Covid Vaccine
Forums › General Discussion › Covid Vaccine-
Anyone see the new study from the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) in New Zealand that examined 99 million vaccinated people across eight countries?
Thoughts? Vaxxed people how do you feel about this? Healthy vaxxed people with no other health issues you had less than a 0.02% chance of death from covid and now (from this study) it seems you’ve raised your chances of serious health issues significantly, thoughts?
Unvaxxed people, feeling vindicated or still pissed because the media continues to bury news like this?
Enjoy
-
Which vaccine is the study based on?
-
☝️. And where can we find this report? I find it very fascinating!!
-
Uglyladdie wrote:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/Which vaccine is the study based on?
Here’s the study. It’s based on a bunch of them.
-
℣į₭ϊ₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
Interesting article but from what I find it’s more so the Sputnik vaccine (Russian) causing health problems rather than Western vaccines eg PfizerUglyladdie wrote:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/Which vaccine is the study based on?
Here’s the study. It’s based on a bunch of them.
-
Uglyladdie wrote:
Certainly worse but they’re all showing increases across the board℣į₭ϊ₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
Interesting article but from what I find it’s more so the Sputnik vaccine (Russian) causing health problems rather than Western vaccines eg PfizerUglyladdie wrote:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/Which vaccine is the study based on?
Here’s the study. It’s based on a bunch of them.
-
Sometimes I wonder if the vaccines are for something else that will come, and be very lethal to those that are not vaccinated. Bc so many people with the vaccine still get covid, although they say it is usually more mild.
-
A couple things:
This appears to be funded by the CDC, so anti-vaxxers may not want to base vindication based off this report.
I found this:
While our study confirmed previously identified rare safety signals following COVID-19 vaccination and contributed evidence on several other important outcomes, further investigation is warranted to confirm associations and assess clinical significance.
This leads me to believe the study may not yet be concluded. I found that here under Click on this link to view the paper:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270?via%3Dihub
Aside from that, double vaxxed and no regrets. You can read online about red counties having between 30-40% more deaths or 11 times the mortality rates of blue counties. It’s also said that blue counties tend to be more diverse, more educated, and less religious, and these seem to factor in to peoples decisions on whether or not to get vaccinated as well. I was not able to asce
-
rtain the exact increased risk of side effects due to the extremely dry and long winded study papers, but bottom line, I rather be alive with a small chance of complications than dead. You have to make a decision to protect yourself and your family based on the information you have. Choosing not to participate based off conspiracies is always the wrong decision. Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have since been shown to be either ineffective, or deadly when used incorrectly, who would have guessed? It’s said that 74% of Americans received at least one dose. The antivaxxers are the minority.
-
My dad tried to get me to start taking hydroxycloroquine when I got it a few years ago. It was wild, he literally thought I was going to die because I didn't take it. He was like "It's safe and effective for just about anything. It's almost a cure all! Endorsed by doctors! You can buy it online from Mexico!" No thanks bucko. That being said I got the first vaxx round back in the early days of covid and my girlfriend recently had it and was pretty sick. Couldn't isolate cause, one bedroom apartment that's kinda impossible. Didn't even get the sniffles. I guess I'm just built different🦵
-
Okay hold up lemme clarify some stuff I typed that kinda quickly, I found it weird she got it and I didn't because she has to get the booster every year for her job, and I haven't gotten one since the first round in the waybacks
-
℣į₭ϊ₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
Well really a vaccine is putting a weak virus into your system so you can train to beat it when you get the real thing. Putting a virus in your system is obviously not going to be good but it’s better than the very real risk of death posed by covid. I’m an example, double vaccinated got covid, just was tired. Anti vaccine parents did not vaccinate my friendUglyladdie wrote:
Certainly worse but they’re all showing increases across the board℣į₭ϊ₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
Interesting article but from what I find it’s more so the Sputnik vaccine (Russian) causing health problems rather than Western vaccines eg PfizerUglyladdie wrote:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/Which vaccine is the study based on?
Here’s the study. It’s based on a bunch of them.
-
⬆️ and he almost died
-
Fuck in Argentina they only gave the russian and chinese one bloody gov.
-
Pure blood here! 🩸
To the argument of “oh I woulda had it so much worse”. mumbo jumbo that is!
-
Well really a vaccine is putting a weak virus into your system so you can train to beat it when you get the real thing.
Modern vaccins do not use weakened pathogens anymore. They use so-called spike proteins to teach the immune system how the pathogen looks like. And the newest vaccins use pieces of viral genetic material for this.
-
ʀ⌖ʙʙɪᴇ ʀᴇᴀᴄʜ-ɪɴ wrote:
How devastated will you be if you ever need a blood transfusion?Pure blood here! 🩸
To the argument of “oh I woulda had it so much worse”. mumbo jumbo that is!
-
Roger That wrote:
red cross is looking for pure blood mainly with no spike proteins.ʀ⌖ʙʙɪᴇ ʀᴇᴀᴄʜ-ɪɴ wrote:
How devastated will you be if you ever need a blood transfusion?Pure blood here! 🩸
To the argument of “oh I woulda had it so much worse”. mumbo jumbo that is!
-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.100
COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals
-
⫷ 🎀 𝕂𝕟𝔸 🎀 ⫸ wrote:
Please cite your source.Roger That wrote:
red cross is looking for pure blood mainly with no spike proteins.ʀ⌖ʙʙɪᴇ ʀᴇᴀᴄʜ-ɪɴ wrote:
How devastated will you be if you ever need a blood transfusion?Pure blood here! 🩸
To the argument of “oh I woulda had it so much worse”. mumbo jumbo that is!
-
⫷ 🎀 𝕂𝕟𝔸 🎀 ⫸ wrote:
Only thing I can find about that are articles about people are demanding "pure blood" but I have yet to find red cross actually asking for "pure blood" only people who are demanding they get "pure blood" donors. I have a feeling if they do want "pure blood" its only because people are refusing life saving treatments because they don't want.. mudblood? Why is this starting to feel like an "us vs. them" it's a vaccine. The military requires up to 27 vaccines and shots to prepare for deployment. Why are they not mudblood also?Roger That wrote:
red cross is looking for pure blood mainly with no spike proteins.ʀ⌖ʙʙɪᴇ ʀᴇᴀᴄʜ-ɪɴ wrote:
How devastated will you be if you ever need a blood transfusion?Pure blood here! 🩸
To the argument of “oh I woulda had it so much worse”. mumbo jumbo that is!
-
Roger That wrote:
Guess he’ll just have to get one from me 🤷🏼♂️ʀ⌖ʙʙɪᴇ ʀᴇᴀᴄʜ-ɪɴ wrote:
How devastated will you be if you ever need a blood transfusion?Pure blood here! 🩸
To the argument of “oh I woulda had it so much worse”. mumbo jumbo that is!
-
If it's good enough for Mrs. Dolly Parton it's good enough for me.
-
Between the excess numbers of Mariocaridis in age groups of teens to 40s and now cancer jumping in after the shot and growing in rapid numbers.. . Anyone getting the shot is crazy. I had the first two but never again.
-
YOU wrote:
however, that's my own personal opinionBetween the excess numbers of Mariocaridis in age groups of teens to 40s and now cancer jumping in after the shot and growing in rapid numbers.. . Anyone getting the shot is crazy. I had the first two but never again.
-
In rigid clinical studies of any kind, there are 4 phases need to be satisfied for anything to pass.
Phase 3, requires thousands of participants to find out:
1) Efficacy
2) Contraindications (problems)All of the Covid vaccines had a minimum of roughly 50,000 volunteers before release.
Historically, any vaccine released has to have only a 50% efficacy. (Typical flu shot ) Covid vaccines were at roughly 90%.
Historically, there is ALWAYS a small percentage of people who have adverse reactions. The risk vs benefits is always based on this.
Is it possible that more recipients = more issues down the line? Absolutely yes. That is expected. But at the onset, the risk factor with Covid vaccines was based on at least 50,000 people.
So for anyone looking for a smoking-gun conspiracy about the release of the Covid vaccine - there is none.
From the very beginning, it was publicly announced that the vaccines were not a perfect 100% efficacy.
And yes, they helped. Statistically you were better off.
-
⫷𝔯𝔢𝔡𝔬𝔫𝔥𝔦𝔰𝔥𝔢𝔞𝔡⫸ wrote:
If it's good enough for Mrs. Dolly Parton it's good enough for me.
-
𝕾𝖙𝖆𝖌𝖌𝖊𝖗 𝕷𝖊𝖊 wrote:
Then why aren’t we allowed to sue them for any adverse reactions? Why aren’t people hurt by the vaccine allowed to collect under typical vaccine court rules?In rigid clinical studies of any kind, there are 4 phases need to be satisfied for anything to pass.
Phase 3, requires thousands of participants to find out:
1) Efficacy
2) Contraindications (problems)All of the Covid vaccines had a minimum of roughly 50,000 volunteers before release.
Historically, any vaccine released has to have only a 50% efficacy. (Typical flu shot ) Covid vaccines were at roughly 90%.
Historically, there is ALWAYS a small percentage of people who have adverse reactions. The risk vs benefits is always based
And yes, they helped. Statistically you were better off.
-
༒ COMPΛИY ༒ wrote:
I hope you two have compatible bloodtypes. 🤞🏻Roger That wrote:
Guess he’ll just have to get one from me 🤷🏼♂️ʀ⌖ʙʙɪᴇ ʀᴇᴀᴄʜ-ɪɴ wrote:
How devastated will you be if you ever need a blood transfusion?Pure blood here! 🩸
To the argument of “oh I woulda had it so much worse”. mumbo jumbo that is!
-
℣į₭ϊ₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
don't worry your great grandchildren can sue Viking 😉 lol𝕾𝖙𝖆𝖌𝖌𝖊𝖗 𝕷𝖊𝖊 wrote:
Then why aren’t we allowed to sue them for any adverse reactions? Why aren’t people hurt by the vaccine allowed to collect under typical vaccine court rules?In rigid clinical studies of any kind, there are 4 phases need to be satisfied for anything to pass.
Phase 3, requires thousands of participants to find out:
1) Efficacy
2) Contraindications (problems)All of the Covid vaccines had a minimum of roughly 50,000 volunteers before release.
Historically, any vaccine released has to have only a 50% efficacy. (Typical flu shot ) Covid vaccines were at roughly 90%.
Historically, there is ALWAYS a small percentage of people who have adverse reactions. The risk vs benefits is always based
And yes, they helped. Statistically you were better off.
-
YOU wrote:
Can’t find the Tik Tok you heard it on?⫷ 🎀 𝕂𝕟𝔸 🎀 ⫸ wrote:
Please cite your source.Roger That wrote:
red cross is looking for pure blood mainly with no spike proteins.ʀ⌖ʙʙɪᴇ ʀᴇᴀᴄʜ-ɪɴ wrote:
How devastated will you be if you ever need a blood transfusion?Pure blood here! 🩸
To the argument of “oh I woulda had it so much worse”. mumbo jumbo that is!
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC