what came first? 🐔🍳?
Forums › General Discussion › what came first? 🐔🍳?-
What came first? The chicken, or the egg? 🐔 or 🍳?
-
The roster, because without the roster there would be no egg.
-
THE CHICKEN!!!!!!!!🐔🐔🐔🐔🐔🐔🐔🐔🐤🐤🐤🐔🐔🐔🐤🐤🐤🐔🐔🐔🐔🐔
-
Eggs were laid by dinosaurs before Chickens. So the first chicken came from an egg.
-
Eggs cause females have eggs and even plants do and they were before chickens
-
Hyena wrote:
Eggs were laid by dinosaurs before Chickens. So the first chicken came from an egg.
-
rojo2017 wrote:
The roster, because without the roster there would be no egg.
-
farticus wrote:
Without the egg there is no roster/chickenrojo2017 wrote:
The roster, because without the roster there would be no egg.
-
According to the theory of evolution, whatever laid the egg that the first chicken hatched out of was probably not a 100% chicken yet. It's offspring however was a chicken. So the egg came before the chicken
-
The egg cuz u hav them fer breakfast and chicken u hav fer dinner/lunch
-
farticus wrote:
This is one of the most stupid statements I've ever seen.rojo2017 wrote:
The roster, because without the roster there would be no egg.
-
Prove evolution with science first not psuedoscience so the chicken.
-
Carpenter wrote:
Well sorry I didn't take the question seriously enough.farticus wrote:
This is one of the most stupid statements I've ever seen.rojo2017 wrote:
The roster, because without the roster there would be no egg.
-
Fłtbürgęr3⃣8⃣™ wrote:
👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆The egg cuz u hav them fer breakfast and chicken u hav fer dinner/lunch
-
A roster is a list of people who are on a team. A rooster is a barnyard animal.
-
Chuck norris
-
This question is irrelevant. As birds evolved, there was no specific point where one species was suddenly dubbed "chicken", especially as they are today. Chickens have actually changed a lot through selective breeding from the animals they originated from in the wild.
Hey, fun fact: Did you know birds are dinosaurs? No joke! Which means I live with two of them....😳
-
OMGosh evolution is fake. There hasn't been any useful mutations found yet. Monkeys have a DNA of 94% the same as humans which have about 2 billion base pairs. They have 120 million base pairs. Monkeys haven't been around for that long, and don't reproduce multiple times per year. Out of 127 diffrent dating methods only 9 show millions of years, the rest thousands. The fossil record doesn't show organisms changing into new organisms. A few atoms turned into an organism, wouldn't my household items evolve to then if they are much more complex? Sorry for bad grammar.
-
C-Beazy wrote:
Also there seems to be a major lack in plausible links between the monkies and humans. Even Lucy was rejected.OMGosh evolution is fake. There hasn't been any useful mutations found yet. Monkeys have a DNA of 94% the same as humans which have about 2 billion base pairs. They have 120 million base pairs. Monkeys haven't been around for that long, and don't reproduce multiple times per year. Out of 127 diffrent dating methods only 9 show millions of years, the rest thousands. The fossil record doesn't show organisms changing into new organisms. A few atoms turned into an organism, wouldn't my household items evolve to then if they are much more complex? Sorry for bad grammar.
-
Forgot to say 120 million years. Also if scientists got set back 3 months creating synthetic life how does it pop into existence like that? Evolution is not real science. Since we've been making advances in scientific knowledge evolution has been increasingly improbable, and now impossible. Quit with this evo crap it's not science.
-
Add MajorFail wrote:
Bill Maher, you watch him lol science makes him look like a 2 year old.C-Beazy wrote:
Also there seems to be a major lack in plausible links between the monkies and humans. Even Lucy was rejected.OMGosh evolution is fake. There hasn't been any useful mutations found yet. Monkeys have a DNA of 94% the same as humans which have about 2 billion base pairs. They have 120 million base pairs. Monkeys haven't been around for that long, and don't reproduce multiple times per year. Out of 127 diffrent dating methods only 9 show millions of years, the rest thousands. The fossil record doesn't show organisms changing into new organisms. A few atoms turned into an organism, wouldn't my household items evolve to then if they are much more complex? Sorry for bad grammar.
-
Suprised no evo has said clean up your grammar then we can talk.
-
rojo2017 wrote:
ClearlyCarpenter wrote:
Well sorry I didn't take the question seriously enough.farticus wrote:
This is one of the most stupid statements I've ever seen.rojo2017 wrote:
The roster, because without the roster there would be no egg.
-
Hyena wrote:
So.... Would dinosaurs taste like chicken?Eggs were laid by dinosaurs before Chickens. So the first chicken came from an egg.
-
C-Beazy wrote:
Yes your household items would evolve... Example A: The Clock Radio... Evolution at its best.OMGosh evolution is fake. There hasn't been any useful mutations found yet. Monkeys have a DNA of 94% the same as humans which have about 2 billion base pairs. They have 120 million base pairs. Monkeys haven't been around for that long, and don't reproduce multiple times per year. Out of 127 diffrent dating methods only 9 show millions of years, the rest thousands. The fossil record doesn't show organisms changing into new organisms. A few atoms turned into an organism, wouldn't my household items evolve to then if they are much more complex? Sorry for bad grammar.
-
Hyena wrote:
No where Is that found in any serious research of microevolution.Eggs were laid by dinosaurs before Chickens. So the first chicken came from an egg.
It's same thing when asking the question; can the universe exist and not exist at the same time and the same way before man showed up? People don't have that ability to put themselves into existance neither can anything else.
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Ok guys. Surrender now.Hyena wrote:
No where Is that found in any serious research of microevolution.Eggs were laid by dinosaurs before Chickens. So the first chicken came from an egg.
It's same thing when asking the question; can the universe exist and not exist at the same time and the same way before man showed up? People don't have that ability to put themselves into existance neither can anything else.
This guy will just twist your words into something you don't mean at all. No point in arguing with him. -
You all really don't believe there is evidence for micro evolution?
-
Superyan wrote:
No the real reasons you cant argue with me is because all you ever had to offer is strawman and a bias disbelief in God that's it.For you it's not a matter of logic or facts₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Ok guys. Surrender now.Hyena wrote:
No where Is that found in any serious research of microevolution.Eggs were laid by dinosaurs before Chickens. So the first chicken came from an egg.
It's same thing when asking the question; can the universe exist and not exist at the same time and the same way before man showed up? People don't have that ability to put themselves into existance neither can anything else.
This guy will just twist your words into something you don't mean at all. No point in arguing with him. -
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
"if homosexuality is ok then so is pedophilia"Superyan wrote:
No the real reasons you cant argue with me is because all you ever had to offer is strawman and a bias disbelief in God that's it.For you it's not a matter of logic or facts₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Ok guys. Surrender now.Hyena wrote:
No where Is that found .Eggs were laid by dinosaurs before Chickens. So the first chicken came from an egg.
This guy will just twist your words into something you don't mean at all. No point in arguing with him.
Remember our last argument? You kept repeating that. You twist the words to something completely unrelated.Oh! Let's not forget that you try to talk in riddle to purposely confuse the person your arguing with. You don't make your argument clear at all.
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Does anyone argue against the fact that dinosaurs did layed eggs? So, to solve the initial question, the egg came first. No one specified if it was a chicken egg. Second, the theory of evolution has more facts closer to proving its theory exists as opposed to the theory that it was a *POOF* now there are humans situation.Hyena wrote:
No where Is that found in any serious research of microevolution.Eggs were laid by dinosaurs before Chickens. So the first chicken came from an egg.
It's same thing when asking the question; can the universe exist and not exist at the same time and the same way before man showed up? People don't have that ability to put themselves into existance neither can anything else.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC