Putz-you are a coward.
Forums › General Discussion › Putz-you are a coward.-
~|LINE|~ wrote:
Screw democracy...Charlie for communist dictator!!!!TheCoconutMafia wrote:
Charlie for president!Johnny Cage 👊add cage👊 wrote:
Good work Charlie 👍
I'm just one small piece of a larger force. It's the efforts of many that are stomping a mudhole in GC3's collective ass.
-
😰😰😰
You don't get to cry...it was 22 vs. 1 at one point with 8 V's... Yet you couldn't handle it your self like you said.
I've been going against mobs bigger than me for 8 days now...
It's sad it comes to you acting like a bitch after your plans were foiled.
Oh and who was it that lowered their influence after they were getting their ass kicked.... 17vs. 1 at the time and who is the coward???
-
In my desperation I am capping everyone?? Lies..
Hmm.... Let's see, I capped no one until they started ending up in your little V's..Like omnius... Don't twist it and make it sound like I did it for no reason.. I also gave many warnings for them to move outside the warzone. There are several I still havent attacked who responded... Those who didn't respond were taken out in case they joined v's like others...
And your stats??? Are you going to seriously boast of win% when I was not in a V and you were, yet I still capped that ass? Do you think people reading this are that dumb??
Wow, for someone who had 22 people and 8 V's on your side you sound like a sore loser... Win or lose against the others (not you) I had people commend me for my warring skills and strategies ... You on the other hand are showing 0 character... Great job!!!
-
TheCoconutMafia wrote:
Stats?? V vs. No V.. Nice stat..All I've been doing is fighting. I've hardly been in the forums.
No lies on my part. Stats speak for themselves.
-
TheCoconutMafia wrote:
Wow.. Gc3 getting asses kicked??? Everyone knows it's 22 vs. 1... Hardly a battle vs. Gc3... Go get sleep coconuthead you are getting delusions of grandeur.Johnny Cage 👊add cage👊 wrote:
Good work Charlie 👍
I'm just one small piece of a larger force. It's the efforts of many that are stomping a mudhole in GC3's collective ass.
... Wait I can see the twisted headlines now.. Charlie defeats GC3 in Vegas all by his wittle self!! Blahahaha..
At 22 vs. 1 you don't get to whine!!!
-
add PUTZ 👊🐶 wrote:
i just counted 19 and that's if you include Bella and zraygo abd as far as I know that's a defense only v.... And are you really fighting by yourself, you have no one else from GC3 or other friends helping you at all??TheCoconutMafia wrote:
Wow.. Gc3 getting asses kicked??? Everyone knows it's 22 vs. 1... Hardly a battle vs. Gc3... Go get sleep coconuthead you are getting delusions of grandeur.Johnny Cage 👊add cage👊 wrote:
Good work Charlie 👍
I'm just one small piece of a larger force. It's the efforts of many that are stomping a mudhole in GC3's collective ass.
... Wait I can see the twisted headlines now.. Charlie defeats GC3 in Vegas all by his wittle self!! Blahahaha..
At 22 vs. 1 you don't get to whine!!!
-
add PUTZ 👊🐶 wrote:
I also gave many warnings for them to move outside the warzone. There are several I still havent attacked who responded... Those who didn't respond were taken out in case they joined v's like others...
So you took out players in your area "in case" they decided to v you? I may have misinterpreted that but it sounds kinda crazy....
-
Johnny some of those are for defensive v's. Honestly he is only up agains 5-8, he tends to exagerate. Putz had a v going on before but he left it because he couldn't target that many people and he was losing turfs fast. So he started ERing people that were in v's and bought stam then picked off turfs off Charlie. Well that's ourside of the battle.
-
JayDee wrote:
a V is a V defensive or not. Putz is by himself in Vegas and he's giving them hellJohnny some of those are for defensive v's. Honestly he is only up agains 5-8, he tends to exagerate. Putz had a v going on before but he left it because he couldn't target that many people and he was losing turfs fast. So he started ERing people that were in v's and bought stam then picked off turfs off Charlie. Well that's ourside of the battle.
cocohead, you are the REAL coward. afraid to raise your influence bcuz you know ur ass would get capped.
Also, all of your so called facts are bs. Putz would destroy you 1 v 1. And Gc3 would stomp the shit outta Yall if we had HALF the support in range as u guys do.
run your mouth all you want but the only obvious fact is you guys cant even handle 1 Gc3. imagine if we had 17 V's on your ass Coco. you would of been gone long ago.
-
You guys had vs up against me and cc and Bella. He might be the only one in Vegas but he was not alone.
-
There was any xx vs. 1.
Putz bought henchmen and tried to clean me out in Vegas. When that didn't work GC3 Put a Vendetta on me. My Vendetta was defensive.
I'm not whining. Just eliminating. And Putz, you have capped several players not involved with this. You're being pushed further out and down by the day.
And we've been hit by at least a dozen players. Stop wit the oh poor me all vs, 1 crap.
And the only plan that was foiled was me going at you 1 on 1 and then moving on to Texas.
All that money you spent just to beat me...so sad.
The real winners in this war are going to be the players. A lot of updates are being funded by this one.
Warning players to get out of the war zone is just a sad excuse to cap. What if they don't have the funds to move? And they have every right to be there. They're not causing a problem for "22" that are hitting you, why should the "1' have any problems? -
And Putz tou have no warring skills. You proved that on day 1 by by rying to clean me out before I copuld even get in the fight.
You knew before then you couldn't beat me. You knew then. and you still know it now. The only ones complimenting you are gc3.
-
FYI...it's fairly easy for someone who's not above their turf limit to stay afloat in a city, even in the midst of a war...no matter how many players they're against. So to say that Putz is holding his own against 19 or 20 or 21 or however many players is not really saying much.
The key here is money. If you don't have any funds, you can't lay new turfs. And Putz is eventually going to run out as this war lingers on. Although I guess he could just keep spending Don points on cash too...whatever it takes to stay alive I guess.
-
$151k Cash - 10 pts
"pay tha bills"When your rolling in Don Points yo!!!
-
Humboldtmoog wrote:
Hahahaha! The worst deal on the don points board just became the balla way to play!$151k Cash - 10 pts
"pay tha bills"When your rolling in Don Points yo!!!
-
Not to suggest it is either appropriate or inappropriate, but what military strategy I know suggests that attempting to disable or even thoroughly dispatch one's enemy before the opening of any sort of standard battle is just good sense. I'm not sure how these types of ideas translate into this war "game" but (speaking generally) if I knew my enemy just came into range and also had a fairly good idea that he would engage me, I would probably want to make an attempt at wiping him out before he became organized. Is the general thinking within the TW community that this is poor strategy, poor manners, or both? Is it just safer to say that even though it may be good strategy, it's always going to be perceived as poor form?
-
I mean this as a general question only, not as a veiled attempt at excusing anyone's actions -- whether Putz was right or wrong in this (or any other action) is not really what I'm asking... I might consider a pre-emptive strike in my own game-play, so I am naturally curious as to whether or not I should always attempt to avoid it.
-
attrition wrote:
This is true but it seems you would also agree that 100 vs. Putz is fine under conventional military stragety !! True ?I mean this as a general question only, not as a veiled attempt at excusing anyone's actions -- whether Putz was right or wrong in this (or any other action) is not really what I'm asking... I might consider a pre-emptive strike in my own game-play, so I am naturally curious as to whether or not I should always attempt to avoid it.
-
SKWID DOG wrote: This is true but it seems you would also agree that 100 vs. Putz is fine under conventional military stragety !! True ?
I would agree that (in many cases, most perhaps) the better your advantage, the better of you will be. I'm not sure how that relates to my question though. Relationships between pre-emptive strikes and asymmetric warfare (while they do exist) are not what I'm asking about.I think most would agree that "pre-emptive strikes" are fine strategy, what I am more curious about is how this is *perceived* here in this game. If I used this strategy, would it _always_ be considered poor form?
-
No ATTRITION by looking at your turf capos I think you'll be just fine. Never really got far in the MARINES. However you seem like a fine political strategist. Any move u make
will probably be a good one. -
attrition wrote:
my personal answer is not always. It's all dependent on the situation. I feel this is true for any strategy. Personally I don't think what putz did was perse wrong, but it did open the door for vendettas as well as other strategies to be used.SKWID DOG wrote: This is true but it seems you would also agree that 100 vs. Putz is fine under conventional military stragety !! True ?
I would agree that (in many cases, most perhaps) the better your advantage, the better of you will be. I'm not sure how that relates to my question though. Relationships between pre-emptive strikes and asymmetric warfare (while they do exist) are not what I'm asking about.I think most would agree that "pre-emptive strikes" are fine strategy, what I am more curious about is how this is *perceived* here in this game. If I used this strategy, would it _always_ be considered poor form?
-
Eewww, "fine political strategist", now I am offended... hehe. I think I would have preferred a kick in the balls over this compliment. ;)
-
Belial wrote:
my personal answer is not always. It's all dependent on the situation. I feel this is true for any strategy. Personally I don't think what putz did was perse wrong, but it did open the door for vendettas as well as other strategies to be used.
Fair enough, "be prepared to face the music" -- makes sense.
-
True enough in RL also.
-
JayDee wrote:
Unreal... Here are people that hit me or my turfs or are supporting V's being used... Cocohead, belial, zraygo, spectre, the chef, Rick, Kvnk, Key, southland, ominus, jmanx, the fish, ibadfish, Bella, David Fagger, reddawg, bigfagoo, Milo homo, ~Matt..Johnny some of those are for defensive v's. Honestly he is only up agains 5-8, he tends to exagerate. Putz had a v going on before but he left it because he couldn't target that many people and he was losing turfs fast. So he started ERing people that were in v's and bought stam then picked off turfs off Charlie. Well that's ourside of the battle.
There's a few not on there..
To keep it simple.... Many other cg3 members weren't in range until Saturday.. Day 6 if coco's ass whoopin
-
TheCoconutMafia wrote:
Get Charlie a waaaahhhhbulence!!!!And Putz tou have no warring skills. You proved that on day 1 by by rying to clean me out before I copuld even get in the fight.
You knew before then you couldn't beat me. You knew then. and you still know it now. The only ones complimenting you are gc3.
🏥🏥🚑🚑🚑🚑🚑🚑🏥🏥
-
add PUTZ 👊🐶 wrote: Unreal... Here are people that hit me or my turfs or are supporting V's being used... Cocohead, belial, zraygo, spectre, the chef, Rick, Kvnk, Key, southland, ominus, jmanx, the fish, ibadfish, Bella, David Fagger, reddawg, bigfagoo, Milo homo, ~Matt..
😰😰😰😰😰😰There's a few not on there..
😽💨💵💵😪😪 -
attrition wrote:
Eewww, "fine political strategist", now I am offended... hehe. I think I would have preferred a kick in the balls over this compliment. ;)
lmao.
-
add PUTZ 👊🐶 wrote:
how the hell is that whining?TheCoconutMafia wrote:
Get Charlie a waaaahhhhbulence!!!!And Putz tou have no warring skills. You proved that on day 1 by by rying to clean me out before I copuld even get in the fight.
You knew before then you couldn't beat me. You knew then. and you still know it now. The only ones complimenting you are gc3.
🏥🏥🚑🚑🚑🚑🚑🚑🏥🏥
-
Charlie its whining when you creat a thread calling Putz a "coward" when we can all see for ourself that you got your ass kicked by putz and then had to call in an entire alliance and elements from elsewhere to even keep your head above water.
YOu always said you hated alliances and yet the first thing you do when you bite off more than you can chew is to call upon one of these alliances to cary the water for you.
Now you even have people defecting CMS to target Putz:)
You cant carry Putz' jock strap
Just admit it
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC