The Syria situation ....
Forums › General Discussion › The Syria situation ....-
What is your guys opinion on us (the US) taking military action on this? If you want my opinion I think: we aren't the world police, but something has to be done. I say we go for it and bomb the airports but NOT kill the leader! I say we "open the doors" for the civilians and they do what they want with him. They can kill him or whatever and then do what Egypt is still tryna do.. Elect a new leader and make sure he's trustworthy. What you guys think
-
The chemicals reportedly came from Saudi, according to the markings found on the barrels. Saudi is the rebels' biggest supporter. Who really used the chems is in dispute. Remember, the same rebels we're supporting are the same ones who support Al Queda. Do some research.
-
Im inclined to say: dont put a finger in the hornets nest, they sting.
But something has to be done about it.
Another thing: i agree with joka when hè says the US is not the world police, but then why does the whole world look at the US when something has to be done somewhere?
If the US does decide to step in, i sure hope that it doesnt backfire.
-
A couple years from now when the rebels establish a new government, the U.S. will have a long drawn out military conflict with them. I say we prolong the war to where each side is so weak the U.S. could appoint their own leaders 👍
-
🏃💨fartex💩 wrote:
Fart, the UK are gearing up too...Im inclined to say: dont put a finger in the hornets nest, they sting.
But something has to be done about it.
Another thing: i agree with joka when hè says the US is not the world police, but then why does the whole world look at the US when something has to be done somewhere?
If the US does decide to step in, i sure hope that it doesnt backfire.
Just as in Libya when the UK and France were carrying out air strikes...
-
💩The Other Guy💩 wrote:
The UK and many other countries, not just US.🏃💨fartex💩 wrote:
Fart, the UK are gearing up too...Im inclined to say: dont put a finger in the hornets nest, they sting.
But something has to be done about it.
Another thing: i agree with joka when hè says the US is not the world police, but then why does the whole world look at the US when something has to be done somewhere?
If the US does decide to step in, i sure hope that it doesnt backfire.
Just as in Libya when the UK and France were carrying out air strikes...
-
The US have a very large military force, who wouldn't want them onside? That being said they are not the only force that inject themselves into conflicts. Even Oz sends troops. We just don't have the numbers the US has, that makes the US a target.
-
‡℟ɸɱⱥɲ☧ɭɇɠɩɸɳ‡ wrote:
Like cuba?A couple years from now when the rebels establish a new government, the U.S. will have a long drawn out military conflict with them. I say we prolong the war to where each side is so weak the U.S. could appoint their own leaders 👍
Not only did we HELP the rebels but we also chose the leader and that leader was Castro, then he said "FUCK YOU" and went back on his promise to change the government from a dictatorship to democracy -
‡℟ɸɱⱥɲ☧ɭɇɠɩɸɳ‡ wrote:
👆brilliant! They hate us anyway. Let's turn that place into Thunderdome!!!!A couple years from now when the rebels establish a new government, the U.S. will have a long drawn out military conflict with them. I say we prolong the war to where each side is so weak the U.S. could appoint their own leaders 👍
-
If you think about it the mass regional media can skew things to their favor. Rebels could have been the ones using those weapons against their own, to frame the Governement of Syria. Then again the CIA has a shady past in other countries. Some thing to think about.😨
-
💩The Other Guy💩 wrote:
Oh, im aware of that buddy. But a real life friend of mine that lives near york have been talking about this topic a couple of days ago, and hè told me that hè didnt really want the UK to get involved, as the financial Side of it is going to put a huge strain on tax money... Thats why i left the Uk out of it 😉🏃💨fartex💩 wrote:
Fart, the UK are gearing up too...Im inclined to say: dont put a finger in the hornets nest, they sting.
But something has to be done about it.
Another thing: i agree with joka when hè says the US is not the world police, but then why does the whole world look at the US when something has to be done somewhere?
If the US does decide to step in, i sure hope that it doesnt backfire.
Just as in Libya when the UK and France were carrying out air strikes...
-
I wish we'd stay out of it. We don't understand the nature of things in Syria. We hardly understand the nature of things in our own country. France helped the US in our revolutionary war, and now it seems we hate each other. (I don't hate France, I'm envious of how much their people care about their issues.) So who wants to be Syria's France? I'd rather be like Switzerland. Neutral til the end. Could the US ever be neutral, or are we too intertwined with globalism? Don't get me wrong, I appreciate all that the US has provided for me, I just lack faith in our leaders (both parties), and our declining society (due to the media and rampant greed).
-
ebenezer wrote:
Most European countries hate us too lolI wish we'd stay out of it. We don't understand the nature of things in Syria. We hardly understand the nature of things in our own country. France helped the US in our revolutionary war, and now it seems we hate each other.
The majority if French people hate Americans for some strange reason. A lot of Americans like the French and Europeans and I don't have a problem with the Europeans I've come to know but I wouldn't travel there to cross paths with all the haters. Otherwise I might end up leaving a trail of knocked out people behind me (which country is it where cops don't carry guns?) in a country like that I would have the most fun ever running from the police 😂 -
Bernie Green wrote:
‡℟ɸɱⱥɲ☧ɭɇɠɩɸɳ‡ wrote:
👆brilliant! They hate us anyway. Let's turn that place into Thunderdome!!!!A couple years from now when the rebels establish a new government, the U.S. will have a long drawn out military conflict with them. I say we prolong the war to where each side is so weak the U.S. could appoint their own leaders 👍
Idiot. Let's tear up a whole country of civilians off all kinds, beliefs, and mindstates! Fuck yeah!!
Don't forget we are STILL fighting in Afghanistan, which shows no signs of ending, and Iraq us still a mess. Plus, Syria & Iran are close allies. This could tear the entire Mid East up. But hell yeah, let's do this shit anyway!
-
✮⇚❹☠❶☠❺⇛✮ wrote:
Actually the rebels are supported by Al Queda not supporting. So the US and Al Queda are on the same team... sort of. Al Queda said that they would attack iran if we help the rebels even though they are also helping the rebels in syriaThe chemicals reportedly came from Saudi, according to the markings found on the barrels. Saudi is the rebels' biggest supporter. Who really used the chems is in dispute. Remember, the same rebels we're supporting are the same ones who support Al Queda. Do some research.
-
Actually, some factions of the Syrian rebels pledged their allegiance to Al Queda leaders. So yeah, we're now on the "same side." Kinda.
Also, there's the tiny issue of creating a bad situation with Russia & China, too.
-
✮⇚❹☠❶☠❺⇛✮ wrote:
Yea but more than likely Russia would chill because we're not allies but the US and Russia are basically neutral, however Russia has been looking for a reason to push china's shit in for a long time now.Actually, some factions of the Syrian rebels pledged their allegiance to Al Queda leaders. So yeah, we're now on the "same side." Kinda.
Also, there's the tiny issue of creating a bad situation with Russia & China, too.
-
🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
Didn't the Russians get there butts kicked by the Taliban when the CIA was helping the Taliban ?Afghanistan✮⇚❹☠❶☠❺⇛✮ wrote:
Yea but more than likely Russia would chill because we're not allies but the US and Russia are basically neutral, however Russia has been looking for a reason to push china's shit in for a long time now.Actually, some factions of the Syrian rebels pledged their allegiance to Al Queda leaders. So yeah, we're now on the "same side." Kinda.
Also, there's the tiny issue of creating a bad situation with Russia & China, too.
-
⌖🔥ཧ़ཀंེབ།༨ཛყ🔥⌖ wrote:
I think you're right🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
Didn't the Russians get there butts kicked by the Taliban when the CIA was helping the Taliban ?Afghanistan✮⇚❹☠❶☠❺⇛✮ wrote:
Yea but more than likely Russia would chill because we're not allies but the US and Russia are basically neutral, however Russia has been looking for a reason to push china's shit in for a long time now.Actually, some factions of the Syrian rebels pledged their allegiance to Al Queda leaders. So yeah, we're now on the "same side." Kinda.
Also, there's the tiny issue of creating a bad situation with Russia & China, too.
-
⌖🔥ཧ़ཀंེབ།༨ཛყ🔥⌖ wrote:
If im not mistaking the russians where over there for about 12 years? I could be wrong however.🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
Didn't the Russians get there butts kicked by the Taliban when the CIA was helping the Taliban ?Afghanistan✮⇚❹☠❶☠❺⇛✮ wrote:
Yea but more than likely Russia would chill because we're not allies but the US and Russia are basically neutral, however Russia has been looking for a reason to push china's shit in for a long time now.Actually, some factions of the Syrian rebels pledged their allegiance to Al Queda leaders. So yeah, we're now on the "same side." Kinda.
Also, there's the tiny issue of creating a bad situation with Russia & China, too.
-
The Taliban fought the Russians in Afghanistan and were losing. Until the US stepped in and provided weapons & training. Yeah, the Taliban, much like Iran & even Osama, were loose allies once. Which makes it even stupider, seeing the history of our past "friends" there, to intervene in the Mid East. Just imagine if all this money was spent domestically on education, job creation & infrastructure, what it could do for the US.
-
Who ever comes out on top is the one who set the stage. The details are irrelevant and full of misguided propaganda. They talk about peace yet only resort to violence. This is not a war, this is war profiteering at the expense of innocents.
-
My opinion: US should stay out of it. Neither side is/will be a US Allie. Let some other country take the lead. The US is broke... We can't afford to be the worlds police.
-
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3835530?utm_hp_ref=world
-
✮⇚❹☠❶☠❺⇛✮ wrote:
More than likely for show than anything. Russia couldn't honestly think their navy would be capable of stopping the United States Navy. Not trying to seem like a stereotypical American but our navy is literally the strongest in the world. They more than likely did it just to try and discourage the US.http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3835530?utm_hp_ref=world
-
Its funny how they are yet again trying to convince the nation that the Syrian conflict a "moral" issue, while the real moral issues facing our country are violated -- by actions like taking food and early education away from children, ripping off college students, having a minimum wage equivalently lower than it was in 1968, swiping pensions from private and public employees, attacking Social Security and subsidizing devious banksters who practice debt extortion all over the world to rob communities and nations of their revenues and treasures? You know, just to scratch the surface of our own "wars" we need to fight...
-
So, the question isn't is it wrong what the Assad Regime is doing but is it in our national interest to do something about it? Does Syria pose an immediate threat to our country? Well, there's no indication that it does, so we should not involve ourselves in another's civil war. Why is it that it only matters when it provides an opportunity for for-profit (oil) war? What about all the other nations that continually have genocide? How is it that oil determines where our moral compass lies?
-
★Λddi★ wrote:
👋✋👋✌. You know too much drone flying above your house ✈.So, the question isn't is it wrong what the Assad Regime is doing but is it in our national interest to do something about it? Does Syria pose an immediate threat to our country? Well, there's no indication that it does, so we should not involve ourselves in another's civil war. Why is it that it only matters when it provides an opportunity for for-profit (oil) war? What about all the other nations that continually have genocide? How is it that oil determines where our moral compass lies?
-
🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
When has one side ever stopped the other due to military prowess? When you back a wild animal into a corner after tazing and beating his family for centuries, you're damn right he's not going to roll over and die. You don't fight the americans with an army, you destroy them from the inside and pitch them against themselves with terrorism. Trust me, america can't win shit with their army, matter of fact, their army is what is destroying their country.✮⇚❹☠❶☠❺⇛✮ wrote:
More than likely for show than anything. Russia couldn't honestly think their navy would be capable of stopping the United States Navy. Not trying to seem like a stereotypical American but our navy is literally the strongest in the world. They more than likely did it just to try and discourage the US.http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3835530?utm_hp_ref=world
-
⌖🔥ཧ़ཀंེབ།༨ཛყ🔥⌖ wrote:
Lmao, but will the insurance claim get me a better one? 🙊★Λddi★ wrote:
👋✋👋✌. You know too much drone flying above your house ✈.So, the question isn't is it wrong what the Assad Regime is doing but is it in our national interest to do something about it? Does Syria pose an immediate threat to our country? Well, there's no indication that it does, so we should not involve ourselves in another's civil war. Why is it that it only matters when it provides an opportunity for for-profit (oil) war? What about all the other nations that continually have genocide? How is it that oil determines where our moral compass lies?
-
★MΛΥΗΞΜ★ wrote:
So right, Mayhem. Remember those silly founding fathers that told us to stay our of foreign affairs? To bad we treat their words like we treat the words of the Bible. Selective reading and memories. But hey, as long as the moronic masses keep supporting the gains of the few, here we are. ;)🔰darkmagician🔰 wrote:
Trust me, america can't win shit with their army, matter of fact, their army is what is destroying their country.✮⇚❹☠❶☠❺⇛✮ wrote:
.http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3835530?utm_hp_ref=world
It's like this whole idea "well they hate us anyways, might as well." God damn right they hate us. We hate them without them murdering our women and children and destroying our societies the last 50 years. Imagine how we would feel if the shoe was on the other foot. Money, the destroyer of souls.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC