search live leak for it, be forewarned it is a pretty brutal photo. -
ffmedic4143 wrote: Irrational fear of having ones face chewed off is an oxymoron. I'm most definitely afraid of that. Probably to the point of phobia.
The police officer was not in danger of having is face chewed off. Don't get crazy on me now.
🌟This week on "The Deadliest Warrior", we pit a fully armed and professionally trained law enforcement officer against a psychotic nekkid guy on the ground in a concrete enclosure.
The police have Tasers, clubs, riot control gear, armor, specialized training, shotguns, pistols, and backup.
The psychotic nekkid guy has scary blood on him and growls after being shot.
Though advanced computer simulation, we will find out who is "The Deadliest Warror".🌟
-
Fizzone wrote:
Why limit yourself? The gun is used by the police as an intimidation weapon more than a bullet thrower. Point the gun, assert yourself, and hope he leaves. The law here: you must have no escape. You must warn the intruder. You must threaten to shoot. Only then can you unload on them.Well no, it's not cause they were "on ma properteh". It's cause they smashed out a window or kicked in a door to enter the place where their wife and children are. Two of the instances, the intruder had a gun. The third, sure that guy may be a little trigger happy. But I would not take kindly to someone endangering my family, and I would only draw my gun on a person if I intended to kill them.
-
The Merc wrote:
Not usually. Why should I be?Brown Note you also against the Death Penalty? Seems like you would be from reading all your comments
-
§αʋcɛ☠BʘՏՏ wrote:
Of course I've already seen the photos and the videos. Are you arguing without first having researched the case? Not only did I carefully gather the facts, I went out and looked for public opinion sources. Man.Just saw the photo of this mans face, the man was in danger of dying and still is. This isn't simple assault but attempted murder.
Search live leak for it, be forewarned it is a pretty brutal photo. -
ffmedic4143 wrote:
Your absolutely rightMy points were:
#1. NOBODY in this forum can say for sure how they would react when confronted with a situation like that because you've never been there.
#2. My opinion (and strictly my opinion) is the shooting is justified.
#3. I'm a firefighter/paramedic and I'm quite certain I've seen more than most lay people, however, I'm also certain wouldn't know how to react in a situation like that and my training would probably kick in and over ride any logical thought.
-
Before you go ahead and start making up scernios. No officer has ever came close to seeing what that officer saw that day. You talked about if he only didn't freak out. That's BS right there...I guarantee you 100% of everyone would have freaked out when they saw a human eating the face of the other humans face. The officer acted just like any other Officer would have. He told him to get off and he didn't listen..he shot him and he still didn't listen and kept on eating so another shot was fired. What was done..was done. Maybe he didn't want to kill that person. We don't know the facts.How do you know the officer had a taser? Everything your saying is going by your training and idk where your from and what you do. I have the officer side every day.
-
Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:
That's ok, you've seen the photo of the mans face and call it assault and not what it really is attempted murder? Just shows me you are trolling now.§αʋcɛ☠BʘՏՏ wrote:
Of course I've already seen the photos and the videos. Are you arguing without first having researched the case? Not only did I carefully gather the facts, I went out and looked for public opinion sources. Man.Just saw the photo of this mans face, the man was in danger of dying and still is. This isn't simple assault but attempted murder.
Search live leak for it, be forewarned it is a pretty brutal photo.Attempted murder=deadly force.
Don't try to kill folks and you won't get killed.
-
ffmedic4143 wrote:
The idea is appropriate force. Its a bit appalling You think shooting is appropriate force over attemptIng to subdueAnd to justify brutality over shooting is like trying to justify driving drunk, causing and accident but not killing anyone. The root cause should not have happened and the end result wouldn't have happened. Don't drink and drive and you won't cause a drunken accident. Dont chew someone's face off and you won't get shot.
-
Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it must be a duck.☣ĢħΘȘτ ιΘƈƲȘτ☣ wrote:
All true. But that is completely unprofessional behavior for law enforcement.Yes, let's subdue a person that has chewed the face off another person just so we can spend millions of dollars trying to rehabilitate him and defend him in court. A bullet is a much more cost effective method of solving the problem. Our society doesn't need people like that.
The law must be applied evenly. Are you saying all criminals should be shot on sight to save taxpayer dollars?
If it acts like a rabid animal by attacking people and chewing on their faces, it must be a rabid animal.
How do we handle a rabid animal? We shoot them! -
Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:
I know I'm for capital punishment. but there's a difference between a fair trial and appeals and a police officer shootin an unarmed manThe Merc wrote:
Not usually. Why should I be?Brown Note you also against the Death Penalty? Seems like you would be from reading all your comments
-
Lol played too much RDR:Undead nightmare
-
☣ĢħΘȘτ ιΘƈƲȘτ☣ wrote:
Awesome philosophy. Great way to assert law and order. We have laws and polic procedures for a reason. These should not be crossed under any circumstancesBrown🎵Note😲 wrote:
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it must be a duck.☣ĢħΘȘτ ιΘƈƲȘτ☣ wrote:
All true. But that is completely unprofessional behavior for law enforcement.method of solving the problem. Our society doesn't need people like that.
taxpayer dollars?
If it acts like a rabid animal by attacking people and chewing on their faces, it must be a rabid animal.
How do we handle a rabid animal? We shoot them! -
Police officer shooting a human whos EATING almost more than 75% of ones face almost killing him? You forgot the other parts
-
You guys who said the shooting is justified are thinking with your emotions. The law must at all times remain completely void of emotion if it is to function properly
-
The Merc wrote:
That's your emotions at a brutal act talking. Not fact. Fact is he was an in armed man. Last I checked procedures does not say shooting an unarmed man is the optimal responsePolice officer shooting a human whos EATING almost more than 75% of ones face almost killing him? You forgot the other parts
-
👿Belial wrote:
Nope but there are procedures that say deadly force is authorized if used in the defense of a life.The Merc wrote:
That's your emotions at a brutal act talking. Not fact. Fact is he was an in armed man. Last I checked procedures does not say shooting an unarmed man is the optimal responsePolice officer shooting a human whos EATING almost more than 75% of ones face almost killing him? You forgot the other parts
-
Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:
Seriously? So you would run up amd tackle the guy off? And risk being but in the neck and bleed to death? That cop did te right thing. Well should have been a kill shot from the start. There is no mentall hospital that could help someone like that.Glock45 wrote:
I believe he will be found to be within the rules in this case.Before you render judgement on the officer I think it would be wise to wait for the investigation to be complete. That officer has to justify his use if lethal force. The Miami PD will review the case and judge what he did. The news is always sensationalized so we really don't know the whole story.
My concern is that irrational fear may have significantly contributed to the outcome, and that extreme measures were taken too quickly, which I feel is exceedingly rare among our extremely professional law enforcement personnel.
-
§αʋcɛ☠BʘՏՏ wrote:
👿Belial wrote:
Nope but there are procedures that say deadly force is authorized if used in the defense of a life.The Merc wrote:
That's your emotions at a brutal act talking. Not fact. Fact is he was an in armed man. Last I checked procedures does not say shooting an unarmed man is the optimal responsePolice officer shooting a human whos EATING almost more than 75% of ones face almost killing him? You forgot the other parts
Yes Agree^^^
-
§αʋcɛ☠BʘՏՏ wrote:
When appropriate. We are talojg about an unarmed alleged suspect. Obviously if he's unarmed Discharge of firearms is not the appropriate response👿Belial wrote:
Nope but there are procedures that say deadly force is authorized if used in the defense of a life.The Merc wrote:
That's your emotions at a brutal act talking. Not fact. Fact is he was an in armed man. Last I checked procedures does not say shooting an unarmed man is the optimal responsePolice officer shooting a human whos EATING almost more than 75% of ones face almost killing him? You forgot the other parts
-
An unarmed man murdering someone that did not listen to verbal commands and continued attacking after being shot once. As I said attempted murder=deadly force.
-
§αʋcɛ☠BʘՏՏ wrote:
Actually no. That's not what procedure says. He was unarmed. Case closed he shouldn't be dead.An unarmed man murdering someone that did not listen to verbal commands and continued attacking after being shot once. As I said attempted murder=deadly force.
-
He was murdering someone case closed he should be dead. See I can do that too.
-
Once again you're thinking with your emotions. You must seperate the facts from everything that causes an emotional response. We have an unarmed man dead for an alleged crime without the benafit of trial. Thats the only facts you need as those are the only facts that don't put a spin on the incident
-
👿Belial wrote:
Wait you forgot to mention he was tearing another mans face apart and he attacked the man first. It wasnt just a 5 min attack it went on for 18 min! Lucky for the man being attack to be alive. Yes the man attacking did not follow the orders being made§αʋcɛ☠BʘՏՏ wrote:
Actually no. That's not what procedure says. He was unarmed. Case closed he shouldn't be dead.An unarmed man murdering someone that did not listen to verbal commands and continued attacking after being shot once. As I said attempted murder=deadly force.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC