Let's Debate!
Forums › General Discussion › Let's Debate!-
Damn. Education is cool.
-
We had a good one yesterday don't ya think clone?😏
-
I don't believe in killing at all...Unless it is in self-defense or in the action of duty given by armed forces. So...Ofcourse, I believe it would be worth it to sacrifice one life for many....Unless that person is my one and only love. ❤
-
Yes it is.
It's stupid that anyone would think otherwise.
Let me get this straight.
If you die, we all live.
If you don't die, we all die anyways.
So either way your gonna die?
Then DIE.
Duhz. -
🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
He has a point. And to add a point, watch the short movie the bridge. It has a lot to do with this discussion. Well worth the 10 minutes.Yes it is.
It's stupid that anyone would think otherwise.
Let me get this straight.
If you die, we all live.
If you don't die, we all die anyways.
So either way your gonna die?
Then DIE.
Duhz. -
🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
Evidently, the people on the ferries in the dark knight were just mentally ill.Yes it is.
It's stupid that anyone would think otherwise.
Let me get this straight.
If you die, we all live.
If you don't die, we all die anyways.
So either way your gonna die?
Then DIE.
Duhz.Even the evil white hard ass couldn't turn the key.
Psh... Movies.
-
Μɽ ÐΩΩΜ™🔫🔴🌆 wrote:
Haha yes we didWe had a good one yesterday don't ya think clone?😏
-
So now that we seemed to all agree on this, let's change the topic. I liked that one that was posted earlier:
Is water a right or a commodity?
-
ང༐བℵཇ🔥💢👣 wrote:
Water is required for life. Life is an enumerated protected right. It is both.So now that we seemed to all agree on this, let's change the topic. I liked that one that was posted earlier:
Is water a right or a commodity?
-
Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:
👆thisང༐བℵཇ🔥💢👣 wrote:
Water is required for life. Life is an enumerated protected right. It is both.So now that we seemed to all agree on this, let's change the topic. I liked that one that was posted earlier:
Is water a right or a commodity?
-
👆👆in response to this..
Um really, rights get taken away every day. Just because you have the right to something doesnt mean it will be granted. You have the right to life, but someone could kill you. Therefore you don't have that right. You "say" you have a right to water, well water can be withheld from you. Again you no longer have that right. Someone please make a good argument for it being a right. -
Topic: Is it right to suck
People into a debate? -
🔥〽on⚡ter™🔥 wrote:
Is it right to not like this guy already?Topic: Is it right to suck
People into a debate? -
ང༐བℵཇ🔥💢👣 wrote:
It is right🔥〽on⚡ter™🔥 wrote:
Is it right to not like this guy already?Topic: Is it right to suck
People into a debate? -
There might be consequences but I have a right to do whatever I want.
-
The train is coming, your on track A, 200 friends, family and random people are on track B, you can reach the leaver to change the course of the train, you have 10 seconds, what do you do?
-
Hebrew Hitman wrote:
Dude, you know this idea is EXACTLY what the Nazis started with. Eugenics is widely regarded as extremely dangerous and immoral. The practice is illegal in many states around the world, including our own. With a name like yours, you might want to study a little history.And maybe those chimps are doing what's best for their species. Killing off a sick member could benefit the masses. I think we should adopt a similar aspect of that, like maybe not let special needs people procreate. Not kill them but not allow them to repopulate which could cause genetc mutations in our species.
-
Hebrew Hitman wrote:
Ummm, no. Absolutely wrong. Our founding documents are very clear on this. Rights in America are "endowed by our creator". It is absolutely impossible to have your rights removed.👆👆in response to this..
Um really, rights get taken away every day. Just because you have the right to something doesnt mean it will be granted. You have the right to life, but someone could kill you. Therefore you don't have that right. You "say" you have a right to water, well water can be withheld from you. Again you no longer have that right. Someone please make a good argument for it being a right.The fact that someone locks you up without water and kills you does not remove your right to life and liberty.
You go now. Study. Come back, ONE YEAR.
-
As with Christ. He was killed to save the whole. He had to be killed as he was to redeem His own.
-
Dirty Balls wrote:
Your argument is flawed from the jump. You define morality from your point of view and then base everything on your "fact".There are really two ways to view it, 1) Realistically and 2) Philosophically… I will use both as a tool to prove that it is indeed morally permissible to kill one innocent to save many innocent people.
-
Here's a better question.
Would you kill yourself for the good of a couple hundred people?
-
Brown note you continuously amaze me with ignorance. If its a right everyone should have it and no one should ever die of thirst. Also where in the declaration does it mention anything about water being a right? You need to take notes, formulate an agreement, read it out loud, the come back . You are a product your enviorent, step out of your bubble into the real world where people are suffering. Water is NOT a right! What if it stops raining? There goes your right to water and who ya gonna cry to about your rights to water. Remember the dust bowl? If not read up on it
-
The nazis were killing people that were not ethnically exactly like them. There is a huge difference in my statement and again Brown Note you show your ignorance. I am referring to people that unable to care for, it is morally irresponsible to allow them to have children. All that is gonnahappen is the child will be taken away and put up for adoption, probably with the same disorder as the parents. Just get the male snipped no big deal
-
Hebrew Hitman wrote:
...I am referring to people that unable to care for, it is morally irresponsible to allow them to have children. All that is gonnahappen is the child will be taken away and put up for adoption, probably with the same disorder as the parents. Just get the male snipped no big deal
Hebrew Hitman wrote:
Oh, you have a imperfection? Here let's get you snipped.... No big deal. Take two qaluuds and call the doc in the morning.✌The nazis were killing people that were not ethnically exactly like them. There is a huge difference in my statement and again Brown Note you show your ignorance. I am referring to people that unable to care for, it is morally irresponsible to allow them to have children. All that is gonnahappen is the child will be taken away and put up for adoption, probably with the same disorder as the parents. Just get the male snipped no big deal
-
The real question is, "why do we kill people, who kill people, to show that killing people is bad?"
-
YOU wrote:
Its the same as, "why is it, if i play hookie and get caught, i get sent home." WTF? What idiot teacher came up wit that rule!?The real question is, "why do we kill people, who kill people, to show that killing people is bad?"
-
Frosty :) I never said snip for an imperfection I said snip those who cannot take care of themselves.
Dark panther- you bring a good question to the table. I think we kill people that commit murder because it is generally well known that life is better than death. There are executions of course, but typically people would chose life over death as they should. So ending the life of a murderer is the only way for justice and it benefits the masses. -
Ok, Mr. Jewish Hitman. You're right. Jefferson made no mention of inalienable rights. Hell, I'm not even sure what that means. Must be just gibberish, because you say that concept is invalid.
And, yeah.. Sterilizing undesirables is not how the Nazis got started, you know... Undesirables like the mentally handicapped... Never happened. We are all mistaken. Eugenics applies only to ethnicity, you are right. Man, what was I thinking? I'm so glad you are here to set my ignorance straight.
What a tool.
-
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
(originally, the pursuit of happiness was the right to private property, but the former just sounds better.)
So by your argument, life is not a right, because we all die.
Liberty is not a right, because you can be locked up.
Unalienable means precicely: cannot be separated. These rights, (among others), cannot be taken from you. They are from God. That's what the thing says.
You say no. I guess they were all ignorant. If you say so.
-
The argument is about water being a right. Where in your argument do you prove that?? Also again you are ignorant to the aspect of humans rights not American rights. That piece of parchment means nothing any where else. I believe it also states owning another human being on that same piece of paper. Life is not a right we all share, because as you say rights can never be taken away. That is so bat shit crazy, rights are taken away by murders, accidents, natural disasters. Here is that same water as right example dumbed down hopefully you get it this time: let's say you kid wants to eat a candy bar but you deny your child that candy bar. You are denying his right for the persist of happiness, so as you take away that right does the child really have it?
Also there is no god do please don't include him in our fairy tale views here.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC