Home | News | Forums | Turf Map | Screenshots | Play Turf Wars Now!

Duck Dynasty

• 〓 S E E K E R 〓 Dec 25, 2013

  Come on Lex. Quit being a child and actually back up your statements. Or is name calling your only line of defense? Lol
• 〓 S E E K E R 〓 Dec 25, 2013

  ☦ΔUGUSTIΠΣ☦ wrote:

  〓 S E E K E R 〓 wrote:

  ☦ΔUGUSTIΠΣ☦ wrote:

  〓 S E E K E R 〓 wrote:

  ☦ΔUGUSTIΠΣ☦ wrote:

  〓 S E E K E R 〓 wrote:

  🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:

  I love how a lack of by

  God

  Of course I follow rules. Rules set forth by MANKIND, called judge not god.

  How did man create marriage? Umm they used their

  I thought you would have learnt by now. You will NEVER change someone's mind by using bible versus to prove the b.
  

  Answer me seeker, how do you get truth without God?
  

  Science
• 〓 S E E K E R 〓 Dec 25, 2013

  Lex, are you one of those pathetic lawyers too? Have to be f you agree with that assclown for saying Phil should sue over this. Nothing wrong was done. Only a moron would disagree with that. Would all of you be as butthurt over this if Phil was a Muslim?
• ★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ Dec 25, 2013

  Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:

  ☦ΔUGUSTIΠΣ☦ wrote: He needs to give detail of what he means by "equal". I would beg to differ that he wants true equal rights or "protection". There is two lovely brothers a the moment who want to get married. Who is fnord to tell them they cant have equal rights. Im sure he wouldnt defend fathers marrying their daughters.

  Slippery slope. Kinda Straw man, too. "What's next? Boys marrying goats?"

  Its not slippery when its already in court.
• ★ΛUGUSTINΞ★ Dec 25, 2013

  ★fnord★ wrote:

  I hate to say it, but for many Christianity is a choice while being gay is clearly not. Which is worse, to criticize a chosen belief system or to criticize someone's innate human nature? In the bible the word hypocrite had a different meaning than it does today. It means one who practices their faith in public for all to see, or one who puts their religion on display. The Bible calls this a sin. Then, as now, there were many faiths and many lifestyle choices. They knew that the hypocrites did more harm than good in aggressively spreading the word of God. This remains true today, as we are seeing. You have to give respect to get it.
  

  Its not a choice? Where you born in a cave? If i had my computer running if show you even atheistic web pages of articles in their unsupport of this "gay gene" because the science even denies it.
• ★MΛΥΗΞΜ★ Dec 25, 2013

  I would like to see your source from the science atheistic webpages
• ~Kountra Dec 25, 2013

  Ojibwe wrote:

  Which code does the prohibition on divorce and remarriage fall under?
  

  Lol you make another comment on divorce yet you completely ignored my response to your accusations on my beliefs for divorce.
• ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ Dec 25, 2013

  Here's a shocker: 100% of heterosexual people agree with Phil. It's why we are straight. If you think having sex with another man would be nice, you ain't straight! Every straight person thinks its gross. If you don't, you ain't straight. Therefore, the huge majority agree with Phil. And A&E is now bowing to a huge minority.
• 〓UNDERTOW〓 Dec 25, 2013

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  Here's a shocker: 100% of heterosexual people agree with Phil. It's why we are straight. If you think having sex with another man would be nice, you ain't straight! Every straight person thinks its gross. If you don't, you ain't straight. Therefore, the huge majority agree with Phil. And A&E is now bowing to a huge minority.
  

  Are you suggesting that the majority of people don't agree with the points of view that Fnord, Addi and Ojibwe whine and cry about???? Maybe if they were more tolerant instead of forcing their opinions on everyone else. It's amazing how hostile they get because their feelings are more important than anyone else's opinion.
• Ojibwe Dec 25, 2013

  Tides a'turning guys. Gays are getting married in Utah today. Your states are next. :)
• ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ Dec 26, 2013

  Ojibwe wrote:

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  Here's a shocker: 100% of heterosexual people agree with Phil. It's why we are straight. If you think having sex with another man would be nice, you ain't straight! Every straight person thinks its gross. If you don't, you ain't straight. Therefore, the huge majority agree with Phil. And A&E is now bowing to a huge minority.
  

  Yeah that's stupid considering there's a bunch of straight people here opposed to Phil's comments. Also in Minnesota as an example the gay marriage ban amendment lost by 52%. Considering that lgbt people make up at most 5% of the population, your math is ridiculous.

  What I said was if you think having sex with another man sounds fun, you ain't straight. If the thought of a man having sex with you sounds fun, you ain't straight. That's Phil's whole point.
• Ojibwe Dec 26, 2013

  Yeah ok, anyway it's been fun arguing with you guys. But more and more states are giving gays equal marriage rights. Your, and Phil's, arguments are becoming moot. You're on the wrong side of history and public opinion. Your point of view will soon be a quaint and old fashioned historical footnote. :)
• ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ Dec 26, 2013

  Ojibwe wrote:

  Yeah ok, anyway it's been fun arguing with you guys. But more and more states are giving gays equal marriage rights. Your, and Phil's, arguments are becoming moot. You're on the wrong side of history and public opinion. Your point of view will soon be a quaint and old fashioned historical footnote. :)
  

  GIVING not earning. I don't understand how any straight person doesn't agree with Phil. He said it was gross to him. If you think 2 dudes having sex ain't gross, you're not straight.
• ~Kountra Dec 26, 2013

  Ojibwe wrote:

  Yeah ok, anyway it's been fun arguing with you guys. But more and more states are giving gays equal marriage rights. Your, and Phil's, arguments are becoming moot. You're on the wrong side of history and public opinion. Your point of view will soon be a quaint and old fashioned historical footnote. :)
  

  Let me just say that if you think states like Louisiana and other southern states are going to legalize gay marriage you're in for a rude awakening. The only thing less likely than southern states voting in gay marriage would be us giving up our guns xD.
• Ojibwe Dec 26, 2013

  🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:

  Ojibwe wrote:

  Yeah ok, anyway it's been fun arguing with you guys. But more and more states are giving gays equal marriage rights. Your, and Phil's, arguments are becoming moot. You're on the wrong side of history and public opinion. Your point of view will soon be a quaint and old fashioned historical footnote. :)
  

  Let me just say that if you think states like Louisiana and other southern states are going to legalize gay marriage you're in for a rude awakening. The only thing less likely than southern states voting in gay marriage would be us giving up our guns xD.

  Louisiana's laws barring gay marriage are the same as Utah's. Look what happened there this week. It doesn't matter how many people voted for it if it is unconstitutional. Just a matter of time. Get used to it. :)
• ✯RagnarLoðbrók✯ Dec 26, 2013

  🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:

  Ojibwe wrote:

  Yeah ok, anyway it's been fun arguing with you guys. But more and more states are giving gays equal marriage rights. Your, and Phil's, arguments are becoming moot. You're on the wrong side of history and public opinion. Your point of view will soon be a quaint and old fashioned historical footnote. :)
  

  Let me just say that if you think states like Louisiana and other southern states are going to legalize gay marriage you're in for a rude awakening. The only thing less likely than southern states voting in gay marriage would be us giving up our guns xD.

  The south said the same thing about their slaves about 150 years ago. How'd that work out?
• ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ Dec 26, 2013

  I see the coming flood. I know gays will be able to marry and I've said it for years. Doesn't matter how big the majority is against it. But, it will still be outlawed in my home. And it will be 100 years before a gay couple feels comfortable kissing in public in my hometown.
• ʟɛx тooтʜɛʀ™ Dec 26, 2013

  〓 S E E K E R 〓 wrote:

  Come on Lex. Quit being a child and actually back up your statements. Or is name calling your only line of defense? Lol
  

  I'm saying you're being a douche bag, not anyone else. The way you're so intolerantly belittling someone else's opinion or even their possible mistaken viewpoints. I never said anything about agreeing with him.
  And name calling being an only line of defense? Please go back and read your posts.
  -also, forgive me for not getting a rebuttal to you in your timely preference. Some people choose not to make this their life.
• sural746 Dec 26, 2013

  Anyone else grabbed a bowl of popcorn to watch the argument?
• Ojibwe Dec 26, 2013

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  I see the coming flood. I know gays will be able to marry and I've said it for years. Doesn't matter how big the majority is against it. But, it will still be outlawed in my home. And it will be 100 years before a gay couple feels comfortable kissing in public in my hometown.
  

  Don't worry Mack. In twenty years you'll wonder what the big deal was all about. You'll have kids or grand kids who are gay and married and you'll love them like the others. You'll attend gay marriages and dance with the brides. People are adaptable, you'll be fine. :)
• ꅔꉻꐪ꒩ᵀᴸ Dec 26, 2013

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  Ojibwe wrote:

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  I have an explanation as to why it doesn't say in red "gay is bad". Where in our law does it say that if your robot goes to the store and wrecks, you're responsible? It doesn't cause that whole scinario is so far out of our realm we words.
  

  Sorry Mack but homosexuality is as old as the human race, probably older. It's not a new development like robots.

  Won't be able to convince me of that....
  

  That has to be one of the funniest things I've ever read on the Internet. A new era of understanding and hope emerges for people with a different sexual preference in the wiring.

  "Didn't exist before then, obviously."

  I can't do this anymore. Bowing out now, goodnight.
• gunstreet grrl Dec 26, 2013

  〓 S E E K E R 〓 wrote:

  ☦ΔUGUSTIΠΣ☦ wrote:

  〓 S E E K E R 〓 wrote:

  ☦ΔUGUSTIΠΣ☦ wrote:

  〓 S E E K E R 〓 wrote:

  ☦ΔUGUSTIΠΣ☦ wrote:

  〓 S E E K E R 〓 wrote:

  🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:

  I love how a lack of by

  God

  Of course I follow rules. Rules set forth by MANKIND, called judge not god.

  How did man create marriage? Umm they used their

  b.
  

  Answer me seeker, how do you get truth without God?
  

  Science

  Best response of all time.

  In that vein, merry Isaac Newton day to those living outside the "law."
• ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ Dec 26, 2013

  Ojibwe wrote:

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  I see the coming flood. I know gays will be able to marry and I've said it for years. Doesn't matter how big the majority is against it. But, it will still be outlawed in my home. And it will be 100 years before a gay couple feels comfortable kissing in public in my hometown.
  

  Don't worry Mack. In twenty years you'll wonder what the big deal was all about. You'll have kids or grand kids who are gay and married and you'll love them like the others. You'll attend gay marriages and dance with the brides. People are adaptable, you'll be fine. :)

  I can honestly say that if one of my daughters turned gay, they would be disowned. I don't support that lifestyle even in my own kids.
• ✯RagnarLoðbrók✯ Dec 26, 2013

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  Ojibwe wrote:

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  I can honestly say that if one of my daughters turned gay, they would be disowned. I don't support that lifestyle even in my own kids.
  

  I doubt it. You may disapprove, but I'm willing to bet you will still love them.

  What if your child rejects your faith? Will you disown him/her for that?

  What if he/she becomes addicted to prescription painkillers after a tooth extraction, and turns to crime to support his/her addiction? Are you gonna disown her, or get her the help she needs?

  For someone who claims to be Christian you don't sound very Christ like.

  How did Christ react when the woman caught in adultery was brought to him? Did he disown her, or did he forgive her, and tell her to go forth and sin no more?
• Ojibwe Dec 26, 2013

  You're not losing a daughter, you're gaining... ah ah another daughter.
• ★fnord★ Dec 26, 2013

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  Here's a shocker: 100% of heterosexual people agree with Phil. It's why we are straight. If you think having sex with another man would be nice, you ain't straight! Every straight person thinks its gross. If you don't, you ain't straight. Therefore, the huge majority agree with Phil. And A&E is now bowing to a huge minority.
  

  Why in your analogy is Phil imagining dudes going at it? Weird. Do you imagine dudes going at it just to guage your level of revulsion? I sure don't. Pick out two women that you are not in any at attracted to and imagine them going at it. If it's gross to you then you must not be attracted to women. 100% of people may be grossed out by imagining people they don't find attractive having sex, but oddly enough 53% support their right to marry and it's trending upward:
  http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx
• ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ Dec 26, 2013

  ★fnord★ wrote:

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  Here's a shocker: 100% of heterosexual people agree with Phil. It's why we are straight. If you think having sex Therefore, the huge majority agree with Phil. And A&E is now bowing to a huge minority.
  

  Why in your analogy is Phil imagining dudes going at it? Weird. Do you imagine dudes going at it just to guage your level of revulsion? I sure don't. Pick out two women that you are not in any at attracted to and imagine them going at it. If it's gross to you then you must not be attracted to women. 100% of people may be grossed out by imagining people they don't find attractive having sex, but oddly enough 53% support their right to marry and it's trending upward:
  http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

  Then why not let the people decide instead of the courts?
• 〓 S E E K E R 〓 Dec 26, 2013

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  ★fnord★ wrote:

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  Here's a shocker: 100% of heterosexual people agree with Phil. It's why we are straight. If you think having sex Therefore, the huge majority agree with Phil. And A&E is now bowing to a huge minority.
  

  Why :
  http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

  Then why not let the people decide instead of the courts?
  

  Do you really have to ask that? Let's let muslim's vote on your rights. See how fast you start fighting back then.
• ★fnord★ Dec 26, 2013

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  ★fnord★ wrote:

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote: ✂️
  

  ✂️53% support their right to marry and it's trending upward:
  http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

  Then why not let the people decide instead of the courts?
  

  Because direct democracy is like two wolves and a sheep voting to decide what's for dinner. Also it seems a bit redundant to hold a popular vote on whether or not we should follow the Constitution.
• 〓UNDERTOW〓 Dec 26, 2013

  ★fnord★ wrote:

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote:

  ★fnord★ wrote:

  ᎷᎪᏟᏦᎷᎬᏟᎻ ᎪᎠᎠ ᏦᎷ wrote: ✂️

  ✂️53% support their right to marry and it's trending upward:
  http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

  Then why not let the people decide instead of the courts?
  

  Because direct democracy is like two wolves and a sheep voting to decide what's for dinner. Also it seems a bit redundant to hold a popular vote on whether or not we should follow the Constitution.

  Can't even get the quote right.

Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC