Breaking News!!
Forums › General Discussion › Breaking News!!-
⌖🔥Groucho🔥⌖ wrote:
I'm just catching up from yesterday. Sorry to disappoint you, but that had nothing to do with her being your wife. It had to do with her starting a V on Belial & staying low inf so she couldn't be capped. At the time, it also looked more like a second account of yours rather than someone else playing.Mystery wrote: I have nothing to do with why others attack you. I think it's lame to go after someone's spouse that didn't do anything.
✂You wouldn't let her plant turf anywhere for months! Even the turf she built in Miami while traveling and trying to gain some income FAR away from you, you flattened on an almost daily basis, trying to get her to quit.✂
She planted plenty of turf. Her inf was too low to cap, so when exactly did I cap all her turf?
-
Thru👣Hiker wrote:
I didn't put words in anyone's mouth. I quoted what was said & asked a question - a question that wasn't answered.🔥SirTalkALot🔥 wrote:
"Our" means, in this case, Gmoney and whoever else was in the Vendetta with him, not necessarily SmokeMonster or any other particular person. So don't try to put words in other people's mouths.Mystery wrote:
Looks like one of you isnt telling the truth..(G Money) wrote:
You said he was the host of "our" V? Whose V? Flossin just said he was never in a V with him.🔥Ţąʝįķ☠Çąƥǫŋę™🔥 wrote:
Demario was the host of our v and was in talks to switch sides. ✂Oh and Smoke if Demario refused to create a v on hacksaw you should have moved on and created it yourself.
-
Thru👣Hiker wrote:
Sorry, my mistake. 😁Mystery wrote:
My comment was directed at the guy I quoted, not you.Thru👣Hiker wrote:
I didn't put words in anyone's mouth. I quoted what was said & asked a question - a question that wasn't answered.🔥SirTalkALot🔥 wrote:
Mystery wrote:
(G Money) wrote:
🔥Ţąʝįķ☠Çąƥǫŋę™🔥 wrote:
-
Demario wrote:
I don't know about your statement, I think that their gameplay is what this game needs and they have my respect! I'm pretty sure they have more friends then enemies on the map!Smoke and G, it seems you have a lot more enemies then I originally though. Maybe you should change your gameplay bro!! N
-
I will send you some popcorn Z. Might be a little old and moldy when you get it. Put a little maple syrup on it. Works on anything I hear. Smoke & G freinds of mine by the way. Met them in combat. Then we got to know eachother a bit.
-
El Cuñado wrote:
🙌🙌🙌👏👏👏🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸Viva El Groucho
-
Everyone just needs to grow up! I'm sick and tired of all you children squabbling, enough is enough or I'll call your parents!
-
gunnwr wrote:
Someone beat you to it... Look out!Everyone just needs to grow up! I'm sick and tired of all you children squabbling, enough is enough or I'll call your parents!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8nYG_sSJmc&feature=youtube_gdata_player
-
Get a job! 😜 haha
-
This ones the best yet. Get a job and stop playing video games. 😂😂😂
-
I remember a lot of public outcry when Putz went after Batel instead of Turf Warrior. What's the difference in this case (other than there are 2 people going after attrition instead - Flossin & GMoney)?
-
Mystery wrote:
I remember a lot of public outcry when Putz went after Batel instead of Turf Warrior. What's the difference in this case (other than there are 2 people going after attrition instead - Flossin & GMoney)?
Hmmm... I am not familiar with the case law that you are citing , however.. I would argue that in THAT case, the defendants mother was not informed of the situation...
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
-
YOU wrote:
Mystery wrote:
I remember a lot of public outcry when Putz went after Batel instead of Turf Warrior. What's the difference in this case (other than there are 2 people going after attrition instead - Flossin & GMoney)?
Hmmm... I am not familiar with the case law that you are citing , however.. I would argue that in THAT case, the defendants mother was not informed of the situation...
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
It appears we have submitted the wrong link... We are now submitting Exhibit A-2 as evidence to prove the first difference between these two cases...
Thanks for your consideration...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8nYG_sSJmc&sns=em
-
We would like to submit as further evidence of a "difference" in cases the following:
While some people would like to believe that "they" are the cause of such actions for whatever reason...
The truth is that this action has been in the works for months.. As the defendants whered capped out of Berlin when they were at the time smaller.
The recent events only served as a reminder of that situation...
Thanks for your consideration
-
You can't prove a "difference between the two cases" if you have no idea what I'm referring to.
If your "further evidence" is supposed to be directed at me, it doesn't make any sense. In the past, the only place place I've capped the 2 of you out of is Houston. I'm pretty sure attrition has never capped either of you.
-
Mystery wrote:
Are you pretty sure? or sure?You can't prove a "difference between the two cases" if you have no idea what I'm referring to.
If your "further evidence" is supposed to be directed at me, it doesn't make any sense. In the past, the only place place I've capped the 2 of you out of is Houston. I'm pretty sure attrition has never capped either of you.
Also, you ask what was "different"
I still maintain that
1) Putz mother did not know
2) That us planning to attack attrition in response to his unprovoked capping in Berlin also never happened in the previously cited case.If I am incorrect, I am sorry
-
Mystery wrote:
You can't prove a "difference between the two cases" if you have no idea what I'm referring to.
If your "further evidence" is supposed to be directed at me, it doesn't make any sense. In the past, the only place place I've capped the 2 of you out of is Houston. I'm pretty sure attrition has never capped either of you.
Instead of trying to settle this dispute in the forums, why don't you do it the old fashioned way. Use that "vendetta" button, it's what it's there for.
-
ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:
I would have to ask him to be sure, but he would have no reason to cap you out of Berlin. Unless you had a defensive penalty, Flossin, I know he would not have been able to cap you since late December/early Jan when you got your Brens & hench. I will certainly ask him if he did, but why don't you show me some ss as proof on Pal? Also - are you accusing him of capping you both out of Berlin?Mystery wrote: ✂
Also, you ask what was "different"
I still maintain that
1) Putz mother did not know
2) That us planning to attack attrition in response to his unprovoked capping in Berlin also never happened in the previously cited case.1) Putz's mother? Besides the fact that it's just silly to bring up something do irrelevant, are you saying 1 or both your mothers knew you were going to cap attrition? Aren't you guys supposed to be adults?
-
I have never said "both of us".
You are the one that lumped us together.
Please reread #2 above.
Putz Mother? Response: Yes
Both our mothers? I can only speak for mine as I had dinner with her two nights ago and showed her the video from GMoney's mom. I then showed her the forum and told her exactly that and more.Also, there are people reading this thread that know this to be true, because I sent them pictures from the dinner on PAL
Thanks for your consideration
-
★HΛVOC★ wrote:
Flossin's the one that brought this into the forum. There has been activity on the map as well.Mystery wrote:
You can't prove a "difference between the two cases" if you have no idea what I'm referring to.
If your "further evidence" is supposed to be directed at me, it doesn't make any sense. In the past, the only place place I've capped the 2 of you out of is Houston. I'm pretty sure attrition has never capped either of you.
Instead of trying to settle this dispute in the forums, why don't you do it the old fashioned way. Use that "vendetta" button, it's what it's there for.
-
Mystery wrote:
★HΛVOC★ wrote:
Flossin's the one that brought this into the forum. There has been activity on the map as well.Mystery wrote:
You can't prove a "difference between the two cases" if you have no idea what I'm referring to.
If your "further evidence" is supposed to be directed at me, it doesn't make any sense. In the past, the only place place I've capped the 2 of you out of is Houston. I'm pretty sure attrition has never capped either of you.
Instead of trying to settle this dispute in the forums, why don't you do it the old fashioned way. Use that "vendetta" button, it's what it's there for.
I have a feeling there will be more as well.
-
Anybody in here claim this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu1w9Lg0_EE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Kinda ramble, I expected better... I think
-
ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:
Obviously. You're clearly set up to remove attrition from Maryland. I hear GMoney's been working on California. I'm still waiting on that proof.Mystery wrote:
★HΛVOC★ wrote:
Flossin's the one that brought this into the forum. There has been activity on the map as well.Mystery wrote:
You can't prove a "difference between the two cases" if you have no idea what I'm referring to.
If your "further evidence" is supposed to be directed at me, it doesn't make any sense. In the past, the only place place I've capped the 2 of you out of is Houston. I'm pretty sure attrition has never capped either of you.
Instead of trying to settle this dispute in the forums, why don't you do it the old fashioned way.
I have a feeling there will be more as well.
-
Defense submits Exhibit B for your perusal.
I am not so sure why this is even being discussed when attrition does not care anyway. Her is a message that he sent to me...
attrition says:
I guess what is really hilarious is that I'm mostly retired from the game -- so it's not even clear what you hope to gain.
1 day agoDELETE REPLYAnd yes, your honor, you can verify that as well while researching the "Berlin Incident"
Thanks for your consideration
-
^ By proof I mean proof that he capped you and/or GMoney out of Berlin.
I looked at his turf list. He prefers to keep the turf he caps rather than tear them down. I couldn't find any turf from either of you.
-
Mystery wrote:
ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:
Obviously. You're clearly set up to remove attrition from Maryland. I hear GMoney's been working on California. I'm still waiting on that proof.Mystery wrote:
★HΛVOC★ wrote:
Flossin's the one that brought this into the forum. There has been activity on the map as well.Mystery wrote:
Instead of trying to settle this dispute in the forums, why don't you do it the old fashioned way.
I have a feeling there will be more as well.
I can verify that at the current time, 1 part of that is true
-
ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:
Where does that say he doesn't care at all? Saying he doesn't care is an assumption made on your part.Defense submits Exhibit B for your perusal.
I am not so sure why this is even being discussed when attrition does not care anyway. Her is a message that he sent to me...
attrition says:
I guess what is really hilarious is that I'm mostly retired from the game -- so it's not even clear what you hope to gain.
1 day agoDELETE REPLYAnd yes, your honor, you can verify that as well while researching the "Berlin Incident"
Thanks for your consideration
-
Mystery wrote:
You are correct. At least thinks it's "hilarious" and I have nothing to gain..ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:
Where does that say he doesn't care at all? Saying he doesn't care is an assumption made on your part.Defense submits Exhibit B for your perusal.
I am not so sure why this is even being discussed when attrition does not care anyway. Her is a message that he sent to me...
attrition says:
I guess what is really hilarious is that I'm mostly retired from the game -- so it's not even clear what you hope to gain.
1 day agoDELETE REPLYAnd yes, your honor, you can verify that as well while researching the "Berlin Incident"
Thanks for your consideration
So yes, not caring was my conclusion.
What is yours?
-
ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:
You know I saw you in Maryland; that's where I capped you. I do have a ss of GMoney with attrition's turf in DFW. I haven't looked to see if he's set up in Cali or not.Mystery wrote:
ϮђěՏϻօҡěℳօɲṩϮěℜ wrote:
Obviously. You're clearly set up to remove attrition from Maryland.✂Mystery wrote:
★HΛVOC★ wrote:
Flossin's the one that brought this into the forum. There has been activity on the map as well.Mystery wrote:
Instead of trying to settle this dispute in the forums, why don't you do it the old fashioned way.
I have a feeling there will be more as well.
I can verify that at the current time, 1 part of that is true
-
Since attrition is unable to speak for himself. I rest with the information I have provided. Which is much more than the prosecution.
Any further questions can directed to my counsel, The Ambassador or Syracuse, Mr. Free Mason.
Thanks for your consideration
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC