Moon landing
Forums › General Discussion › Moon landing-
ΤΞ⊄Η∩➒₦∉ wrote:
What ?????Lizard people?
Fuck this thread.
-
ShytTAlker69 wrote:
Why would we use a telescope with such a high zoom and have the first thing we look at be the flag on the moon? I would definitely look at other planets and stuff first. Things I haven't seen on several different occasions.🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
Lol if the Hubble could see the moon flag and lander I guarantee you that would have been picture 1, day 1.No but there's pictures where you can clearly see a human being. Assuming the person is, let's just say, 6ft tall. The flag is 4ft tall. You think we couldn't see the flag? It's that close of a difference that 2 measly feet makes it non visible. Come on now haha.
-
🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
You're stupid dudeShytTAlker69 wrote:
Why would we use a telescope with such a high zoom and have the first thing we look at be the flag on the moon? I would definitely look at other planets and stuff first. Things I haven't seen on several different occasions.🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
Lol if the Hubble could see the moon flag and lander I guarantee you that would have been picture 1, day 1.No but there's pictures where you can clearly see a human being. Assuming the person is, let's just say, 6ft tall. The flag is 4ft tall. You think we couldn't see the flag? It's that close of a difference that 2 measly feet makes it non visible. Come on now haha.
-
What exactt makes me stupid? I know the first thing I would look at with the telescope wouldn't be a flag on the moon lol. It seems like a waste to take such an expensive picture of something everyone has already seen.
-
Ok man for the last time, now listen close-no telescope today has the RESOLUTION to see the flag or lander.
-
AND... Hell yeah the first thing I would look at if I ran the Hubble would be to PROVE they landed on the moon and get a pic of the crap they supposedly left there-that is, if they really ever went there at all
-
Shyt before you make an even bigger ass of yourself look at the link I posted. The one from nasa themselves showing pictures of one of the Apollo missions were you can clearly see both astronauts on the surface and their rover. Then underneath it tells you which Apollo mission and the the Hubble took the pictures. Did you fail to see that post?
-
Papillon wrote:
There is a horizontal rod going across the top of the flag so it doesn't just "sag" or whatever.Yer doped out of his head. Lol
So why was the flag blowing when there's no wind on the moon. Where's the stars in the background ? Why is it pitch black. The shadows don't add up to the kind of shadow it should be from the light of the sun. When they were supposed to be three mile away from there landing spot they filmed there selves in the moon buggy, why were all the rocks exactly the same size and position as at the landing spot. Last one when blasting off the moon why didn't dust come up with the moon being covered in it.
We've been had
-
Ojibwe wrote:
Ah yea I see what I did. I thought something was up myself but didn't feel like bein bothered to look into it xD oh well guess its time to eat my crow =pYou read the caption wrong, dm. Those photos were not concurrent.
-
🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
They would circulate pictures of it taken from high powered telescopes most deffenetly. But they won't because it isn't up thereWhat exactt makes me stupid? I know the first thing I would look at with the telescope wouldn't be a flag on the moon lol. It seems like a waste to take such an expensive picture of something everyone has already seen.
-
ΛŦLΛŜ wrote:
But it was actually moving like wind was blowing itPapillon wrote:
There is a horizontal rod going across the top of the flag so it doesn't just "sag" or whatever.Yer doped out of his head. Lol
So why was the flag blowing when there's no wind on the moon. Where's the stars in the background ? Why is it pitch black. The shadows don't add up to the kind of shadow it should be from the light of the sun. When they were supposed to be three mile away from there landing spot they filmed there selves in the moon buggy, why were all the rocks exactly the same size and position as at the landing spot. Last one when blasting off the moon why didn't dust come up with the moon being covered in it.
We've been had
-
You know papillon I may have made a complete ass of myself here but I don't need you to draw attention from me to yourself. Or are you serious?
-
Papillon wrote:
Just mocking the people in this thread.ΤΞ⊄Η∩➒₦∉ wrote:
What ?????Lizard people?
Fuck this thread.
-
I think we'll find that papillon is just fucking with us. He couldn't actually believe this crap. No one believes it. Even the most ardent conspiracy theorists are just doing it for the money. And shiggles.
I don't mind. It's been fun playing along.
-
🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
Deadly serious , they were in a race with Russia and just bull shittedYou know papillon I may have made a complete ass of myself here but I don't need you to draw attention from me to yourself. Or are you serious?
-
Papillon wrote:
I'm sure they did. So are the Russians liars too? They never got a probe on the moon? What about china and India? What is the difference between landing a drone on the moon and a craft with humans in it?🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
Deadly serious , they were in a race with Russia and just bull shittedYou know papillon I may have made a complete ass of myself here but I don't need you to draw attention from me to yourself. Or are you serious?
-
Btw some extra food for thought. The soviets didn't dispute the moon landing. Don't you think that given the chance Russia would've immediately called a hoax and did everything to prove it false if it were the case? The USA landing on the moon showed technological supremacy over the Russians who at the time was trying to prove that they were the worlds superpower. What did Russia help hide the moon landing? Why would they make themselves seem inferior to a country they were competing with? If the Soviet Union couldn't prove its a hoax you think you could? Take a stab at it man give us everything you got.
-
Papillon wrote:
They would circulate pictures of it taken from high powered telescopes most deffenetly. But they won't because it isn't up there
I think I see why you aren't getting the information you are looking for.
It's g-o-o-g-l-e-.-c-o-m; not guegel.cam. LROC. Look it up. Pictures of the landing sites taken recently just for people like you.
-
Even if you go on google earth and select the moon view, it shows every landing and every picture of the moon. 80-90% of them are from Hubble and other satellites in orbit, and a few are from long-distance satellites as they flew past.
-
Papillon wrote:
But it was actually moving like wind was blowing it
That is from the physical phenomenon known as centripetal acceleration. Any object traveling in an arc accelerates towards the center of the arc itself. As the flag accelerated from the astronaut spinning the post to put the flag in the ground the flag accelerated centripetally towards the center of the arc. It also gains inertia at this point. That means to twist the post back the flag must first lose it's initial velocity to move back in the other direction. -
Oh and all Apollo missions left mirrors on the surface of the moon to prove we were there.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC