JFK to 911
Forums › General Discussion › JFK to 911-
History repeats itself because...???
I thought no steel building had ever collapsed because of fire.
That's just cliche nonsense you are spewing now.
It's so absolutely impossible that planted explosives brought down WTC1, WTC2, or WTC7, I can't even begin to describe how crazy it would be.
It's possible that every cop in Alaska could fly down in cargo planes, line up on your front lawn, stand on one leg and force you to chug maple syrup at gunpoint until you puke, but nobody in their right mind would believe it without hard proof. I'd call that impossible for all practical purposes.
-
...And then you can wheel out your experts to prove that there was enough room on your lawn for all those cops as long as they stood on one leg, and it's just not feasible to assume you would puke on maple syrup without some coercion.
Most of your experts are not saying they have evidence of explosives. Only that the forensic report might be flawed. Which most are in reality. It doesn't mean that garden gnomes pulled of the caper. It means there are unknown variables and necessary assumptions which may be flawed.
-
Free fall. For the love of....
WATCH THE VIDEO!
See how chunks and debris fall faster than the building itself?
What is that? Rockets secretly strapped on pre-selected building chunks to make it seem like the building didn't free fall when actually it did?
It's so ridiculous that you are still repeating that stupidity, I just can't believe it.
32 feet per second per second. That's free fall. The building didn't fall that fast. People were recording it, including seismologists. It's pretty simple. The building pancaked on itself by gravity and momentum. Not set charges.
-
So three building collapsed at free fall. Or so some experts say but then again some will say it didn't !
The ones who will say it didn't will be no doubt paid by the government to carry out its investigations, which if it was an inside job would be totally pointless .I think anyone who sees WTC 7 collapse in construction - design - demolition - architect would just take one look and say to them selves ?? Wow not seen that happen before.
I've seen old buildings pancake and trust me they don't come down like that.
Common sense should raise an eyebrow to WTC 7 but with the twin towers also coming down the way they did. Lol insultingYou still haven't explained the report building 7 had collapsed 20 mins prior.
-
Also as I've said. All these things I've put on above are not my theories but court cases.
Saville satanic rapes in the tabloids . Been covered up for years but finally out.
Thatcher knowing her Conservative party were raping children but decided to cover it up. Finally out after 30 years.
Over 100 convicted politicians in GB fact.
Saville so close to the royals and MPs ridiculously close. FactsThen you SAY why don't you trust your government .
You still haven't answered none of the above .
-
My point about the peados is. If these animals are willing to do this to our children do I think they are capable of manipulating wars for profit .
Do I think there capable of killing there own.Yes. Of course they would be. But then people like you say "shush your paranoid" lol. They wouldn't do that. Ok they will rape and kill children but they wouldn't do anything worse ?? What's worse Brown.
Do you agree if the TOP cover and engage in the above that they are capable of anything
-
The BBC says you're full of it. So do I.
Wait... Didn't the media report that Florida had picked Bush when the panhandle hadn't finished voting yet?
Creepy.
[forehead slap emoji]
You SERIOUSLY think the BBC was fed the story by the U.S. government rather than reporters on the ground making mistakes?
And I'm sorry your Royals are inbred. I can't help that. England clearly has sexual issues. It must be emotionally repressed.
The Brittish empire is done, if you hadn't noticed. You are a little island fighting to keep strategic sheep herders in the south Atlantic.
What conspiracy?
You and your damn tabloids. You even spoke of them as mainstream news earlier. BAH, I say.
-
BTW, I have nothing against the REAL England. It's this delusional world of Shush that I'm picking on at the moment.
It's a very us vs. them world to you, isn't it Shush. You are different from "them". Please allow me to bring to your attention the fact that you and "them" are the same animal. You can get off your ass and become one of "them" if you wanted to. Most of "them" did it.
And when you do, you can blow the lid clean off the required paedophile initiations and greedy wars for profit scandals.
Can you imagine yourself keeping it quiet?
-
i knew brown was anti brittish lol
-
I never said anything about evidence of explosives,but that their are ppl who want the investigation reopened for that purpose.I provided a link.And for you to say that it isn't possible is a bold statement.Anything is possible. if you don't think a plan of that magnitude could be devised than you are living in a fantasy world.Plenty of mad men have come and gone and have devised plans of that 'magnitude',and worse.And I wasn't talking about the WTC being the 1st building in history to fall due to a fire.I said that because you buy up everything you read or hear.'No change needed because it could devastate my ego' type of attitude.I'm not spewing anything,i'm just guilty by association.Again,I accepted the initial 911 report, but if their are a group of people who work in the fields relevant to 911 saying this,and a 2nd investigation is opened,who is it going to hurt?...
-
So lets say the 2nd investigation is completed,and they find nothing different from the initial investigation.Wow,B and millions of others were right about the conspiracies.Let me buy you a 🍺.But there is still that 'what if' on the other side of the coin.Hell,i'd still buy you a 🍺. But enough about this nonsense, more about these garden gnomes 🎅🍄
-
Ӈཪ༱عɗ☠ᏩᎧེ͜Ꭷེℵ wrote:
Are you paying for this pointless study? If it was your money, you wouldn't. But it's not your money, is it. It's someone else's. What will we learn from it? Is it worth every tax dollar you and ten of your closest friends will pay in your entire life? No. Because the murder case is closed.So lets say the 2nd investigation is completed,and they find nothing different from the initial investigation.Wow,B and millions of others were right about the conspiracies.Let me buy you a 🍺.But there is still that 'what if' on the other side of the coin.Hell,i'd still buy you a 🍺. But enough about this nonsense, more about these garden gnomes 🎅🍄
-
Mr,Shush wrote:
Have you seen buildings with a 20 story gash down the side, on fire, declared by the fire department to be unstable not collapse like that? Are you saying the FD knew it was wired? They let hundreds of their own guys go in WTC1&2, knowing this? Really?The ones who will say it didn't will be no doubt paid by the government to carry out its investigations, which if it was an inside job would be totally pointless .
I think anyone who sees WTC 7 collapse in construction - design - demolition - architect would just take one look and say to them selves ?? Wow not seen that happen before.
I've seen old buildings pancake and trust me they don't come down like that.
Common sense should raise an eyebrow to WTC 7 but with the twin towers also coming down the way they did. Lol insultingYou still haven't explained the report building 7 had collapsed 20 mins prior.
-
You wouldn't get passed the Orange if Obama told you it was a Apple. Brainwashed
http://youtu.be/Zv7BImVvEyk
-
"You still haven't explained the report building 7 had collapsed 20 mins prior."
The BBC said it was an error IF it's true. There's no time on the video, so they can't say if it was 23 minutes early or not.
The BBC also says its a simple mistake to get a report of imminent or may collapse and mistake it for collapsed.
A guy in a live news studio loses track of what's going on in a crisis with information pouring in from all sources... It must be a conspiracy!
It's so outlandish that you think the government would be feeding them a script. Even if they did it, why would they have to, and why would they put themselves to news organizations?
Good grief, the insanity.
-
Ӈཪ༱عɗ☠ᏩᎧེ͜Ꭷེℵ wrote:
I'm not living in a fantasy world. I live in the federal government. Where do you live?I never said anything about evidence of explosives,but that their are ppl who want the investigation reopened for that purpose.I provided a link.And for you to say that it isn't possible is a bold statement.Anything is possible. if you don't think a plan of that magnitude could be devised than you are living in a fantasy world.Plenty of mad men have come and gone and have devised plans of that 'magnitude',and worse.And I wasn't talking about the WTC being the 1st building in history to fall due to a fire.I said that because you buy up everything you read or hear.'No change needed because it could devastate my ego' type of attitude.I'm not spewing anything,i'm just guilty by association.Again,I accepted the initial 911 report, but if their are a group of people who work in the fields ..
-
Name one conspiracy of that magnitude "and more".
Thousands in a free society keeping quiet about murdering thousands of citizens for no other reason than we wanted to attack Iraq. (Which we did 10 years earlier without the charade and with public support.) Not ONE whistle blower. Unlikely, huh? A congressman can't even take out his dick without public outcry on both sides of the house and a forced resignation.
Are you REALLY considering all this?
We can't repel fire of that magnitude.
-
Mr,Shush wrote:
I believe what I see with my own eyes, and not what some nance you YouTube tells me to believe. The fire and the 20 story deep gash through the building is probably what took it down. I see no evidence of the extremely implausible cargo plane full of thermite + controlled demolition fantasy.You wouldn't get passed the Orange if Obama told you it was a Apple. Brainwashed
http://youtu.be/Zv7BImVvEyk
If they were going to do that, why not another truck bomb in the parking garage along with a few set charges? Why have the fake plane show as well?
As long as you keep defending stupidity, I'll keep calling you out on it.
...Or FEMA is in on it, too. 😵
-
〓BROWN🎵NOTE〓 wrote:
I can care less who is paying for it. We have no control over where our taxes go, you should know that. It may be pointless to you, but it isn't for those who have signed that petition to have it reopened. What are you afraid of B?Ӈཪ༱عɗ☠ᏩᎧེ͜Ꭷེℵ wrote:
Are you paying for this pointless study? If it was your money, you wouldn't. But it's not your money, is it. It's someone else's. What will we learn from it? Is it worth every tax dollar you and ten of your closest friends will pay in your entire life? No. Because the murder case is closed.So lets say the 2nd investigation is completed,and they find nothing different from the initial investigation.Wow,B and millions of others were right about the conspiracies.Let me buy you a 🍺.But there is still that 'what if' on the other side of 🎅🍄
-
〓BROWN🎵NOTE〓 wrote:
Umm, you said a plan of that magnitude was pointless and bogus motivation. I asked you if you really thought that someone couldn't devise a plan of that magnitude. You never answered. Then you come back with 'conspiracy' of that magnitude? those are your words, so make note of that. Again, like I said, i'm not considering anything. Those people in the link i provided are.Name one conspiracy of that magnitude "and more".
Thousands in a free society keeping quiet about murdering thousands of citizens for no other reason than we wanted to attack Iraq. (Which we did 10 years earlier without the charade and with public support.) Not ONE whistle blower. Unlikely, huh? A congressman can't even take out his dick without public outcry on both sides of the house and a forced resignation.
Are you REALLY considering all this?
We can't repel fire of that magnitude.
-
〓BROWN🎵NOTE〓 wrote:
I live right outside NYC. Come up sometime for that 🍺 😜Ӈཪ༱عɗ☠ᏩᎧེ͜Ꭷེℵ wrote:
I'm not living in a fantasy world. I live in the federal government. Where do you live?I never said anything about evidence of explosives,but that their are ppl who want the investigation reopened for that purpose.I provided a link.And for you to say that it isn't possible is a bold statement.Anything is possible. if you don't think a plan of that magnitude could be devised than you are living in a fantasy world.Plenty of mad men have come and gone and have devised plans of that 'magnitude',and worse.And I wasn't talking about the WTC being the 1st building in history to fall due to a fire.I said that because you buy up everything you read or hear.'No change needed because it could devastate my ego' type of attitude.I'm not spewing anything,i'm .
-
In order to pull off "an inside job", it's got to be a massive conspiracy. A secret, hush-hush event of total and complete domestic terrorism, without the public knowing, and without 99.999999% of the regular government knowing about it. And you'd need thousands of people to pull it off, without any of them leaking anything.
I sense great back-peddling in you my son. You didn't say it. They did. Uh-huh.
-
Back peddling? Haha. It's in the thread.You should read word for word the first time around instead of wasting our time going back and forth because you enjoy twisting shit up. It's hard to believe you work for the gov. I never met anyone who worked for the gov and gloated about it so much, especially in a game. One thing is for sure though, It is obvious you have nothing to do with the intelligence sector.
-
Ӈཪ༱عɗ☠ᏩᎧེ͜Ꭷེℵ wrote:
Are you sure you're sure about that?Back peddling? Haha. It's in the thread.You should read word for word the first time around instead of wasting our time going back and forth because you enjoy twisting shit up. It's hard to believe you work for the gov. I never met anyone who worked for the gov and gloated about it so much, especially in a game. One thing is for sure though, It is obvious you have nothing to do with the intelligence sector.
-
Look, I was a submariner in the navy in the 90's. I worked with a small collection of NSA, CIA, and military intelligence types in the 00's on a private business venture. Now I've settled down in a nice federal IT job in DC running Linux servers.
I'm not gloating. I'm just telling it like it is. From the inside. Because you and your little friend are so full of ignorant bullshit, I'm compelled to communicate that "The Government" is not some dark, secret, media controlling, plane hijacking, building dropping, secret society.
It's full of honest, whistle-blowing, stewards of public funds and public trust, people that care about clean government. Even when they are at Fort Mead, or Langley.
So please, a note of seriousness. Get real and STFU.
-
I've been real the whole time..... or AM I?????? CONSPIRACY!!! muhahahaha.
yall are a funny bunch. -
I love this thread, i've never felt like more of a troll than I am when reading it, but i can't help myself.
-
against my better judgement i did watch the video about the 7th building falling. I don't know dick about the dynamics of building falling. i know the video shows what they look like and tells you what is controlled or not. but i only know what they are telling me if that is the truth. so after watching it i can say... oh that was controlled blast.... because a video told me so. truth is i haven't put in the time and effort for the proper education to be in a position to judge anything. it's only going off what someone else tells me. and if i'm going to be that person it boils down to who tells me what I "know" first right? i'm still just as ignorant about it as i was before i ever watched it but now i'm suppose to have a view or position on the matter?
-
I think that's what alot of people do. I will admit that anything is possible, and sure the gov could be behind the whole thing. but i don't care. i'm not going to watch a video , or read reports one way or another trusting someone else's "research" when they all have agenda's of their own. the only way for me to take a position or stand on the issue is for me to do the work. to really be involved and contribute to the cause. do my own research and have my own findings. but before that I would need to get the education to do so properly. no thanks. my education is in IT, I believe the truth will come out, or what they want us to believe will come out. either way the strongest side survives, it pushes through. so no matter which way it goes I'm ok with it. conspiracy, great. no conspiracy. great. i won't be upset either way.
-
if a person already has a position or stand on the matter then no matter what proof the other side has it's easy for them to sit back and say they don't believe it, or that's not real, it's been fabricated or influenced or it's a lie. they just don't believe because they already have their view. what will change it? what would it take for either side to change views or switch over? there probably is nothing. it's endless back and forth. kinda like this thread.
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC