What sport do u play???
Forums › General Discussion › What sport do u play???-
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
I won't need a vendetta to take down your accounts. But I'm sure I wouldn have any trouble gathering supper if I wanted to go that route.
And you do know you cannot use your other accounts in a vendetta together, right?
I'm not. Look at the four vendettas.
-
DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
-
Scroobius Pip wrote:
but then it would be a whole different sport. It wouldn't automobile racing, it would be automatic racing.DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
-
Scroobius Pip wrote:
Exactly. A sport should depend only minimaly on the avaliable technology. While vasebats have improved over the years, corking u'r bat is still illegal.DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
-
YOU wrote:
Scroobius Pip wrote:
but then it would be a whole different sport. It wouldn't automobile racing, it would be automatic racing.DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
-
DarthPenatrator wrote:
Where do you draw the line though?Scroobius Pip wrote:
but then it would be a whole different sport. It wouldn't automobile racing, it would be automatic racing.DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
-
Scroobius Pip wrote:
it shouldn't be a sport if there is no skill involved. That's whereDarthPenatrator wrote:
Where do you draw the line though?Scroobius Pip wrote:
but then it would be a whole different sport. It wouldn't automobile racing, it would be automatic racing.DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
I would draw the Lind. -
Lind=line
stupid auto correct
-
DarthPenatrator wrote:
There's skill in Turf WarsScroobius Pip wrote:
it shouldn't be a sport if there is no skill involved. That's whereDarthPenatrator wrote:
Where do you draw the line though?Scroobius Pip wrote:
but then it would be a whole different sport. It wouldn't automobile racing, it would be automatic racing.DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
I would draw the Lind. -
Scroobius Pip wrote:
DarthPenatrator wrote:
There's skill in Turf WarsScroobius Pip wrote:
it shouldn't be a sport if there is no skill involved. That's whereDarthPenatrator wrote:
Where do you draw the line though?Scroobius Pip wrote:
but then it would be a whole different sport. It wouldn't automobile racing, it would be automatic racing.DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
I would draw the Lind.yay, turf wars is a sport!
-
p s i wrote:
1) Riding a dirtbike in circles is certainly not a sport either (to answer u'r Missy glove comment).
Your ignorance knows no bounds. You should educate yourself on the subject matter at hand before engaging in debate.
Missy Giove does not ride in circles, nor does she ride a dirtbike.
-
She is professional competitive mountain bike racer. Downhill, cross country and slalom.
There are sanctioning bodies (IMBA, NORBA) that set the rules and organize the events. There is a start and finish line. Points, money and medals/trophies are awarded. There are winners and losers.
There are penalties imposed for unfair play. There are national and international rankings.
Physical ability such as strength and stamina are required. Especially cardio. Skill is also required. When to pass, block, attack, choosing the right line amongst treacherous obstacles...and knowledge of the equipment.
The above definition does not define which phisical attributes are required, only that "the physical capabilities and skills of the competitor when determining the outcome (winning or losing). " and "The physical activity involves the movement of people, animals and/or a variety of objects such as balls and machines."
-
p s i wrote:
The physical capabilities of auto-racing are null. Stephan Hawking would probably make a fine driver if the technology were avaliable.
Auto racing meets all the same rquirements-organization, rules, awards for winning, penalties for cheating...
Physical ability to operate and control the equipment. Ask a physics professor what it might take to handle 4000 pounds of mass at 180 mph on 30 degrees of banking for 3-5 hours at a time. All the while dealing with 140 degree heat. And no breaks. Most sports get a break or rest period every 15-20 minutes. NASCAR and cross country racing are all about endurance and skill.
When to pit or stay out, 2 tires or four? Or fuel only. How much fuel? Suspension adjustments...
Not to mention your going 180 mph with less than two inches seperating you from the cars in front of, beside and behind you.
-
Scroobius Pip wrote:
DarthPenatrator wrote:
There's skill in Turf WarsScroobius Pipwrote:
it shouldn't be a sport if there is no skill involved. That's whereDarthPenatrator wrote:
Where do you draw the line though?Scroobius Pip wrote:
but then it would be a whole different sport. It wouldn't automobile racing, it would be automatic racing.DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
I would draw the Lind.There is.
And come June, we will see which is better-book smart or street smart.
Don't get too attached to your turf there, p s i a l p h a o m e g a z e t a g a m m a
-
Scroobius Pip wrote:
DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
Minimal skill is still skill. How much skill is involved in basketball? Marathon running?
-
Cone to think of it, "booksmart"
is quite an outdated term nowadays, given that many booksmart people get most of their information from wikipedia -
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
I mean a negligible amount of skill. Like the skill involved in doing missions in Turf WarsScroobius Pip wrote:
DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
Minimal skill is still skill. How much skill is involved in basketball? Marathon running?
-
Ya know what's really funny? The last place driver in last year's NASCAR season made more money in those 36 weeks than p s i did in his entire lifetime.
And all he did was drive in circles.
-
p s i wrote:
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
I won't need a vendetta to take down your accounts. But I'm sure I wouldn have any trouble gathering supper if I wanted to go that route.
And you do know you cannot use your other accounts in a vendetta together, right?
I'm not. Look at the four vendettas.
I just wanted to acknowledge this.
-
I am curious though...of the four vendettas, do any of them have a common target? Because that would be one hell of an exploit. Instead of utilizing three acounts together, you can use the four accounts to have 12 players, as opposed to three, attacking a single target.
Man...I'm really looking forward to this. I love a challenge.
-
Scroobius Pip wrote:
DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
The more technology you put into something, the greater the skill required to manipulate it. And there will always at least be some physical requirement.
The diminishing needs likely will be athletic abilities.
-
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
Ah yes. That's why it's easier to do long division with a pen and paper than with a calculator. If computers are developed that are better at driving than people, then the level of skill required by the driver will be reducedScroobius Pip wrote:
DarthPenatrator wrote:
What if the technology became so advanced that it required minimal skill or knowledge?☝☝☝☝☝☝
steven hawking would require the skill and knowledge to use the technology.
The more technology you put into something, the greater the skill required to manipulate it. And there will always at least be some physical requirement.
The diminishing needs likely will be athletic abilities.
-
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
they all have the same target.I am curious though...of the four vendettas, do any of them have a common target? Because that would be one hell of an exploit. Instead of utilizing three acounts together, you can use the four accounts to have 12 players, as opposed to three, attacking a single target.
Man...I'm really looking forward to this. I love a challenge.
-
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
that's just sad don't u think? So does Jenna Jameson :(Ya know what's really funny? The last place driver in last year's NASCAR season made more money in those 36 weeks than p s i did in his entire lifetime.
And all he did was drive in circles.
-
Something we can agree on. Educators in this country are grossly underpaid. Especially in the public sector.
-
I don't know if I can wait until June. I've only got about 230 miles to hop. Maybe I'll take in a few sights along the way.
-
???????
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC