Inactives
Forums › General Discussion › Inactives-
What's your take on players capping inactives? I gear it all the time well I was only cleanly cappin inactives so in in the right. Doesn't matter how much I lower income blah blah blah. To me there's very little point in capping inactives and it shows a cowardly player who doesn't want to deal with consequences. A new player capping inactives is understandable but it's not for established players IMO.
-
I capped an inscribe the other day because the geocoder changed and I couldn't get Capo of Gotham any other way. I also cap inactive TWFC coz it feels good.
So there are a couple of reasons. But I agree no point just for the sake of capping. -
Lol inactive^ not incribe. Strange autocorrect
-
How do you tell if they are inactive? Maybe they just don't want to plant/cap anymore turf 💑
-
I cap them if I am burning down a city to kill my enemies' income stream if in a battle with multiple players. Especially when there are multiple V's on me, etc. Otherwise I leave them alone.
-
AmNeZ wrote:
That's true too. But I know players who litterally hunt inactives. They send pms and go through all the motions. If I wanna cap I'm going to cap. Nothing on my part to find out. If I know they're inactive I'll almost always leave them alone. Unless of course it's a collector turf or something.How do you tell if they are inactive? Maybe they just don't want to plant/cap anymore turf 💑
-
In my opinion, I can't see a problem with it because ( correct me if I'm wrong ) don't turf reach a maximum income if the areas built up enough? Therefor not affecting the income for others ?
-
I don't get why people get mad if you cap inactives (I don't but still). The game is for people who actually play. When/if I quit I'm tearing down...they don't play anymore...take their shit
-
What if u live in an part of the world were there's not many active player ???? And there's the few that are there higher then u you got aload of inactives there you can grow stronger and more cash laden with if there gone there gone if u can take them over it's all fair game
-
🇬🇧Gogo Yubari🇬🇧 wrote:
If there's an actual reason then it's different.What if u live in an part of the world were there's not many active player ???? And there's the few that are there higher then u you got aload of inactives there you can grow stronger and more cash laden with if there gone there gone if u can take them over it's all fair game
-
In my capos I hate all the little 1 inf pins. Drives me crazy. I try to get rid of them when I can.
I don't like inactives, get them outta here. I make enough money per hour I dont care if I make a fraction less
-
I'm only actives on the forums, and every few weeks I cap one or two turfa
-
zraygo wrote:
That's because you have already hundreds of turfs. For those among us who are not kings, capping inactives is a good way to support your mob, without making someone angry at you, regardless whether you can beat them or not.In my capos I hate all the little 1 inf pins. Drives me crazy. I try to get rid of them when I can.
I don't like inactives, get them outta here. I make enough money per hour I dont care if I make a fraction less
-
What would it matter if they do cap inactives? Does it hurt your income that much? Do we beat on them for hurting income...making them move away thus hurting our incomes further. I have no problems with inactives being capped for any reason. It's just a way for those without don points to go above limit peacefully. So be it.
-
Um. Linei, I was kinda defending people capping inactives not against it. If inactives are all you cap, that's not so cool
-
RedDawg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
So one shouldjust sit back and watch to happen? Better to cut put a cancer than let it grow. I don't think it's asking too much to concentrate on active playersWhat would it matter if they do cap inactives? Does it hurt your income that much? Do we beat on them for hurting income...making them move away thus hurting our incomes further. I have no problems with inactives being capped for any reason. It's just a way for those without don points to go above limit peacefully. So be it.
-
I have always been easy going in my cities. There's only one rule. Don't hurt my income. To do so is considered an act of war.
-
Or not giving me a cigarette
-
zraygo wrote:
Haha, nice.Or not giving me a cigarette
-
Belial wrote:
Or an act of war may result in lowering your income. As for inactive my only rule against capping them is if it starts lower my income.I have always been easy going in my cities. There's only one rule. Don't hurt my income. To do so is considered an act of war.
-
What about all the inactives that hold capos Belial?
-
So if I move in near you Belial...Increase your income and go to war with some jerk who is trash talking....thus hurting your income. You would then go to war with me. You can't punish someone for moving next to you and capping someone else. I can understand if they take out 5 different people....but one moves in and caps one out. Same endgame. I think the punishment doesnt fit the crime either. SO they cap a few...you go to war thus hurting your own income worse in the long run...sure you get a little on turf income upon capping. Who knows but I guess I could care less since my income is pretty high.
-
Do you allow capping of inactives turfs over 84inf? Surely that would be acceptable. What about using Putz strategy as he mentioned....during wartime? It just seems so odd in a turf wars game with so many yelling about calling things Turf Hugs to want to protect the inactives for a few bucks here and there. I know most responding on this forum spend more uselessly in a hop to some place we don't need to be than what we gain off some inactives. At least I do so I put it in perspective and let them rip some inactives. Yeah I could argue that there would be a limit but I think most would be respectful after a polite message instead of a war message.
-
Well Belial you don't seem to mind when you friends do it? You calling Lep and BWS cowards too....or is that just for all the non BAiC players that are cowards if they cap inactives?
-
I guess I see your point but I hope it doesn't catch on... Too many players will be using that as their excuse when asked why they are being a bully to a guy with half their mob. Then I get stuck in that same situation...smaller player wants help... He says one way..the lager mob guy says another. Who would you help when its he said - she said? The one with half the mob and turfs? When is beating on them enough? Too many variables to work with.
-
I say cap whatever the hell you want. Inactives left the game, if you're able to, then why not? Im not saying to be a bully or cap only inactives, but if it's beneficial, then I'm all for it
-
I cap inactives, but that's just because NY and the surrounding areas are soo damn crowded it won't affect income, and it's damn hard finding someone I can cap.
Ooh, and inactives with EC3 tags are like dessert for me -
Does it really bother u that much to post about it?!?!
-
♠💀RENO💀♠ wrote:
I'm no longer BAIC, and I've never capped an inactive player before.Well Belial you don't seem to mind when you friends do it? You calling Lep and BWS cowards too....or is that just for all the non BAiC players that are cowards if they cap inactives?
-
BlackWall$treet wrote:
You know what...that was my bad BWS I take that back after looking over a message.♠💀RENO💀♠ wrote:
I'm no longer BAIC, and I've never capped an inactive player before.Well Belial you don't seem to mind when you friends do it? You calling Lep and BWS cowards too....or is that just for all the non BAiC players that are cowards if they cap inactives?
-
Inactive or not if you have a turf i need im taking it,If i get a message asking to stop then ill stop....unless your a dick about it.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC