Mob deletion
Forums › General Discussion › Mob deletion-
KillnChill wrote:
Vadan what do you have to say to this.. And ny nuts ain't numbThe button is there to remove mob ?
If it was not to remove mob it wouldng be there
If there was a rule to say you could not remove all mob upon pressing the button it would say you have removed x% of mob unable to remove anymore -
SLICER DICER wrote:
Swift kick in the groin can sort that out.KillnChill wrote:
Vadan what do you have to say to this.. And ny nuts ain't numbThe button is there to remove mob ?
If it was not to remove mob it wouldng be there
If there was a rule to say you could not remove all mob upon pressing the button it would say you have removed x% of mob unable to remove anymore -
Add 😝MARC😝 wrote:
We were waiting for a fix for this for ages and no one was temp banned whilst that was goin on...nick?🍀Swagger🍀 wrote:
Yea but point is he's been banned until it's fixed. Nobody got banned wen dropping inf.If cap range was linked to level, maxing out at 30, this wouldn't be an issue.
If such a fix is applied, those who have deleted mob, will be at a major disadvantage as recovering them is far harder.
-
★PIXΣL βUG★ wrote:
No Carly. The bigger you get the lower your cap range against small/mid size players. That's the disadvantage, no mob is "invincible".Dumb point. So we have the option to purchase hench.. Will we get banned for buying thousands and making ourselves invincible? I don't think so...vadan
-
Add 😝MARC😝 wrote:
No one who went low inf was unbeatable though.🍀Swagger🍀 wrote:
Yea but point is he's been banned until it's fixed. Nobody got banned wen dropping inf.If cap range was linked to level, maxing out at 30, this wouldn't be an issue.
If such a fix is applied, those who have deleted mob, will be at a major disadvantage as recovering them is far harder.
-
And people say the brits like to moan. Wherever did they get that impression?
-
Hardcore wrote:
He isn't unbeatable! Drop mob if u want to fight.Add 😝MARC😝 wrote:
No one who went low inf was unbeatable though.🍀Swagger🍀 wrote:
Yea but point is he's been banned until it's fixed. Nobody got banned wen dropping inf.If cap range was linked to level, maxing out at 30, this wouldn't be an issue.
If such a fix is applied, those who have deleted mob, will be at a major disadvantage as recovering them is far harder.
-
Vadan™ wrote:
Neither would a 3 mob player be invincible. He can be attacked by a similar player making him non invincible.. So yet again. Not valid (:★PIXΣL βUG★ wrote:
No Carly. The bigger you get the lower your cap range against small/mid size players. That's the disadvantage, no mob is "invincible".Dumb point. So we have the option to purchase hench.. Will we get banned for buying thousands and making ourselves invincible? I don't think so...vadan
-
Hardcore wrote:
If you look at your mob list everyone has the remove mob button 3 man army is not unbeatableAdd 😝MARC😝 wrote:
No one who went low inf was unbeatable though.🍀Swagger🍀 wrote:
Yea but point is he's been banned until it's fixed. Nobody got banned wen dropping inf.If cap range was linked to level, maxing out at 30, this wouldn't be an issue.
If such a fix is applied, those who have deleted mob, will be at a major disadvantage as recovering them is far harder.
-
Where's britney when u need him (:
-
randombloke wrote:
Lol it's twfc who have complained to nick. You could fight him, just drop mob. Or send In a mule(you's hav plenty) with no mob.And people say the brits like to moan. Wherever did they get that impression?
-
Add 😝MARC😝 wrote:
Hardcore wrote:
He isn't unbeatable! Drop mob if u want to fight.Add 😝MARC😝 wrote:
No one who went low inf was unbeatable though.🍀Swagger🍀 wrote:
Yea but point is he's been banned until it's fixed. Nobody got banned wen dropping inf.If cap range was linked to level, maxing out at 30, this wouldn't be an issue.
If such a fix is applied, those who have deleted mob, will be at a major disadvantage as recovering them is far harder.
-
★PIXΣL βUG★ wrote:
In a town near you soonWhere's britney when u need him (:
-
★PIXΣL βUG★ wrote:
The only way would be for someone genuinely small enough mob (just started or reset) or exploit and remove mob. So yes actually, my point stands. And if you check back to my comment I stated no mob is invincible.Vadan™ wrote:
Neither would a 3 mob player be invincible. He can be attacked by a similar player making him non invincible.. So yet again. Not valid (:★PIXΣL βUG★ wrote:
No Carly. The bigger you get the lower your cap range against small/mid size players. That's the disadvantage, no mob is "invincible".Dumb point. So we have the option to purchase hench.. Will we get banned for buying thousands and making ourselves invincible? I don't think so...vadan
-
Removing mob is not against the Terms of Service. However, doing so to take advantage of vendettas is an exploit, and it is quite easy to tell who dropped their mob to take advantage of this. Those found exploiting this (or any other) issue (as determined solely by MeanFreePath) are going to be temporarily banned until a reasonable fix can be made. Repeat and/or egregious offenders may be permanently banned.
The time for consequence-free exploiting is over.
-
Valiant attempt at defending one of your guys but we all know he was exploiting glitch. More importantly so did Nick. Now let's move on and get back to scrapping and you can all return to takin Mick (pun intended) out of me for running away.😉
-
You don't scrap oddy you hide.
-
nick wrote:
And wen every one did it on low inf? That was ok ?Removing mob is not against the Terms of Service. However, doing so to take advantage of vendettas is an exploit, and it is quite easy to tell who dropped their mob to take advantage of this. Those found exploiting this (or any other) issue (as determined solely by MeanFreePath) are going to be temporarily banned until a reasonable fix can be made. Repeat and/or egregious offenders may be permanently banned.
The time for consequence-free exploiting is over.
-
nick wrote:
👍Removing mob is not against the Terms of Service. However, doing so to take advantage of vendettas is an exploit, and it is quite easy to tell who dropped their mob to take advantage of this. Those found exploiting this (or any other) issue (as determined solely by MeanFreePath) are going to be temporarily banned until a reasonable fix can be made. Repeat and/or egregious offenders may be permanently banned.
The time for consequence-free exploiting is over.
-
I thought about this earlier today and thought of comparisons. I have been an avid player online on ps3 of MLB The Show. 2 years ago there was something called the "Bullpen glitch". Occasionally you'd get a lead against some dude, and they'd pause it and go to their bullpen. While in there, they'd do something that would freeze up the game, typically resulting in the other guy turning off the system and give them the win.
Doing things like using low mobbed players to use an exploit is as chicken **** as using a "bullpen glitch". I don't even know who is doing it but whoever it is, man up and play like a man
-
randombloke wrote:
You can counter. Send in one of your many mules.He is if you plant as close to his turf as the game allows and it says that you are still too far away. Appreciate it as a tactic. I discussed this with belial ages ago when the new rule came in. Well done on implementing it but seriously a 20k+ mobster is not gooing to delete their mob. Besides most people these days have henchies from loot so you don't even have the option to get as mobless as him. At least with low inf you had a chance to counter.
-
nick wrote:
Nick please can you explain what egregious means as some dbr players think it's something to do with omelettesRemoving mob is not against the Terms of Service. However, doing so to take advantage of vendettas is an exploit, and it is quite easy to tell who dropped their mob to take advantage of this. Those found exploiting this (or any other) issue (as determined solely by MeanFreePath) are going to be temporarily banned until a reasonable fix can be made. Repeat and/or egregious offenders may be permanently banned.
The time for consequence-free exploiting is over.
-
I thought it meant to hide your genitals in fruit.
-
nick wrote:
Nick why should a player suffer if there is a fix needed for this?Removing mob is not against the Terms of Service. However, doing so to take advantage of vendettas is an exploit, and it is quite easy to tell who dropped their mob to take advantage of this. Those found exploiting this (or any other) issue (as determined solely by MeanFreePath) are going to be temporarily banned until a reasonable fix can be made. Repeat and/or egregious offenders may be permanently banned.
The time for consequence-free exploiting is over.
-
So why not kill the v
Instead of banning the player untill you come up with a fix ?
He could of been warned -
★PIXΣL βUG★ wrote:
Because it was obvious he was intentionally exploiting it perhaps.nick wrote:
Nick why should a player suffer if there is a fix needed for this?Removing mob is not against the Terms of Service. However, doing so to take advantage of vendettas is an exploit, and it is quite easy to tell who dropped their mob to take advantage of this. Those found exploiting this (or any other) issue (as determined solely by MeanFreePath) are going to be temporarily banned until a reasonable fix can be made. Repeat and/or egregious offenders may be permanently banned.
The time for consequence-free exploiting is over.
-
Yeah just like the police map glitch and the deffence penalty glitch
They was obvious and abused -
KillnChill wrote:
So why not kill the v
Instead of banning the player untill you come up with a fix ?
He could of been warned -
Add 😝MARC😝 wrote:
Broken record! READ the last line! Get over it.nick wrote:
And wen every one did it on low inf? That was ok ?Removing mob is not against the Terms of Service. However, doing so to take advantage of vendettas is an exploit, and it is quite easy to tell who dropped their mob to take advantage of this. Those found exploiting this (or any other) issue (as determined solely by MeanFreePath) are going to be temporarily banned until a reasonable fix can be made. Repeat and/or egregious offenders may be permanently banned.
The time for consequence-free exploiting is over.
-
nick wrote:
This is the correct thing to do . Nip it in the bud early and stop everyone jumping on the band wagon .Removing mob is not against the Terms of Service. However, doing so to take advantage of vendettas is an exploit, and it is quite easy to tell who dropped their mob to take advantage of this. Those found exploiting this (or any other) issue (as determined solely by MeanFreePath) are going to be temporarily banned until a reasonable fix can be made. Repeat and/or egregious offenders may be permanently banned.
The time for consequence-free exploiting is over.
Really guys is that the best you got !
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC