I will debate anything
Forums › General Discussion › I will debate anything-
Ivory Harris wrote:
I think we need to hear the tales of his last adventure─╤╦︻ ƦōƝɪℕ ︻╦╤─ wrote:
Why does this masterful character not grace us with 1 last run? Maybe he truly hasn't died. Maybe he went on the greatest adventure of all time. He could tell us all about it.Mickey McFly wrote:
I think anyone who puts turf wars on their back for the greater good is worthy of daily honor. Keller, we toast you this morning! May the king rest in peace─╤╦︻ ƦōƝɪℕ ︻╦╤─ wrote:
Mickey McFly wrote:
But you did not address the point that he does not deserve daily praise, so I am to assume you agree with me on that point.
-
─╤╦︻ ƦōƝɪℕ ︻╦╤─ wrote:
★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
The possibility of being wrong about any claim does not negate the ability to know things; it simply means that knowledge is provisional and subject to revision based on new evidence or reasoning. Knowledge can still be justified and reliable, even if it’s not infallible. The statement itself presupposes that one can recognize uncertainty without dismissing the concept of knowing altogether.If you could be wrong about anything you claim to “know”, then it logically follows you can not claim to know anything, including the statement.
If it is subject to revision, then it followed that you did not know.
You gave up knowledge before starting the assumption.
-
If truth (axioms) a=a the law of identity for example is subject to change, then it negates comportment of reality… you can never know what is real nor argue to anyone else that your reality exists or if their reality is wrong…
But we all know things for certain right? i.e gravity, seeing and believing?
-
So your response begs the question: what is forever? Does forever truly mean until the end of humans/earth? Or is forever a little more tangible than we think? People say things like "together forever" they don't mean "until the heat death of the universe" they generally mean for 100+ years, or until death. And, as we all know, Wu-Tang will never die. The people in it might, but as a concept, and idea, and a message, wu tang is forever.
Rest in peace ol' dirty bastard
-
And for arguments sake, let's say the end of our solar system/complete destruction of earth is "forever" the Wu have graciously left us some Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth, so by that time humans might have left with a wu tang CD to guide them into the stars.
-
Rͣeͩeͩferjuana wrote:
In a few trillion years all the important stuff in the universe will just be gone so yeah, forever isn’t likelySo your response begs the question: what is forever? Does forever truly mean until the end of humans/earth? Or is forever a little more tangible than we think? People say things like "together forever" they don't mean "until the heat death of the universe" they generally mean for 100+ years, or until death. And, as we all know, Wu-Tang will never die. The people in it might, but as a concept, and idea, and a message, wu tang is forever.
Rest in peace ol' dirty bastard
-
Uglyladdie wrote:
But someone will have moved to another system and they will have taken the Wu-Tang with them. So it will live FOREVER!!!!Rͣeͩeͩferjuana wrote:
In a few trillion years all the important stuff in the universe will just be gone so yeah, forever isn’t likelySo your response begs the question: what is forever? Does forever truly mean until the end of humans/earth? Or is forever a little more tangible than we think? People say things like "together forever" they don't mean "until the heat death of the universe" they generally mean for 100+ years, or until death. And, as we all know, Wu-Tang will never die. The people in it might, but as a concept, and idea, and a message, wu tang is forever.
Rest in peace ol' dirty bastard
-
Ivory Harris wrote:
Uglyladdie wrote: In a few trillion years all the important stuff in the universe will just be gone so yeah, forever isn’t likely
But someone will have moved to another system and they will have taken the Wu-Tang with them. So it will live FOREVER!!!!Nope they didn’t read it, they heard it & also had a hearing impediment. They ended up leaving Wu-Tang behind and brought the Poon-Tang
-
Which way should the toilet paper face.
-
Ivory Harris wrote:
That other system doesn’t existUglyladdie wrote:
But someone will have moved to another system and they will have taken the Wu-Tang with them. So it will live FOREVER!!!!Rͣeͩeͩferjuana wrote:
In a few trillion years all the important stuff in the universe will just be gone so yeah, forever isn’t likelySo your response begs the question: what is forever? Does forever truly mean until the end of humans/earth? Or is forever a little more tangible than we think? People say things like "together forever" they don't mean "until the heat death ofthe universe" they generally mean for 100+ years, or until death. And, as we all know, Wu-Tang will never die. The people in it might, but as a concept, and idea, and a message, wu tang is forever.
Rest in peace ol' dirty bastard
“In the universe”
Yep not Forever -
★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.If truth (axioms) a=a the law of identity for example is subject to change, then it negates comportment of reality… you can never know what is real nor argue to anyone else that your reality exists or if their reality is wrong…
But we all know things for certain right? i.e gravity, seeing and believing?
-
I believe it was my fairy god mother that told me for certain that there is only one Easter bunny.
-
BigAl! wrote:
https://images.app.goo.gl/DQz3rkcmVWRwAxa86I believe it was my fairy god mother that told me for certain that there is only one Easter bunny.
-
Brown🎵Note wrote:
I hate starwars. Star trek is superior.★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.If truth (axioms) a=a the law of identity for example is subject to change, then it negates comportment of reality… you can never know what is real nor argue to anyone else that your reality exists or if their reality is wrong…
But we all know things for certain right? i.e gravity, seeing and believing?
-
★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Your opinion is just wrongBrown🎵Note wrote:
I hate starwars. Star trek is superior.★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.If truth (axioms) a=a the law of identity for example is subject to change, then it negates comportment of reality… you can never know what is real nor argue to anyone else that your reality exists or if their reality is wrong…
But we all know things for certain right? i.e gravity, seeing and believing?
-
This thread had a lot of potential
😔 -
★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Again.. Both are great. Subjectivity and nuance are features; not bugs, Darth.Brown🎵Note wrote:
I hate starwars. Star trek is superior.★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.If truth (axioms) a=a the law of identity for example is subject to change, then it negates comportment of reality… you can never know what is real nor argue to anyone else that your reality exists or if their reality is wrong…
But we all know things for certain right? i.e gravity, seeing and believing?
-
Brown🎵Note wrote:
Starwars is parody. Change my mind★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Again.. Both are great. Subjectivity and nuance are features; not bugs, Darth.Brown🎵Note wrote:
I hate starwars. Star trek is superior.★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.If truth (axioms) a=a the law of identity for example is subject to change, then it negates comportment of reality… you can never know what is real nor argue to anyone else that your reality exists or if their reality is wrong…
But we all know things for certain right? i.e gravity, seeing and believing?
-
★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
What is the scope we’re talking here? 4,5,6?Brown🎵Note wrote:
Starwars is parody. Change my mind★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Again.. Both are great. Subjectivity and nuance are features; not bugs, Darth.Brown🎵Note wrote:
I hate starwars. Star trek is superior.★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.If truth (axioms) a=a the law of identity for example is subject to change, then it negates comportment of reality… you can never know what is real nor argue to anyone else that your reality exists or if their reality is wrong…
But we all know things for certain right? i.e gravity, seeing and believing?
-
Brown🎵Note wrote:
All of them👊★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
What is the scope we’re talking here? 4,5,6?Brown🎵Note wrote:
Starwars is parody. Change my mind★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Again.. Both are great. Subjectivity and nuance are features; not bugs, Darth.Brown🎵Note wrote:
I hate starwars. Star trek is superior.★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote:
Only the Sith deal in absolutes.If truth (axioms) a=a the law of identity for example is subject to change, then it negates comportment of reality… you can never know what is real nor argue to anyone else that your reality exists or if their reality is wrong…
But we all know things for certain right? i.e gravity, seeing and believing?
-
★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ wrote: All of them👊
So now we know this is not a serious debate. Just look at the grosses. -
**Star Wars (1977):**
- **Domestic Gross:** Approximately $460 million (in 1977 dollars).
- **Worldwide Gross:** About $775 million (including re-releases).**Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979):**
- **Domestic Gross:** Around $82 million (in 1979 dollars).
- **Worldwide Gross:** Approximately $139 million. -
Since it seems as though some others have joined in to start debating some of the last questions… someone give me some new things to debate you about 😁🤣
-
What came first? The 🐓or the 🥚?
-
Ꮩϵη☠︎ϻᵗᵡ wrote:
Eggs existed during dinosaurs, long before chickens existed.What came first? The 🐓or the 🥚?
-
─╤╦︻ ƦōƝɪℕ ︻╦╤─ wrote:
I’ll try something controversial: trump is a silly gooseSince it seems as though some others have joined in to start debating some of the last questions… someone give me some new things to debate you about 😁🤣
-
This is fun and all, but too many softies out here. I have a private room where a few of us do this all the time. It actually works out very well. We have a great crew that likes to have legit debates.
-
Phwoar wrote:
Allow me to clarify. Which came first? The chicken or the chicken egg?Ꮩϵη☠︎ϻᵗᵡ wrote:
Eggs existed during dinosaurs, long before chickens existed.What came first? The 🐓or the 🥚?
-
Brown🎵Note wrote:
For a chicken egg to exist, a chicken had to be born mutated from a very close relatives egg, where do you draw the line and start calling it a chicken. For a chicken egg to exist it must come from a chicken.Phwoar wrote:
Allow me to clarify. Which came first? The chicken or the chicken egg?Ꮩϵη☠︎ϻᵗᵡ wrote:
Eggs existed during dinosaurs, long before chickens existed.What came first? The 🐓or the 🥚?
-
Ꮩϵη☠︎ϻᵗᵡ wrote:
You have to give me an opinion so I can argue against it 😁What came first? The 🐓or the 🥚?
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC