Bernie
Forums › General Discussion › Bernie-
All these economists coming out in favor of Bernie's plans... Anyone ever think they're right? Bernie 2016!!
-
Also many previous Clinton supporters - elected officials - have been changing sides to come into the #BernWard - the more people learn the truth behind his ideas, the more that support him. If you unbiasedly look at the plan I think you'd be more in favor. Just my opinion I suppose - but I've been following Sanders a long time - anyone can - a lot of his 30+ years in elected office are documented, many with video
-
I'm voting for Ted Cruz because of his Biblical stance on family, economics, and the constitution. America is not the ideal nation to practice socialism in.
-
༎།SཛཀᎢཇΧ།༎ wrote:
Separation of church and state is in place for a reason - wish someone would remind some of these candidatesI'm voting for Ted Cruz because of his Biblical stance on family, economics, and the constitution. America is not the ideal nation to practice socialism in.
-
Tweek wrote:
if you want to throw out the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and give the government the power to control, run and tell the capitalists exactly what they can and can't do , not to mention how terrible that will be to the future of the worker. 😭😭😭😭 I cry if a socialist or progressive gets the presidency. I nominate the Constitution for president.Sanders is leaps and bounds better than his competition on either side.
Of course, each potential candidate will be valued differently by everyone. For me, Sanders is the best candidate. May not be the same for everyone. It doesn't make anyone wrong, just different.
-
It's like people think Bernie can just change everything to socialist overnight. They forget about that pesky house and senate he has to get past.
-
༎།SཛཀᎢཇΧ།༎ wrote:
Biblical stance? Wait...I'm voting for Ted Cruz because of his Biblical stance on family, economics, and the constitution. America is not the ideal nation to practice socialism in.
Family: polygamy and slave surrogacy. Sell your daughters.
Economics: give away all your earthly possessions and follow Jesus. What other economic model did Jesus support?
The Constitution is not in the Bible, and this isn't a theocracy so I'm sure the bible has little to say on it.
What biblical stance?
-
≣☰〓CRͣAͩCͩKA〓☰≣ wrote:
In God We Trust༎།SཛཀᎢཇΧ།༎ wrote:
Separation of church and state is in place for a reason - wish someone would remind some of these candidatesI'm voting for Ted Cruz because of his Biblical stance on family, economics, and the constitution. America is not the ideal nation to practice socialism in.
-
≣☰〓CRͣAͩCͩKA〓☰≣ wrote:
༎།SཛཀᎢཇΧ།༎ wrote:
Separation of church and state is in place for a reason - wish someone would remind some of these candidatesI'm voting for Ted Cruz because of his Biblical stance on family, economics, and the constitution. America is not the ideal nation to practice socialism in.
Constitution never says that...
-
ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:
You're right. The constitution just prevents a state-established religion (i.e. The Church of England)≣☰〓CRͣAͩCͩKA〓☰≣ wrote:
༎།SཛཀᎢཇΧ།༎ wrote:
Separation of church and state is in place for a reason - wish someone would remind some of these candidatesI'm voting for Ted Cruz because of his Biblical stance on family, economics, and the constitution. America is not the ideal nation to practice socialism in.
Constitution never says that...
-
Fiberian Hufky wrote:
The word of the day is: filibuster!It's like people think Bernie can just change everything to socialist overnight. They forget about that pesky house and senate he has to get past.
-
I'm fine with any president as long as the president is NOT Clinton. She is the worst on the Dem side this year.
Personally I like Cruz. He's chill about guns. 👏
-
⠀ wrote:
Democratic Socialist, complete opposite of a commyThe guy is a communist.
We have all seen where that leads too. -
"Larkin" Morris wrote:
⠀ wrote:
Democratic Socialist, complete opposite of a commyThe guy is a communist.
We have all seen where that leads too.Really? From which brand of cereal did you pull your education?
There's complete non-sharing individualism, then Socialism, and then Communism. Voting has nothing to do with an economic system, so I'm not sure what "Democratic" has to do with it. Communism can be Democratic.
It's about who owns and controls the means of production, and who gets to benefit from it.
Socialism is not the opposite of Communism. When Socialism is perfect and complete, the result is Communism. (On paper, anyway...)
Vote your own way, but that's what it is.
-
"Larkin" Morris wrote:
Democratic Socialist, complete opposite of a commy
My brain cells took damage from reading this.
-
I think I'm gonna pass on the far left socialist views of Bernie and stay away from that lying c#nt Hillary too :)
-
Can we all agree that Bernie job was to keep Hillary in the news?
-
Bernie is such a crappy candidate
-
ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:
It does, it just doesn't use those words. They were coined by Thomas Jefferson and have been affirmed at every Supreme Court challenge. Theocrats like Cruz, Palin, and Pat Robertson cry foul, but they're grasping at straws.≣☰〓CRͣAͩCͩKA〓☰≣ wrote:
༎།SཛཀᎢཇΧ།༎ wrote:
Separation of church and state is in place for a reason - wish someone would remind some of these candidatesI'm voting for Ted Cruz because of his Biblical stance on family, economics, and the constitution. America is not the ideal nation to practice socialism in.
Constitution never says that...
-
Also, Fox News crew, we've had democratic socialism in the U.S. for well over a century, and miraculously, we haven't imploded or been consumed by fire/flood/seven plagues yet.
-
jimmy big-balls wrote:
>this is what socialists actually believeAlso, Fox News crew, we've had democratic socialism in the U.S. for well over a century
-
jimmy big-balls wrote:
Also, Fox News crew, we've had democratic socialism in the U.S. for well over a century, and miraculously, we haven't imploded or been consumed by fire/flood/seven plagues yet.
Yes we have. And look at the trillions in debt plus the unfunded future liabilities from it.
-
ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:
Go drive on your capitalist roads then, or call the for profit fire and police departments next time. Send your kids to private school and make sure they don't ride public transport to get there. Dig a hole to shit in, don't want to use those public pipes that are costing you trillions of dollars.jimmy big-balls wrote:
Also, Fox News crew, we've had democratic socialism in the U.S. for well over a century, and miraculously, we haven't imploded or been consumed by fire/flood/seven plagues yet.
Yes we have. And look at the trillions in debt plus the unfunded future liabilities from it.
-
Ojibwe wrote:
ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:
Go drive on your capitalist roads then, or call the for profit fire and police departments next time. Send your kids to private school and make sure they don't ride public transport to get there. Dig a hole to shit in, don't want to use those public pipes that are costing you trillions of dollars.jimmy big-balls wrote:
Also, Fox News crew, we've had democratic socialism in the U.S. for well over a century, and miraculously, we haven't imploded or been consumed by fire/flood/seven plagues yet.
Yes we have. And look at the trillions in debt plus the unfunded future liabilities from it.
Basic infrastructure is the governments job. That and keep us safe. Handing billions out a year to people that won't work ain't their job.
-
Hmm, I think you need a better definition of socialism, because the things I mentioned are and the thing you mentioned is not socialism.
-
That "basic infrastructure" is democratic socialism. Welfare (corporate - which dwarfs personal welfare) is not.
-
jimmy big-balls wrote:
1st of all, I believe u r taking Jeffersons statements out of historical context. The founding fathers wanted separation bc of persecution (by a corrupt church, I might add). Also, Cruz and others are NOT trying to establish Theocracy, they just want to lead America from their world view, the same way ALL other presidents have done.ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:
It does, it just doesn't use those words. They were coined by Thomas Jefferson and have been affirmed at every Supreme Court challenge. Theocrats like Cruz, Palin, and Pat Robertson cry foul...≣☰〓CRͣAͩCͩKA〓☰≣ wrote:
༎།SཛཀᎢཇΧ།༎ wrote:
Separation of church and state is in place for a reason...I'm voting for Ted Cruz bc of his Biblical...
Constitution never says that...
-
I look forward to the day when the next puppet disappoints this country...yet again. Repetition is a sign of stupidity and the majority continues to get sucked in deeper and deeper, election after election. Lmao!
-
Ӈཪ༱عɗ☠ᏩᎧེ͜Ꭷེℵ wrote:
Puppet? Which hand do you think is up President Obama's ass? At what point in his career do you think he was informed someone's hand would be up his ass, and why do you think he stayed quiet and played along?I look forward to the day when the next puppet disappoints this country...yet again. Repetition is a sign of stupidity and the majority continues to get sucked in deeper and deeper, election after election. Lmao!
-
Bernie is still the best option, I'd say. I can't really get behind Clinton at all... And god help us if one of the republican candidates win. The notion that democratic socialism destroy capitalism is just insane. Basically what we do now is corporate socialism - where we subsidize and give handouts to big business and blame our debt on the minuscule amount we spend on helping the poorer than average American, who, by chance, is poorer than it was years ago in result of the corporations like Walmart who employ a huge amount at a wage that can't support most people or pay for college tuition or health costs, etc without government assistance.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC