Today in the election fraud hearings
Forums › General Discussion › Today in the election fraud hearings-
💉СУГЦЅDAVIГЦЅ💉 wrote:
I give up. You losers can spout your theories all day. Trump lost, I guarantee it, I’m not going to keep wasting my time with your bullshit. See you in game.
bullshit?
The associate, Tony Bobulinski, alleged that in May 2017 he met with Joe Biden and his son, as well as Joe Biden’s brother Jim to discuss a joint venture with the Chinese energy firm CEFC. That was after Joe Biden had left public office, and it was far from clear he would again run in 2020. But Bobulinski appeared to be disputing Joe Biden’s assertion that he had never discussed foreign business dealings with his son.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/hunter-biden-under-federal-investigation/2020/12/09/3b7361be-3a64-11eb-9276-ae0ca72729be_story.html
-
∞🪓Persephone🌲∞ wrote:
Repub supporters can mail stuff too. It’s legal for both sides now.
Can't pass illegal laws that violate the laws in place. if you want to play the game, everyone is playing fair "well unless you change the rules".
That sir is dangerous. and it amazes me that your ok with this.
-
“Cant pass illegal laws that violate laws in place.”
What legal law was passed and was found to be illegal in relation to the 2020 - regardless or not of if it violated other legal laws (which may or may not be illegal based on other legal laws).
Seriously this loop can keep going like the energizer bunny.
-
∞🪓Persephone🌲∞ wrote:
“Cant pass illegal laws that violate laws in place.”
What legal law was passed and was found to be illegal in relation to the 2020 - regardless or not of if it violated other legal laws (which may or may not be illegal based on other legal laws).
Seriously this loop can keep going like the energizer bunny.
That’s why there are lawsuits genius😒
It’s like I’m going to have to explain this to a child...
-
You know what, how about we make a law that registered democrats and republican voter ballots are thrown out. Hey if it becomes law it’s morally right. Right?
-
💉СУГЦЅDAVIГЦЅ💉 wrote:
Lmfao hope allWow I agree with icepick. I guess there is hope for the world.
Is well Cy -
★ΛUG★ wrote:
Simple people realized Trumps a POSԵαɠհɑƈԋαɾ wrote:
How is it that a man who did not campaign, who has been caught making money from foreign countries, who literally no one likes, made record breaking turn outs in key states where Obama did better in yet made millions or more votes than Obama. How is it that just before the election, unconstitutional laws were put into place to violate specific constitutional terms? You are delusional if you think Biden won fairly.Every state has now certified their election results. Trump doesnt even have to concede, everyone knows hes lost. Well, everyone except the delusional.
-
ICEPICK111 wrote:
I want peace... and we are in another peace treaty with Israel and Morocco. While the war machine was asleep now will be awaken with Biden. I don’t know one person who’s backing thatup★ΛUG★ wrote:
Simple people realized Trumps a POSԵαɠհɑƈԋαɾ wrote:
How is it that a man who did not campaign, who has been caught making money from foreign countries, who literally no one likes, made record breaking turn outs in key states where Obama did better in yet made millions or more votes than Obama. How is it that just before the election, unconstitutional laws were put into place to violate specific constitutional terms? You are delusional if you think Biden won fairly.Every state has now certified their election results. Trump doesnt even have to concede, everyone knows hes lost. Well, everyone except the delusional.
-
I know this is sort of off topic but does anyone else remeber those North Korean summits? Ya know, the ones where trump was suppose to secure denuclearization deals with ole Kim..... but ended up creating worst relations with the North korean state? Art of the deal my ass. And the only reason why trump didnt go to war with either NK or Iran is because he knows hes not competent enough to lead a war effort. I mean how many sec. of defense has trump gone through in 4 years? 4? 5? Maybe more, no one knows 🤷♂️. All i know is James Mattis after being fired by trump refered to him as a "fucking idiot".
-
Եαɠհɑƈԋαɾ wrote:
Did you vote for Pedophile joe?I know this is sort of off topic but does anyone else remeber those North Korean summits? Ya know, the ones where trump was suppose to secure denuclearization deals with ole Kim..... but ended up creating worst relations with the North korean state? Art of the deal my ass. And the only reason why trump didnt go to war with either NK or Iran is because he knows hes not competent enough to lead a war effort. I mean how many sec. of defense has trump gone through in 4 years? 4? 5? Maybe more, no one knows 🤷♂️. All i know is James Mattis after being fired by trump refered to him as a "fucking idiot".
-
Եαɠհɑƈԋαɾ wrote:
Oh this is A opinion piece, I thought you were stating facts and evidence🤷I know this is sort of off topic but does anyone else remeber those North Korean summits? Ya know, the ones where trump was suppose to secure denuclearization deals with ole Kim..... but ended up creating worst relations with the North korean state? Art of the deal my ass. And the only reason why trump didnt go to war with either NK or Iran is because he knows hes not competent enough to lead a war effort. I mean how many sec. of defense has trump gone through in 4 years? 4? 5? Maybe more, no one knows 🤷♂️. All i know is James Mattis after being fired by trump refered to him as a "fucking idiot".
-
★ΛUG★ wrote:
Big fan of Mattis. He wanted ww3 with China and Russia. He understood if we waited we were fucked in the long run. I understand Trump not wanting to start ww3 though. Also pretty sure mattis quit.Եαɠհɑƈԋαɾ wrote:
Oh this is A opinion piece, I thought you were stating facts and evidence🤷I know this is sort of off Ya know, the ones where trump was suppose to secure denuclearization deals with ole Kim..... but ended up creating worst relations with the North korean state? Art of the deal my ass. And the only reason why trump didnt go to war with either NK or Iran is because he knows hes not competent enough to lead a war effort. I mean how many sec. of defense has trump gone through in 4 years? 4? 5? Maybe more, no one knows 🤷♂️. All i know is James Mattis after being fired by trump refered to him as a "fucking idiot".
-
★ΛUG★ wrote:
Excellent observation Aug, this is A opinion piece. No where in that post did i say im about to drop truth bombs, just wanted to say my piece.Եαɠհɑƈԋαɾ wrote:
Oh this is A opinion piece, I thought you were stating facts and evidence🤷I know this is sort of off topic but does anyone else remeber those North Korean summits? Ya know, the ones where trump was suppose to secure denuclearization deals with ole Kim..... but ended up creating worst relations with the North korean state? Art of the deal my ass. And the only reason why trump didnt go to war with either NK or Iran is because he knows hes not competent enough to lead a war effort. I mean how many sec. of defense has trump gone through in 4 years? 4? 5? Maybe more, no one knows 🤷♂️. All i know is James Mattis after being fired by trump refered to him as a "fucking idiot".
-
Եαɠհɑƈԋαɾ wrote:
★ΛUG★ wrote:
Excellent observation Aug, this is A opinion piece. No where in that post did i say im about to drop truth bombs, just wanted to say my piece.Եαɠհɑƈԋαɾ wrote:
Oh this is A opinion piece, I thought you were stating facts and evidence🤷I know this is sort of off topic but does anyone else remeber those North Korean summits? Ya know, the ones where trump was suppose to secure denuclearization deals with ole Kim..... but ended up creating worst relations with the North korean state? Art of the deal my ass. And the only reason why trump didnt go to war with either NK or Iran is because he knows hes not competent enough to lead a ".
“only reason why trump didnt go to war with either NK or Iran is because he knows hes not competent enough to lead“
Pretty sure your trying a little hard here
-
WakeUpAmerica🇺🇸 wrote:
That’s ok, I’m not either. We don’t need bullshit legal speak anyway. Explain your understanding of it, in a way everyone can understand.Opium wrote:
Sorry I'm not a lawyer.why don’t you explain to everyone the legal precedent Bush v Gore set in the Supreme Court.
-
Opium wrote:
Simple the courts have overturned elections before . Example Bush vs GoreWakeUpAmerica🇺🇸 wrote:
That’s ok, I’m not either. We don’t need bullshit legal speak anyway. Explain your understanding of it, in a way everyone can understand.Opium wrote:
Sorry I'm not a lawyer.why don’t you explain to everyone the legal precedent Bush v Gore set in the Supreme Court.
-
http://americanpatriotcontacttracers.com/ominous-u-s-positioning-naval-vessels-off-east-and-west-coasts-massive-troop-movements-in-conus/
-
WakeUpAmerica🇺🇸 wrote:
You’ve got it ass about mate. The court upheld Bush’s win, Gore wanted a recount and the conservative judges blocked it because - well they’re conservative. That’s the point -conservative judges are appointed to make conservative decisions (not decisions in favor of the “conservative” party.Opium wrote:
Simple the courts have overturned elections before . Example Bush vs GoreWakeUpAmerica🇺🇸 wrote:
That’s ok, I’m not either. We don’t need bullshit legal speak anyway. Explain your understanding of it, in a way everyone can understand.Opium wrote:
Sorry I'm not a lawyer.why don’t you explain to everyone the legal precedent Bush v Gore set in the Supreme Court.
-
The Texas AG has the radical position in this case. If the case was actually heard (which I doubt it will) and the precedent from Bush v Gore applied, Texas would lose the case.
Honestly you are getting swindled. -
For those that are interested, the problem with this case is that whilst Texas has the constitutional ability bring the case before SCOTUS, I doubt that the court will accept that Texas (or any other state) has standing as plaintiff.
On the other hand while Trump has standing in the case as plaintiff he can’t constitutionally bring the case to SCOTUS because it can only act as an appeals court for plaintiffs that are NOT states. -
Opium wrote:
Bush in my in my opinion was not conservative.WakeUpAmerica🇺🇸 wrote:
You’ve got it ass about mate. The court upheld Bush’s win, Gore wanted a recount and the conservative judges blocked it because - well they’re conservative. That’s the point -conservative judges are appointed to make conservative conservative” party.Opium wrote:
Simple the courts have overturned elections before . Example Bush vs GoreWakeUpAmerica🇺🇸 wrote:
That’s ok, I’m not either. We don’t need bullshit legal speak anyway. Explain your understanding of it, in a way everyone can understand.Opium wrote:
Sorry I'm not a lawyer.why don’t you explain to everyone the legal precedent Bush v Gore set in the Supreme Court.
-
The judges who upheld his win against Gore, definitely were.
-
Opium wrote:
Maybe i wasnt 100%WakeUpAmerica🇺🇸 wrote:
You’ve got it ass about mate. The court upheld Bush’s win, Gore wanted a recount and the conservative judges blocked it because - well they’re conservative. That’s the point -conservative judges are appointed to make conservative decisions (not decisions in favor of the “conservative” party.Opium wrote:
Simple the courts have overturned elections before . Example Bush vs GoreWakeUpAmerica🇺🇸 wrote:
That’s ok, I’m not either. We don’t need bullshit legal speak anyway. Explain your understanding of it, in a way everyone can understand.Opium wrote:
Sorry I'm not a lawyer.why don’t you explain to everyone the legal precedent Bush v Gore set in the Supreme Court.
-
the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Florida decision, holding that the various methods and standards of the recount process violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution. The court ruled 5–4 on the remedy of the matter, with the majority holding that the Florida Supreme Court’s decision had created new election law—a right reserved for the state legislature—and that no recount could be held in time to satisfy a federal deadline for the selection of state electors.
The supreme court ruled against the state that they didnt have the right to change the rules , very similar to the Texas case -
What new election law did the Florida Supreme Court create?
What new law did the PA Supreme Court create? -
Opium wrote:
You have eyes read the case for yourselfWhat new election law did the Florida Supreme Court create?
What new law did the PA Supreme Court create? -
It didn’t create new election law. From what was posted, the vote was held. There winner was disputed and a recount was held. The court ruled the recount to be invalid due to
and not sufficient time left to do another recount. If that is the precedent being claimed, the votes for Biden would stand. Shucks. -
Next will be a lawsuit against China and Biden. It will state Biden conspired with China to release Covid just to manipulate the voting process and remove bigly orange from office
-
The basic fight or difference between the left of center liberals and the right of center conservatives seems to be:
A)LOCL: Society is too stupid to make correct decisions and government needs to decide for them.B)ROCC: Government is too slow and stupid to make correct decipher s and people need to decide for themselves.
The center (Dem and Repub) : People should make decisions for themselves and government should only step in when the nature of a decision will alter the lives of society at large and the government can afford to do so.
-
WakeUpAmerica🇺🇸 wrote:
The supreme court ruled against the state that they didnt have the right to change the rules , very similar to the Texas case
But apparently not similar enough to actually warrant a review.
Too soon?
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC