Obama V Putin
Forums › General Discussion › Obama V Putin-
Brown tosses insults in just about every post and yet, when I point something out about him you say I am the one taking it personal. Lmao thanks for the laugh.
Brown is afraid to admit that the majority of his life has been based off of lies and deception. It's not about winning or losing.
The smartest man is the one who jumps out of a plane with no parachute on because he thinks he can fly.
Hahaha
-
★MΛΥΗΞΜ★ wrote:
Well who's funding Isis then. The country's buying the oil will be funding them and need dealing with. Turkey and our allies.Isis is a product of the proxy war not a participant shush.
-
Ꮋ⌖Ꭲ🔥ŠϦᎥt 💩 wrote:
👆 what he saidAmerica created Isis, to overthrow Asad, because the Middle East is fucked up enough. Now we realize that we created a demon child. So we will use Isis as an excuse to put combat troops back in Iraq and Syria. Then we will continue mission to overthrow Assad. The Russians are allies with Assads Regime. The Russians are fighting ISIS to take back land for Assad. Russians will kick our lily ass when we try to overthrow Assad. Not because our troops are weak or incompetent. It's because our political leaders are weak. They won't let us war correctly, and Putin will.
-
Ꮋ⌖Ꭲ🔥ŠϦᎥt 💩 wrote:
👆This is true★★BЯOШИИOTΞ★★ wrote:
Meaning Rules of Engagement. In both Iraq and Afghanistan our troops were restricted by these rules that often times we'd have to sit back and wait to be attacked, and even then there was limitations to how we could respond. I'm not saying the Geneva conventions are wrong, but if a full out war were to happen with Russia, Russia would not abide by those restrictions. War is ugly, but it's uglier when one side tries to abide by some gentlemens rule and the other does not.I did like the "They won't let us war correctly" comment. What is the correct way to war in Syria? Please enlighten us.
-
Cute room. So who's winning
-
BK👊 wrote:
Lol jeez. Get a grip as if we fight to rules hahaha cos we are the good guys rightᎻ⌖Ꭲ🔥ŠϦᎥt 💩 wrote:
👆This is true★★BЯOШИИOTΞ★★ wrote:
Meaning Rules of Engagement. In both Iraq and Afghanistan our troops were restricted by these rules that often times we'd have to sit back and wait to be attacked, and even then there was limitations to how we could respond. I'm not saying the Geneva conventions are wrong, but if a full out war were to happen with Russia, Russia would not abide by those restrictions. War is ugly, but it's uglier when one side tries to abide by some gentlemens rule and the other does not.I did like the "They won't let us war correctly" comment. What is the correct way to war in Syria? Please enlighten us.
-
No, actually I view the US as the aggressor in all the conflicts we've been involved in over the last 15, he'll who I am kidding, the last 115 years... but I do know from experience as a military police officer who patrolled the streets of Mosul as a .50 cal gunner 12 hrs a day, everyday for over a year... from my experiences, most normal thinking people in the military that were put into situations like that followed the ROI, but that doesn't mean everyone... me personally I took a "judge by 12 than carry by 6" approach... if I felt for my life, I'd did what I had to do... but I never fired a round that didn't have a purpose... honestly in a way, I sympathized with the local population... I'm not saying it was hunky door over there before we got there, but it sure wasn't the shit storm it is now and the suffering on the local population is immense... and I know if a foreign cou try tried to occupy my neighborhood, I'm dusting off the AR and fighting for what's mine
-
🎥ʗяㅌョƿⓢӈṏ₩📺👀 wrote:
👆 😂 😂 😂Cute room. So who's winning
-
BK👊 wrote:
US was definitely the main aggressor of WWII 😝No, actually I view the US as the aggressor in all the conflicts we've been involved in over the last 15, he'll who I am kidding, the last 115 years...
-
It would be a pretty cool cage match
-
I would also like to know exactly when a russian politician like putin got more credibility than any western leader. If we are gonna talk about countries histories, russia definatley does not have a shining background, Not to mention what russia is doing to those within the country as we speak. Putting all these things together i find it hard to believe anything coming from that government.
-
BK👊 wrote:
Very honest opinion. 👍No, actually I view the US as the aggressor in all the conflicts we've been involved in over the last 15, he'll who I am kidding, the last 115 years... but I do know from experience as a military police officer who patrolled the streets of Mosul as a .50 cal gunner 12 hrs a day, everyday for over a year... from my experiences, most normal thinking people in the military that were put into situations like that followed the ROI, but that doesn't mean everyone... me personally I took a "judge by 12 than carry by 6" approach... if I felt for my life, I'd did what I had to do... but I never fired a round that didn't have a purpose... honestly in a way, I sympathized with the local population... I'm not saying it was hunky door over there before we got there, but it sure wasn't the shit storm it is now and the suffering on the local population is immense...
-
@BK
Was you young when you was over there mate ? If so if you had the choice would you do it again.I don't understand why people go to war if they don't have to. Can't understand why they would leave there families to fight a stranger who as never wronged them or how they fall for politicians bullshit time and time again.
I do understand young people because they are easy to dupe.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC