What to do about the PSI thing.
Forums › General Discussion › What to do about the PSI thing.-
davey boy wrote:
Then remove#2Putz wrote:
a little too much to ask for putz. Were all working to meet a happy ground. Let's see if we can all give and take.So it will be psi and one other account, not psi and two other accounts? Please be clear.
Also, let's define mule:
1. Can't attack the same user with both accounts.
2. Can't build near each other to raise income level faster.
3. Can't be in a vendetta together or multiple vendettas against the same users (see#1)
4. Can't use the second account to defend against an attack to the other account or against a vendetta. -
Natedogg wrote:
I concur.The rules for restricting extra accounts should be limited to rules of engagement. You can't use them in tandem for attacking or defending. This rule should apply to everyone and not only PSI.
-
Also, this problem stems mainly from a lack of clarification on the subject. Once we all agree on the use of extra accounts, they should b posted and enforced by the entire TW community. Nick can't b expected to catch all rule breakers by himself. We should begin to police ourselves.
-
no i know davey. but everytime a war starts some ppl want to TALK it out. Why even have a war game if this is going to happen every single time. We had a huge war here in Texas and you didn't see any of us wanting to talk it out. we fought till the end. just dont understand its a game so lets play the game .
everyone runs their mouth and starts shit then wants to call timeout when someone starts to do something about it. i don't get it
-
Nates making sense and I agree with him
-
Natedogg wrote:
how do I do this? Do I just ignore the fact that somebody is screwing with my other account? I think it contradicts human nature.The rules for restricting extra accounts should be limited to rules of engagement. You can't use them in tandem for attacking or defending. This rule should apply to everyone and not only PSI.
-
DoN✯DriZZy wrote:
I never negotiated with thug in this manner. He was too far gone. Psi still has a legit voice. Let's see what he has to say.no i know davey. but everytime a war starts some ppl want to TALK it out. Why even have a war game if this is going to happen every single time. We had a huge war here in Texas and you didn't see any of us wanting to talk it out. we fought till the end. just dont understand its a game so lets play the game .
everyone runs their mouth and starts shit then wants to call timeout when someone starts to do something about it. i don't get it
-
Putz wrote:
this sounds better. Thoughts psi?davey boy wrote:
Then remove#2Putz wrote:
a little too much to ask for putz. Were all working to meet a happy ground. Let's see if we can all give and take.So it will be psi and one other account, not psi and two other accounts? Please be clear.
Also, let's define mule:
1. Can't attack the same user with both accounts.
2. Can't build near each other to raise income level faster.
3. Can't be in a vendetta together or multiple vendettas against the same users (see#1)
4. Can't use the second account to defend against an attack to the other account or against a vendetta. -
You would socialize, build relationships and call friends to your defense
-
All wars are governed by rules of engagement and so should TW. There is a wright and a wrong way to go about it. My only request is that the mouthing be kept to a minimum and if a gentleman's agreement cannot be reached. Then let's strap it on!
-
p s i wrote:
Treat them as separate entities. I you don't see this is the main issue at hand, then well never compromise.Natedogg wrote:
how do I do this? Do I just ignore the fact that somebody is screwing with my other account? I think it contradicts human nature.The rules for restricting extra accounts should be limited to rules of engagement. You can't use them in tandem for attacking or defending. This rule should apply to everyone and not only PSI.
-
I think a mule is an account that is used by the main account to better the other one without regard for the original account. I think we should ask Nick personally. Actually I think the only one I 100% agree with in the list is #2, LoL. I will gladly spread my accounts out. But if somebody comes after one account they will come after both. I am only one person.
-
Natedogg wrote:
spot on. If we can't reach a agreement. Then we shall simply agree to dissagree. The CMS, ECS, GC3, and the rest of our Divisions are ready for anything. However I agree with Nate. Let's keep the personal beef out of it. Some smack talk is always ok. But Mentioning anything from real life in a game like this becomes a problem.All wars are governed by rules of engagement and so should TW. There is a wright and a wrong way to go about it. My only request is that the mouthing be kept to a minimum and if a gentleman's agreement cannot be reached. Then let's strap it on!
-
p s i wrote:
I'd love to see Nicks thoughts here.I think a mule is an account that is used by the main account to better the other one without regard for the original account. I think we should ask Nick personally. Actually I think the only one I 100% agree with in the list is #2, LoL. I will gladly spread my accounts out. But if somebody comes after one account they will come after both. I am only one person.
-
PSI, the spirit of the game, I believe, is to recreate a moblike society. I don't know any mobsters who can multiply themselves and fight as one person. You should have to rely on relationships built with other mobsters to achieve your goals.
-
Natedogg wrote:
but nate, its not so easy. For example, if we get attacked by lets say china, then china says oh wait lets talk it out....are you fkn kidding me? No, you started something finish it. Talking is done BEFORE a war, not once you realize you fucked up.All wars are governed by rules of engagement and so should TW. There is a wright and a wrong way to go about it. My only request is that the mouthing be kept to a minimum and if a gentleman's agreement cannot be reached. Then let's strap it on!
if PSI gives up, and declares this, and follow the rules, then i suppose it would be the end of this war. But until then, until he officially gives up then why stop? Especially one He started. You can't go around calling people names and judging people, using a bunch of accounts to your advantage, then when someone starts to take care of it you ask for a timeout? doesn't work that way.
-
Update:
psi will only have the primary psi account and 1 other account.
Also, let's define mule:
1. Can't attack the same user and/or turfs with both accounts.
2. Can't capture turfs or attack the secondary account with the primary account and visa versa.
3. Can't be in a vendetta together or multiple vendettas against the same users (see#1)
4. Can't use the second account to defend against an attack to the other account or against a vendetta or visa versatile. -
davey boy wrote:
Me too. He chimes in on topics with no relevance at all. Nick, your thoughts would be both welcomed and benefitial here. 👊🔨💀p s i wrote:
I'd love to see Nicks thoughts here.I think a mule is an account that is used by the main account to better the other one without regard for the original account. I think we should ask Nick personally. Actually I think the only one I 100% agree with in the list is #2, LoL. I will gladly spread my accounts out. But if somebody comes after one account they will come after both. I am only one person.
-
Natedogg wrote:
exactly. As don said. Working and co-ordinating with players is alot of time and work. However hitting from 2 accounts. One never happens to miss a ER visit or hitts can be super organized were I had to call someone to do something close. And their not always home. So Nates point is valid. Relasionships made are up to you. However one made with yourself can't realy be called a relashiohship now can it.PSI, the spirit of the game, I believe, is to recreate a moblike society. I don't know any mobsters who can multiply themselves and fight as one person. You should have to rely on relationships built with other mobsters to achieve your goals.
-
davey boy wrote:
the opposite is also true as well though. For the record I have plenty of friends in this game. The vendettas I have been declaring lately aren't 100% me btw.Natedogg wrote:
exactly. As don said. Working and co-ordinating with players is alot of time and work. However hitting from 2 accounts. One never happens to miss a ER visit or hitts can be super organized were I had to call someone to do something close. And their not always home. So Nates point is valid. Relasionships made are up to you. However one made with yourself can't realy be called a relashiohship now can it.PSI, the spirit of the game, I believe, is to recreate a moblike society. I don't know any mobsters who can multiply themselves and fight as one person. You should have to rely on relationships built with other mobsters to achieve your goals.
-
Drizzy, I agree with you 100%. Obviously, I don't know exactly what happened between you and PSI. If he started a war with you them so be it. Do what you have to do. My rules of engagement comment was aimed more at personal conduct before, during and after the battle. Let's face it, there were some things said in the forums that NEVER should have been said. 👊🔨💀
-
just stop making excuses.
are you or are you not giving up?
are you or are you not going to follow the guidlines we wish for??
-
Natedogg wrote:
thanks for your post Nate. Couldent agree more. Well I'm off to eat dinner. Don't wait up for me. But I'll be back in a few. Keep it clean fellas. I know everyones heart is in the right place. Especially you drizzy and putz. You 2 seem to have the biggest issues. I repect you both. And Nate is 100% on the rules of conduct/engagement. Be back later.Drizzy, I agree with you 100%. Obviously, I don't know exactly what happened between you and PSI. If he started a war with you them so be it. Do what you have to do. My rules of engagement comment was aimed more at personal conduct before, during and after the battle. Let's face it, there were some things said in the forums that NEVER should have been said. 👊🔨💀
-
DoN✯DriZZy wrote:
I gave up a long time ago Don. And I thought we hashed this out the other day? How did I 'start' this war? I placed turfs in Texas after asking magna's explicit permission (and getting it), got on a 10 hour flight, got to my destination only to find all my turfs taken by u.just stop making excuses.
are you or are you not giving up?
are you or are you not going to follow the guidlines we wish for??
-
ttt wrote:
As a bystander I would Say: Why should he be allowed 2 accounts? It's not fair. 1 account 1 player.
-
PSI. Im not saying that you dont have relationships or use your accounts purely for a vendetta or other advantage. What i am saying is that even if Nick says its OK, ( and that would be a purely financial decision on his part) it is still against the true spirit of this game which is to find OTHERS to side with you to accomplish a task or set of tasks. 👊🔨💀
-
And playing with others is much more fun than playing with yourself! Lol 👊🔨💀
-
21st street muscle wrote:
21 u are the furthest thing from a bystander.ttt wrote:
As a bystander I would Say: Why should he be allowed 2 accounts? It's not fair. 1 account 1 player.
-
Idc if I'm not a "bystander". I don't think this war is done at all you started it we should be able to Finnish it unless you delete your multiples and reset
-
That would be a proper surrender
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC