Home | News | Forums | Turf Map | Screenshots | Play Turf Wars Now!

Breaking News!!

• Mystery Jul 8, 2012

  If attrition wants to share how he feels about it in the forum, he will. I don't have to draw any conclusions.
• Mystery Jul 8, 2012

  ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:

  Since attrition is unable to speak for himself. I rest with the information I have provided. Which is much more than the prosecution.

  Any further questions can directed to my counsel, The Ambassador or Syracuse, Mr. Free Mason.

  Thanks for your consideration
  

  Congrats on providing no proof that he ever capped you or GMoney.
• Mystery Jul 8, 2012

  Since you seem to like assumptions, based on your lack of proof and the timing of your capping him, I'll continue with what appears an obvious assumption to me: you & GMoney are capping him because I publicly disagreed with something you said in the forum. It's funny how that's pretty close to your past behavior as well.
• Mystery Jul 8, 2012

  ★Λubergine★ wrote:

  What is the obsession with proof here? Stop trying to figure out why, and think about what to do next.
  

  Because I don't trust him or GMoney; I'm certainly not going to take their word for it.
• onter™ Jul 9, 2012

  What does it matter if attrition capped them it's just a game if they capped attrition it's just a game
• ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ Jul 9, 2012

  I would like to say that ... And yes I actually have a Ss. Mystery is capping me because I capped attrition.

  I think that it is outrageous for someone's spouse to attack you because you attack their spouse..

  Where is the humanity?!

  Thanks for your consideration
• ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ Jul 9, 2012

  I also believe that the statements made above are sufficient proof..

  Please direct all future questions on this matter to my counsel, The Ambassador of Syracuse

  Thanks for your consideration
• Fireproof™ Jul 9, 2012

  This is all too funny. Well - the videos are funny. The rest might be a little sad. Since when does someone need a 'good reason' to cap someone (where 'good reason' is apparently a reason that others deem appropriate).

  No where in the TW rules did it give me a list of circumstances where one could cap another. I have many reasons for capping:
  - someone pissed me off
  - someone capped me when I was smaller
  - someone named vulgar turfs
  - someone said something annoying in the forums
  - someone happened to have turf next to me

  I don't need to justify my reasons to anyone and neither does SmokeMonster.

  Some (Mystery) may think it's stupid/inappropriate to attack someone (or their spouse) just because they annoyed them. (Which is ironic given the BigRedVee case).

  I (and others) happen to think it's stupid for Mystery to cap anyone in Houston who happens to place a turf on one of her1-pins. Could she grow it to 86-inf and avoid being taxed? Yes. Does she? No - she caps you.
• Fireproof™ Jul 9, 2012

  ...continued from above...

  Everyone caps by their own rules, but it doesn't mean others have to agree or like those rules.

  TL;DR - stop whining and play the game or go download Snoopy's Fair.
• Mystery Jul 9, 2012

  My apologies. I just talked to attrition. Apparently he did cap 1 turf from either you or GMoney (he forgot which) 9 months ago in Berlin. It happened to be either Flossin's or GMoney's last turf. He didn't even know it was their last turf. Whichever one of you he capped told him you guys were cool.

  @Fireproof - scroll back. I already said it had nothing to do with BRV being Groucho's spouse.
• ★MΛΥΗΞΜ★ Jul 9, 2012

  Just curious what hat gmoneys wearing, kind of looks like pluto the dog. Either way I love the vids!
• Mystery Jul 9, 2012

  Apparently everyone reading this is too new to remember the Putz/Batel thing. Where's the Emoji for throwing up your hands in exasperation?
• El Devorador 👊🏻 Jul 9, 2012

  🙌
  This one maybe
• attrition Jul 9, 2012

  Yep, I capped a turf in Berlin that knocked someone out of that city. I exchanged several PMs and it seemed like I was forgiven. It was a favor anyway for someone -- not my wife.

  My wife is my alliance. I protect her in *real life* -- so it is only natural she would attempt to protect me here. It is not BS it is no different than any other alliance (such as the pile of crap you've assembled -- at least I know who and what I'm aligned with) and two is the smallest alliance one can really have.
• attrition Jul 9, 2012

  Now, if you are trying to justify what you are doing based on anything other than, "I've decided to become an asshole for a while." -- that's pretty disingenuous.

  So my wife is a bigger player, so I capped a single turf... No, none of that is the truth -- shovel that crap on someone else who might believe it.
• ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ Jul 9, 2012

  attrition wrote:

  Yep, I capped a turf in Berlin that knocked someone out of that city. I exchanged several PMs and it seemed like I was forgiven. It was a favor anyway for someone -- not my wife.

  My wife is my alliance. I protect her in *real life* -- so it is only natural she would attempt to protect me here. It is not BS it is no different than any other alliance (such as the pile of crap you've assembled -- at least I know who and what I'm aligned with) and two is the smallest alliance one can really have.
  

  So it is settled.
  You are alliance.

  Not sure why we had to go through all this just for you to say that.

  Or.. Are you now suggesting that alliance should not attack other members of an alliance?
• ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ Jul 9, 2012

  attrition wrote:

  Yep, I capped a turf in Berlin that knocked someone out of that city. I exchanged several PMs and it seemed like I was forgiven. It was a favor anyway for someone -- not my wife.

  My wife is my alliance. I protect her in *real life* -- so it is only natural she would attempt to protect me here. It is not BS it is no different than any other alliance (such as the pile of crap you've assembled -- at least I know who and what I'm aligned with) and two is the smallest alliance one can really have.
  

  Also, aren't you and your wife an alliance of two?

  So confused...but in a strange way starting to understand
• Fireproof™ Jul 9, 2012

  ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:

  attrition wrote:

  Yep, I capped a turf in Berlin that knocked someone out of that city. I exchanged several PMs and it seemed like I was forgiven. It was a favor anyway for someone -- not my wife.

  My wife is my alliance. I protect her in *real life* -- so it is only natural she would attempt to protect me here. It is not BS it is no different than any other alliance (such as the pile of crap you've assembled -- at least I know who and what I'm aligned with) and two is the smallest alliance one can really have.
  

  So it is settled.
  You are alliance.

  Not sure why we had to go through all this just for you to say that.

  Or.. Are you now suggesting that alliance should not attack other members of an alliance?
  

  Q.E.D.
• attrition Jul 9, 2012

  I actually don't care about what is happening anymore. So do what you like. I'm just pointing out the complete and utter bullshit in your "justifications" as I read through here. You think people believe your crap? Fantastic, it says a lot about you SM, and the people drinking your cool-aide.
• attrition Jul 9, 2012

  ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:

  attrition wrote:

  Yep, I capped a turf in Berlin that knocked someone out of that city. I exchanged several PMs and it seemed like I was forgiven. It was a favor anyway for someone -- not my wife.

  My wife is my alliance. I protect her in *real life* -- so it is only natural she would attempt to protect me here. It is not BS it is no different than any other alliance (such as the pile of crap you've assembled -- at least I know who and what I'm aligned with) and two is the smallest alliance one can really have.
  

  So it is settled.
  You are alliance.

  Not sure why we had to go through all this just for you to say that.

  Or.. Are you now suggesting that alliance should not attack other members of an alliance?
  

  Not sure why I have to spell out the bleedin' obvious for you to clue in -- but obviously, needed to be done.
• attrition Jul 9, 2012

  Fireproof™ wrote:

  ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:

  attrition wrote:

  Yep, I capped a turf in Berlin that knocked someone out of that city. I exchanged several PMs and it seemed like I was forgiven. It was a favor anyway for someone -- not my wife.

  My wife is my alliance. I protect her in *real life* -- so it is only natural she would attempt to protect me here. It is not BS it is no different than any other alliance (such as the pile of crap you've assembled -- at least I know who and what I'm aligned with) and two is the smallest alliance one can really have.
  

  So it is settled.
  You are alliance.

  Not sure why we had to go through all this just for you to say that.

  Or.. Are you now suggesting that alliance should not attack other members of an alliance?
  

  Q.E.D.

  We now understand the obvious -- QED? Haha
• ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ Jul 9, 2012

  attrition wrote:

  ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:

  attrition wrote:

  My wife is my alliance. I protect her in *real life* -- so it is only natural she would attempt to protect me here. It is not BS it is no different than any other alliance (such as the pile of crap you've assembled -- at least I know who and what I'm aligned with) and two is the smallest alliance one can really have.
  

  So it is settled.
  You are alliance.

  Not sure why we had to go through all this just for you to say that.

  Or.. Are you now suggesting that alliance should not attack other members of an alliance?
  

  Not sure why I have to spell out the bleedin' obvious for you to clue in -- but obviously, needed to be done.
  

  Umm ... It was your wife asking the question originally ... Not me..

  Making sooooo much sense now
• Mystery Jul 9, 2012

  See, I wouldn't have used the word alliance to describe us, but I'm thinking more in terms of normal Turf Wars alliances.
• attrition Jul 9, 2012

  Mystery wrote:

  See, I wouldn't have used the word alliance to describe us, but I'm thinking more in terms of normal Turf Wars alliances.
  

  You should probably stick to really small words from now on anyway. The difficulty in conveying the smallest concept to these guys is like pulling teeth.
• attrition Jul 9, 2012

  But because "[it makes] soooo much sense now" I guess we don't have to worry much longer. ;)
• attrition Jul 9, 2012

  It wasn't going where he intended it to.
• Account Closed Jul 9, 2012

  The thing that should worry everyone is the newest rumor that everyone on pal is talking about... Those poor saps in Michigan. Word is that Gmoney and Smoke are planning to cap everyone in Michigan until Demario resets. Talk about bullying... Comments from Smoke or Gmoney?
• onter™ Jul 9, 2012

  ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:

  Ϯℍㅌ📠ϮㅌʟㅌǤяᵃℙң wrote:

  The thing that should worry everyone is the newest rumor that everyone on pal is talking about... Those poor saps in Michigan. Word is that Gmoney and Smoke are planning to cap everyone in Michigan until Demario resets. Talk about bullying... Comments from Smoke or Gmoney?
  

  100% true.. The whole state should evacuate...

  Afterwards we will be capping every turf in the state of Hawaii followed by a small island in the middle of the Atlantic ocean
  

  Wtf!?😨
• ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ Jul 9, 2012

  🔥〽on⚡ter™🔥 wrote:

  ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:

  Ϯℍㅌ📠ϮㅌʟㅌǤяᵃℙң wrote:

  The thing that should worry everyone is the newest rumor that everyone on pal is talking about... Those poor saps in Michigan. Word is that Gmoney and Smoke are planning to cap everyone in Michigan until Demario resets. Talk about bullying... Comments from Smoke or Gmoney?
  

  100% true.. The whole state should evacuate...

  Afterwards we will be capping every turf in the state of Hawaii followed by a small island in the middle of the Atlantic ocean
  

  Wtf!?😨

  For sure... And maybe all of Indonesia following... Moved because poster made a new thread

Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC