Romney wins Iowa caucus by 8 votes.
Forums › General Discussion › Romney wins Iowa caucus by 8 votes.-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
How is it illogical? In this time frame it causes less harm than hetterosexuality which is to ble for our gross overpopulation. I see absolutely nothing wrong with people doing practices that doesn't further strain our Ecco systemAmish Hitman wrote:
Homosexuality is illogical. Advocate heterosexuality.₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Wow your ignorance is bliss. It was Christians who changed the idea of marriage. Read up on the Theodosian Code. Before then it was a regular practice and acceptance for same sex marriage⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
I'm quite sure for different reasons than homos today. Why not advocate heterosexuality?The chinese and the American Indians both had ceremonies for same sex marriage. Saying otherwise doesn't make it true
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
That is inaccurate info. It is very harmful to society shown In reports. Overgrown population? So you also support population reduction too huh... Homosexuality is illogical because a man and a woman are created perfectly for relations. What school did you go to to teach you opposite to facts?₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
How is it illogical? In this time frame it that doesn't further strain our Ecco systemAmish Hitman wrote:
Homosexuality is illogical. Advocate heterosexuality.₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
e⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
I'm quite sure for different reasons than homos today. Why not advocate heterosexuality?marriage. Saying otherwise doesn't make it true
-
Heterosexuallity relations have failed in the past therefore continue the ruin of this chain with homosexuality? I don't understand your logic, why not defend true and wholesome heterosexuality if it be possible to help benefit society?
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Correlation? There is no correlation in nature of two males having the ability to repoduce and the SPECIAL qualities both a man and woman need to carry on nourishment. So you are in favor of this standard to men marrying little boys?₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
You're sick for even seeing a correlation. Two consenting adults by nature should have rights.⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Delittle boys who also love them? Hmm?₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
I'm quite sure for different reasons than homos today. Why not advocate heterosexuality? By your marrying little boys is right and lawful...ceremonies for same sex marriage. Saying otherwise doesn't make it true
-
Once again if reproduction is the only quakigying element to a relationship then you support fertility tests before marriage?
-
By saying that you don't understand a difference between consenting adults and child molestation shows how disgusting you are. Go seek professional help
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
I can say its wrong. I'm just refuting your circular irrational thinking on the topic. You sure can't say it is molestation because that would be demonization of those rights of those individuals who want intergenerational marriage.... Exposure.By saying that you don't understand a difference between consenting adults and child molestation shows how disgusting you are. Go seek professional help
-
Wow Augustine. Just wow. You are the reason I receive so much grief for being a Christian.
I read through like page 5. Belial excellent job debating. Unfortunately, calling them on their emotional argument fallacies isn't going to cut it with some people. The great thing is, you can't reach them, but their are some people reading silently that can be reached.
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
It isn't the only element... But yes it's a "common sense". Anus isn't made for sex... I'm sorry buddy if you disagree...Once again if reproduction is the only quakigying element to a relationship then you support fertility tests before marriage?
-
Λdོdོi wrote:
Have you not read the inconsistency of his reasoning? I don't think you read much.Wow Augustine. Just wow. You are the reason I receive so much grief for being a Christian.
I read through like page 5. Belial excellent job debating. Unfortunately, calling them on their emotional argument fallacies isn't going to cut it with some people. The great thing is, you can't reach them, but their are some people reading silently that can be reached.
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
All of the sudden you sound like me when I show how homosexuality is wrong.... Hmm your standard of consensus doesn't validate a incorrect behavior....By saying that you don't understand a difference between consenting adults and child molestation shows how disgusting you are. Go seek professional help
-
There's no inconsistency tiny reasoning. You said it was unnatural. I proved otherwise. You have yet to make a single argument other than its wrong because you know it is
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
How is a relationship between two consenting adults in any way shape or form molestation? Do you understand the deffinition of molestation?⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
I can say its wrong. I'm just refuting your circular irrational thinking on the topic. You sure can't say it is molestation because that would be demonization of those rights of those individuals who want intergenerational marriage.... Exposure.By saying that you don't understand a difference between consenting adults and child molestation shows how disgusting you are. Go seek professional help
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Augustine, Addi is exactly right. No one in history has ever gotten saved because they lost an argument. Don't be hostile- Jesus wasn't hostile. Belial, you seem very solid in what you believe, and while I certainly don't agree with it, I do have some respect for it. No one here's going to be convinced of anything, so just give it a rest already. There are more important things to focus time and energy on.Λdོdོi wrote:
Have you not read the inconsistency of his reasoning? I don't think you read much.Wow Augustine. Just wow. You are the reason I receive so much grief for being a Christian.
I read through like page 5. Belial excellent job debating. Unfortunately, calling them on their emotional argument fallacies isn't going to cut it with some people. The great thing is, you can't reach them, but their are some people reading silently that can be reached.
-
The 12th Doctor wrote:
Hey I'm just exposing the inconsistency of this type of reasoning... sadly to see that assuming that there are Christians who go to church, I don't see enough men stepping up to defend wholesome values.₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Augustine, Addi is exactly right. No one in history has ever gotten saved because they lost an argument. Don't be hostile- Jesus wasn't hostile. Belial, you seem very solid in what you believe, and while I certainly don't agree with it, I do have some respect for itΛdོdོi wrote:
Have you not read the inconsistency of his reasoning? I don't think you read much.Wow Augustine. Just wow. You are the reason I receive so much grief for being a Christian.
I re
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
I don't think I said such. Will you advocate the rights of those who want to marry children? You don't like the question because it uses the same standard your using but not in agreement with... so what ever you consider to be correct is correct even its illogical. stop calling it molestation because that isn't the same with what i'm talking about.₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
How is a relationship between two consenting adults in any way shape or form molestation? Do you understand the deffinition of molestation?⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
I can say its wrong. I'm just refuting your circular irrational thinking on the Exposure.By saying that you don't understand a difference between consenting adults and child molestation shows how disgusting you are. Go seek professional help
-
It uses a different standard. I'm talking consenting adults. You're not
-
So now you not only say that homosexuals are illogical but that they are unwholesome. What a sad way to think. I see hetero couples make more of a mockery of marriage than gay people.
-
Amish Hitman wrote:
So now you not only say that homosexuals are illogical but that they are unwholesome. What a sad way to think. I see hetero couples make more of a mockery of marriage than gay people.
-
🌵cactus97🌵 wrote:
No way neverThe closest Iowa🌵 cactus 🌵ever
But can he win the republican nomination or even become a 🌵cactus??🌵? -
Amish Hitman wrote:
I didn't say they were unwholesome. I see homosexuals and homosexual supporters as mockery to heterosexualsSo now you not only say that homosexuals are illogical but that they are unwholesome. What a sad way to think. I see hetero couples make more of a mockery of marriage than gay people.
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
How are they wanting equal rights a mockery?Amish Hitman wrote:
I didn't say they were unwholesome. I see homosexuals and homosexual supporters as mockery to heterosexualsSo now you not only say that homosexuals are illogical but that they are unwholesome. What a sad way to think. I see hetero couples make more of a mockery of marriage than gay people.
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Yes I am. so your standard is they have to be "adults" and they must be "same sex" in order to be "consensus"- So someone who wants the freedom to have intergenerational marriage- you wont support them because first one or both aren't "adult" or assumed that both aren't consensual?It uses a different standard. I'm talking consenting adults. You're not
-
⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
because it opposes the natural rights of Heterosexuality. People like you don't want homosexual rights, you want uber rights to change the definition of marriage and suppress heterosexuality. its a learned behavior wants that wants rights to suppress anothers₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
How are they wanting equal rights a mockery?Amish Hitman wrote:
I didn't say they were unwholesome. I see homosexuals and homosexual supporters as mockery to heterosexualsSo now you not only say that homosexuals are illogical but that they are unwholesome. What a sad way to think. I see hetero couples make more of a mockery of marriage than gay people.
-
It doesn't oppose the natual rights of anyone or affect Heteros in any way. A group of people just want to have what everyone else has. That's all
-
How is anyone trying in any to repress heterosexuality? That just fear mongering
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
The 12th Doctor wrote:
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Like it or not, it's not about debating. You're trying to fix a symptom of a much greater problem, and you're forgetting the love of Jesus. Arguing theology and morals isn't going to get anywhere unless you focus on showing that love first.
Hey I'm just exposing the inconsistency of this type of reasoning... sadly to see that assuming that there are Christians who go to church, I don't see enough men stepping up to defend wholesome values.
-
₳ʉ₲ʉṣϮḭ₦ê (₳ⓑ€) wrote:
Legally you technically can't have sex until the age of 18. I see no reason this should change.⌖🔥Belial🔥⌖ wrote:
Yes I am. so your standard is they have to be "adults" and they must be "same sex" in order to be "consensus"- So someone who wants the freedom to have intergenerational marriage- you wont support them because first one or both aren't "adult" or assumed that both aren't consensual?It uses a different standard. I'm talking consenting adults. You're not
-
I don't understand how someone having rights affects your own in any way
-
Superyan wrote:
This. I don't think I've seen a more fucked up individual on these forums then him.I fear people like Augustine tbh.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC