How can a mob with 400 members and no turfs have any fun?
Forums › General Discussion › How can a mob with 400 members and no turfs have any fun?-
It must be boring. I notice a mob called noobsmasher who has just started a V against me with H@voc is in this category... Weird huh!
-
✪иэЋцмь฿дѕтдя₫ wrote:
Well what's the point of playing if it isn't fun? To not mob up, do missions or lay turfs and just sit around creating vendettas for Havov must be really boring.You are assuming the purpose of the account is to have fun. That likely is a false assumption.
-
Missy Jane wrote:
Leaves them plenty of time to socialize no?✪иэЋцмь฿дѕтдя₫ wrote:
Well what's the point of playing if it isn't fun? To not mob up, do missions or lay turfs and just sit around creating vendettas for Havov must be really boring.You are assuming the purpose of the account is to have fun. That likely is a false assumption.
-
✙Baron✙ wrote:
This is just missy way of crying about a v started on her.Missy Jane wrote:
Leaves them plenty of time to socialize no?✪иэЋцмь฿дѕтдя₫ wrote:
Well what's the point of playing if it isn't fun? To not mob up, do missions or lay turfs and just sit around creating vendettas for Havov must be really boring.You are assuming the purpose of the account is to have fun. That likely is a false assumption.
You ever think it's really fun for this player t help smash vets lyk you :) -
Interesting eh. Ohhh now Missy. I've seen a bunch of these lil Cats dat start these Vs. They don't lay turf (Less some1 is farming them). They don't mob up. No matter how many months they have been playing. They don't run missions. They only start Vs. And what's so ironic they always heal. It's just trippy 2 say da least. Every1 dats been around knows what I'm saying but I bet their punk azzes won't comment here. If it was any1 else they'd all be yacking up a fit. Just my thought of da day. Well good luck Missy. I know U ain't gonna let no Adler piss in Ur wheates. Huh. ✌out TW Cats. Hehe. Haha. Lol.
-
DAS HYENA wrote:
Yup, Nothing new here....Interesting eh. Ohhh now Missy. I've seen a bunch of these lil Cats dat start these Vs. They don't lay turf (Less some1 is farming them). They don't mob up. No matter how many months they have been playing. They don't run missions. They only start Vs. And what's so ironic they always heal. It's just trippy 2 say da least. Every1 dats been around knows what I'm saying but I bet their punk azzes won't comment here. If it was any1 else they'd all be yacking up a fit. Just my thought of da day. Well good luck Missy. I know U ain't gonna let no Adler piss in Ur wheates. Huh. ✌out TW Cats. Hehe. Haha. Lol.
-
DAS HYENA wrote:
Stating th obvious, clearly crying about a mule but come on missy evry1 has had a v on them off one, I hav had 3 on me in th last week and one still live now. Get ova it.Interesting eh. Ohhh now Missy. I've seen a bunch of these lil Cats dat start these Vs. They don't lay turf (Less some1 is farming them). They don't mob up. No matter how many months they have been playing. They don't run missions. They only start Vs. And what's so ironic they always heal. It's just trippy 2 say da least. Every1 dats been around knows what I'm saying but I bet their punk azzes won't comment here. If it was any1 else they'd all be yacking up a fit. Just my thought of da day. Well good luck Missy. I know U ain't gonna let no Adler piss in Ur wheates. Huh. ✌out TW Cats. Hehe. Haha. Lol.
Oh and they don't really need t heal das. -
Das - i certaintly won't let anyone piss in my wheats...rofl
-
I feel for you Missy ( or for that matter any one else who's ever been in such a situation) unfortunately, in this game, it's innocent until proven guilty And MORE importantly decided by the gods. (which can be itself a load of fun trying to do)
Having been in a similar situation myself, there are loads of characters that lack integrity in this game (or for that matter in life) & sure it's a game but there's no need to look elsewhere if one gets into trouble in RL. Where in the world do we get the Bernie Madoff, Martha Stewart or Kenneth Lay, to name a few. Thing is they get rich still even after their supposed penalty.
Oh well, enjoy what's thrown at you anyway & that's what matters. Now go kick some booty!
-
I am completely against mules. They degrade the integrity of the game. It seems that most people have one too. I don't know what makes it so hard to fight someone without one. Worst case scenario, have someone else start the vendetta for you, mule problem eliminated. If nobody will start a vendetta for you, then hit your target with the Kansas City shuffle. Make them think that you are going to hit them somewhere, or let them know even. Prepare the area in which the imminent attack is obvious, just as if you really are gonna hit there. Then, hit them from the other side of the world. If somebody feels that mules are necessary, please feel free to voice your opinion here. I'm interested in your twisted failure of logic.
-
DAS HYENA wrote:
Poor Alfred, he must be rolling over in his grave right now....I know U ain't gonna let no Adler piss in Ur wheates...
Here is one for you Missy: "Exaggerated sensitiveness is an expression of the feeling of inferiority."
-- Alfred Adler. -
mimosa wrote:
Maybe you should start another post on Adlers ideas on homosexuality and feminism. Let's see how much you really agree with this mans ideas and if you can argue them true?DAS HYENA wrote:
Poor Alfred, he must be rolling over in his grave right now....I know U ain't gonna let no Adler piss in Ur wheates...
Here is one for you Missy: "Exaggerated sensitiveness is an expression of the feeling of inferiority."
-- Alfred Adler. -
Alfred Adler the psychotherapist? Wow, forum's all erudite today. Rock on.
-
Missy Jane wrote:
A thread on psychology and social feeling, wouldn't that be a hit on the forum. No, thank you, I am not touching this one, even if contrary of what you may think I do agree with most of his ideas.mimosa wrote:
Maybe you should start another post on Adlers ideas on homosexuality and feminism. Let's see how much you really agree with this mans ideas and if you can argue them true?DAS HYENA wrote:
Poor Alfred, he must be rolling over in his grave right now....I know U ain't gonna let no Adler piss in Ur wheates...
Here is one for you Missy: "Exaggerated sensitiveness is an expression of the feeling of inferiority."
-- Alfred Adler. -
Tweek wrote:
If its not against tos it'a no problem. So as long as the alt isn't havocs then theres no Actual cheating. Every side including yours uses them missy. Havoc had such a targeting in Sydney last week and No one bothered to say a thing.I am completely against mules. They degrade the integrity of the game. It seems that most people have one too.
And tweek. By nicks own words alternate acct are perfectly legal. Unless the player is actuall helping its owner then it's fully legal
-
Tweek wrote:
First off the definition of mule is a second account that is being used to create turf for a primary acct. thus allowing one to bypass limit.If somebody feels that mules are necessary, please feel free to voice your opinion here. I'm interested in your twisted failure of logic.
What you're referring to in this case is an alternate acct or alt for short. Now alts are nowhere against the rules. Providing of course its on a second device and providing that it isn't used in vendettas with the same players acct. Necessary for the game? Probably not. But they aren't necessarily wrong either
-
B, the TOS states that multiple accounts may not be used in a manner detrimental to another player or fair gameplay. Someone using an "alt" (as you call it) to start a vendetta on someone else, especially if that alt serves no purpose other than starting vendettas, be it from yourself or an ally, is both detrimental to another player and fair gameplay. To make the fact sadder, these "alts" usually have a low enough level, mob, influence, or a combination of the three to prevent them from being capped, allowing them to remain in whatever area they want with no repercussion. This is also unfair gameplay. The fact that the simplicity and directness of this rule is so often ignored amd misinterpreted astounds me, and I think that anyone who violates it needs to take a step away from the game for a while, by choice or not.
-
I cannot think of a way that an alt account would not violate the TOS, unless it is strictly made for finding bugs, or works completely independent and different than the account from which it originated (which never will happen). I have just stated why "alts" are wrong. I will wait for a proper rebuttal, but I'm not going to expect one other than "everybody does it" or "I have to or else I can't do anything" because that's all I ever seem to get in response when I bring up the subject.
-
Huh - I don't have mules, in fact I have only ever been in a V twice ( that I remember). Once against schulzie a long long time ago and once a few months ago with Dotore in Manchester for 10 minutes. So get ur facts right before acusing me of using mules. And also I never accused you of this. All I said was it must be boring for em. You seem to have accused yourself of it though. 💔💔💔
-
Tweek wrote:
From nicks own mouth second accounts are a mainstay in mmos. And in and of themselves are not against the rulesB, the TOS states that multiple accounts may not be used in a manner detrimental to another player or fair gameplay. Someone using an "alt" (as you call it) to start a vendetta on someone else, especially if that alt serves no purpose other than starting vendettas, be it from yourself or an ally, is both detrimental to another player and fair gameplay. To make the fact sadder, these "alts" usually have a low enough level, mob, influence, or a combination of the three to prevent them from being capped, allowing them to remain in whatever area they want with no repercussion. This is also unfair gameplay. The fact that the simplicity and directness of this rule is so often ignored amd misinterpreted astounds me, and I think that anyone who violates it needs to take a step away from the game for a while, by choice or not.
-
We have your hearsay, or we have what it says exactly in the TOS.
-
Missy Jane wrote:
How about your chipsDas - i certaintly won't let anyone piss in my wheats...rofl
-
Tweek wrote:
Heresay? Hmm. BblWe have your hearsay, or we have what it says exactly in the TOS.
-
💔💔💔
-
I'm with Tweek on this point - one account per person (not per device) is fairest approach. People do things with a second account that they would not do with their first & main account - so how is that fair play? It's like birthing a second child purely to harvest its organs for your firstborn (immoral & unethical IMHO). SAY NO TO MULES, KIDS!
-
http://turfwarsapp.com/login?redir=http%3A%2F%2Fturfwarsapp.com%2Fforum%2F43%2F1735531%2F2%2F
-
Fluke wrote:
We all end up with a second device at one time or another. To say you must trash that device is a little ridiculousI'm with Tweek on this point - one account per person (not per device) is fairest approach. People do things with a second account that they would not do with their first & main account - so how is that fair play? It's like birthing a second child purely to harvest its organs for your firstborn (immoral & unethical IMHO). SAY NO TO MULES, KIDS!
-
👿߀ŁîÅŁ wrote:
Trash the device???? Bit strong.Fluke wrote:
We all end up with a second device at one time or another. To say you must trash that device is a little ridiculousI'm with Tweek on this point - one account per person (not per device) is fairest approach. People do things with a second account that they would not do with their first & main account - so how is that fair play? It's like birthing a second child purely to harvest its organs for your firstborn (immoral & unethical IMHO). SAY NO TO MULES, KIDS!
I took over a friends account ChickenChops(USMUD) but didn't actually use it for much.... The iPhone I had the account on got stolen so just have this one now.
I do still send messages to the account saying "Hi, I know who you are.... Enjoying my iPhone?" hoping the notification pops up! 😃 -
Fluke wrote:
What random said 👆👆👆I'm with Tweek on this point - one account per person (not per device) is fairest approach. People do things with a second account that they would not do with their first & main account - so how is that fair play? It's like birthing a second child purely to harvest its organs for your firstborn (immoral & unethical IMHO). SAY NO TO MULES, KIDS!
-
randombloke wrote:
What Fluke said 👆👆👆Fluke wrote:
What random said 👆👆👆I'm with Tweek on this point - one account per person (not per device) is fairest approach. People do things with a second account that they would not do with their first & main account - so how is that fair play? It's like birthing a second child purely to harvest its organs for your firstborn (immoral & unethical IMHO). SAY NO TO MULES, KIDS!
-
👿߀ŁîÅŁ wrote: We all end up with a second device at one time or another. To say you must trash that device is a little ridiculous
I never said trash the old device (bit extreme B!)I just find that some players with mules use those accounts in ways they never would with their main account, e.g. Never mob up to remain relatively untouchable, so that they can move into areas without being capped & then join Vs to cap and clear larger players... Or they may plant turf so that others may cap or harvest... Both those scenarios are unfair and detrimental to other players.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC