State of the CMS
Forums › General Discussion › State of the CMS-
Quit dodging the subject Nate. According to brown. The CMS is calling the ECS out because we haven't met "your mob standards" for the entire game.
-
\\// (/\dd Vee) wrote:
So u are saying brown is not going to carry CMS anymore? Or it is just today I am Rambo tomorrow I am not?As an outsider looking in It doesn't seem as though all of CMS as a whole is initiating attacks on any one group. Seems more like Brown is playing the game as he wants without the backing of CMS. Unless I missed something that is. IMO players should be able to play the game they want alliance or not. assuming of course that their conduct does not all out violate to core values of the group they represent.
If Brown or any other member of any group wants to go solo Rambo style against a whole alliance more power to him and best of luck defeating a whole group on your own.
-
!Davey Boy 🌇🌊🔨 wrote:
U do think he need a reason to attack u ... Drizzy is right this is publicity ... The joke is not funny at all and u guys tolerate that that's why they take another step...Quit dodging the subject Nate. According to brown. The CMS is calling the ECS out because we haven't met "your mob standards" for the entire game.
-
Nate. I'd stop discussing this. You have backing on this decision. Some players don't understamd the difference between good leadership and blind following. Their loss i say
-
(stepping aside from CMS, of course)
Davey, I have experienced both your leadership and Nate's. To put it bluntly, you are not up to Nate's standards as a leader by a long shot.I took off my colors before going out on my own recently, so that I could have one last retirement bash. I did that out of respect for the mature leadership of the CMS officers, who comparatively make you look like a screaming child.
I am not attacking you here. I am just clearing the air. Talking down to Nate like that, coming from you, just makes me want to quit being polite, and tell it like I see it.
I think I have done enough damage here. I'm finished now. I had a great time playing here. I think I'll just hang out chatting with my friends and making smart-ass comments here and on my wiki. My turf belongs to all of you. Have fun trying to own an original brown note.
-
If Brown or any other member of any group wants to go solo Rambo style against a whole alliance more power to him and best of luck defeating a whole group on your own.
CMS members have been attacking Gc3 members while we were allied. Instead of nate holding onto the ally title, which would require him to punish or some kind of recourse to his members, he says screw it we aren't allies.Gc3 hasnt once retaliated bcuz we respect most of CMS, and we come to nate thinking he held friends as valuable as we do. We were wrong obviously.
-
👿βΣŁĮÅŁ wrote:
I'm not doubting the core values of the CMS or any alliance. My issue mearly lies in how CMS has decided to govern how many mob we must have and how many turf we can have and where.Nate. I'd stop discussing this. You have backing on this decision. Some players don't understamd the difference between good leadership and blind following. Their loss i say
-
👿βΣŁĮÅŁ wrote:
im a FKN SSG in the Army with 3 tours of war under my belt and 7 years of leadership experience in some of the most stressful situations YOU COULD NEVER IMAGINE. go back to disneyland mfkr dont try to tell me shit about leadership.Nate. I'd stop discussing this. You have backing on this decision. Some players don't understamd the difference between good leadership and blind following. Their loss i say
lets compare awards and accolades if u wanna take that route.
MoMo hit it on the BUTTON.
"i think today ill do what i want, then come back to cms tomorrow".
CMS isnt a group at all. just a gathering of the largest pkayers
-
!Davey Boy 🌇🌊🔨 wrote:
oh I can see where you're coming from davey. That wasmt directed at you per se👿βΣŁĮÅŁ wrote:
I'm not doubting the core values of the CMS or any alliance. My issue mearly lies in how CMS has decided to govern how many mob we must have and how many turf we can have and where.Nate. I'd stop discussing this. You have backing on this decision. Some players don't understamd the difference between good leadership and blind following. Their loss i say
-
👿βΣŁĮÅŁ wrote:
Agreed. No hard feelings.!Davey Boy 🌇🌊🔨 wrote:
oh I can see where you're coming from davey. That wasmt directed at you per se👿βΣŁĮÅŁ wrote:
I'm not doubting the core values of the CMS or any alliance. My issue mearly lies in how CMS has decided to govern how many mob we must have and how many turf we can have and where.Nate. I'd stop discussing this. You have backing on this decision. Some players don't understamd the difference between good leadership and blind following. Their loss i say
-
I think we're done hear. Comparing real life accolades in a virtual game is just plain silly. The two are no where close to comparable. If these attacks were intended to be a crew wide assault then I assure you that it would have been a whole CMS involved hit. Yes CMS players have attacked ECS players and Gc3 players. If we wanted to wage war on either group.....we would have done that. We don't want that.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
so instead of handling your own people for their actions, which would require action on your part, you say ok fuck it ill follow my members and do what they want me to do.I think we're done hear. Comparing real life accolades in a virtual game is just plain silly. The two are no where close to comparable. If these attacks were intended to be a crew wide assault then I assure you that it would have been a whole CMS involved hit. Yes CMS players have attacked ECS players and Gc3 players. If we wanted to wage war on either group.....we would have done that. We don't want that.
Belial always makes remarks reguarding real life don't act like he doesn't. Im not the one who took it there, i just responded.
-
I'm confused. We have alliances and individuals in this game. I assume that the lashing out at Nate is because of Brown Note poking ECS with his big shtick. But is it not Brown as an individual playing his war games? Can't one alliance take on one individual member? At the end of the day this game is just that, a game. I would say you all should try to have a little more fun with it and play the game. It's not like someone kills your kitten every time a turf gets capped. All I'm saying is have some fun with this and roll with the punches. although I am not the one getting punched so maybe it is easier to say that from here, I dunno.
-
\\// (/\dd Vee) wrote:
Down south there are some skirmishes over disputed local territory. But I don't hit GC3. I don't have much history with them, other than putz, who is a warrior worth respecting.I'm confused. We have alliances and individuals in this game. I assume that the lashing out at Nate is because of Brown Note poking ECS with his big shtick. But is it not Brown as an individual playing his war games? Can't one alliance take on one individual member? At the end of the day this game is just that, a game. I would say you all should try to have a little more fun with it and play the game. It's not like someone kills your kitten every time a turf gets capped. All I'm saying is have some fun with this and roll with the punches. although I am not the one getting punched so maybe it is easier to say that from here, I dunno.
-
Look, there are indeed people in my own group bigger and badder than me. Every single one of those people will defer to my judgement if I asked them too. NOT because of my size but because of my leadership. I give my group the perimeters to operate in and they appreciate that. As with any group there are times when those perimeters are challenged and those challenges are dealt with. Just not publicly. CMS is as stable now as it has ever been. Each of our members will tell you the same thing without prompting by leadership.
-
Nate, i told you some stuff on palringo you had no idea about. About some of your OWN members, don't tell me y'all are stable. A good leader will know about they people, and an outsider telling you things about them you didn't know is ridiculous.
they operate in parameters you set huh.... does that include attacking allies? oh yea thats right, you decided we aren't allies anymore.
-
I don't feel it necessary to defend my leadership style to you or anyone else. Congratulations on informing me that one of my members had turf in California. That is earth shattering information. There are some philosophical differences between CMS and Gc3/ECS. All allied groups have individuals who do not get along and to make te assumption that an individual hit reflects the nature of a group is a terrible mistake. My decision to terminate our alliance with Gc3 and ECS had everything to do with drama. I'm tires of putting out fires everytime an individual attack happens.
-
Aside from the burn Philly event (which I have publicly apologized for).......all of the attacks that your talking about have been on an individual basis and not a "CMS" hit.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
so you basically have no "group" standard. just "hey you have a big mob, slap this logo in your name and do as you please"Aside from the burn Philly event (which I have publicly apologized for).......all of the attacks that your talking about have been on an individual basis and not a "CMS" hit.
-
Oh we have a group standard all right. And believe it or not, those standards include playing the game. We can go ahead and drop this subject since we are not allied any longer. We are not looking to attack Gc3 or ECS but I will not punish my people for conflicts with other groups. My members have the right and ability to pursue individual goals as they see fit so long as their actions are within the core CMS belief system.
-
YOU wrote:
Quit dodging the subject Nate. According to brown. The CMS is calling the ECS out because we haven't met "your mob standards" for the entire game.
-
I was part of a team that could deploy 192 nuclear warheads anywhere in the world. 140 guys, lead by one man, operating in relative isolation from his superiors. We always behaved as if we were at war. We were wound up tight at all times. Every contact meant preparation for engagement or avoidance.
So I too am familiar with the concept of leadership. Nate has some big dogs at his command. It's a delicate operation, and he does it with ease. He is respected, and his direction is followed. Not by force, but because we all look up to him.
-
Ya should all sit back and take a deep breath, this is Turf Wars, not the United-fucking-Nations. This is inevitable when players form these alliances - ya grow big and you're gonna bang heads. Just fight it out - lose some turf, gain some turf, rebuild, whatever. But this crap about honor and leadership and who bought the most henchies, blah blah is just noise.
-
Everyone is dancing around the big question here so I'll come on out and ask it so we can all plan accordingly.
A simple yes or no answer is all we all want. No "in this scenario" or other conditionals (if, but, etc).
Is, or is not, the Inter-Alliance Bake Sale still on for the fall❔❕❔❕❔❕❔❕❔
🍰🍰🍰🍰🎂🎂🎂🎂🍰🍰🍰🍰
-
Lol. Good question North. I do love a good bake sale. You bringing the "special" brownies?
-
!Davey Boy 🌇🌊🔨 wrote:
No, according to brown, you need a wake-up call. Your guys are falling way behind. You are rapidly becoming the next Maid Men. I used my retirement to deliver that message to you. Yes, other members of CMS agree with me, but that does not mean Nate is not tolerating your slackage. It means you are plainly becoming the children that we must protect, because you can't protect yourselves. 🍟YOU wrote:
Quit dodging the subject Nate. According to brown. The CMS is calling the ECS out because we haven't met "your mob standards" for the entire game.
-
That's just it Whitey. Only a small number of each of our members are involved in the head butting. I would NEVER endorse an attack on ECS or Gc3 as a whole. However, not allowing attacks to settle disputes on an individual basis is unrealistic and would ultimately lead to a much larger confrontation.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
👆👆👆Oh we have a group standard all right. And believe it or not, those standards include playing the game. We can go ahead and drop this subject since we are not allied any longer. We are not looking to attack Gc3 or ECS but I will not punish my people for conflicts with other groups. My members have the right and ability to pursue individual goals as they see fit so long as their actions are within the core CMS belief system.
This is how it should be. It's a war game. Right now one member of an alliance has gone and attacked another alliance that also has allies and has done so without the support of his crew evidently.
Ecs and gc3 should mount up, lock n load, all systems go for launch, etc. etc.
Go nuts people lol.
-
And as always, no one is forcing you to read.
-
It's like an example of the psychological crap about how folks avoid confrontation. I can see this in action in life - like I won't go knock my neighbor out for blocking my driveway. On the other hand, this is just a game of confrontation - pixels and a server. While I enjoy some (ok, most haha) of these drama-ridden posts and fingerpointing it's a little crazy to talk attack someones honor or pull out your dicks to measure who served the country best during war or peace-time.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC