Nick = Idiot
Forums › General Discussion › Nick = Idiot-
Oh no ... So ur logic is since he can't catch one token of x so he can't catch any tokens of x ??? So base on ur logic if the police force fails to catch one robber they are unable to catch any robber ??? Seriously an either or and all or nth argument in a contemporary inductive world??? Wt are u teaching?
-
👆👆👆👍
-
add: MikeyB wrote:
If u'r thinking I got banned for that other thing u'r wrong. Nick even sent me a pm telling me he wasn't going to ban me for that.I'm sure it takes a considerable amount of time to prove that someone is cheating the way you do. And it's probably on a case by case basis.
HE BANNED ME AND MY FRIEND'S BASED ON HEARSAY (well in my case the hearsay was from me, lol).
-
👿BeIial wrote:
think of it this was. Police officer bust some guy who he saw running up the stairs. In trial the police officer is proven to be blind.Oh no ... So ur logic is since he can't catch one token of x so he can't catch any tokens of x ??? So base on ur logic if the police force fails to catch one robber they are unable to catch any robber ??? Seriously an either or and all or nth argument in a contemporary inductive world??? Wt are u teaching?
-
lameee wrote:
Yeah. I know it's hard to keep track of all of the times you cheated. And you should have been banned before for using multiple accounts on a device. But I do know why u got banned this time and I'm sure he had proof.add: MikeyB wrote:
If u'r thinking I got banned for that other thing u'r wrong. Nick even sent me a pm telling me he wasn't going to ban me for that.I'm sure it takes a considerable amount of time to prove that someone is cheating the way you do. And it's probably on a case by case basis.
HE BANNED ME AND MY FRIEND'S BASED ON HEARSAY (well in my case the hearsay was from me, lol).
-
lameee wrote:
Don't try to twist the topic ... Still awaiting for evidence rather than conclusion ... It is question beggin ...add: MikeyB wrote:
If u'r thinking I got banned for that other thing u'r wrong. Nick even sent me a pm telling me he wasn't going to ban me for that.I'm sure it takes a considerable amount of time to prove that someone is cheating the way you do. And it's probably on a case by case basis.
HE BANNED ME AND MY FRIEND'S BASED ON HEARSAY (well in my case the hearsay was from me, lol).
-
add: MikeyB wrote:
Please fucking tell me!! It's amazing u know, but I don't! I assumed I got bannedlameee wrote:
Yeah. I know it's hard to keep track of all of the times you cheated. And you should have been banned before for using multiple accounts on a device. But I do know why u got banned this time and I'm sure he had proof.add: MikeyB wrote:
If u'r thinking I got banned for that other thing u'r wrong. Nick even sent me a pm telling me he wasn't going to ban me for that.I'm sure it takes a considerable amount of time to prove that someone is cheating the way you do. And it's probably on a case by case basis.
HE BANNED ME AND MY FRIEND'S BASED ON HEARSAY (well in my case the hearsay was from me, lol).
for making canyonman, and I didn't even bother to check that account till today! -
lameee wrote:
Nope.. The new analogy has sematically twisted the original one (by expanding the case)... It targets how it is problematic in thinking missing 1 = missing all !!!!👿BeIial wrote:
think of it this was. Police officer bust some guy who he saw running up the stairs. In trial the police officer is proven to be blind.Oh no ... So ur logic is since he can't catch one token of x so he can't catch any tokens of x ??? So base on ur logic if the police force fails to catch one robber they are unable to catch any robber ??? Seriously an either or and all or nth argument in a contemporary inductive world??? Wt are u teaching?
-
Look man. You cheated. You know it. U got caught. Why does the reason matter?
-
👿BeIial wrote:
look at ghost's post where Nick explains why we got banned. People like ole and mikey ran their mouth and since I told the world that I was going tolameee wrote:
👿BeIial wrote:
think of it this was. Police officer bust some guy who he saw running up the stairs. In trial the police officer is proven to be blind.Oh no ... So ur logic is since he can't catch one token of x so he can't catch any tokens of x ??? So base on ur logic if the police force fails to catch one robber they are unable to catch any robber ??? Seriously an either or and all or nth argument in a contemporary inductive world??? Wt are u teaching?
cheat Nick assumed these two were telling the truth. Nick's clearly at fault here! -
Read how he explains how he's 'watched us'. If anything he had said in that rant were true he would have caught canyonman. PERIOD! Ok, I'm off to bed! Happy turfing! This is a fun game :).
-
Nick doesn't owe you anything PSI. You can whine & cry & beg for the attention that you can't live without, but you can't manipulate him. Just because you, a proven liar (yes, I've seen proof), claim he has no evidence. How about this - prove that nick doesn't have the evidence. None of your arguments so far hold water, so you can't use those. I'm sorry but PSI=Fail!
-
Mystery wrote:
Ahhhhhhhh!!!!Nick doesn't owe you anything PSI. You can whine & cry & beg for the attention that you can't live without, but you can't manipulate him. Just because you, a proven liar (yes, I've seen proof), claim he has no evidence. How about this - prove that nick doesn't have the evidence. None of your arguments so far hold water, so you can't use those. I'm sorry but PSI=Fail!
1) Nick doesn't owe me, he owes Mel. I admitted to cheating with canyon and still never got caught!
2) what u'r talking about in terms of evidence has been dealt with previously.
3) pay attention or shut the fuck up. -
lameee wrote:
I think we can all agree that were all starting to hate psiMystery wrote:
Ahhhhhhhh!!!!Nick doesn't owe you anything PSI. You can whine & cry & beg for the attention that you can't live without, but you can't manipulate him. Just because you, a proven liar (yes, I've seen proof), claim he has no evidence. How about this - prove that nick doesn't have the evidence. None of your arguments so far hold water, so you can't use those. I'm sorry but PSI=Fail!
1) Nick doesn't owe me, he owes Mel. I admitted to cheating with canyon and still never got caught!
2) what u'r talking about in terms of evidence has been dealt with previously.
3) pay attention or shut the fuck up. -
CanyonMan wrote:
actually. i have proof mel t cheated. as well as her admitting to it. grow up. the reason ur nit banned yet is Bcuz Nick takes his time when investigating ppl like you.So for starters I am who u think I am.
So I couldn't help but notice that Nick posted in ghost's forum, so I read about how much we 'cheat'. So I figured it was because of this account that I made to fuck up punk searle, considering that's the only bit of cheating I've ever done. I mean this account is spoofed and faked!! And the way Nick was running his mouth about us 'cheating' u'd think he'd b able to catch this obvious example. The fact that he didn't proves that Nick has 0 evidence of any wrong doings of mel's or anybody else's 'cheating'. To my knowledge they never did cheat.
-
lameee wrote:
I don't have to stfu, I'm not the one who was banned!Mystery wrote:
Ahhhhhhhh!!!!Nick doesn't owe you anything PSI. You can whine & cry & beg for the attention that you can't live without, but you can't manipulate him. Just because you, a proven liar (yes, I've seen proof), claim he has no evidence. How about this - prove that nick doesn't have the evidence. None of your arguments so far hold water, so you can't use those. I'm sorry but PSI=Fail!
1) Nick doesn't owe me, he owes Mel. I admitted to cheating with canyon and still never got caught!
2) what u'r talking about in terms of evidence has been dealt with previously.
3) pay attention or shut the fuck up. -
!Ldubs🌇🌊🔨 wrote:
He gets pissy when he loses the argument. Mystery has a knack for accuracy...lameee wrote:
I think we can all agree that were all starting to hate psiMystery wrote:
Ahhhhhhhh!!!!Nick doesn't owe you anything PSI. You can whine & cry & beg for the attention that you can't live without, but you can't manipulate him. Just because you, a proven liar (yes, I've seen proof), claim he has no evidence. How about this - prove that nick doesn't have the evidence. None of your arguments so far hold water, so you can't use those. I'm sorry but PSI=Fail!
1) Nick doesn't owe me, he owes Mel. I admitted to cheating with canyon and still never got caught!
2) what u'r talking about in terms of evidence has been dealt with previously.
3) pay attention or shut the fuck up.We SHOULD ignore him and let him go away.
-
Ur math equation is invalid.
-
Grimjaow Ⓖ₡➌ wrote:
That's wat she saidUr math equation is invalid.
-
i always proved to the TW community PSI was a liar. it was so obvious. his debating skills are lacking substance.
-
nick wrote:
k awesome. Now let's say bye!Everyone say hi to p s i!
-
BellaItaliana wrote:
Bye psi!!!!!!!!! 👋🙋👋🙋👋🙋 fagnick wrote:
k awesome. Now let's say bye!Everyone say hi to p s i!
-
BellaItaliana wrote:
nick wrote:
k awesome. Now let's say bye!Everyone say hi to p s i!
-
////AMG Add:E63 wrote:
BellaItaliana wrote:
nick wrote:
k awesome. Now let's say bye!Everyone say hi to p s i!
-
T e ✯ a S wrote:
I'm tired of all the complaining Nick should just ban em just for bein annoyin n keepin a thread that's goin no where alive. END EM COMPLETELY AND DESTROY THIS THREAD NICK it's ok we'll all look the other way 😒actually. i have proof mel t cheated. as well as her admitting to it. grow up. the reason ur nit banned yet is Bcuz Nick takes his time when investigating ppl like you.
-
CanyonMan wrote:
I'm confused, does that make you Dennis Green or the Bears?So for starters I am who u think I am.
-
Mystery wrote:
plus attrition is gonna kick ur ass.lameee wrote:
I don't have to stfu, I'm not the one who was banned!Mystery wrote:
Ahhhhhhhh!!!!Nick doesn't owe you anything PSI. You can whine & cry & beg for the attention that you can't live without, but you can't manipulate him. Just because you, a proven liar (yes, I've seen proof), claim he has no evidence. How about this - prove that nick doesn't have the evidence. None of your arguments so far hold water, so you can't use those. I'm sorry but PSI=Fail!
1) Nick doesn't owe me, he owes Mel. I admitted to cheating with canyon and still never got caught!
2) what u'r talking about in terms of evidence has been dealt with previously.
3) pay attention or shut the fuck up. -
What a little punk idiot. So creating multiple accounts is one way you cheated for sure. Care to tell us some others?
I've seen why melT was banned. It is not baseless.
Wouldn't it be cool if we just let him mob up a whole bunch of new accounts, and THEN ban him?
And seriously, "p s i quits like...". You can't even quit when you are being dragged out by your ear lobes. Pathetic.
-
This is a game of firsts for me.
For example;
It's my first mmorpg (hope that's the right term)
It's my first active (semi) forum
It's the first time I've seen a developer take an active roll with players
It's the first time I have ever seen anyone get so upset they have to attack the developer for standing behind his rules. Like really, if someones caught modding or glitching on xboxlive for example they don't get to come back and bitch. I'm not suckin nicks ass. I've never talked to the guy. These kids don't have balls they have no life if they can let a game they cheated (albeit slightly in some cases) get to them so much they have to attack the developer. Get a life and gtfo -
Ps...
Go play cartel wars or better yet log on to facebook and play mafia wars...
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC