Romney wins Iowa caucus by 8 votes.
Forums › General Discussion › Romney wins Iowa caucus by 8 votes.-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Homosexuality isn't that commen in animals either...MDTenacity wrote:
Actually incest isn't that common in animals. Primarily because of the genetic side effects. Instincts tend to lead species away from thatBelail
"But homosexuality is observed constantly in nature. You can't call something observed in nature unnatural"
Well, insest in animal aswell and everyone know that's unnatural... And I swear if I see someone post that insest is ok I'm going to recommend a strait jacket, come to your house and put it on you myself (just painting a picture don't freakout). -
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Lol so when anamals try to mate with the same sex makes it logically natural for that to be ok. Well if that isn't "acting upon" behavior I guess I don't know what is₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
But that doesn't make it unnatural. You're argument is even though it's in nature it is not natural. So does that mean Augustine is our guideline for what's natural?People can live illogically but just because they live doesn't make them any more logical. Same with behavior just because it's been done therefore it's justified is very bad thinking and fallible
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Actually that sums it up quite nicely.⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Lol so when anamals try to mate with the same sex makes it logically natural for that to be ok. Well if that isn't "acting upon" behavior I guess I don't know what is₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
But that doesn't make it unnatural. You're argument is even though it's in nature it is not natural. So does that mean Augustine is our guideline for what's natural?People can live illogically but just because they live doesn't make them any more logical. Same with behavior just because it's been done therefore it's justified is very bad thinking and fallible
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
All I did is refute your claim on it being "unnatural". This fact cannot be disputed as it occurs in nature⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Lol so when anamals try to mate with the same sex makes it logically natural for that to be ok. Well if that isn't "acting upon" behavior I guess I don't know what is₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
But that doesn't make it unnatural. You're argument is even though it's in nature it is not natural. So does that mean Augustine is our guideline for what's natural?People can live illogically but just because they live doesn't make them any more logical. Same with behavior just because it's been done therefore it's justified is very bad thinking and fallible
-
MDTenacity wrote:
Every single mammalian species actually. I call that pretty common⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Homosexuality isn't that commen in animals either...MDTenacity wrote:
Actually incest isn't that common in animals. Primarily because of the genetic side effects. Instincts tend to lead species away from thatBelail
"But homosexuality is observed constantly in nature. You can't call something observed in nature unnatural"
Well, insest in animal aswell and everyone know that's unnatural... And I swear if I see someone post that insest is ok I'm going to recommend a strait jacket, come to your house and put it on you myself (just painting a picture don't freakout). -
To decide if it's "ok" morally is a more complicated debate. I would say that it's genetic. That it doesn't cause anyone harm and that it allows people to be sexually active without adding to our population problem. Therefore I personally would define it as morally sound
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
They're all crazy. I Would never in a million years vote for any one of these republicans.Bayern Munich wrote:
He said last time that he couldn't put his religion aside to run the country impartially. That's hardly the least crazy. I myself will never vote for Jim because of his opinions that freedom should only be given to some (Mormon opinion on gay marriage)Everyone's realizing that he's the least crazy of the bunch and that he's the only one with any chance to win in the general election.
-
Lol looks as though you're apart of the 34% of amarica that actually thinks that...
-
Dragon Tattoo wrote:
Baliel was right i got to sayMDTenacity wrote:
You don't have to be with or against gay and lesbian.. But who gave you the right to say what they have a right to? If they aren't trying to push their views on you what the hell does it matter to you? They leave you be you leave them be.. Get a life then worry a out yours not theirs!I still believe Newt has the majority overall vote... and no offense to anyone but I believe that freedom should be given to all that have papers and are not gay... Not even a Christian and yet I believe it's morally wrong, unnatural and disgusting.
-
MDTenacity wrote:
Where is "amarica"Lol looks as though you're apart of the 34% of amarica that actually thinks that...
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Tell me is it natural to kill anyone with the justification of viewing nature? I think that makes more sense than anamals trying to mate with same sex. You haven't refuted anything.There is contrdiction with our standard of nature and your odd view of homosexualityTo decide if it's "ok" morally is a more complicated debate. I would say that it's genetic. That it doesn't cause anyone harm and that it allows people to be sexually active without adding to our population problem. Therefore I personally would define it as morally sound
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Once again that's going into⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Tell me is it natural to kill anyone with the justification of viewing nature? I think that makes more sense than anamals trying to mate with same sex. You haven't refuted anything.There is contrdiction with our standard of nature and your odd view of homosexualityTo decide if it's "ok" morally is a more complicated debate. I would say that it's genetic. That it doesn't cause anyone harm and that it allows people to be sexually active without adding to our population problem. Therefore I personally would define it as morally sound
Morals not nature. Yes it is natural to kill. We have a term killer instinct for a reason. Default is survival of the fittest. But once again something that causes harm to another shouldn't be morally lumped with something consensual -
GAYS ARE NOT NATURAL
-
SupaHunteh wrote:
Once again how can something observed in nature be termed unnatural? And if that's the case then how can we know what natural is? And keep in mind this has nothing to do with moral implications.GAYS ARE NOT NATURAL
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
We shouldnt have prisons anymore then₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Once again that's going into⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Tell me is it natural to kill anyone with the justification of viewing nature? I think that makes more sense than anamals trying to mate with same sex. You haven't refuted with our standard of nature and yohomosexualityTo decide if it's "ok" morally is a more complicated debate. I would say that it's genetic. That it doesn't cause anyone harm and that it allows people to be sexually active without adding to our population problem. Therefore I personally would define it as morally sound
Morals not nature. Yes it is natural to kill. Default is survival of the fittest. But once again something that causes harm to another shouldn't be morally lumped with something consensual -
You know belial I have a friend that has a Chihuahua that humps everything... Hmm I'm lead to see that it's trying to have biological sex with everything... Perhaps we should up into law that rape is ok.... Sounds natural
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Nope should stone them all and burn them for being witches.⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
We shouldnt have prisons anymore then₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Once again that's going into⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
To decide if it's "ok" morally is a more complicated debate. I would say that it's genetic. That it doesn't cause anyone harm and that it allows people to be sexually active without adding to our population problem. Therefore I personally would define it as morally sound
Morals not nature. Yes it is natural to kill. Default is survival of the fittest. But once again something that causes harm to another shouldn't be morally lumped with something consensual -
Don't you understand that laws are designed to maintain public safety and social order? Explain how homosexuality is contrary to those things
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
What? I dont know any Gay GiraffesSupaHunteh wrote:
Once again how can something observed in nature be termed unnatural? And if that's the case then how can we know what natural is? And keep in mind this has nothing to do with moral implications.GAYS ARE NOT NATURAL
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Same sexes don't reproduce... 😱😱😱😱😱SupaHunteh wrote:
Once again how can something observed in nature be termed unnatural? And if that's the case then how can we know what natural is? And keep in mind this has nothing to do with moral implications.GAYS ARE NOT NATURAL
-
SupaHunteh wrote:
Male dogs mating with each other.⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
What? I dont know any Gay GiraffesSupaHunteh wrote:
Once again how can something observed in nature be termed unnatural? And if that's the case then how can we know what natural is? And keep in mind this has nothing to do with moral implications.GAYS ARE NOT NATURAL
Male frogs mating with each other
Male lions mating with each other.
Male cats mating with each other.
I have seen male giraffes mating with each other. -
Superyan wrote:
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Nope I have nothing to say therefore I'm not going to say anything meaningful⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
We shouldnt have prisons anymore then₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Once again that's going into⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
To decide if it's "ok" morally is a more complicated debate. I would say that it's genetic. That it doesn't cause anyone harm and that it allows people to be sexually active without adding to our population problem. Therefore I personally would define it as morally sound
Morals not nature. Yes it is natural to kill. Default is survival of the fittest. But once again something that causes harm to another shouldn't be morally lumped with something consensualOk?
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
And Meither do infertile couples. Does that mean that it is imoral for them to have sex?⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Same sexes don't reproduce... 😱😱😱😱😱SupaHunteh wrote:
Once again how can something observed in nature be termed unnatural? And if that's the case then how can we know what natural is? And keep in mind this has nothing to do with moral implications.GAYS ARE NOT NATURAL
-
Superyan wrote:
Thats pretty creepySupaHunteh wrote:
Male dogs mating with each other.⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
What? I dont know any Gay GiraffesSupaHunteh wrote:
Once again how can something observed in nature be termed unnatural? And if that's the case then how can we know what natural is? And keep in mind this has nothing to do with moral implications.GAYS ARE NOT NATURAL
Male frogs mating with each other
Male lions mating with each other.
Male cats mating with each other.
I have seen male giraffes mating with each other. -
Once again you never answered my question. If occurring in nature doesn't make something natural then what is the qualifying factor?
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
What's what your religion has done in the past right?Superyan wrote:
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
meaningful⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
We shouldnt have prisons anymore then₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Once again that's going into⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
To decide if it's "ok" morally is a more complicated debate. I would say that it's genetic. That it doesn't cause anyone harm and that it allows people to be sexually active without adding to our population problem. Therefore I personally would define it as morally sound
Ok?
Let's send millions of soldiers to kill all homosexuals! Just because Christianity disagrees with them!
*cough* The Crusades *cough* -
SupaHunteh wrote:
But it's true. Every single mammalian species on the planet engages in some form of homosexual activitySuperyan wrote:
Thats pretty creepySupaHunteh wrote:
Male dogs mating with each other.⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
What? I dont know any Gay GiraffesSupaHunteh wrote:
Once again how can something observed in nature be termed unnatural? And if that's the case then how can we know what natural is? And keep in mind this has nothing to do with moral implications.GAYS ARE NOT NATURAL
Male frogs mating with each other
Male lions mating with each other.
Male cats mating with each other.
I have seen male giraffes mating with each other. -
Superyan w₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
What's what your religion has done in the past right?Superyan wrote:
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
meaningful⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
We shouldnt have prisons anymore then₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Once again that's going into⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Ok?
Let's send millions of soldiers to kill all homosexuals! Just because Christianity disagrees with them!
*cough* The Crusades *cough*
1. Shut up. 2. The killed Muslims and took over Holy lands not out to kill Homos. 3. You win most idiotic comment -
And you've also yet to tell me in what grounds it harms society. So far I have the op who says its immoral because he says and he doesn't know why just that it is. And you say it's immoral because it doesn't lead to reproduction. Neither really work well as arguments. Reproduction argument doesn't work in an already overpopulated society
-
Nah! Did it to Muslims right? Innocent kids and women. Why not homosexuals too?
Let's look at the bible....
If you find out a city worships a different god, destroy the city and kill all of it's inhabitants... even the animals. (Deuteronomy 13:12-15)GASP
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC