United World
Forums › General Discussion › United World-
You guys know how much easier the whole world would be if we where just one huge nation? We would have a standard currency for the whole world, we could eliminate wars over territory because there are no territory lines, and there would be a lot less nukes going off because they're weapons of MASS destruction so we'd wipe out inocent people if we did set off nukes unless a huge area was rebelling or something. It's far fetched and basically an impossible idea but we can dream can't we?
-
Mormon Mobster wrote:
You do understand that only 1 I guess you could say "group" would be able to rule the world? People would fight, bicker and possible kill to get a chance like that.You guys know how much easier the whole world would be if we where just one huge nation? We would have a standard currency for the whole world, we could eliminate wars over territory because there are no territory lines, and there would be a lot less nukes going off because they're weapons of MASS destruction so we'd wipe out inocent people if we did set off nukes unless a huge area was rebelling or something. It's far fetched and basically an impossible idea but we can dream can't we?
-
Well if we had a rep from each region we could have multiple of rulers
-
And who would you proper run this? Not the UN they can't accomplish anything. So either America or China? No thanks!
-
*propose
-
I think each region would hold a election kinda like we do for our presidents and that group could work in conjunction with eachother
-
Mormon Mobster wrote:
I'm not talking about religion, that you will not be able to settle between Muslims Christians, Buddhists ect...Well if we had a rep from each region we could have multiple of rulers
Only one could rule, and only the powerful would have a chance at that, there would be assassinations everyday! That and this one group or person could order deaths, food, land, people, anything and have no one tell him or her otherwise. It would be a dictatorship. -
Just the dozens of civil wars over cultural differences.
-
Mormon Mobster wrote:
Trust me, that will never happen. Ever.I think each region would hold a election kinda like we do for our presidents and that group could work in conjunction with eachother
-
Don't people doe every day anyway???
-
mccoy17 wrote:
What?Don't people doe every day anyway???
-
If it turned out to be a dictatorship then the people could just kick them out, like we did to pres nixon. And there would be lots of reps, like at least 15. The world would have 2 be pretty screwed up for the leaders of all the regions to want to kill all those who oppose them
-
Mormon Mobster wrote:
If it turned out to be a dictatorship then the people could just kick them out, like we did to pres nixon. And there would be lots of reps, like at least 15. The world would have 2 be pretty screwed up for the leaders of all the regions to want to kill all those who oppose them
I really hoping this is an attempt to troll... If not... Well I would be very sad to know where our educational system is going.
-
Mormon Mobster wrote:
That's easier said than done. You can't just go up to a dictator and say, "We don't like you get out" you would be placed in front of a firing squad before you had a chance to speak. Also what does Nixon have to do with a dictatorship?If it turned out to be a dictatorship then the people could just kick them out, like we did to pres nixon. And there would be lots of reps, like at least 15. The world would have 2 be pretty screwed up for the leaders of all the regions to want to kill all those who oppose them
-
Mormon Mobster wrote:
Also, the Muslims want to kill the JewsIf it turned out to be a dictatorship then the people could just kick them out, like we did to pres nixon. And there would be lots of reps, like at least 15. The world would have 2 be pretty screwed up for the leaders of all the regions to want to kill all those who oppose them
Death meter:1The Jews want to get rid of the Muslims
Death meter:2
The Christians want to get rid of the atheists
Death meter: 3
And so on in so forth.
No one will get along. And bringing all of them together will make things worse.
-
YOU wrote:
And I just read your full comment. And let me be the first person to tell you if no one has already. This world is screwed up. People will kill for power, money, woman, houses, drugs. All most anything.Mormon Mobster wrote:
Also, the Muslims want to kill the JewsIf it turned out to be a dictatorship then the people could just kick them out, like we did to pres nixon. And there would be lots of reps, like at least 15. The world would have 2 be pretty screwed up for the leaders of all the regions to want to kill all those who oppose them
Death meter:1The Jews want to get rid of the Muslims
Death meter:2
The Christians want to get rid of the atheists
Death meter: 3
And so on in so forth.
No one will get along. And bringing all of them together will make things worse.
-
You would need people to set aside their differences and a very charismatic leader come along. You may get your leader but people will never give up religion and their beliefs.
-
The Inspector. wrote:
Wht would we bring the religions together? I said REGIONS not religionsMormon Mobster wrote:
Also, the Muslims want to kill the JewsIf it turned out to be a dictatorship then the people could just kick them out, like we did to pres nixon. And there would be lots of reps, like at least 15. The world would have 2 be pretty screwed up for the leaders of all the regions to want to kill all those who oppose them
Death meter:1The Jews want to get rid of the Muslims
Death meter:2
The Christians want to get rid of the atheists
Death meter: 3
And so on in so forth.
No one will get along. And bringing all of them together will make things worse.
-
The Inspector. wrote:
The people would control their leaders like the US does their presidents. And if the dictator wanted all those people killed he'd have to make the army kill their own people and i honestly dont think they'd kill their ownMormon Mobster wrote:
That's easier said than done. You can't just go up to a dictator and say, "We don't like you get out" you would be placed in front of a firing squad before you had a chance to speak. Also what does Nixon have to do with a dictatorship?If it turned out to be a dictatorship then the people could just kick them out, like we did to pres nixon. And there would be lots of reps, like at least 15. The world would have 2 be pretty screwed up for the leaders of all the regions to want to kill all those who oppose them
-
Your going to have to do both. You can't just bring in different regions, each region has a faith, and if you thought skin color or race would be a troubling arguement among some, then you have a hole thing coming.
-
It's doable but you time and people need to change. But the bigger question is who do we entrust the power to. Can you answer this question for I you can't then your idea wouldn't mean nothing unless everyone can agree on who is in charge and everyone stops trying to kill each other over petty disputes.
-
Damien Dayne wrote:
I agreeYou would need people to set aside their differences and a very charismatic leader come along. You may get your leader but people will never give up religion and their beliefs.
-
Mormon Mobster wrote:
Stallin ring a bell? How about Mao Tse-Tung? Do those names remind you of anything?The Inspector. wrote:
The people would control their leaders like the US does their presidents. And if the dictator wanted all those people killed he'd have to make the army kill their own people and i honestly dont think they'd kill their ownMormon Mobster wrote:
That's easier said than done. You can't just go up to a dictator and say, "We don't like you get out" you would be placed in front of a firingIf it turned out to be a dictatorship then the people could just kick them out, like we did to pres nixon. And there would be lots of reps, like at least 15. The world would have 2 be pretty screwed up for the leaders of all the regions to want to kill all those who oppose them
-
How about Fidel Castro? Ever heard of him?
-
Damien Dayne wrote:
Well i honestly havent thought about it that much i just had the idea. Maybe its not possible. Maybe the worlds too far goneIt's doable but you time and people need to change. But the bigger question is who do we entrust the power to. Can you answer this question for I you can't then your idea wouldn't mean nothing unless everyone can agree on who is in charge and everyone stops trying to kill each other over petty disputes.
-
The Inspector. wrote:
Yes i've heard of these dictators but im saying why would the whole world each elect a tyrrant like those dictators?How about Fidel Castro? Ever heard of him?
-
Mormon Mobster wrote:
We all wish that the world was a better place. But your not the only one who wanted a national currency and world. Dictators from around the world dream of this, a perfect chance to change the world into his or her(never seen a female dictator before) image. Own the world, have the power to have anything you want, do anything you want, kill anyone you want. I'm afraid of people who think this should be the way, if that does happen, then all of us will be doomed, once in power, always in power.Damien Dayne wrote:
Well i honestly havent thought about it that much i just had the idea. Maybe its not possible. Maybe the worlds too far goneIt's doable but you time and people need to change. But the bigger question is who do we entrust the power to. Can you answer this question for I you
-
Mormon Mobster wrote:
Voting can be rigged, people can be bribed, or competition can be eliminated. It's all about controll, if you have the money, then you can basically make yourself king, promise the world that you will give them money riches anything. And then do whatever you please.The Inspector. wrote:
Yes i've heard of these dictators but im saying why would the whole world each elect a tyrrant like those dictators?How about Fidel Castro? Ever heard of him?
-
If u want a united world u better learn Chinese or mandarin
-
Candyman77 wrote:
Well there goes 2 years of Latin down the drain.If u want a united world u better learn Chinese or mandarin
-
The Inspector. wrote:
K here's what i think your point is, correct me if i'm wrong. Each region(say there's 15 regions) would all hold an election & each one of those regions would vote in a tyrrant who wants nothing but to rule the world. If anybody objected, he would make the military turn on their own people & kill them. That doesnt sound practical to meMormon Mobster wrote:
Voting can be rigged, people can be bribed, or competition can be eliminated. It's all about controll, if you have the money, then you can basically make yourself king, promise the world that you will give them money riches anything. And then do whatever you please.The Inspector. wrote:
Yes i've heard of these dictators but im saying why would the whole world each elect a tyrrant like those dictators?How about Fidel Castro? Ever heard of him?
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC