What came first?
Forums › General Discussion › What came first?-
Donnie Blingo wrote:
No it doesn't at all. I would like to see some evidence backing up your claim. As a Christian, I honestly don't know where I stand on the entirety of evolution through natural selection, but I know it could not have happened on its own.Exactly you cant be christian and believe in evolution at the same time. You contradict yourself.
-
darth vulki wrote:
Hey, I'm a Christian but yet I do believe in evolution, you cannot possibly say that someone is/isn't a Christian just because of an opionionOk who ever is a christian and says they believe in evolution is lying!!! Thats not what a christian is
-
Which came first, stupid questions or stupid people?
-
Mr.Northtrack wrote:
We talking about chicken eggs, or eggs in general?
In general there have been eggs way before chickens, but if you are talking chicken eggs you need to evolve/mutate/create the chicken first before you can have your chicken (laid) egg.
Give this man a 🍺🍺🍺
-
UnknownAssassin wrote:
First of all you have a false assumption of what Christians actually believe about evolution. And then assume a false conception of what denominations are compared to entirely different religions. Trying to input both of these arguments together as if they are some where related is a catagory fallacy. Wither your view of evolution (micro vs macro) is inserted isn't dependant on your paticular view of Christianity when you speak of "denominations". Christinity must accept in what Christianity is or else it ist Christinity.Hey, Christian views can be changed. If it can't, why are there so many denominations with varying views of the bible today? How many, at least dozens.
-
If you deny mico evolution (development through adaptation over time) and only accept a naturalistic macro view of evolution (slime forming into fish), you eliminate the possibility of Creation. You can not be a Christian and believe in a naturalistic view of "essence devolopment".
-
darth vulki wrote:
I believe in some kin of divine intervention. Kinda like 2001 space odyssey, just not like that though.Never says anything about evolution!!! Duh!!!
darth vulki wrote:
Of course it's not. A Christian is someone who believes in god and that he sent his son Jesus to the cross to die for our sins. Thats what a Christian is.Ok who ever is a christian and says they believe in evolution is lying!!! Thats not what a christian is
-
ᏟᏞᏫNᎬ wrote:
That's a simplistic view. But yeah.darth vulki wrote:
I believe in some kin of divine intervention. Kinda like 2001 space odyssey, just not like that though.Never says anything about evolution!!! Duh!!!
darth vulki wrote:
Of course it's not. A Christian is someone who believes in god and that he sent his son Jesus to the cross to die for our sins. Thats what a Christian is.Ok who ever is a christian and says they believe in evolution is lying!!! Thats not what a christian is
-
Which one holds more value... Is the egg the chickens way of creating more chickens or is the chicken the eggs way of creating more eggs.
-
Reality before potentiality. An egg is a potential chicken, therefore the chicken came first.
-
darth vulki wrote:
Were you the alter boy? The one the preacher touched?Ok who ever is a christian and says they believe in evolution is lying!!! Thats not what a christian is
-
Egg, once the new gene is made that seperates the chicken from its ancestor is created then the chicken egg is laid and then the first chicken was born
-
SuperBob wrote:
The chicken has the potential to create eggs. And once its done creating eggs, it dies off. Doesn't this just make it a vessel to create eggs.Reality before potentiality. An egg is a potential chicken, therefore the chicken came first.
-
rogue storm wrote:
It doesn't just "die off", it actually keeps living, of every chicken just died off as soon as it laid its eggs, then the eggs wouldn't have a chance at life, and the chicken population would be 0 in a matter of monthsSuperBob wrote:
The chicken has the potential to create eggs. And once its done creating eggs, it dies off. Doesn't this just make it a vessel to create eggs.Reality before potentiality. An egg is a potential chicken, therefore the chicken came first.
-
Once the chicken has exhausted it's ability to create eggs it no longer serves any purpose for the egg. The chicken could just be a pawn in the eggs attempt to create more eggs
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC