what is the answer to the radical islamists threat to the west
Forums › General Discussion › what is the answer to the radical islamists threat to the west-
anyone ??
-
Best solution is to westernize their country. Give them free satellite t.v. Give them free access to all the American t.v channels. Give them fast food and Walmart. Give them Internet . It will not eliminate radicals but will sure reduce them.
Jihadi:"Hey Durka Durka join our cause."
Durka Durka: "fuck that dude,Fall out 4 comming soon and i want to be around for that" -
The US could always stop creating the groups to fight secret wars to begin with.
-
OneToedBastard wrote:
Yeah, the Middle East was all peace and harmony before the Brits started drawing arbitrary borders everywhere.The US could always stop creating the groups to fight secret wars to begin with.
Wait, no it wasn't...
But let's certainly not blame religious fanaticism. That would be way out of line.
-
Let us remeber that ISIS does not represent all of islam
-
☠ðůﾅ⌖ʟḁẘ☠ wrote:
Best solution is to westernize their country. Give them free satellite t.v. Give them free access to all the American t.v channels. Give them fast food and Walmart. Give them Internet . It will not eliminate radicals but will sure reduce them.
Jihadi:"Hey Durka Durka join our cause."
Durka Durka: "fuck that dude,Fall out 4 comming soon and i want to be around for that" -
★★BЯOШИИOTΞ★★ wrote:
Lol well you got a point there. Although they'd be a whole lot less effective if they weren't driving around Bradley's and shooting ak'sOneToedBastard wrote:
Yeah, the Middle East was all peace and harmony before the Brits started drawing arbitrary borders everywhere.The US could always stop creating the groups to fight secret wars to begin with.
Wait, no it wasn't...
But let's certainly not blame religious fanaticism. That would be way out of line.
-
OneToedBastard wrote:
★★BЯOШИИOTΞ★★ wrote:
Lol well you got a point there. Although they'd be a whole lot less effective if they weren't driving around Bradley's and shooting ak'sOneToedBastard wrote:
Yeah, the Middle East was all peace and harmony before the Brits started drawing arbitrary borders everywhere.The US could always stop creating the groups to fight secret wars to begin with.
Wait, no it wasn't...
But let's certainly not blame religious fanaticism. That would be way out of line.
Yeah, we better just back down and not get involved.
-
What do you think, Frank?
-
The threat is fucking tiny. If you feel threatened in the states from radical Islamists then you pay way too much attention to the media.
-
★★BЯOШИИOTΞ★★ wrote:
Didn't say we don't get involved. Saying we either get involved or don't. We don't give weapons to "rebels" and send them to fight for us. Why? Because history has shown over and over again that in time they get powerful and rebel against the US.OneToedBastard wrote:
★★BЯOШИИOTΞ★★ wrote:
Lol well you ✂️'sOneToedBastard wrote:
Yeah, the Middle East was all peace and harmony before the Brits started drawing arbitrary borders everywhere.The US could always stop creating the groups to fight secret wars to begin with.
Wait, no it wasn't...
But let's certainly not blame religious fanaticism. That would be way out of line.
Yeah, we better just back down and not get involved.
-
☠ðůﾅ⌖ʟḁẘ☠ wrote:
Team America ?Best solution is to westernize their country. Give them free satellite t.v. Give them free access to all the American t.v channels. Give them fast food and Walmart. Give them Internet . It will not eliminate radicals but will sure reduce them.
Jihadi:"Hey Durka Durka join our cause."
Durka Durka: "fuck that dude,Fall out 4 comming soon and i want to be around for that" -
Just nuc em taught japan not to fuck around teach these kunts al queda Isis rid one another more dangerous one comes so just finish it or my other solution send Russia n isreal in
-
OneToedBastard wrote: Didn't say we don't get involved. Saying we either get involved or don't. We don't give weapons to "rebels" and send them to fight for us. Why? Because history has shown over and over again that in time they get powerful and rebel against the US.
Thanks for that. Do you have any policy advice beyond the 1980s?But we did help them route the Soviets, doncha know, and lemme tell you that we have and continue to train Afghani security forces to defend their country, EXACTLY as we did in the 1980s. Though this time maybe you have no problem with it?
The stinger missile batteries are flat, and we didn't give them AK-47s or the tanks. (TANKS?! What are you smoking?) We want a free and prosperous society over there. Holding them down to the 1200s was wrong, England. Now we are all building them schools together, and shooting those that want to keep them in the 1200s IN THE FACE.
Involved, we are.
-
euser wrote:
What's a "nuc"?Just nuc em taught japan not to fuck around teach these kunts al queda Isis rid one another more dangerous one comes so just finish it or my other solution send Russia n isreal in
-
Total annihilation is the only solution. One big-ass bomb that settles the question or lack there of.
1) one bomb doesn't eliminate a world-wide perversion of a marginally legittimate religion
2) we weren't prepared to do so 40+ years ago to settle a problem, and less so today
3) we're not perfect either
4) islam (ottomans) have been hell-bent on destroying anyone but those in the fold. That's been going on 1500+ years.5) other religions have been just as evil, but they've assimilated their opponents. Islamic extremists say it's there way or no way.
6) we've evolved (less than perfectly), they hold fast. Severe heads. Rape or enslave women. Kill other religous groups. Eliminate or deny records of opponents.
7) kill or be killed... Get used to it... 😔
-
★★BЯOШИИOTΞ★★ wrote:
Keep bashing everything everyone has to say but all I've heard you say is it's a religious issue. You wanna drop atheism pamphlets out of airplanes? Is that your big plan? Please elaborate so we can all learn something from someone so intelligent.OneToedBastard wrote: Didn't say we don't get involved. Saying we either get involved or don't. We don't give weapons to "rebels" and send them to fight for us. Why? Because history has shown over and over again that in time they get powerful and rebel against the US.
Thanks for that. Do you have any policy advice beyond the 1980s?B
I'm always right .
Involved, we are.
-
Mob up
-
MLP solves all religious issues
...My Little Pony to the rescue! -
⚕Ðя⌖₲я℧སǥཛ⚕ wrote:
Interesting points but lacking any reference to evidence. 5/10 for content, 7/10 for spelling, 6/10 for grammar.Total annihilation is the only solution. One big-ass bomb that settles the question or lack there of.
1) one bomb doesn't eliminate a world-wide perversion of a marginally legittimate religion
2) we weren't prepared to do so 40+ years ago to settle a problem, and less so today
3) we're not perfect either
4) islam (ottomans) have been hell-bent on destroying anyone but those in the fold. That's been going on 1500+ years.
5) other religions have been just as evil, but they've assimilated their opponents. Islamic extremists say it's there way or no way.
6) we've evolved (less than perfectly), they hold fast. Severe heads. Rape or enslave women. Kill other religous groups. Eliminate or deny records of opponents.
7) kill or be killed... Get used to it... 😔
-
euser wrote:
Lol i dont recall "nucing" japan...whatever the hell that meansJust nuc em taught japan not to fuck around teach these kunts al queda Isis rid one another more dangerous one comes so just finish it or my other solution send Russia n isreal in
-
Is there even an answer to this?
I mean, back in the mediëval times, they got pushed back by force, and only over time europe was able to push them back.
These days however, we cant resort to those kind of options as they are deemed "inhuman".
Does not take away the fact that they themselves turn to these kind of inhuman ways.
What they are accomplishing however, is inducing fear into the western world, wich, slowly over time, we are giving in to. -
Roger That wrote:
sorry been working .....well in ex forces i would like to see more active approach on is eradication ....a few months ago when they raised there head in syria we shouldve put boots on the ground then to send a message ....but i think now its to late and the will continue to attack soft targets.What do you think, Frank?
-
if i had my way ...bomb bomb bomb even know it might kill innocents still bomb
-
First rule of war is to know your enemy. In this case, that means at least reading the Koran. I've forced myself to read it. I came away with the impression that in some cases it claims tolerance. But in others cutting your enemy's head is the best thing. The book is an absolute philosophical slophouse for sure.
The problem is who interprets it. A more intelligent mind will bend around the more severe statements. Unfortunately, the more angry and less insightful mind wil grasp onto to nasty parts.
Statistically, the majority of those who've used the nasty parts to justify violence tend to be less educated and impoverished.
So perhaps, education, a job and an occasional hand-job from someone they find attractive might mitigate poor Ahmad's anger?
In short- I endorse Outlaw's first suggestion. And maybe a bottle of lube too.
If not- I think Frank Zappa's idea of dropping pork bombs might equally terrorize them
🐷💥🐷💥 -
OneToedBastard wrote: Keep bashing everything everyone has to say but all I've heard you say is it's a religious issue. You wanna drop atheism pamphlets out of airplanes? Is that your big plan? Please elaborate so we can all learn something from someone so intelligent.
It precisely is an issue of religion. Do you disagree? I realize as a liberal, you are conflicted. Culture is sacred. If they want to slice off their daughter's clitoris before she becomes "difficult", you feel a need to respect that. If they decapitate a few homosexuals, you don't mind. Multiculturalism is the new mantra of the social justice warrior left.Of course, radical Christians, you hate them. Right?
So conflicted, so conflicted...
There is no easy solution. Kill or be killed until we can assimilate them. That's all we got right now. What's your answer?
-
Stop funding them would be a great start
-
@Stagger
I think the book was put together for an illiterate, megalomaniacal, and dangerous man. The book is an attempt to rationalize him from the perspective of those he controlled. I'd expect similar from those around Kim Jung Il who are either brainwashed or in fear.I agree with you. More moderate and educated people seem to find the ability to ignore the harsh bits in the writings of Judeo-Christian-Muslim writings, but still live by the good bits. As soon as anyone picks up a bible or Koran and takes it as the literal word of God, bad shit goes down.
I follow Mein Kampf, myself. Just the good bits, lol!
-
Mr,Shush wrote:
Tell us more. I find you fascinating.Stop funding them would be a great start
-
★★BЯOШИИOTΞ★★ wrote:
It costs the USA alone 14 million a day fighting IS Isil whatever you want to call them. That's just the USA. GB France Germany and so on have there costs to.Mr,Shush wrote:
Tell us more. I find you fascinating.Stop funding them would be a great start
So where do IS keep finding there resources to fight all of the above ?? -
Mr,Shush wrote:
Plunder.★★BЯOШИИOTΞ★★ wrote:
It costs the USA alone 14 million a day fighting IS Isil whatever you want to call them. That's just the USA. GB France Germany and so on have there costs to.Mr,Shush wrote:
Tell us more. I find you fascinating.Stop funding them would be a great start
So where do IS keep finding there resources to fight all of the above ??
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC