Why is the eastcoast so much better than the westcoast for turf?

Forums › General Discussion › Why is the eastcoast so much better than the westcoast for turf?

« Prev 12Next »

Mr. Snuckels Nov 1, 2010

Ask for Cupcake's input on this one.

As for me, the way is see it is that the West Coast started out quietly and the East Coast started fighting sooner.
In the beginning, if you recall, San Fran was a heavy area due to "population density" and Nixon kept a tight rule over that town.
Remember Eli's thread: "Hollywood is Burning". There was West Coast action early.

But the population density and the propensity to play pushed the East Coast to more action earlier. LA and San Diego are spread out. California is a huge state. Plenty of players but plenty of room. That's my two pennies worth.
bunnymcd Nov 1, 2010

RENO🌵💀 wrote:
Belial wrote:
Viper 👊🔨💀 wrote:
Strictly how crowded it is B, too many people for everyone to play nice. NY is a constant state of flux, Philly is wide open, DC is always good for a few skirmishes a week. The constant battles just keep it hopping.

Damn. Why cant californians live closer together? We need mor crowded cities here!
No. The game makers here need to get off there ass and make something that will allow others to travel and place turf outside where they live...well for starters that would help mix it up.
Once again, it's fix the damn geocoder or allow forced plants with maps.
styrik Nov 1, 2010

Every time u find another noob help him. Make him feel important. That lessens the chance of him quitting.
FluffyRaptor Nov 1, 2010

One world FARMERS

« Prev 12Next »