Debate Forum:
Forums › General Discussion › Debate Forum:-
Debate Forum:
HELLO TURF WARS! The ideas put forth in these forums are many times filled with nonsense getting quite difficult to put up with after a while. Therefore I would like this thread to be dedicated to serious debating on two new topics every week. Please, for the sake of those who enjoy debating do not make the choice of debating or not debating a topic up for debate in this thread, Thank you.
Basic Flow:
I will be posting two, usually historical topics that have meaning, unlike topics like "iPhone 5 vs. Samsung Galaxy III" or "should Havoc have retired or not?" I will post a new thread each week with different topics and give an unbiased opinion of which side did the better job of debating their side's views at the beginning of every new thread from now on. (cont.)
-
Rules:
I ask for no cursing or profanity, we are civilized human beings and are quite capable of expressing ourselves without the use of such vain language. Please do not address a specific player whom you disagree with, simply state why you view one side or the other as that can turn into two people "hogging the podium" so to speak. The main goal here is to have fun expressing your opinion (hopefully based on research) and reading the opinions of others. I am the host, therefore I will not post my opinion on a topic. I may give the reason for the controversy because sometimes from what people have been accustomed to hearing about a subject may incline them to give an answer too quick. Again the main goal is to have fun so I'm going to shut up now and let you do the talking.
Today's topic is--Stalin vs. Hitler who was a worse individual considering Hitler murdered 6 million people and Stalin murdered over 10 million of his own people.
-
I'm sorry but no one can replace Belial in terms of debate threads.
-
Sounds good and should see some healthy flexing of minds.
-
hitler was worse. hitler killed because he thought himself and his race were superior. he felt other people as subhuman. stalin killed those who disagreed with him or posed a threat. psychotic but political in the end. hitler was about hatred and the evil systematic extermination of whole races.
-
jake rock wrote:
Belials debates were serious.... Well at least most of them.🔥SirTalkALot🔥 wrote:
My answer is pls read the first paragraph. Maybe you should talk less, Sir.I'm sorry but no one can replace Belial in terms of debate threads.
And they always started out nice, then after a few hours it was time to grab the popcorn.
Maybe yours will be different. But I sure miss Belial. -
🔥SirTalkALot🔥 wrote:
I don't mind heated debates at all, but come come.... We will have a new debate every week keep in mind, and if The debates are boring than I will lift the rule that makes them so. I respect what you are saying completely and I most deffinately agree.jake rock wrote:
Belials debates were serious.... Well at least most of them.🔥SirTalkALot🔥 wrote:
My answer is pls read the first paragraph. Maybe you should talk less, Sir.I'm sorry but no one can replace Belial in terms of debate threads.
And they always started out nice, then after a few hours it was time to grab the popcorn.
Maybe yours will be different. But I sure miss Belial. -
Now let's try not to clog the debate with unrelated arguments. Just PM me if you want it done differently and I probably will comply. Keep in mind this is the first debate of many (hopefully) and this is all meant to be a fun time ok.
-
How bout you master debate, my balls. Ohhhhhhhh!!!! ✊
-
This is blasphemy!
-
Hitler b/c he's a NAZI
-
First of all, whos stalin. Second of all, i'm jewish.
-
ИЕШ☠ВГЕЕD wrote:
Seriously?....First of all, whos stalin. Second of all, i'm jewish.
-
I'd say Stalin was worse not only in sheer volume of people murdered but his reason why. Hitler was at war. His focus was exterminating the Jewish race because of his hate for them. That was his drive. Stalin on the other hand killed his own people and any one else simply because they were a political threat to him. He murdered simply because they were in his way.
-
ИЕШ☠ВГЕЕD wrote:
Joseph Stalin was the Russian Communist dictator of Russia during World War II who killed over 10 million of his own people because they opposed his political views.First of all, whos stalin. Second of all, i'm jewish.
-
omg coke v pepsi
dnt let it get outta hands guyz -
Coke..... No wait Pepsi ...... No coke... Fanta?
-
Considering the WWII conflict involved the deaths of over 60 (sixty) million people, I think in order to establish who was worse in terms of deaths caused, one needs to crunch a whole lotta variables.
Remember, the soviet union was not Russia alone, the union was made up of a lot of eastern European countries, all deaths being accredited to Stalin.
Check out the wiki page 'World war two casualties' for more info.
IMO. Historically we know only what we are told in history and only really know what we do, because the victors wrote that history. Taking that into account, Hitler comes off as the worst in this (limited) debate. 👍
-
I have three reasons for believing that Adolph Hitler was a worse man than Joseph Stalin.
1.) there are many adulterated biographal ideas about Hitler in that he only killed 6 million Jews, (not counting the 40 million lives lost in the fighting of World War II) but Hitler murdered 11 million people systematically, simply because he believed that they were racially inferior to him.
2.) Hitler started a world conquest because of greed which ended in the most loss of life ever in any war in history. Of course, the first battle of WWII started because of a Belgian man assign acted Archduke Ferdinand, but Hitler simply used these battles as an excuse to go conquering his dream and the world along with it, turning it into much more than just a murder/honor dispute.
3.) and finally, Hitler was a cowardly bastard who committed suicide along with his wife, when the city in which he was in was being captured by the Allies.
-
👆the assasination of the archduke set off wwi not wwii.
-
c. wrote:
WWII Would likely never have happened had it not been for WWI.👆the assasination of the archduke set off wwi not wwii.
Not just in the numeric sense.
-
༙Ꭻeͣ͜sͩuͩs͗͡Ꮯ wrote:
true but wwi wouldnt have happened without the franco-prussian war. point is hitler didnt look for some bs excuse like the assasination of some ally. he went blitzkrieging across poland after forcing annexation of other territories setting off the bloodiest period in human history. the direct result of his actions was 50 million or more deaths.c. wrote:
WWII Would likely never have happened had it not been for WWI.👆the assasination of the archduke set off wwi not wwii.
Not just in the numeric sense.
-
Ok, I'm lifting the restriction of not commenting on other people's posts. Might make it more interesting....
-
🔥SirTalkALot🔥 wrote:
I don'tjake rock wrote:
Belials debates were serious.... Well at least most of them.🔥SirTalkALot🔥 wrote:
My answer is pls read the first paragraph. Maybe you should talk less, Sir.I'm sorry but no one can replace Belial in terms of debate threads.
And they always started out nice, then after a few hours it was time to grab the popcorn.
Maybe yours will be different. But I sure miss Belial. -
c. wrote:
Your right and to add to that I believe that the assassin was Serbian not Belgian as said before.👆the assasination of the archduke set off wwi not wwii.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC