Some Clarification
Forums › General Discussion › Some Clarification-
DRAMABOT 5000 wrote:
Why would you want to type in your ear?But nick has a gun against my head right now shouting type in my ear 😭🔫
-
I'm a little Vadan,
Hear me shout,
Here are my henchman,
That's what im on about,
When you make me angry,
I will let you knowwwww,
Even when I'm in the wrong,
I won't let it.... GO-O-O-O -
ʗℝ₳ℤㄚℝㅌⅆℕⅇʗҜ wrote:
Got any beer instead?📣Hot Dogs📣 📣Soda📣 who needs a hot dog?? Soda??
-
🔰Bཞuęℵǿཞ🔰 wrote:
LmaoI'm a little Vadan,
Hear me shout,
Here are my henchman,
That's what im on about,
When you make me angry,
I will let you knowwwww,
Even when I'm in the wrong,
I won't let it.... GO-O-O-O -
Danny MFC wrote:
Actually I used to believe B was the biggest whiner in the game as well.... until the last week. Even B didn't go on a week long whine about one topic, he just finds a few dozen to constantly cry about. At least there is variety with him. Realistically Vadan, this is a topic that should have been handled between you and the dev team, taking it to the public forum opens you up to all the ridicule you get. And Danny, a bit obvious where your head is... mate.DRAMABOT 5000 wrote:
Belial shut up mate your the biggest Wanker this forum has seen I think mate. Go make a thread crying about something you emotional wreck.Very clever. Don't mass with Danny. He's got the most sophisticated banter I've seen
-
Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Yet your example was completely unfounded and inaccurate.Λdོdོi wrote:
No, I was merely giving an example based on what you said. I made nothing public, Nick is the 1 who shouted exploit in public. Learn to read properly.FYI, Vadan, take responsibility for your own actions. You have made it very clear you expect that of Nick, well it's no less expected of you in his side of things I'm sure. You're the one that's made this a public free for all. H@voc is not to blame for your choices. Your off-base deflections are just rediculous to say the least.
-
Avvi and Vadan are the same people..... I thought
-
Λdོdོi wrote:
Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Yet your example was completely unfounded and inaccurate.Λdོdོi wrote:
No, I was merely giving an example based on what you said. I made nothing public, Nick is the 1 who shouted exploit in public. Learn to read properly.FYI, Vadan, take responsibility for your own actions. You have made it very clear you expect that of Nick, well it's no less expected of you in his side of things I'm sure. You're the one that's made this a public free for all. H@voc is not to blame for your choices. Your off-base deflections are just rediculous to say the least.
-
Danny MFC wrote:
I don't have to have my head up his ass moron. Any genius knows everyone starts with the same stats. This mob thing wasn't even available them. Range was based on inf. thanks for playing!Λdོdོi wrote:
Did he have your head up he's arse when he first downloaded the game? Lol take he's nuts out your mouth for 5minutes will ya!Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Exploit reset? Um no. You are assuming you know the reason whereas you guys were very clear about mob builder being your reason.Addi what you're basically saying is H@VOC shouldn't have been re-instated or allowed to play after his "exploit" reset either, because he also hurt the "integrity" of this game.
Come to .
Havoc never had low mob aside from when he first downloaded the game? Strange memory you got there.
-
randombloke wrote:
RoflTweek wrote:
So do you know when I get my 4k hench?This thread has clarified it for me.
Everyone else is wrong, and I am always right, just like I've always thought.
-
randombloke wrote:
Right after Vadan gets using them. Probably any day now at the rate things are going.Tweek wrote:
So do you know when I get my 4k hench?This thread has clarified it for me.
Everyone else is wrong, and I am always right, just like I've always thought.
-
Things are obviously getting heated beyond where I was expecting, so I'm gonna let you lot crack on with whatever you want to say. It's obvious the community is split between right and wrong. Thanks to everyone who supports my reasons for doing what I have. ✌
-
I've skimmed through this thread, but I'm not clear on the following point: did Vadan delete mob members for the sole purpose of using his strategy or did he reset for another reason and then adopted the strategy?
To me, there is a big difference because in the case of the former, it would be reasonable for Vadan to believe that what we are now calling an "exploit" was actually a valid strategy at the time. It seems unfair for him to take the risk of deleting his mob members only to have his plans stymied by an intervention of the developer. If I'm getting my facts straight, by leaving the exploitable mechanic in the game, nick must also accept part of the blame for what ultimately boils down to a miscommunication. Perhaps the best course of action would be to just reinstate Vadan's mob in full, correct the exploit, and try to compensate those who were affected by vadan's actions while he was over-powered. -
Robo37 wrote:
Im not stupid after all that's been said by the Nick I'm not jumping into any v.Smasher you may not have jumped into a vendetta yet but I'm sure you will at some point to "help a friend".
And as you all know it wasn't just vadan doing it so I think out of respect for nick it should stop now till them team work out what they can do to fix the problem. 👊 -
smasher35 wrote:
Agreed. I also appreciate you being honest enough to not use the exploit while the problem is being worked out. I am also still waiting for the answer to my question.Robo37 wrote:
Im not stupid after all that's been said by the Nick I'm not jumping into any v.Smasher you may not have jumped into a vendetta yet but I'm sure you will at some point to "help a friend".
And as you all know it wasn't just vadan doing it so I think out of respect for nick it should stop now till them team work out what they can do to fix the problem. 👊 -
smasher35 wrote:
Agreed. It's been obviously states as an exploit. If you can't be capped outside a v, I don't recommend anyone enter a v at this point.Robo37 wrote:
Im not stupid after all that's been said by the Nick I'm not jumping into any v.Smasher you may not have jumped into a vendetta yet but I'm sure you will at some point to "help a friend".
And as you all know it wasn't just vadan doing it so I think out of respect for nick it should stop now till them team work out what they can do to fix the problem. 👊 -
Λdོdོi wrote:
👍👍👍smasher35 wrote:
Agreed. It's been obviously states as an exploit. If you can't be capped outside a v, I don't recommend anyone enter a v at this point.Robo37 wrote:
Im not stupid after all that's been said by the Nick I'm not jumping into any v.Smasher you may not have jumped into a vendetta yet but I'm sure you will at some point to "help a friend".
And as you all know it wasn't just vadan doing it so I think out of respect for nick it should stop now till them team work out what they can do to fix the problem. 👊 -
Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
-
Ujustgotshanked wrote:
Nick didn't give it to him, he got it from loot missions.Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
He was thanking nick cause nick made the Missions have the chance for the loot. -
Ujustgotshanked wrote:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
-
Ujustgotshanked wrote:
I think you got shanked.Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
-
Carpenter wrote:
Excessive emoticons, buddy. I'll let it slide this time.Ujustgotshanked wrote:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
-
Thuggie🐻 add:TB wrote:
Haha😜😂😂😜😜😜👽👽👽😲Ujustgotshanked wrote:
I think you got shanked.Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
-
Ujustgotshanked wrote:
Not the sharpest shank in the sheath.Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
-
Death to emoticon guy: Killed by alien emoticon. Everybody run for your lives... Oh, wait, emoticons have no feet! Sorry!
-
🔥⌖saelo⌖🔥 wrote:
LmfaoUjustgotshanked wrote:
Not the sharpest shank in the sheath.Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
-
Ujustgotshanked wrote:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Carpenter wrote:
Excessive emoticons, buddy. I'll let it slide this time.Ujustgotshanked wrote:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
I'm sorry, but this was almost equally hilarious. -
🔥⌖saelo⌖🔥 wrote:
There have been duller. Dog eat kibble, shank stab shank.Ujustgotshanked wrote:
Not the sharpest shank in the sheath.Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
-
Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Yeah, I'll buy that for a $1, but only if by 'split' you meant TWFC on one side and everyone else on the other!! 😂😂😂Things are obviously getting heated beyond where I was expecting, so I'm gonna let you lot crack on with whatever you want to say. It's obvious the community is split between right and wrong. Thanks to everyone who supports my reasons for doing what I have. ✌
-
Carpenter wrote:
Phooey.Ujustgotshanked wrote:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Carpenter wrote:
Excessive emoticons, buddy. I'll let it slide this time.Ujustgotshanked wrote:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Nick, if you're so impartial to players, then how come I saw a thread titled, "Thanks, Nick" and the maker of the thread said that you gave him a liquor liscence, henchmen, etc.? Come on.
I'm sorry, but this was almost equally hilarious.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC