What to do about the PSI thing.
Forums › General Discussion › What to do about the PSI thing.-
I've spoke with psi recently and he wants me to help see what I can negotiate. So here it goes. First question for the players who have a issue with him. Name specifically what you want. Be clear and decisive. (note. If you can't take this seriously. Then I will start attacking you) im the negotiator here. Every side has a voice here. Anyone not willing to be reasonable and negotiate will have me to answer to. Got it? Now. Please state only valid concerns And or valid terms of a stand down from both sides.
-
His mule accounts need to be reset/destroyed. That will end this.
-
Putz wrote:
His mule accounts need to be reset/destroyed. That will end this.
-
Ok. That is a fair statement. Thanks for keeping it clean. The late great shake has convinced psi to drop all but psi and one other acct starting may 20th. I have yet to confirm this however. Perhaps psi can elaborate.
-
Yes, I will drop all but 2 accounts on may 20th, the day my honeymoon officially starts.
-
Thank you psi. Now what else can we hash out. Again. Only valid legit issues will be addressed here.
-
As a bystander that sounds like a fair compromise.
-
All or none.
-
See. Now we're all getting somewhere. Keep it civil as it is and we'll all be happy in no time.
-
Putz wrote:
His mule accounts need to be reset/destroyed. That will end this.
-
I am fine with him having only two accounts. There are countless others in the TW community who have two accounts. So long as those people do not mule the extra account then I have no issues.
-
As a bystander I would Say: Why should he be allowed 2 accounts? It's not fair. 1 account 1 player.
-
Putz wrote:
2 accounts I'd say is a fairly resonable compromise. Seeing as innevitably in the end psi will have alienated a good chunk of players (dispite a truce if we can agree to one). Having the 2 isn't that much different from having one good friend in TW. However. I'd agree somewhat that as long as a truce is met and both sides agree to it. I would assume that part of this deal would be never join a v with both Acts?All or none.
-
Natedogg wrote:
yes. As Long as the one and only advatage if any psi may hold is a bit more income.I am fine with him having only two accounts. There are countless others in the TW community who have two accounts. So long as those people do not mule the extra account then I have no issues.
-
davey boy wrote:
AgreedPutz wrote:
2 accounts I'd say is a fairly resonable compromise. Seeing as innevitably in the end psi will have alienated a good chunk of players (dispite a truce if we can agree to one). Having the 2 isn't that much different from having one good friend in TW. However. I'd agree somewhat that as long as a truce is met and both sides agree to it. I would assume that part of this deal would be never join a v with both Acts?All or none.
-
Another demand I have made in the past was for the player to tear down any captured truf from the area. This shows good faith on the part of the targeted. (because let's face it. You have to have done something innevitably to piss off that many players.) so that is is possible term. However this isn't up to me. It up to the areas he has affected.
-
I was never involved, but I guess I'll start.
Sometimes just go with the compromise, many players have two accounts. So there. He has two accounts deal with it... Sorry if I started helping "Negotiate" davey
-
Keep it clean and we can all get through this smoothly and easily.
-
So it will be psi and one other account, not psi and two other accounts? Please be clear.
Also, let's define mule:
1. Can't attack the same user with both accounts.
2. Can't build near each other to raise income level faster.
3. Can't be in a vendetta together or multiple vendettas against the same users (see#1)
4. Can't use the second account to defend against an attack to the other account or against a vendetta. -
p s i wrote:
Please don't reset these, leave these to be cappedYes, I will drop all but 2 accounts on may 20th, the day my honeymoon officially starts.
-
frankly, im tired of all the hugz n kisses. U want 5 accounts, then fight with 5 accounts and c what happens. everyone always wants to TALK it out. its a war game not real life.
once this is done then what. nothing. back to boring TALKING i get he doesnt want to get demolished, ok, cool. But AFTER the war.
-
ttt wrote:
I have invested in xtra iPods/iPhone exactly for the purpose of gaming, all but two touches have nothing on them with the exception of turf wars. I would have never started playing a game if I would have known this would have been such a problem. As u might guess, buying so many iPods/ phones is not a cheap ordeal and I think asking me to rid of all accounts is similiar to asking brown note to return the extra 1000 henchmen because most people playing the game can't afford to spend 1000's on a video game.As a bystander I would Say: Why should he be allowed 2 accounts? It's not fair. 1 account 1 player.
-
Can't build near each other??? That's ridiculous Putz. I agree with everything Nate and davey are saying 🔨👊💀
-
Yes, all this makes me a loser, but I've accepted this 😺
-
I don't have an issue with number 2. Generating income with a second account is fine by me. This is really no different than if I were to ask a friend to come and drop a couple turf in my neighborhood. That would also boost the income of any other mobster in the area so I don't see this as a threat.
-
DoN✯DriZZy wrote:
I'm not neciasrrily trying to prevent a war. Simply trying to clean it up and keep It fair for everyone. Everyone here is a real person behind the player. I treat everyone as such. Psi is trying to meet a happy medium. Let's give it a chance. Good can come out of bad.frankly, im tired of all the hugz n kisses. U want 5 accounts, then fight with 5 accounts and c what happens. everyone always wants to TALK it out. its a war game not real life.
once this is done then what. nothing. back to boring TALKING i get he doesnt want to get demolished, ok, cool. But AFTER the war.
-
Natedogg wrote:
Until they are cappedI don't have an issue with number 2. Generating income with a second account is fine by me. This is really no different than if I were to ask a friend to come and drop a couple turf in my neighborhood. That would also boost the income of any other mobster in the area so I don't see this as a threat.
-
Putz wrote:
a little too much to ask for putz. Were all working to meet a happy ground. Let's see if we can all give and take.So it will be psi and one other account, not psi and two other accounts? Please be clear.
Also, let's define mule:
1. Can't attack the same user with both accounts.
2. Can't build near each other to raise income level faster.
3. Can't be in a vendetta together or multiple vendettas against the same users (see#1)
4. Can't use the second account to defend against an attack to the other account or against a vendetta. -
YOU wrote:
So it will be psi and one other account, not psi and two other accounts? Please be clear.
Also, let's define mule:
1. Can't attack the same user with both accounts.
2. Can't build near each other to raise income level faster.
3. Can't be in a vendetta together or multiple vendettas against the same users (see#1)
4. Can't use the second account to defend against an attack to the other account or against a vendetta. -
The rules for restricting extra accounts should be limited to rules of engagement. You can't use them in tandem for attacking or defending. This rule should apply to everyone and not only PSI.
-
Natedogg wrote:
exactly.I don't have an issue with number 2. Generating income with a second account is fine by me. This is really no different than if I were to ask a friend to come and drop a couple turf in my neighborhood. That would also boost the income of any other mobster in the area so I don't see this as a threat.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC