Why is Chicago so violent?
Forums › General Discussion › Why is Chicago so violent?-
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
This is sideways gibberish talk. It’s the right to bear arms. Also there is a clear difference between using a gun to defend yourself over attacking other Americans. If another American breaks in my house or try’s harming my family it is them doing the attacking so yes I will use my right to defend myself.So much distraction from the real issue. Americans are told by the word of law that they can have guns to defend themselves. It’s their right. This means many Americans believe it’s okay to defend themselves with guns and defend their right to do so. This means you need guns to attack Americans because Americans have guns to defend themselves.
-
The 2nd amendment is crucial. It’s something you’re born with. If it is taken, what’s stopping them from taking other rights you’re born with? It’s more than just *guns*, it is a right that you are *born* with. That’s what’s more important.
-
Case in point x 2.
-
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
The fuq you babbling about?So much distraction from the real issue. Americans are told by the word of law that they can have guns to defend themselves. It’s their right. This means many Americans believe it’s okay to defend themselves with guns and defend their right to do so. This means you need guns to attack Americans because Americans have guns to defend themselves.
-
The right to bear arms.
Is the right of individuals to protect their lives an property. This includes from criminals, organizations and yes even government. It is absolutely a citizen’s right to defend themselves against a government who is an immediate threat to their lives or property WHEN that governs is acting illegally. That is the crux of the issue- whose determination of illegal government is going to prevail. My guess is the government will tend to back themselves and not the individual. Self preservation is the name of the game. -
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
Key point, just don’t fucking attack AmericansSo much distraction from the real issue. Americans are told by the word of law that they can have guns to defend themselves. It’s their right. This means many Americans believe it’s okay to defend themselves with guns and defend their right to do so. This means you need guns to attack Americans because Americans have guns to defend themselves.
-
༼།༠༦༣༩༽ wrote:
I can’t. I don’t have a gun.🔥B337🔥 wrote:
Key point, just don’t fucking attack AmericansSo much distraction from the real issue. Americans are told by the word of law that they can have guns to defend themselves. It’s their right. This means many Americans believe it’s okay to defend themselves with guns and defend their right to do so. This means you need guns to attack Americans because Americans have guns to defend themselves.
-
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
Because if you did have a gun, you’d be bullet proof. I get it now.༼།༠༦༣༩༽ wrote:
I can’t. I don’t have a gun.🔥B337🔥 wrote:
Key point, just don’t fucking attack AmericansSo much distraction from the real issue. Americans are told by the word of law that they can have guns to defend themselves. It’s their right. This means many Americans believe it’s okay to defend themselves with guns and defend their right to do so. This means you need guns to attack Americans because Americans have guns to defend themselves.
-
Funny that. Having a fun doesn’t make you bulletproof. Remind me again why you Americans need them?
-
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
It’s a quick way to shoot someone? I don’t understand the question.Funny that. Having a fun doesn’t make you bulletproof. Remind me again why you Americans need them?
-
I’m wondering why you need guns if guns don’t protect you from guns.
-
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
You need the right to have a gun bc now that they exist if america made them illegal it would only hurt those who follow the laws. You can buy an off the market pistol for $50 in the hood.I’m wondering why you need guns if guns don’t protect you from guns.
-
—͟͞͞𝙀𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙬𝙤𝙤𝙙 wrote:
☝🏻ThisGun free zones are when law abiding citizens don’t have guns and criminals do because well, they don’t care about the law
-
So it is what it is because it is what it is and so it always will be. That’s progress.
-
According to smartertravel.com:
The World’s Safest Cities
These are the top 20 safest cities, ranked overall:
Tokyo, Japan
Singapore, Singapore
Osaka, Japan
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Sydney, Australia
Toronto, Canada
Washington, D.C.
Copenhagen, Denmark
Seoul, South Korea
Melbourne, Australia
Chicago, Illinois
Stockholm, Sweden
San Francisco, California
London, England
New York City, New York
Frankfurt, Germany
Los Angeles, California
Wellington, New Zealand
Zurich, Switzerland
Hong Kong -
I can’t help but notice that Chicago is safer than London, where you have to kill your rapist with a screwdriver you concealed from the police.
-
I mean, living in D.C., this list looks off. Putting Washington DC on a “safest city” list is like putting a Bill Cosby on the list of “Best Bartenders”.
-
LOL, that list is way off. Not denying London has it’s hot spots though. Every town/city does. Even where I live on the East coast people sometimes get shanked.
-
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
It is what it is because when seconds matter, cops are minutes away. The Supreme Court has already ruled that police do not have an obligation to protect anyone, a reasonable response time from police in Chicago is a couple minutes at best.So it is what it is because it is what it is and so it always will be. That’s progress.
-
People travel to LA to go to Disney, Universal and the beach, not Compton, East LA, Duarte, Riverside, El Monte, Pomona, etc……
-
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
LOL, that list is way off. Not denying London has it’s hot spots though. Every town/city does. Even where I live on the East coast people sometimes get shanked.
Wouldn’t get shanked if you had a gun.
-
☠ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴғᴏʀᴄᴇʀ☠ wrote:
Do you wear guns like a stab vest?🔥B337🔥 wrote:
LOL, that list is way off. Not denying London has it’s hot spots though. Every town/city does. Even where I live on the East coast people sometimes get shanked.
Wouldn’t get shanked if you had a gun.
-
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
Stab vests are interesting. The only place I’ve heard the term is in British movies. Here we use ballistic vests, because let’s kill two birds with one stone.☠ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴғᴏʀᴄᴇʀ☠ wrote:
Do you wear guns like a stab vest?🔥B337🔥 wrote:
LOL, that list is way off. Not denying London has it’s hot spots though. Every town/city does. Even where I live on the East coast people sometimes get shanked.
Wouldn’t get shanked if you had a gun.
The gun makes it a fair fight in rape negotiations. Why take that away from the vulnerable among us?
Anyway, it’s clear the English are still a bit raw over that whole revolutionary war thing. Sour grapes if you ask me.
-
I blame Thomas Paine.
-
🔥B337🔥 wrote:
I blame Benedict “Eggs” Arnold and his grumpy band of n’er-do-wells.I blame Thomas Paine.
-
〓∞Persephone∞〓 wrote:
Exactly i will always have weapons for self defense, i trust noone but my friends, and i trust no governments, im glad i also have the knowledge to make inprovised weapons, everyone need to prepareThe right to bear arms.
Is the right of individuals to protect their lives an property. This includes from criminals, organizations and yes even government. It is absolutely a citizen’s right to defend themselves against a government who is an immediate threat to their lives or property WHEN that governs is acting illegally. That is the crux of the issue- whose determination of illegal government is going to prevail. My guess is the government will tend to back themselves and not the individual. Self preservation is the name of the game. -
♚☠️𝕳𝖆𝖉𝖊𝖘☠️♚ wrote:
For real ive been in rooms with kilos of coke and walls stacked with guns, the dirty guns they were letting go cheap. Gangsters will always have guns, and even if the government magically found them all, its eady to make a $10 shotgun or convert military surplus flare guns into sing shot pistols🔥B337🔥 wrote:
You need the right to have a gun bc now that they exist if america made them illegal it would only hurt those who follow the laws. You can buy an off the market pistol for $50 in the hood.I’m wondering why you need guns if guns don’t protect you from guns.
-
Stab vests are interesting. The only place I’ve heard the term is in British movies. Here we use ballistic vests, because let’s kill two birds with one stone.
The gun makes it a fair fight in rape negotiations. Why take that away from the vulnerable among us?
Anyway, it’s clear the English are still a bit raw over that whole revolutionary war thing. Sour grapes if you ask me.What revelutionary war?
Get your ballistic vest on n show your guns, makes you strong! -
I got more guns than you
who even gives a fuck get a life -
Coolio wrote:
🤨I got more guns than you
who even gives a fuck get a life
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC