Is this guy cheating?

Forums › General Discussion › Is this guy cheating?

BeanDawg Sep 5, 2010

Wanted to have a few people check out J Dubity Dizzle, looks like he is blatantly muling to me, wanted some second opinions, thanks.
Johnny O 💃 Sep 5, 2010

WOW 2122 turfs mostly at 1 influence. Many capped from the same player. I am not the judge here but I would say it's worth sending over to the TW feedback post.
Johnny O 💃 Sep 5, 2010

He has a nice win ratio.Lol
Yeaaah ride that 🐴.
RENO Sep 5, 2010

Ya, we all have been enjoying this F*+%# Fest. It's our own mini Burning Man. 🔥🔥🔥🔥
\\// (/\dd Vee) Sep 5, 2010

Feedback already sent a while ago. That player knows what he is doing is wrong and that he is at nicks mercy now. Most likely he will lose all those turf. IMO his fight stats should be reset as well. This is all assuming nick takes pity on him and let's him keep his mob.
Primo Loco Sep 5, 2010

👆 only cuz we're all tired of losin mob right 😏
BeanDawg Sep 5, 2010

Bump
BeanDawg Sep 5, 2010

Bump
nick Sep 5, 2010

It's been made pretty clear that this is within the game rules. There's already an income penalty for players who own a lot of another player's turf. As long as there's no sharing of vendettas between potential multiple accounts than they are free to play the game.
Howard Sep 5, 2010

nick wrote:
It's been made pretty clear that this is within the game rules. There's already an income penalty for players who own a lot of another player's turf. As long as there's no sharing of vendettas between potential multiple accounts than they are free to play the game.

So if I got myself a mule I can just repeatedly cap it and it would be within the rules?
Lilrhys [reset] Sep 5, 2010

It would be better if a big player went on a capping spree on him
nick Sep 5, 2010

Howard wrote:
nick wrote:
It's been made pretty clear that this is within the game rules. There's already an income penalty for players who own a lot of another player's turf. As long as there's no sharing of vendettas between potential multiple accounts than they are free to play the game.

So if I got myself a mule I can just repeatedly cap it and it would be within the rules?

You would suffer a severe income penalty on all turfs belonging to your mule, so it wouldn't make any economic sense to do so.

The reasoning is simple: unless we start collecting Social Security numbers from all players, there's no 100% guarantee that 2 accounts belong to the same person, no matter how similar they may seem. Banning people because they almost 100% seem to be muling is like sentencing criminals to death based on circumstantial evidence.
Howard Sep 5, 2010

I can see where your coming from, how severe is the income penalty 60% 80%?
Dr. Robotnik Sep 5, 2010

Annoys me that people can get away with this.
BeanDawg Sep 6, 2010

Guess that answers it then, thx for the replies