Morals and integrity - Part 2 of 3
Forums › General Discussion › Morals and integrity - Part 2 of 3-
Hypothetically speaking.
What if player A (The buyer of the account) is still using the account bought from player "B" (The seller - no relation to the B we know).
Then "B" comes back with a new account assuming his old identity and stir crap up and "B" already had a shaky past, and lots of people owned turfs capped from him and people will remember the turfs, notice the name difference thinking he's hiding his main account and cap the shit outta "A" thinking it's still "B" . Then "A" starts crying and says 'Hey, I'm not "B", I bought this account from him'.
So, knowing that this is againts the TOS everyone keeps kicking "A" ass.Questions;
What should "A" do, reset or keep using "B" account?
Is "A" really "B" hiding as "A"?
Should everyone keep kicking "A" ass? -
🔥Ţąʝįķ☠Çąƥǫŋę™🔥 wrote:
If it is against the TOS and he admits he has bought it then report him to feedback and let them deal with it. Personally I would cap few then let him be until he starts shit again.
I actually agree with him 😢
-
He should keep the account. He payed money for it..It's his.
-
I think "A" should suck it up and reset. If you didn't build any of those stats yourself it's not truly that big of a loss. Except the $30 bucks you paid. I'm guessing it was $30 of course.
-
Baron Von Fritz wrote:
Oh wow like it's a big shock you'd say that. Where's all your turf?He should keep the account. He payed money for it..It's his.
-
As a practical person, If I were in A's position, I go dark for a few weeks. Destroy all comments linking me to anything, destroy all turf, sell all weapons, bank all money. You payed your 50$, and I'm assuming you want to keep your account. Then weeks later, I name change and start posting again( by now only have laid 100ish turf). Slowly gain noterioty and respect.
This is the you made your bed now lay in it approach.
-end
Now, the easiest route would be to reset and waste the $50 you spent.
P.s. I would have bought the account in the first place since I know it is against my morals and the TOS.
-Aswell, it seems this person may not want to reset so this may be the option he takes. -
🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
$30. The price was $30. Hypothetically of course.As a practical person, If I were in A's position, I go dark for a few weeks. Destroy all comments linking me to anything, destroy all turf, sell all weapons, bank all money. You payed your 50$, and I'm assuming you want to keep your account. Then weeks later, I name change and start posting again( by now only have laid 100ish turf). Slowly gain noterioty and respect.
This is the you made your bed now lay in it approach.
-end
Now, the easiest route would be to reset and waste the $50 you spent.
P.s. I would have bought the account in the first place since I know it is against my morals and the TOS.
-Aswell, it seems this person may not want to reset so this may be the option he takes. -
Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote:
Oh also the other 2 questions.🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
$30. The price was $30. Hypothetically of course.As a practical person, If I were in A's position, I go dark for a few weeks. Destroy all comments linking me to anything, destroy all turf, sell all weapons, bank all money. You payed your 50$, and I'm assuming you want to keep your account. Then weeks later, I name change and start posting again( by now only have laid 100ish turf). Slowly gain noterioty and respect.
This is the you made your bed now lay in it approach.
-end
Now, the easiest route would be to reset and waste the $50 you spent.
P.s. I would have bought the account in the first place since I know it is against my morals and the TOS.
-Aswell, it seems this person may not want to reset so this may be the option he takes.
B. probably not
C. Yes -
i didnt see part 1, is this a true story?
-
🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
Yes.Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote:
Oh also the other 2 questions.🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
$30. The price was $30. Hypothetically of course.✂
B. probably not
C. Yes
And @ Grimm, it was $50 -
🔥Ţąʝįķ☠Çąƥǫŋę™🔥 wrote:
You may want to re-read the TOS Part I. Restrictions and Rules of Use: section xiv. Sell or transfer... and while you're at it read again section ix., x., xi. and xii.If it is against the TOS and he admits he has bought it then report him to feedback and let them deal with it. Personally I would cap few then let him be until he starts shit again.
-
The hypothetical Screen shots on pal says it was $30
-
🔰🔪ℬяʊтʊṩ😵🔰 wrote:
I dunno. I'm pretty sure it was $30. But I could be wrong. Wouldn't be the first time. Of course this is all hypothetical anyway. Technicalities.🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
Yes.Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote:
Oh also the other 2 questions.🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
$30. The price was $30. Hypothetically of course.✂
B. probably not
C. Yes
And @ Grimm, it was $50 -
🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
This hypothetical comment makes the situation seem less hypothetical. 😏The hypothetical Screen shots on pal says it was $30
-
🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
Hypothetically speaking "B" confirmed that he sold it and that it wasn't for 50$.🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
This hypothetical comment makes the situation seem less hypothetical. 😏The hypothetical Screen shots on pal says it was $30
-
★Мr. D⌖цх★ wrote:
Yeah, I was hypothetically making fun of Raikou. I do not know the full hypothetical story.🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
Hypothetically speaking "B" confirmed that he sold it and that it wasn't for 50$.🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
This hypothetical comment makes the situation seem less hypothetical. 😏The hypothetical Screen shots on pal says it was $30
-
🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
That's hypothetically funny.★Мr. D⌖цх★ wrote:
Yeah, I was hypothetically making fun of Raikou. I do not know the full hypothetical story.🔰࿈Ᏸลอ🔥Ᏸεαη࿈🔰 wrote:
Hypothetically speaking "B" confirmed that he sold it and that it wasn't for 50$.🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
This hypothetical comment makes the situation seem less hypothetical. 😏The hypothetical Screen shots on pal says it was $30
Haha
-
Hypothetically,
If it was me, I'd go badbeans way, except I'd start hopping. Hop hop hop to an airport and fly far from my origonal position. Then a name change, and using my turf far away, start building again, everywhere except where I am.But that's against TOS, and I don't cheat.. Except at chutes and ladders.. :)
-
Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote:
Wow a 40% drop in the value of a TW account since I last read a thread on this. Definitely not a good investment...I think "A" should suck it up and reset. If you didn't build any of those stats yourself it's not truly that big of a loss. Except the $30 bucks you paid. I'm guessing it was $30 of course.
-
🔰ℬཞüęℵǿཞ🔰 wrote:
You are the one that moved that chute!Hypothetically,
If it was me, I'd go badbeans way, except I'd start hopping. Hop hop hop to an airport and fly far from my origonal position. Then a name change, and using my turf far away, start building again, everywhere except where I am.But that's against TOS, and I don't cheat.. Except at chutes and ladders.. :)
*Angrily shakes fist -
🔰ℬཞüęℵǿཞ🔰 wrote:
But what if hypothetically we had tones of turfs that belong to "A". That would make it very easy to find him again, right?Hypothetically,
If it was me, I'd go badbeans way, except I'd start hopping. Hop hop hop to an airport and fly far from my origonal position. Then a name change, and using my turf far away, start building again, everywhere except where I am.But that's against TOS, and I don't cheat.. Except at chutes and ladders.. :)
-
A and B are two different people. A should reset. B should've known better.
-
YOU wrote:
And A should've changed his invite code 😂😂😂😂A and B are two different people. A should reset. B should've known better.
-
★Мr. D⌖цх★ wrote:
This would have been as soon as you get the account. You would have to tear down them all. The hypothetical transgressor is now for lack of a better term, screwed.🔰ℬཞüęℵǿཞ🔰 wrote:
But what if hypothetically we had tones of turfs that belong to "A". That would make it very easy to find him again, right?Hypothetically,
If it was me, I'd go badbeans way, except I'd start hopping. Hop hop hop to an airport and fly far from my origonal position. Then a name change, and using my turf far away, start building again, everywhere except where I am.But that's against TOS, and I don't cheat.. Except at chutes and ladders.. :)
-
Going under the radar would not help, some people may own quite a few turfs capped from "B" and be keeping a close eye on the Created By account. Hypothetically, of course
-
I take it in this hypothetical situation would involve notifications being delivered
-
Question is, can A fix this mess?
.
.
.
Yes he can! (Hypothetically) -
randombloke wrote:
Yea. If they happened to work. Hypothetically.I take it in this hypothetical situation would involve notifications being delivered
-
E. none of the above.
-
Both players should be reset & banned for breaking the TOS.
(I only read your initial posts on the thread yesterday. I didn't want to see how many players, or who, would choose to cheat if given the option.)
-
Mystery wrote:
Well then let me break it down with no names..Both players should be reset & banned for breaking the TOS.
(I only read your initial posts on the thread yesterday. I didn't want to see how many players, or who, would choose to cheat if given the option.)
99% who posted said no.
.1% said they'd buy it to keep other people from it, but keep their own.
.9% said yes. .3 of that .9 were joking, the rest were no doubt serious.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC