Belial/BAIC/Gc3
Forums › General Discussion › Belial/BAIC/Gc3-
~Matt~ wrote:
most of the time, in areas with alot of ppl and capo positions, Gc3 establishes an area out of the heavy traffic. people are assuming without asking exactly how it would be done. just bcuz Gc3 sets up a safe zone, it doesn't mean that they OWN that area, just means that Gc3 is creating a good environment for all players.So under my logic, if Hell froze over & GC3 were able to recruit Bella...then with her influence there, the GC3 would in fact control San Diego.
But of course I would have to relieve her of that position should that ever happen. Since Bella is BAIC, then BAIC technically controls San Diego through her...but since BAIC is mostly benign, I have no reservations.
stop thinking so negatively about this, and look at the good in it.
a makeshift area, on a map, for an iphone game, that ppl will be able to prosper, is completely harmless. its not world domination.
-
Basically I'm saying the Capo rules and if the Capo is an alliance member, then the alliance rules through the Capo.
If an alliance doesn't have any members with Capo titles, then they really don't have any control in an area and are just any other mob until they take a Capo title over and take control...
I think this could give us an unquestionable rule of thumb that perhaps we can all agree on.
-
~Matt~ wrote:
ok. but what problem could a capo have about a small area e1, noobs and vets, could they possibly have? seems like the ppl complaining just want the option to cap anyone whenever they feel like it.Basically I'm saying the Capo rules and if the Capo is an alliance member, then the alliance rules through the Capo.
If an alliance doesn't have any members with Capo titles, then they really don't have any control in an area and are just any other mob until they take a Capo title over and take control...
I think this could give us an unquestionable rule of thumb that perhaps we can all agree on.
Gc3 is being unselfish here, setting up an area with zero drawbacks and only a great outcome. unless they want to be selfish which seems the case here.
-
Grimjaow Ⓖ₡➌ wrote:
That's my line of thought. Although I can only speak on behalf of myself.~Matt~ wrote:
so... Since I am recently capo of this city, can they be in control there?
Don✯Page wrote:
I was saying that if GC3 were able to recruit Bella (for example) since she is Capo of San Diego, then GC3 would then control San Diego through her being a member....
Wait, Now I'm confused.
-
@ T e ✯ a S
I say let the Capo decide...if they allow it, then cool...if not either respect their wishes or take their title & control away. If the Capo is an introvert & doesn't respond then do whatever you want.
Personally, I think there are more than enough measures in place to protect so-called noobs and I'm not sure what a nation-wide sprinkling of safe zones will accomplish...maybe all this protection is why we're seeing all these level 50 players with less than 1500 mob; they're all sitting fat, dumb & happy with no threats driving them to improve themselves.
-
~Matt~ wrote:
Moo🐮@ T e ✯ a S
I say let the Capo decide...if they allow it, then cool...if not either respect their wishes or take their title & control away. If the Capo is an introvert & doesn't respond then do whatever you want.
Personally, I think there are more than enough measures in place to protect so-called noobs and I'm not sure what a nation-wide sprinkling of safe zones will accomplish...maybe all this protection is why we're seeing all these level 50 players with less than 1500 mob; they're all sitting fat, dumb & happy with no threats driving them to improve themselves.
-
🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑Baaaaaaahhhhhhh!!!!!
Oh crap not appropriate timing! I saw the moo and jumped the gun
-
maybe so matt, and ive thought this myself. but we havent changed it yet, so we will continue to operate like normal. capo or not if someobe has a problem with e1 earning higher income then they are selfish, like i previously stated. so, who here wants to cap freely anyone they want instead of helping others for more income? pipe in you selfish jerks.
me, i am all about growing a highly populated area for larger income. Vets and Noibz alike prosper. no one is saying e1 has to put turfs IN the Sz, its an option, a good one at that, that allows e1 benefits. except cap'n turfs. wanna cap turfs....cap elsewhere. why is this so hard?
-
I don't think the Cali people really care about capping people near as much as they care that they're told they can't cap by people. I may be wrong but that's what I'm reading from this. Back to minding my own business ✌
-
Turf🐑Warrior wrote:
who would want to disrupt peace and big money making of many people, for their own selfish reasons. ???I don't think the Cali people really care about capping people near as much as they care that they're told they can't cap by people. I may be wrong but that's what I'm reading from this. Back to minding my own business ✌
-
@ T e ✯ a S
I'm not disagreeing with you; safe zones are a good thing. Downtown San Diego was a safe zone for the longest time & I prospered there...still do. I am only trying to articulate, that it's my opinion or philosophy rather, that the Capos should at least be given the opportunity to allow or dis-allow anything that goes on in their areas.
I tell you right now if you came to San Diego or recruit a member in San Diego & want to establish a safe zone here...it goes without question that you will go through Bella first; and that's true for any big city.
-
~Matt~ wrote:
no i agree with you matt. my comments are more for those complaining. you seem neutral on the matter.@ T e ✯ a S
I'm not disagreeing with you; safe zones are a good thing. Downtown San Diego was a safe zone for the longest time & I prospered there...still do. I am only trying to articulate, that it's my opinion or philosophy rather, that the Capos should at least be given the opportunity to allow or dis-allow anything that goes on in their areas.
I tell you right now if you came to San Diego or recruit a member in San Diego & want to establish a safe zone here...it goes without question that you will go through Bella first; and that's true for any big city.
now honestly if i wasnt capo of san diego i wouldnt try to set up a Sz there. anyone who thinks that is mistaking my game play, or Gc3's for that matter.
-
Well then we're on the same page; I am more neutral than others and am very open-minded....if someone can demonstrate sound logic & reasoning of one argument over another, I'll side with them every time regardless of any personal biases I may have.
-
FaIVIouz ✯ Ⓖ₡➌ wrote: so what u r saying that u declare the state of a Cali a safe zone otherwise no need for permission
Uhhh, no. Did you just get off the teacups at Disneyland FaIVIouz ✯ Ⓖ₡➌ -
~Matt~ wrote:
all i have ever asked for was logic. ppl want to yell and point fingers b4 looking into things reasonably.Well then we're on the same page; I am more neutral than others and am very open-minded....if someone can demonstrate sound logic & reasoning of one argument over another, I'll side with them every time regardless of any personal biases I may have.
my fact thread brought nothing of proof of Gc3 injustice any more than those poibting fingers.
if people took the time, to get to know us, their views would change 180•
-
Just remember, everything I have said here represent my own independent views...I couldn't possibly expect everyone in CA to agree with my reasoning.
-
~Matt~ wrote:
I agree with this. I wouldn't want someone/anyone declaring any part of San Diego (city, not county - or anywhere that reads as SD as the turf location) as a safe zone, especially w/o asking me.@ T e ✯ a S
I say let the Capo decide...if they allow it, then cool...if not either respect their wishes or take their title & control away. If the Capo is an introvert & doesn't respond then do whatever you want.
One time I capped off Flatface & he tried telling me Las Vegas was a cap-free zone.
As capo in Temecula, CA, I set up a good safe zone. I ended up letting Spectre take the capo bc we were cool & he wanted to expand more than my turf limit would allow. He could have said "screw this safe zone stuff" & gone on a capping spree, but months later, he still respects it & our little area makes as much as SD or LV.
-
~Matt~ wrote:
only a selfish person would disagree with u mattJust remember, everything I have said here represent my own independent views...I couldn't possibly expect everyone in CA to agree with my reasoning.
-
@ Matt: when was SD ever a true safe zone?
@ Drizzy: am I selfish now?
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
u guys r full on ay! Lol. Is this what happens when u play this game too much?? 😺The following people attended the summit........
Humboldtmoog
Matt
Belial
Manganelli
Natedogg (mediator) -
T e ✯ a S wrote:
every one who wants more turf in that big money areaTurf🐑Warrior wrote:
who would want to disrupt peace and big money making of many people, for their own selfish reasons. ???I don't think the Cali people really care about capping people near as much as they care that they're told they can't cap by people. I may be wrong but that's what I'm reading from this. Back to minding my own business ✌
-
TheCoconutMafia wrote:
You are irrelevant to this thread since you aren't a member of any group mentioned.Everyone brings their opinions to threads mot directed at them. I figured since all the key players were here, this was as good a place as any to ask.
I've seen stated that Oakland was a safe zone, philly in it's entirety was no cap.
Just seeking calarification.
How about posting a list of safe zones? I'm going coast coast. Am I expected to ask every turf group I encounter if it's a safe zone?
-
Tony Montana Add poo wrote:
Nope. It's what happens when the he said/she saids get out of control. Don't be a hater. If you don't like it.....don't watch!Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
u guys r full on ay! Lol. Is this what happens when u play this game too much?? 😺The following people attended the summit........
Humboldtmoog
Matt
Belial
Manganelli
Natedogg (mediator) -
T e ✯ a S wrote:
Turf🐑Warrior wrote:
who would want to disrupt peace and big money making of many people, for their own selfish reasons. ???I don't think the Cali people really care about capping people near as much as they care that they're told they can't cap by people. I may be wrong but that's what I'm reading from this. Back to minding my own business ✌
so is the name of the game turf wars, or turf peace and prosperity?
-
add PUTZ 👊🐶 wrote:
Then ignore me.TheCoconutMafia wrote:
You are irrelevant to this thread since you aren't a member of any group mentioned.Everyone brings their opinions to threads mot directed at them. I figured since all the key players were here, this was as good a place as any to ask.
I've seen stated that Oakland was a safe zone, philly in it's entirety was no cap.
Just seeking calarification.
How about posting a list of safe zones? I'm going coast coast. Am I expected to ask every turf group I encounter if it's a safe zone?
-
add PUTZ 👊🐶 wrote:
actually chainsaw is with me. We are going to form an alliance together I believe. Chainsaw is relevant to this thread because I say he is. I respect his views more than mostTheCoconutMafia wrote:
You are irrelevant to this thread since you aren't a member of any group mentioned.Everyone brings their opinions to threads mot directed at them. I figured since all the key players were here, this was as good a place as any to ask.
I've seen stated that Oakland was a safe zone, philly in it's entirety was no cap.
Just seeking calarification.
How about posting a list of safe zones? I'm going coast coast. Am I expected to ask every turf group I encounter if it's a safe zone?
-
Tony Montana Add poo wrote:
I'm glad I'm not the only fucker to point this out.Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
u guys r full on ay! Lol. Is this what happens when u play this game too much?? 😺The following people attended the summit........
Humboldtmoog
Matt
Belial
Manganelli
Natedogg (mediator) -
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
nah, it's fun to watch u say and do stupid things. It's like the circus 🎏Tony Montana Add poo wrote:
Nope. It's what happens when the he said/she saids get out of control. Don't be a hater. If you don't like it.....don't watch!Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
u guys r full on ay! Lol. Is this what happens when u play this game too much?? 😺The following people attended the summit........
Humboldtmoog
Matt
Belial
Manganelli
Natedogg (mediator) -
@ Belial- thanks.
As to relevance, considering I am coming through every one of your territories, I would say I have a vested interset in these talks and any resolution as i af pledged full support to parties involved.
And to Putz-you and your opinions hold no relevance to me until I land in your area. And even thing, the only thing of any relevance will be your turfs.
-
BellaItaliana wrote:
I think I threw in a "mostly" which covers me. It was a safe zone for us, cuz nobody could beat us haha!@ Matt: when was SD ever a true safe zone?
@ Drizzy: am I selfish now?
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC