Quantum mechanics. 🔫🔫©
Forums › General Discussion › Quantum mechanics. 🔫🔫©-
This game, your cell phone, computer, and any electronic device you've ever used is the result of quantum mechanics. A whole century of technical progress (and terror, e.g. the atom bomb) sprang out of seemingly mundane research into how an object radiates heat in a vacuum.
Basic research ain't all that exciting at first glance, but then again it's not a breakthrough if you saw it coming.
SCIENCE. It works, bitches.
-
i understand that lol but this is what seems like nonsense to me:
Guns wrote:
yes basic quantum mechanics is responsible for me typing this message but why do we need to know if theres a multiverse or a non-universe? thats what gets me. if the entire universe is a black hole, or if the universe can really implode and destroy us all, or whatever, what can we do to prevent it? nothing.Universe or multiverse? Either way wouldn't there need to be a non-verse or multi-non-verse? If there is oneverse or a universe there would have to be an opposite. Correct? 🔫🔫©
however we can call our families and say our last goodbye from our quantum mechanics phones. -
nick wrote:
This game, your cell phone, computer, and any electronic device you've ever used is the result of quantum mechanics. A whole century of technical progress (and terror, e.g. the atom bomb) sprang out of seemingly mundane research into how an object radiates heat in a vacuum.
Basic research ain't all that exciting at first glance, but then again it's not a breakthrough if you saw it coming.
SCIENCE. It works, bitches.
String theory has no application. Not no way, not no how.
Quantum mechanics, yes.
Let's not confuse the two.
-
Brown🎵Note🇺🇸🐔🔫 wrote:
Depends. Nothing has come out of it yet – maybe something will, maybe it won't.String theory has no application. Not no way, not no how.
Quantum mechanics, yes.
Let's not confuse the two.
General Relativity, which for 60 years only had practical interest for theoretical physicists, was required to build a reliable GPS system – which we all use now.
-
nick wrote:
...Also to put Trident MIRVs on target with time-space based navigation. Go science! Relativity and quantum mechanics has always been of interest to create military applications, such as GPS, designed for the nuclear triad. Sure, we can all use it now... But it wasn't until 2000 that civilians had full access to GPS.Brown🎵Note🇺🇸🐔🔫 wrote:
Depends. Nothing has come out of it yet – maybe something will, maybe it won't.String theory has no application. Not no way, not no how.
Quantum mechanics, yes.
Let's not confuse the two.
General Relativity, which for 60 years only had practical interest for theoretical physicists, was required to build a reliable GPS system – which we all use now.
I like medical research. I think we can already effectively destroy any targets any where. Let's divert our energies.
-
nick wrote:
Plus e=mc2 was just disproved because tgere are oarticles( ghost particles) that travel faster than speed of light. Also @ the ' big bang' there were particles that were faster than light. The collider nachine and yes mri, gps, infra red, micro wave and radio have changed everything from satellites to popcorn. Nerd all u want lads, not out fault ur naiveBrown🎵Note🇺🇸🐔🔫 wrote:
Depends. Nothing has come out of it yet – maybe something will, maybe it won't.String theory has no application. Not no way, not no how.
Quantum mechanics, yes.
Let's not confuse the two.
General Relativity, which for 60 years only had practical interest for theoretical physicists, was required to build a reliable GPS system – which we all use now.
-
Hey BF! (There was a superhero!)
You are embarrassing yourself. First, E=mc^2 itself was not "disproven". It has nothing to do with the speed of light being the "limit". Special relativity says that matter, energy, or information DO NOT exceed the speed of light from a single inertial reference point. The rest of your post is incoherent. Something about EM radiation on popcorn.
Special relativity has NOT been disproven, and CERN is working to find logical explanations for their unexpected test results.
-
This might be a little to heavy for GD, but: while it's true that the curve representing acceleration toward c is asymptotic (faster you go, more energy is required, ad infinitum), remember that symmetry still obtains. the same asymptotic curve lives happily on the OTHER side of c, which means that any theoretical particle that travels faster than light needs LESS energy to accelerate. Einstein had no problem with this. It doesn't harm relativity at all.
-
Brown🎵Note🇺🇸🐔🔫 wrote:
0 turf 0 mob dude, u prob google ur shit neway, atleast mk ultra has sum substance... And i wasnt regerring to relativity as much as substanciating nicks comment on ur other worthless comment... And regardless of one typo i think my ladt comment actually made sense to normal firward thinking people u ultra-nooOoobHey BF! (There was a superhero!)
You are embarrassing yourself. First, E=mc^2 itself was not "disproven". It has nothing to do with the speed of light being the "limit". Special relativity says that matter, energy, or information DO NOT exceed the speed of light from a single inertial reference point. The rest of your post is incoherent. Something about EM radiation on popcorn.
Special relativity has NOT been disproven, and CERN is working to find logical explanations for their unexpected test results.
-
the border fox wrote:
Brown note has been on this game longer than you and he has 1 mob because of a reset. By the looks of things he probably knows more than you do.Brown🎵Note🇺🇸🐔🔫 wrote:
0 turf 0 mob dude, u prob google ur shit neway, atleast mk ultra has sum substance... And i wasnt regerring to relativity as much as substanciating nicks comment on ur other worthless comment... And regardless of one typo i think my ladt comment actually made sense to normal firward thinking people u ultra-nooOoobHey BF! (There was a superhero!)
You are embarrassing yourself. First, E=mc^2 itself was not "disproven". It has nothing to do with the speed of light being the "limit". Special relativity says that matter, energy, or information DO NOT exceed the speed
-
Knowledge is interesting. Maybe Plato and Socrates were right. Not just about knowledge but the physical world in which we live. 🔫🔫©
-
☢PεtεΤhεβrαvε☢ wrote:
Fair dues my mistakethe border fox wrote:
Brown note has been on this game longer than you and he has 1 mob because of a reset. By the looks of things he probably knows more than you do.Brown🎵Note🇺🇸🐔🔫 wrote:
0 turf 0 mob dude, u prob google ur shit neway, atleast mk ultra has sum substance... And i wasnt regerring to relativity as much as substanciating nicks comment on ur other worthless comment... And regardless of one typo i think my ladt comment actually made sense to normal firward thinking people u ultra-nooOoobHey BF! (There was a superhero!)
You are embarrassing yourself. First, E=mc^2 itself was not "disproven". It has nothing to do with the speed of light being the "limit". Special relativity says that matter, energy, or information DO NOT exceed the speed
-
MK💉Ultra wrote:
Theoretically. 😄This might be a little to heavy for GD, but: while it's true that the curve representing acceleration toward c is asymptotic (faster you go, more energy is required, ad infinitum), remember that symmetry still obtains. the same asymptotic curve lives happily on the OTHER side of c, which means that any theoretical particle that travels faster than light needs LESS energy to accelerate. Einstein had no problem with this. It doesn't harm relativity at all.
-
I find it interesting that even Hawking has changed is mind, saying that trying to find a grand unifying theory is a waste of time.
My favorite argument is that the ever more complex mathematical approximations of reality are just that. Layers of approximation that are increasingly inaccurate. Adding numerous dimensions (as in string theory) in order to rectify general relativity and quantum mechanics, I believe is moving us further from understanding what the true nature of matter/energy and space/time.
Occam's razor.
-
I do have first hand experience with the military application of general relativity, and quantum mechanics. I was typing in crypto every Saturday night for our exclusive P code in GPS when it was new.
I provided nanosecond accurate time from atomic clocks that I maintained to sub launched balistic missiles, which would breach our atmosphere, find a star, and know where it's target was in 3D space relative to that star at that moment in time.
If a MIRV was to hit a pitcher's mound, the accuracy was the infield.
1. I am less than thrilled with the primary application of these technologies.
2. I do not have to Google this information.
3. STFU.
-
What be dis gooogle? 🔫🔫©
-
irridescent✨ wrote:
Idiot.either way its all bull to me. we'll never fully understand a universe we cant see all of, much less a multiverse or a non-verse or anything else. even if we did what would change in our world because of it? what could we do about our new knowledge? besides waste government funding on stuff that could be used for education or AIDS research or something else more useful.
*shrug* just saying. its interesting to think about but its not going to change anything.
-
RENO🌵 wrote:
Harsh.irridescent✨ wrote:
Idiot.either way its all bull to me. we'll never fully understand a universe we cant see all of, much less a multiverse or a non-verse or anything else. even if we did what would change in our world because of it? what could we do about our new knowledge? besides waste government funding on stuff that could be used for education or AIDS research or something else more useful.
*shrug* just saying. its interesting to think about but its not going to change anything.
-
Brown🎵Note🇺🇸🐔🔫 wrote:
Sorry bn i just thought by ur hostility u were quite young, would love to learn some things from u if u dont mind sparing ur time?I do have first hand experience with the military application of general relativity, and quantum mechanics. I was typing in crypto every Saturday night for our exclusive P code in GPS when it was new.
I provided nanosecond accurate time from atomic clocks that I maintained to sub launched balistic missiles, which would breach our atmosphere, find a star, and know where it's target was in 3D space relative to that star at that moment in time.
If a MIRV was to hit a pitcher's mound, the accuracy was the infield.
1. I am less than thrilled with the primary application of these technologies.
2. I do not have to Google this information.
3. STFU.
-
the border fox wrote:
I just like to argue. 😄Brown🎵Note🇺🇸🐔🔫 wrote:
Sorry bn i just thought by ur hostility u were quite young, would love to learn some things from u if u dont mind sparing ur time?I do have first hand experience with the military application of general relativity, and quantum mechanics. I was typing in crypto every Saturday night for our exclusive P code in GPS when it was new.
I provided nanosecond accurate time from atomic clocks that I maintained to sub launched balistic missiles, which would breach our atmosphere, find a star, and know where it's target was in 3D space relative to that star at that moment in time.
If a MIRV was to hit a pitcher's mound, the accuracy was the infield.
1. I am less than thrilled with the primary application of these technologies.
2. I do not have to Google this information.
3. STFU.
-
I would say debate not argue. There is no denying Brown is a Master Debater. 🔫🔫©
-
Guns wrote:
And a cunning linguist.I would say debate not argue. There is no denying Brown is a Master Debater. 🔫🔫©
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC