What’s happened to this game
Forums › General Discussion › What’s happened to this game-
How’s everyone like the new changes ?
-
Mr Dreamsmasher how do you like them?
-
Omertà I would ask you but you just started playing ?
-
Oof
-
Well since you asked, I personally think the openstreetmap geocoder sucks.
But it's like I always tell my wife. Ya get what ya pay for.
-
Doesn't she get offended by that?
-
Mickey Dunn 💔 wrote:
She must have blown through all her savings to land a great guy like you.Well since you asked, I personally think the openstreetmap geocoder sucks.
But it's like I always tell my wife. Ya get what ya pay for.
-
I think its a move in the right direction and should have been done long ago. Will it need tweaking and updates? Of course. I want it to work as well as any other geocoder, or all of them combined :) But i’ve always believed the game should be independent in that sense. Now if we can just get those temp codes brought into the code form..... single thread per day, updated as soon as a new temp code is generated....
-
Lord Business wrote:
No comment.Mickey Dunn 💔 wrote:
She must have blown through all her savings to land a great guy like you.Well since you asked, I personally think the openstreetmap geocoder sucks.
But it's like I always tell my wife. Ya get what ya pay for.
-
It's more fair with one geocoder that everyone has to use, but it still sucks.😐
Airports' gray areas (the actual airports) will be invalid, as they are only valid on apple.🚫🛩 Also; many, many, many roads will be made invalid, as happened with the loss of the google coder.🚫🛣 Reducing valid areas is also going to make the game unplayable for a lot of new players. They will start, not be able to plant, & quit; as it will be a pointless game for those with no valid zones in their area.
It's good for fairness, but very bad for the game.👎💩👉😵 -
And as far as making the game fair would be a valid goal, it's obviously not the goal. MFP has no interest in making the game fair.👉😵
-
You can create an account on OpenStreet map and do your own tagging that will show up on the map ... many many evil possibilities.
-
ฅຮอศརຮƴ♆яїн♆ wrote:
nick has a bit of control over what he chooses to display from the complete OpenStreet map.You can create an account on OpenStreet map and do your own tagging that will show up on the map ... many many evil possibilities.
-
also i agree its a step in the right direction. next thing he needs to work on is getting new players or fixing the mob code system so it isnt tied to the growth of the player base
-
Too many accounts sold
-
elliot-s wrote:
Who even are you?Too many accounts sold
-
ᗰ͡ᎧᎧ͜Ꮆ wrote:
🐊elliot-s wrote:
Who even are you?Too many accounts sold
-
yomama1064 wrote:
Get rid of being over limit and tie it to turf dropped. Its more dynamic, you can get stronger or weaker according to how much turf you have planted. The need for spreading out and safeties would be more important and everyone would be mobile.also i agree its a step in the right direction. next thing he needs to work on is getting new players or fixing the mob code system so it isnt tied to the growth of the player base
-
ᗰ͡ᎧᎧ͜Ꮆ wrote:
elliot-s wrote:
Who even are you?Too many accounts sold
... one of the best back in the day.
-
★DΞICIDΞ★ wrote:
but this would just be pay to win as the players with the highest turf limit would be the strongest.yomama1064 wrote:
Get rid of being over limit and tie it to turf dropped. Its more dynamic, you can get stronger or weaker according to how much turf you have planted. The need for spreading out and safeties would be more important and everyone would be mobile.also i agree its a step in the right direction. next thing he needs to work on is getting new players or fixing the mob code system so it isnt tied to the growth of the player base
i would be open to some kind of change to tie influence to either cap limit or cap range though.
-
yomama1064 wrote:
Don’t really matter, we went from 40% of the map being plantable to 20% and the majority of that is already covered.★DΞICIDΞ★ wrote:
but this would just be pay to win as the players with the highest turf limit would be the strongest.yomama1064 wrote:
Get rid of being over limit and tie it to turf dropped. Its more dynamic, you can get stronger or weaker according to how much turf you have planted. The need for spreading out and safeties would be more important and everyone would be mobile.also i agree its a step in the right direction. next thing he needs to work on is getting new players or fixing the mob code system so it isnt tied to the growth of the player base
i would be open to some kind of change to tie influence to either cap limit or cap range though.
-
Y’all have fun playing for New York and part of Cali
-
Its be pay to win. Hench, bren, turf limit, profile stats, stam refills. If you dont pay... can you seriously compete? Note, I didnt say at all.... but be real.
-
Power would shift a little but same players forking out money would still do so. The difference is it would give new players a chance to ramp up fast and really get into the game instead of the code based system where the get hardly anything for their time and they cant even solve it with money. Would it encourage more spending? Yes. But i think we would see a larger retention percentage if players had more control
-
That or move to fake codes/members. Keep the code punching but issue codes for hench. So the players willing to put in the time get rewarded and stronger. But it would be guaranteed mob members for your effort.
-
★DΞICIDΞ★ wrote:
☝🏻That or move to fake codes/members. Keep the code punching but issue codes for hench. So the players willing to put in the time get rewarded and stronger. But it would be guaranteed mob members for your effort.
-
★DΞICIDΞ★ wrote:
That or move to fake codes/members. Keep the code punching but issue codes for hench. So the players willing to put in the time get rewarded and stronger. But it would be guaranteed mob members for your effort.
This is a good idea. Nothing like punching 500 codes and maybe getting 50 mob bigger. Or, just give everyone 1,000 apiece of Dunn’s mobb. 😈
-
⇚❹☠❶☠❺⇛ wrote:
I like the first part. Not crazy about the 2nd part.★DΞICIDΞ★ wrote:
That or move to fake codes/members. Keep the code punching but issue codes for hench. So the players willing to put in the time get rewarded and stronger. But it would be guaranteed mob members for your effort.
This is a good idea. Nothing like punching 500 codes and maybe getting 50 mob bigger. Or, just give everyone 1,000 apiece of Dunn’s mobb. 😈
-
Lord Business wrote:
Spit on it too why don’t yaMickey Dunn 💔 wrote:
She must have blown through all her savings to land a great guy like you.Well since you asked, I personally think the openstreetmap geocoder sucks.
But it's like I always tell my wife. Ya get what ya pay for.
-
ᗰ͡ᎧᎧ͜Ꮆ wrote:
★DΞICIDΞ★ wrote:
☝🏻That or move to fake codes/members. Keep the code punching but issue codes for hench. So the players willing to put in the time get rewarded and stronger. But it would be guaranteed mob members for your effort.
-
ℕapoleon wrote:
been saying this for years, forgot to bring it up at nick’s weekly baic meetingᗰ͡ᎧᎧ͜Ꮆ wrote:
★DΞICIDΞ★ wrote:
☝🏻That or move to fake codes/members. Keep the code punching but issue codes for hench. So the players willing to put in the time get rewarded and stronger. But it would be guaranteed mob members for your effort.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC