Home | News | Forums | Turf Map | Screenshots | Play Turf Wars Now!

Only in the USA

• ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ May 10, 2014

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  Robert's Rules of Order article XIII clearly states that a member that violates the rules may be forcibly removed, expelled from the society by an officer who may communicate the permanent expulsion to the general public.

  You realize that the structure of these meetings is derived from this standard, right?

  I know you would never let your daughter read Robert's Rules of Order. It's sad that you protect yourself and your loved ones with ignorance.

  Heheheh..
  

  I may have missed it in the video but was there a vote made to have set person removed?
• Papillon May 10, 2014

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  Robert's Rules of Order article XIII clearly states that a member that violates the rules may be forcibly removed, expelled from the society by an officer who may communicate the permanent expulsion to the general public.

  You realize that the structure of these meetings is derived from this standard, right?

  I know you would never let your daughter read Robert's Rules of Order. It's sad that you protect yourself and your loved ones with ignorance.

  Heheheh..
  

  I may have missed it in the video but was there a vote made to have set person removed?

  👍
• Papillon May 10, 2014

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  [Add:Baz]Boffer wrote:

  Papillon, please be quiet. You're making us look bad.
  Please excuse my cuntryman, he's clearly a complete count.
  Thanks.
  

  All great nations have their share of rejects. I certainly wouldn't hold this thread as representative of the United Kingdom. Your amazing culture and system of laws are the basis of our own. We have merely stood on your shoulders, and in truth we have the utmost respect for you.

  Innit?
  

  I'm not judging all of the American people.
  But if that happened in the UK the public would be up in arms.

  It's clear in this thread 50% agree with the actions. That's why it happens over there
• ყoցi May 10, 2014

  Papillon wrote:

  Yogi
  You bought the book mate, that's a totally different argument than if your child was reading a book from the schools curriculum .
  Obviously your parents thought it was fit to read.
  I wouldn't want my daughter reading a book in school at 13 yr old reading about wiping up spunk off the floor. Would you buddy.?
  The most amazing thing still is the guy getting arrested for breaking a 2 minute rule.
  Getting cuffed lol mate that's mad.
  What happend to freedom of speech ??? What's next ??
  I thought freedom of speech was one of the western worlds biggest qualities.
  

  You make a lot of assumptions and willfully ignore the point. No wonder you're coming across as a cotal tunt.
• ყoցi May 10, 2014

  Papillon wrote:

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  [Add:Baz]Boffer wrote:

  Papillon, please be quiet. You're making us look bad.
  Please excuse my cuntryman, he's clearly a complete count.
  Thanks.
  

  All great nations have their share of rejects. I certainly wouldn't hold this thread as representative of the United Kingdom. Your amazing culture and system of laws are the basis of our own. We have merely stood on your shoulders, and in truth we have the utmost respect for you.

  Innit?
  

  I'm not judging all of the American people.
  But if that happened in the UK the public would be up in arms.

  It's clear in this thread 50% agree with the actions. That's why it happens over there
  

  Have you surveyed the General
  Public or is that yet another assumption? Moron.
• Papillon May 10, 2014

  50% of the thread Einstein
• ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ May 10, 2014

  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-131518/Police-arresting-deaf-man-signing.html

  Jesus Christ, only in the U.K.
• Papillon May 10, 2014

  ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ wrote:

  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-131518/Police-arresting-deaf-man-signing.html

  Jesus Christ, only in the U.K.
  

  Not even close buddy.
  Headlines police under fire . Public went mad
• ꅔꉻꐪ꒩ᵀᴸ May 10, 2014

  ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ wrote:

  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-131518/Police-arresting-deaf-man-signing.html

  Jesus Christ, only in the U.K.
  

  👍 The plot thickens.
• Boner Jams '03 May 10, 2014

  Papillon wrote:

  ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ wrote:

  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-131518/Police-arresting-deaf-man-signing.html

  Jesus Christ, only in the U.K.
  

  Not even close buddy.
  Headlines police under fire . Public went mad

  Anarchy in the UK! God Save the Queen
• ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ May 10, 2014

  Boner Jams '03 wrote:

  Papillon wrote:

  ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ wrote:

  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-131518/Police-arresting-deaf-man-signing.html

  Jesus Christ, only in the U.K.
  

  Not even close buddy.
  Headlines police under fire . Public went mad

  Anarchy in the UK! God Save the Queen

  FREEEEEEEEEDOOOOMMMMM
• Papillon May 10, 2014

  ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ wrote:

  Boner Jams '03 wrote:

  Papillon wrote:

  ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ wrote:

  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-131518/Police-arresting-deaf-man-signing.html

  Jesus Christ, only in the U.K.
  

  Not even close buddy.
  Headlines police under fire . Public went mad

  Anarchy in the UK! God Save the Queen

  FREEEEEEEEEDOOOOMMMMM

  Lol
• ყoցi May 10, 2014

  Papillon wrote:

  50% of the thread Einstein
  

  Wrong point, Einstein.
• Boner Jams '03 May 10, 2014

  ༦ᵑყͦიͫǥͣɪͩ༤ wrote:

  Papillon wrote:

  50% of the thread Einstein
  

  Wrong point, Einstein.

  Lot of fucking Einsteins in here
• Ojibwe May 10, 2014

  You're like the guy in the video. You keep saying the same shit over and over and you think that boosts your argument. Your two minutes are up troll.
• ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ May 10, 2014

  Everyone bypass my question?

  As for the lil news article hatter posted... what was the point of that posting? Jus to hammer down a non exsistant point to stir up the hive mind? The topic is man is arrested for goin over 2 mins. Lets stay there for now..
• ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ May 10, 2014

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Everyone bypass my question?

  As for the lil news article hatter posted... what was the point of that posting? Jus to hammer down a non exsistant point to stir up the hive mind? The topic is man is arrested for goin over 2 mins. Lets stay there for now..
  

  Idk, ask him.
• ყoցi May 10, 2014

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Everyone bypass my question?

  As for the lil news article hatter posted... what was the point of that posting? Jus to hammer down a non exsistant point to stir up the hive mind? The topic is man is arrested for goin over 2 mins. Lets stay there for now..
  

  If that's the legal statutory response to his specific actions then it was right. If not then it was wrong. Job done 👍
• Brown🎵Note May 10, 2014

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  Robert's Rules of Order article XIII clearly states that a member that violates the rules may be forcibly removed, expelled from the society by an officer who may communicate the permanent expulsion to the general public.

  You realize that the structure of these meetings is derived from this standard, right?

  I know you would never let your daughter read Robert's Rules of Order. It's sad that you protect yourself and your loved ones with ignorance.

  Heheheh..
  

  I may have missed it in the video but was there a vote made to have set person removed?

  Does article XIII require one?
• Brown🎵Note May 10, 2014

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Everyone bypass my question?

  As for the lil news article hatter posted... what was the point of that posting? Jus to hammer down a non exsistant point to stir up the hive mind? The topic is man is arrested for goin over 2 mins. Lets stay there for now..
  

  He wasn't arrested for going over the two minutes. Is that against the law? Think about it for a second.... What other reason might he have been arrested?
• ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ May 10, 2014

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  Robert's Rules of Order article XIII clearly states that a member that violates the rules may be forcibly removed, expelled from the society by an officer who may communicate the permanent expulsion to the general public.

  I know you would never let your daughter read Robert's Rules of Order. It's sad that you protect yourself and your loved ones with ignorance.

  Heheheh..
  

  I may have missed it in the video but was there a vote made to have set person removed?

  Does article XIII require one?

  Yes it does. Read the rules u posted.

  He was arrested for disorderly conduct. He need cuffs? Was he physically damaging property? He spoke out of turn.. takin out sure, arrested dont think he should have been.. anyone know if he was charged?
• ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ May 10, 2014

  ༦ᵑყͦიͫǥͣɪͩ༤ wrote:

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Everyone bypass my question?

  As for the lil news article hatter posted... what was the point of that posting? Jus to hammer down a non exsistant point to stir up the hive mind? The topic is man is arrested for goin over 2 mins. Lets stay there for now..
  

  If that's the legal statutory response to his specific actions then it was right. If not then it was wrong. Job done 👍

  In my opinion it was wrong. N by roberts rules it was also done wrong. But thats why we're talkin about it ;-)
• ყoցi May 10, 2014

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  ༦ᵑყͦიͫǥͣɪͩ༤ wrote:

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Everyone bypass my question?

  As for the lil news article hatter posted... what was the point of that posting? Jus to hammer down a non exsistant point to stir up the hive mind? The topic is man is arrested for goin over 2 mins. Lets stay there for now..
  

  If that's the legal statutory response to his specific actions then it was right. If not then it was wrong. Job done 👍

  In my opinion it was wrong. N by roberts rules it was also done wrong. But thats why we're talkin about it ;-)

  It was either right or wrong according to law, not according to opinion.
• ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ May 10, 2014

  So according to hatters post (wanted to stay on topic here but a point there) the deaf man was arrested for the right. Police can do no wrong... I know jokes n that one takes the cake hands down haha
• Brown🎵Note May 10, 2014

  Charged and fined I believe.

  In any government meeting when someone is disruptive and refuses to leave like that, they are arrested, or at the very least physically removed by the police.

  There is NEVER a vote when ejecting protesters or people talking out of turn over others from their seat.

  What planet are you from? When is this NOT the result of being disruptive in government meetings?
• ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ May 10, 2014

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  So according to hatters post (wanted to stay on topic here but a point there) the deaf man was arrested for the right. Police can do no wrong... I know jokes n that one takes the cake hands down haha
  

  I was mainly pointing out that stupid arrest happen everywhere. I'm not getting into all that other jazz.
• Papillon May 10, 2014

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Everyone bypass my question?

  As for the lil news article hatter posted... what was the point of that posting? Jus to hammer down a non exsistant point to stir up the hive mind? The topic is man is arrested for goin over 2 mins. Lets stay there for now..
  

  He wasn't arrested for going over the two minutes. Is that against the law? Think about it for a second.... What other reason might he have been arrested?

  There was no other reason
• ✯RagnarLoðbrók✯ May 10, 2014

  Papillon wrote:

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  Everyone bypass my question?

  As for the lil news article hatter posted... what was the point of that posting? Jus to hammer down a non exsistant point to stir up the hive mind? The topic is man is arrested for goin over 2 mins. Lets stay there for now..
  

  He wasn't arrested for going over the two minutes. Is that against the law? Think about it for a second.... What other reason might he have been arrested?

  There was no other reason

  Disorderly conduct.
• ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ May 10, 2014

  ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ wrote:

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  So according to hatters post (wanted to stay on topic here but a point there) the deaf man was arrested for the right. Police can do no wrong... I know jokes n that one takes the cake hands down haha
  

  I was mainly pointing out that stupid arrest happen everywhere. I'm not getting into all that other jazz.

  Exactly. This one included.
• ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ May 10, 2014

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  ✯ᎷᎪᎠᎠᎻᎪᎢᎢᎬᏒ✯ wrote:

  ＴＨＥ ＪＯＫＥＲ wrote:

  So according to hatters post (wanted to stay on topic here but a point there) the deaf man was arrested for the right. Police can do no wrong... I know jokes n that one takes the cake hands down haha
  

  I was mainly pointing out that stupid arrest happen everywhere. I'm not getting into all that other jazz.

  Exactly. This one included.

  I didn't say they were the same. I didn't say that this was a stupid arrest lol. I don't know or care if it was. Papillon said "only in America" do stupid arrests happen. I'm pointing out that stupid arrests are everywhere.

Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC