Give Capo a portion of Build Cost
Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Give Capo a portion of Build Cost-
Just an idea. What if the capo of an area recieved a certain percent of the amount payed to build a new turf?
-
Ooh that might work... And it's realistically accurate... I like 👍
-
It would also encourage people to try to take capo of more populated areas to nab more income from new turf being built
-
👍👍👍
-
Cool idea Fraba. Gives Capo a little more worth and like Corrupted said it's realistic.
-
that's better than my previous idea since it's directly related to the turfs, although in reality paying a "respect" (protection money) to the Don is a time-honored mob tradition. In Sicily it's called a "pizzo"
-
I like the idea. Unlike most ideas it doesn't have a bad effect on the non capo player. The percentage should be low I think though
-
Where does the ingame money go now? Correct me if I am wrong but it just gets taken out of the game essentially. I think it would be an added bonus if there were different tiers the player could choose from.
Ex. Tier 1 - 50% of the build cost goes to capo and 50% to the don, 24 hour rule applies but can still be cap'd whenever.
Tier 2 - 75% to capo and 25% to the don, 24 hour rule applies but you also get 12 hours of protection before your turf can be cap'd.
These numbers are for example only.
It would probably work better if it was actually the initial build cost that increased in exchange for x amount of "safe" hours.
I know people always say they can just build another turf but for noobs it is very expensive to build turf up then have it cap'd before they can even make any money off of it.
-
..👍
-
50% is way too much. If you are in London for example, paying 1m just to lay a turf isn't rare, giving 500k of that to a capo is way too high.
-
naughtyjames wrote:
50% is way too much. If you are in London for example, paying 1m just to lay a turf isn't rare, giving 500k of that to a capo is way too high.
-
mikeysee wrote:
No it's notnaughtyjames wrote:
50% is way too much. If you are in London for example, paying 1m just to lay a turf isn't rare, giving 500k of that to a capo is way too high.
-
naughtyjames wrote:
No it's not50% is way too much. If you are in London for example, paying 1m just to lay a turf isn't rare, giving 500k of that to a capo is way too high.
-
glman wrote:
Yeah it is. I pay an average of 24m to lay down a turf. 12m should not go to the caponaughtyjames wrote:
No it's not50% is way too much. If you are in London for example, paying 1m just to lay a turf isn't rare, giving 500k of that to a capo is way too high.
-
Belial wrote:
The percent would have to be very small. Not enough to be a complete game changer, but enough to motivate people to try to get the bonus it would give.glman wrote:
Yeah it is. I pay an average of 24m to lay down a turf. 12m should not go to the caponaughtyjames wrote:
No it's not50% is way too much. If you are in London for example, paying 1m just to lay a turf isn't rare, giving 500k of that to a capo is way too high.
-
🔫🌊🗻Fraba wrote:
I say 5%. No more than 10 maxBelial wrote:
The percent would have to be very small. Not enough to be a complete game changer, but enough to motivate people to try to get the bonus it would give.glman wrote:
Yeah it is. I pay an average of 24m to lay down a turf. 12m should not go to the caponaughtyjames wrote:
No it's not50% is way too much. If you are in London for example, paying 1m just to lay a turf isn't rare, giving 500k of that to a capo is way too high.
-
Ya I just threw out numbers as an example. I also think it should be way smaller.
-
Good idea.
-
Good idea, but if it is an idea to increase the chance of challenging for capo, then surely the current capo will just smash the shit out of any new comers? The money is unlikely to affect a wealthy capo anyway?
-
Another insentive for large players to go around robbing capos..
Not good.. unless ur a big capo-ing player.... -
Don Dennis wrote:
I think the current capo would crush the second place person down. I wouldn't hit anyone below me, and I would also keep placing turfs in the area. It would promote growth. Right now, there isn't a point to having capo. Still think this is a good idea.Good idea, but if it is an idea to increase the chance of challenging for capo, then surely the current capo will just smash the shit out of any new comers? The money is unlikely to affect a wealthy capo anyway?
-
👍👍👍👍👍
-
Belial wrote:
Yh 5-10%🔫🌊🗻Fraba wrote:
I say 5%. No more than 10 maxBelial wrote:
The percent would have to be very small. Not enough to be a complete game changer, but enough to motivate people to try to get the bonus it would give.glman wrote:
Yeah it is. I pay an average of 24m to lay down a turf. 12m should not go to the caponaughtyjames wrote:
No it's not50% is way too much. If you are in London for example, paying 1m just to lay a turf isn't rare, giving 500k of that to a capo is way too high.
-
Good idea.
-
last1here wrote:
It should depend on the player density, where I live it costs like 12.6k to plant turfBelial wrote:
Yh 5-10%🔫🌊🗻Fraba wrote:
I say 5%. No more than 10 maxBelial wrote:
The percent would have to be very small. Not enough to be a complete game changer, but enough to motivate people to try to get the bonus it would give.glman wrote:
Yeah it is. I pay an average of 24m to lay down a turf. 12m should not go to the caponaughtyjames wrote:
No it's not50% is way too much. If you are in London for example, paying 1m just to lay a turf isn't rare, giving 500k of that to a capo is way too high.
-
If you plant a turf where you are the capo do you get 5-10 percent back from your own turf?
-
bugs malone wrote:
No. I say that money just goes bye byeIf you plant a turf where you are the capo do you get 5-10 percent back from your own turf?
-
For once I like what glman said. 5% in Belial's area is a whole lot of money. Some areas, 5% isn't gonna get you a shank (SARCASM).
-
Bugsy Seigel wrote:
5% seems reasonableFor once I like what glman said. 5% in Belial's area is a whole lot of money. Some areas, 5% isn't gonna get you a shank (SARCASM).
-
Belial wrote:
Agreed. I think it should actually be closer to 10% than 50%I like the idea. Unlike most ideas it doesn't have a bad effect on the non capo player. The percentage should be low I think though
-
Still a great idea actually the more I consider that.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC