Global Warming, your thoughts on a very real danger
Forums › General Discussion › Global Warming, your thoughts on a very real danger-
groupthink is an interesting term did you make that up just now or did you pull from a culture that has perhaps blinded YOU? It must be wonderful to have the market on all original thought cornered.
-
KeMiKaL wrote:
Global warming is nothing more than a big hoax. It's all about money.
what money????????????? I have no idea what u are talking about?!?!
-
theOlentangyKid wrote:
ive heard the term groupthink before. It means a group of people brainwashed to think exactly the same. At least, thats my understanding.groupthink is an interesting term did you make that up just now or did you pull from a culture that has perhaps blinded YOU? It must be wonderful to have the market on all original thought cornered.
-
theOlentangyKid wrote:
(shhhh, I don't think that he realizes that you are moching him)groupthink is an interesting term did you make that up just now or did you pull from a culture that has perhaps blinded YOU? It must be wonderful to have the market on all original thought cornered.
-
p s i wrote:
good job, you spelt mocking wrong.theOlentangyKid wrote:
(shhhh, I don't think that he realizes that you are moching him)groupthink is an interesting term did you make that up just now or did you pull from a culture that has perhaps blinded YOU? It must be wonderful to have the market on all original thought cornered.
-
p s i wrote:
LOLtheOlentangyKid wrote:
(shhhh, I don't think that he realizes that you are moching him)groupthink is an interesting term did you make that up just now or did you pull from a culture that has perhaps blinded YOU? It must be wonderful to have the market on all original thought cornered.
-
calm ur nipples penatrator
-
theOlentangyKid wrote:
See, its not funny when you say it. Plus for me it was the weed talking. I had an excuse to say it.calm ur nipples penatrator
-
p s i wrote:
He is talking about all that sweet electric car cash everyone will be making.KeMiKaL wrote:
Global warming is nothing more than a big hoax. It's all about money.
what money????????????? I have no idea what u are talking about?!?!
-
DarthPenatrator wrote:
Hes got you therep s i wrote:
good job, you spelt mocking wrong.theOlentangyKid wrote:
(shhhh, I don't think that he realizes that you are moching him)groupthink is an interesting term did you make that up just now or did you pull from a culture that has perhaps blinded YOU? It must be wonderful to have the market on all original thought cornered.
-
Thank you, Mr. Stawman for that fascinating display of our cultural differences.
I know it must come as a shock to you that there are highly educated people on every side of any political argument. In my experience, those educated in history: natural history, political and social history, tend to be conservative. Do you disagree?
-
p s i wrote:
government in the uk has a load of 'green taxes' as they are called. Want a big engined car? It will cost more to tax, want to drive into the city? Pay an extra tax. There's loads more plus the car tax which we already pay! Some 70% of our petrol/diesel at the pumps is a duty/tax by the governmentKeMiKaL wrote:
Global warming is nothing more than a big hoax. It's all about money.
what money????????????? I have no idea what u are talking about?!?!
-
TDi wrote:
I thought that was to ease congestion and smog in the metro areas especially london.p s i wrote:
government in the uk has a load of 'green taxes' as they are called. Want a big engined car? It will cost more to tax, want to drive into the city? Pay an extra tax. There's loads more plus the car tax which we already pay! Some 70% of our petrol/diesel at the pumps is a duty/tax by the governmentKeMiKaL wrote:
Global warming is nothing more than a big hoax. It's all about money.
what money????????????? I have no idea what u are talking about?!?!
-
Brown I agree with u there, conservatives tend to care more about history and tradition than liberals This country needs more independents and bipartisanship than any one party tho
-
Brown Note wrote:
Forum post failThank you, Mr. Stawman for that fascinating display of our cultural differences.
I know it must come as a shock to you that there are highly educated people on every side of any political argument. In my experience, those educated in history: natural history, political and social history, tend to be conservative. Do you disagree?
-
theOlentangyKid wrote:
not really...Brown Note wrote:
Forum post failThank you, Mr. Stawman for that fascinating display of our cultural differences.
I know it must come as a shock to you that there are highly educated people on every side of any political argument. In my experience, those educated in history: natural history, political and social history, tend to be conservative. Do you disagree?
-
if you are saying that people who are educated tend to be conservative then yes I disagree with you. That is not the case and I am surprised you would even try to argue that.
-
I'm sorry to hear that your posting failed. I know it's just one button, but I won't hold it against you if you are having trouble. Try again.
-
theOlentangyKid wrote:
he specifically said educated in natural, political, and social. Not educated in all areas.if you are saying that people who are educated tend to be conservative then yes I disagree with you. That is not the case and I am surprised you would even try to argue that.
-
all these buttons can be very confusing for us groupthinkers
-
theOlentangyKid wrote:
I understand. Try again.all these buttons can be very confusing for us groupthinkers
-
theOlentangyKid wrote:
you're not very good at arguing or insulting. u may as well just stop.all these buttons can be very confusing for us groupthinkers
-
theOlentangyKid wrote:
Attention to detail, son. Try again.if you are saying that people who are educated tend to be conservative then yes I disagree with you. That is not the case and I am surprised you would even try to argue that.
-
See, a geologist may-or may not be conservative, but they are more likely to call out global warming hysteria for what it is. Political historians tend to have lots of examples of why a socialist government is a bad thing in most cases. It's history. It involves using the past to prevent future mistakes. I'm guessing that's a weak area for you, amiright?
Would you prefer 1984 or Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome? Why?
-
whats a stawman? spelling son. try again.
-
Conservatives arent bad by nature, but the current republican party is buttfucked beyond all repair. Thats why you are out there teabagging each other on the capital lawn.
-
Brown Note wrote:
If you are saying everyone who has a deathgrip on history and tradition is a republican then I agree with you. Always focused on some sort of idealized version of what they think we once were. Always looking backwards, fighting progress at every turn. That is the essence of the modern republican party.Thank you, Mr. Stawman for that fascinating display of our cultural differences.
I know it must come as a shock to you that there are highly educated people on every side of any political argument. In my experience, those educated in history: natural history, political and social history, tend to be conservative. Do you disagree?
-
Brown Note wrote:
so are we arguing global warming or socialized medicine? For someone so free of cultural influence you seem to be dropping alot of fox news talking points.See, a geologist may-or may not be conservative, but they are more likely to call out global warming hysteria for what it is. Political historians tend to have lots of examples of why a socialist government is a bad thing in most cases. It's history. It involves using the past to prevent future mistakes. I'm guessing that's a weak area for you, amiright?
Would you prefer 1984 or Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome? Why?
-
theOlentangyKid wrote:
fox news = the only non-liberal-biased news station leftBrown Note wrote:
so are we arguing global warming or socialized medicine? For someone so free of cultural influence you seem to be dropping alot of fox news talking points.See, a geologist may-or may not be conservative, but they are more likely to call out global warming hysteria for what it is. Political historians tend to have lots of examples of why a socialist government is a bad thing in most cases. It's history. It involves using the past to prevent future mistakes. I'm guessing that's a weak area for you, amiright?
Would you prefer 1984 or Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome? Why?
-
DarthPenatrator wrote:
How is that better than a conservative biased station. Either way you are being feed a line of bullshittheOlentangyKid wrote:
fox news = the only non-liberal-biased news station leftBrown Note wrote:
so are we arguing global warming or socialized medicine? For someone so free of cultural influence you seem to be dropping alot of fox news talking points.See, a geologist may-or may not be conservative, but they are more likely to call out global warming hysteria for what it is. Political historians tend to have lots of examples of why a socialist government is a bad thing in most cases. It's history. It involves using the past to prevent future mistakes. I'm guessing that's a weak area for you, amiright?
Would you prefer 1984 or Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome? Why?
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC