🃏Down With Forum Police🃏
Forums › General Discussion › 🃏Down With Forum Police🃏-
BuckDuck wrote:
Listen to hyena. He's right. You're hurting yourself by capping the smaller people, because you lose money when they lose turfHow am i supposed to know whos inactive and who isnt???? And i didnt know i was supposed to let the high level players in my area have the upper hand. Isnt the point of the game to have fun and try to dominate others? And i just wanna clean up the area to make it easier for me when i level up....
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Los Angeles where he is at is densely populated. Income will not dropBuckDuck wrote:
Listen to hyena. He's right. You're hurting yourself by capping the smaller people, because you lose money when they lose turfHow am i supposed to know whos inactive and who isnt???? And i didnt know i was supposed to let the high level players in my area have the upper hand. Isnt the point of the game to have fun and try to dominate others? And i just wanna clean up the area to make it easier for me when i level up....
-
Buck. When capping smaller players it damages the economy for everyone. To find out if someone's inactive, put a larger turf over them. If they move they're active. Message the player. If they reply, they're active. There's lots of ways to find out. In dense cities its nor as important. It's the rural areas with 4-5 players that its crucial. If u have any more questions feel free to pm me. I'm happy to help.
-
ThatTallKid_ wrote:
So that makes it fine by you if he caps inactives? Why not tax them instead?ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Los Angeles where he is at is densely populated. Income will not dropBuckDuck wrote:
Listen to hyena. He's right. You're hurting yourself by capping the smaller people, because you lose money when they lose turfHow am i supposed to know whos inactive and who isnt???? And i didnt know i was supposed to let the high level players in my area have the upper hand. Isnt the point of the game to have fun and try to dominate others? And i just wanna clean up the area to make it easier for me when i level up....
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
How long is loot gonna last in LA if ur 10k mob ?ThatTallKid_ wrote:
So that makes it fine by you if he caps inactives? Why not tax them instead?ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Los Angeles where he is at is densely populated. Income will not dropBuckDuck wrote:
Listen to hyena. He's right. You're hurting yourself by capping the smaller people, because you lose money when they lose turfHow am i supposed to know whos inactive and who isnt???? And i didnt know i was supposed to let the high level players in my area have the upper hand. Isnt the point of the game to have fun and try to dominate others? And i just wanna clean up the area to make it easier for me when i level up....
-
Many people who just join go on the forums post something then mean players destroy them with out even blinking it's ok if it's a mean very distaistful post.
When I first started I posted a post that wasn't mean, but apparently it was " already done" how was I supposed to know ? I got attacked.
So please only smash if it's a mean or constantly annoying post, or someone who knows better
That's just my opinion ✌ -
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Not saying its okay, it's his own personal decision if he wants to. You said if he destroys/cap them his income will drop. I just pointed out his turf's income will not drop. I did not say go ahead and cap me Buck.ThatTallKid_ wrote:
So that makes it fine by you if he caps inactives? Why not tax them instead?ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Los Angeles where he is at is densely populated. Income will not dropBuckDuck wrote:
Listen to hyena. He's right. You're hurting yourself by capping the smaller people, because you lose money when they lose turfForum Post by Buck Duck
-
👆em not me
-
littlesis127 wrote:
Thanks for actually sticking around after 👍Many people who just join go on the forums post something then mean players destroy them with out even blinking it's ok if it's a mean very distaistful post.
When I first started I posted a post that wasn't mean, but apparently it was " already done" how was I supposed to know ? I got attacked.
So please only smash if it's a mean or constantly annoying post, or someone who knows better
That's just my opinion ✌ -
♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
How long is loot gonna last in LA if ur 10k mob ?ThatTallKid_ wrote:
So that makes it fine by you if he caps inactives? Why not tax them instead?ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Los Angeles where he is at is densely populated. Income will not dropBuckDuck wrote:
Listen to hyena. He's right. You're hurting yourself by capping the smaller people, because you lose money when they lose turfHow am i supposed to know whos inactive and who isnt???? And i didnt know i was supposed to let the high level players in my area have the upper hand. Isnt the point of the game to have fun and try to dominate others? And i just wanna clean up the area to make it easier for me when i level up....
-
LA is an alliance's base, so if you want to walk in there and cap their loot, be my guest. I'd bet tall kid's loot would last longer than the person who takes it from him
-
🐷💥🔫
-
Roman_Legionar wrote:
I feel like you're one that has yet to discover the map. You have 8 wins and over 150 losses🐷💥🔫
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
He's testing you Wegs, don't fall for it lolRoman_Legionar wrote:
I feel like you're one that has yet to discover the map. You have 8 wins and over 150 losses🐷💥🔫
-
This thread had Finlays written all over it...
-
tullid wrote:
👆I see them...This thread had Finlays written all over it...
-
Here a point about invite codes.
Many players from what u seen will keep the invite code up, knowing that like 10 players are attacking them, and telling them it's not allowed. That's the only thing that really pissed me off. -
This was an interesting read. I agree with the person who said that the people who typically attack the noobs for stupid reasons are the little clowns who aren't big enough to do anything to anyone except the little people. So they (cowardly) take their inferiority complex/aggression out on the noobs.
Concerning the person above who said they were attacked for making a thread just because it was done before..... That's cowardly behavior at its finest. Makes me want to smash that person for no reason.
Good conversation.
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
And "thattallkid_" has 0 turf in USA or Canada, So ur point has no meritLA is an alliance's base, so if you want to walk in there and cap their loot, be my guest. I'd bet tall kid's loot would last longer than the person who takes it from him
-
♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
He could if he tried.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
And "thattallkid_" has 0 turf in USA or Canada, So ur point has no meritLA is an alliance's base, so if you want to walk in there and cap their loot, be my guest. I'd bet tall kid's loot would last longer than the person who takes it from him
My point is, I'm trying to teach buck that capping inactives is bad, no matter where it is -
♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
He's saying that the 10k mob is protected by his alliance. I have loot all over Sydney and I'm only 10k mob. And I must say, it's awesome being in the best looking alliance in turf wars. 😃ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
And "thattallkid_" has 0 turf in USA or Canada, So ur point has no meritLA is an alliance's base, so if you want to walk in there and cap their loot, be my guest. I'd bet tall kid's loot would last longer than the person who takes it from him
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Actually, he can't. He's not allowed. He's tried it didn't work out.♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
He could if he tried.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
And "thattallkid_" has 0 turf in USA or Canada, So ur point has no meritLA is an alliance's base, so if you want to walk in there and cap their loot, be my guest. I'd bet tall kid's loot would last longer than the person who takes it from him
My point is, I'm trying to teach buck that capping inactives is bad, no matter where it is -
ThatTallKid_ wrote:
Yep you read correctly.༺☠Ꮹཞ༏ཀཀ☠༻ wrote:
Not allowed? Lmao😂ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Actually, he can't. He's not allowed. He's tried it didn't work out.♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
He could if he tried.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
And "thattallkid_" has 0 turf in USA or Canada, So ur point has no meritLA is an alliance's base, so if you want to walk in there and cap their loot, be my guest. I'd bet tall kid's loot would last longer than the person who takes it from him
My point is, I'm trying to teach buck that capping inactives is bad, no matter where it is
Don't worry Grimm I will let you know when I drop by next time
Evicted twice in a week= not allowed. -
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Actually capping older inactive turfs is a great way to hide pins so its not always bad.♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
He could if he tried.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
And "thattallkid_" has 0 turf in USA or Canada, So ur point has no meritLA is an alliance's base, so if you want to walk in there and cap their loot, be my guest. I'd bet tall kid's loot would last longer than the person who takes it from him
My point is, I'm trying to teach buck that capping inactives is bad, no matter where it is -
♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
He can learn that when he starts fighting, but I'd like to get him started off right. All you're teaching him is that it's right to cap inactivesωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Actually capping older inactive turfs is a great way to hide pins so its not always bad.♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
He could if he tried.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
And "thattallkid_" has 0 turf in USA or Canada, So ur point has no meritLA is an alliance's base, so if you want to walk in there and cap their loot, be my guest. I'd bet tall kid's loot would last longer than the person who takes it from him
My point is, I'm trying to teach buck that capping inactives is bad, no matter where it is -
If people aren't taxing them and it's in a town big enough to where it won't hurt the overall income, what's wrong with it ?
-
ThatTallKid_ wrote:
Im just gonna delete the vendetta and start a new one... Maybe try attacking someone who isnt being taxed.....people take this game too seriously...ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Not saying its okay, it's his own personal decision if he wants to. You said if he destroys/cap them his income will drop. I just pointed out his turf's income will not drop.ThatTallKid_ wrote:
So that makes it fine by you if he caps inactives? Why not tax them instead?ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Los Angeles where he is at is densely populated. Income will not dropBuckDuck wrote:
Listen to hyena. He's right. You're hurting yourself by capping the smaller people, because you lose money when they lose turfForum Post by Buck Duck
-
♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
What happens when he's in a small town and he takes your earlier advice without knowing the consequences?If people aren't taxing them and it's in a town big enough to where it won't hurt the overall income, what's wrong with it ?
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
What consequences are there for taking one inactive turf no one is taxing ? If u go to a small town and take one inactive turf, u make sure there's another one, I didn't say go in and burn the place down, but no one should smash or beat down a guy for taking one inactive turf, and if ur in a big city, I don't see anything wrong with taking a couple of inactive turfs.♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
What happens when he's in a small town and he takes your earlier advice without knowing the consequences?If people aren't taxing them and it's in a town big enough to where it won't hurt the overall income, what's wrong with it ?
-
♛Çąŋժूƴɱąŋ♛ wrote:
ExactlyIf people aren't taxing them and it's in a town big enough to where it won't hurt the overall income, what's wrong with it ?
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC