🇯🇵Meltdown Imminent!!!🇯🇵
Forums › General Discussion › 🇯🇵Meltdown Imminent!!!🇯🇵-
They have to use nuclear because all their natural resources are depleted. How else would they power the country? It is surprising that although they have solid structural buildings designed to outlast far greater magnitudes, the nuclear plants don't have double that structural integrity.
-
I'll guess that more people have died in house fires caused by space heaters than have died from nuclear accidents.
You'd rather burn fossil fuels?
-
Chernobyl-2011 😞
-
VADAN wrote:
Japan get approximately 29% of their electricity from nuclear power. For comparison, the US gets 21% from nuclear. The power plant is in danger of a meltdown because the coal powered generator(the source of most of their power) went down due to the tsunami(not the earthquake or it's aftershocks). As of this instant full scale meltdown has not occurred. They are using salt water to try and cool down the reactor that is in question.They have to use nuclear because all their natural resources are depleted. How else would they power the country? It is surprising that although they have solid structural buildings designed to outlast far greater magnitudes, the nuclear plants don't have double that structural integrity.
-
Brown Note👊🔨💀 wrote:
I'll guess that more people have died in house fires caused by space heaters than have died from nuclear accidents.
You'd rather burn fossil fuels?
-
ripd wrote:
Man don't get me started on the pros of nuclear energy! Sensationalism like this is why there aren't more powering the world and we are still largely dependent on fossil fuels. IF one good thing does come out if all this, hopefully it's that a nuclear power station is able to work through an 8.9 magnitude earthquake with out going into meltdown. With that in the history books it could serve to balance perceptions of nuclear fuel.Brown Note👊🔨💀 wrote:
I'll guess that more people have died in house fires caused by space heaters than have died from nuclear accidents.
You'd rather burn fossil fuels?
-
But the way nuclear fuels are used is pointless. At least in the US. We don't recycle the fuel rods... We use every fuel rod til about 1-3% of it is left, then put it in storage. Whereas countries such as France recycle those fuel rods to get back that energy that we throw away. The US has about 60 years of nuclear energy left (at current consumption rates) but could be extended to almost 1000 years if we recycled the remaining fuel in those rods. Besides, U-235 is a limited resource, just like fossil fuels, that will eventually ve depleted... Renewable sources should be researched more in order to prevent the dependcy on one type of energy.
-
Yes, nuclear power isn't natural, why do we think we deserve to destroy the planet for CONVENIENCE,yes a selfish person would see nuclear power as a pro, we ha it for what 50 years and 1/2 major incidents and 2/3 minor and that what WE know about....electric not a god givn right,yes we are dependent on it, and we have the technology to utilise free energy or even if not free,pay all the unemployed to run round on big hamster wheel,I Dnt care just we selfish beings talking like we are special and that any cost to earth unpeoples ok as long as we don't have to expend to much energy,gem it's on your doorstep mayb u think diff,oh and we store rods,ok like the nuke subs that stored that rotting into the sea?
-
So what happens when we have no use for these stations? Or if th world dies get more disasters,who gonna manage them when ppl busy saving their own life? Like Chernobyl just burning down and down into the earth, conflicting reports,but they thought they slowed it down,,uh huh!what happens if n when that reactor reaches the earths core? Man made engineered semi syth bomb going into magma? Hmmm ,oh but Dnt worry scientists said take more than our lifetimes ,so that's ok then ,we be ok? Lol..yes the world is in need of electric, and I know this but anyone who says that nuke is ok believes the hype,ur own governent worm around giving awnsers to really pressing nuclear questions
-
fagan wrote:
Energy is not convenience. Iys something the human race could no longer survive without given current population densities.Yes, nuclear power isn't natural, why do we think we deserve to destroy the planet for CONVENIENCE,yes a selfish person would see nuclear power as a pro, we ha it for what 50 years and 1/2 major incidents and 2/3 minor and that what WE know about....electric not a god givn right,yes we are dependent on it, and we have the technology to utilise free energy or even if not free,pay all the unemployed to run round on big hamster wheel,I Dnt care just we selfish beings talking like we are special and that any cost to earth unpeoples ok as long as we don't have to expend to much energy,gem it's on your doorstep mayb u think diff,oh and we store rods,ok like the nuke subs that stored that rotting into the sea?
-
I'm not saying it is an easy option, and yes would be disruption to have a massive change over, but they know that now they've fired these nuke plants up they can't ever be left EVER, so that shows mans selfishness,what If man was no more thru disease etc,what bout the animals n earth all them plants,oh I forgot we Dnt care we are man god put us here or we are so clever it's our right,when we have the attitude of many indigenous people that we are caretaker to earth and same as animals, we human are arrogant, we are a miricle yet we treat life as though we can buy another if mess thi one up
-
fagan wrote:
We are only animals. We seek to survive through any means. It just a natural attitude really.I'm not saying it is an easy option, and yes would be disruption to have a massive change over, but they know that now they've fired these nuke plants up they can't ever be left EVER, so that shows mans selfishness,what If man was no more thru disease etc,what bout the animals n earth all them plants,oh I forgot we Dnt care we are man god put us here or we are so clever it's our right,when we have the attitude of many indigenous people that we are caretaker to earth and same as animals, we human are arrogant, we are a miricle yet we treat life as though we can buy another if mess thi one up
-
fagan wrote:
What?? Around 10% of that makes sense.So what happens when we have no use for these stations? Or if th world dies get more disasters,who gonna manage them when ppl busy saving their own life? Like Chernobyl just burning down and down into the earth, conflicting reports,but they thought they slowed it down,,uh huh!what happens if n when that reactor reaches the earths core? Man made engineered semi syth bomb going into magma? Hmmm ,oh but Dnt worry scientists said take more than our lifetimes ,so that's ok then ,we be ok? Lol..yes the world is in need of electric, and I know this but anyone who says that nuke is ok believes the hype,ur own governent worm around giving awnsers to really pressing nuclear questions
-
Fagan, are you krazijay?
-
🔥GOD of WAR🔥.
Yes but we different for we have records sciences,an animal poos or kills with thought for himself, mans big difference is communication, and thought we know we doing bad that's the diff,butt I agree to the instinct of survival untill te threat of survival that is also an same instinct,works both ways
We are only animals. We seek to survive through any means. It just a natural attitude really.
-
punchyclockface wrote:
Yes as said even the goverment avoids awarding slot of questions, it the independent end ex scientist that developed it that have been telling the stories, If insurance companies won't touch it???? HmmmPeople in America talk about it like nuclear power is a sensible option and the only obstacle is those damned tree-huggers. The simple fact is that no insurance company will issue a liability/casualty policy for a new nuclear fission reactor AT ANY PRICE. That should tell you all you need to know. Actuaries are not usually prone to hysterics from what I hear.
-
And as far as harmful radiation reaching it's way to west coast US it is highly unlikely. But to any who are scared go out and get some potasium iodine. You can get the kind you paint on wounds from any pharmacy. Paint about 8 mg on the skin. It will absorbe into your thyroid staurating it and blocking it from the affects of celcium-137. Seriously though iy us unnecessary.
-
punchyclockface wrote:
Nuclear power gives us an efficient form of electricity. IMO it is worth the prices we pay.People in America talk about it like nuclear power is a sensible option and the only obstacle is those damned tree-huggers. The simple fact is that no insurance company will issue a liability/casualty policy for a new nuclear fission reactor AT ANY PRICE. That should tell you all you need to know. Actuaries are not usually prone to hysterics from what I hear.
-
🔥GOD of WAR🔥 wrote:
Does that have side affects? Not going to do ,just never heard before! And I don't think that it will reach west coast, I think the effects of nuclear are slow but will always work it's way into food chainAnd as far as harmful radiation reaching it's way to west coast US it is highly unlikely. But to any who are scared go out and get some potasium iodine. You can get the kind you paint on wounds from any pharmacy. Paint about 8 mg on the skin. It will absorbe into your thyroid staurating it and blocking it from the affects of celcium-137. Seriously though iy us unnecessary.
-
punchyclockface wrote:
Well I guess we should've listened to, "those tree huggers" years ago.People in America talk about it like nuclear power is a sensible option and the only obstacle is those damned tree-huggers. The simple fact is that no insurance company will issue a liability/casualty policy for a new nuclear fission reactor AT ANY PRICE. That should tell you all you need to know. Actuaries are not usually prone to hysterics from what I hear.
-
fagan wrote:
Of course it will. Everyone already infests celcium137. Truth is even if the worst happens I doubt any of us will be ingesting harmful amounts.🔥GOD of WAR🔥 wrote:
Does that have side affects? Not going to do ,just never heard before! And I don't think that it will reach west coast, I think the effects of nuclear are slow but will always work it's way into food chainAnd as far as harmful radiation reaching it's way to west coast US it is highly unlikely. But to any who are scared go out and get some potasium iodine. You can get the kind you paint on wounds from any pharmacy. Paint about 8 mg on the skin. It will absorbe into your thyroid staurating it and blocking it from the affects of celcium-137. Seriously though iy us unnecessary.
-
And with all due respect gow, that wont help people thy close to it, and that is our general opinion, that don't worry won't affect us(you) but what if it was on your doorstep? What if u can't afford to relocate? I'm not scared for me or my family as such,as I am for those who are right there,the fear alone without any consequence is more than enough,I just think renewable is only way forward,and at less fossil fuel is natural process, nuke fission isn't!
-
Amd potassium iodine is harmless in the proper doses unless you're allergic. Look up the FDA dosages for the stuff.
-
There again WE won't infest harmful amounts? But all toxins build up in our body, we now know our cell and DNA carry and pass on metals and toxins we accumalate in our life,so even if don't affect us it will affect our offspring down the line,and thy is proven
-
Watch something called ghost in the genes in YouTube, our DNA (cells) even remember things we experience in life! And they are looking into regression and past life regression,these things would explain a little,but nether the less our na evolves n changes,maybe it would adapt to the amount of celium or by products? Maybe it won't who knows?
-
fagan wrote:
Renewable will never produce enough energy. That's just the way it is.And with all due respect gow, that wont help people thy close to it, and that is our general opinion, that don't worry won't affect us(you) but what if it was on your doorstep? What if u can't afford to relocate? I'm not scared for me or my family as such,as I am for those who are right there,the fear alone without any consequence is more than enough,I just think renewable is only way forward,and at less fossil fuel is natural process, nuke fission isn't!
-
Yes agreed, at moment ou consumption is tooo much to be sustained by renewable, but as Said as people and customers we have the power, but it's whether we want to! We get so wrapped up in our lives,untill it is on our door step we pretend not there,we would all have to give up a % of our luxuory's, maybe a limit on how much we can use per week? I don't know, but this has to be looked at
-
fagan wrote:
Cool. Start by smashing your phone if you care so much.Yes agreed, at moment ou consumption is tooo much to be sustained by renewable, but as Said as people and customers we have the power, but it's whether we want to! We get so wrapped up in our lives,untill it is on our door step we pretend not there,we would all have to give up a % of our luxuory's, maybe a limit on how much we can use per week? I don't know, but this has to be looked at
-
Smashing my phone would not have any bearing on it what so ever?
-
We can have luxury without the cost to earth that is happening! WE don't need 2000 models of mobiles and some parts world don't even have water? 3 iPhones in 2 years...the drive for more and more and more,thats fine if within a moral standpoint and within boundarys of nature, I do not have the awnsers, but untill people realise and say there is a problem then nothing will change,and money will be the main objective! Same as dealing with addiction etc step 1 admitting there is a prob....this is the most important step,
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC