Yo, Alliance peeps
Forums › General Discussion › Yo, Alliance peeps-
Let me ask a hypothetical question. Let's just say you're a very strong player in a largely independant state. Now this state is just outside of the 1000 mile range of another state with a highly dissreputable alliance. Ok now this alliance starts recruiting in your state. Now the y don't take the good players, no they take the bullies and the scum. Then they tell you that to oppose any one member is to go against the whole alliance. What would you do?
-
👿Belial wrote:
call them bullies I guessLet me ask a hypothetical question. Let's just say you're a very strong player in a largely independant state. Now this state is just outside of the 1000 mile range of another state with a highly dissreputable alliance. Ok now this alliance starts recruiting in your state. Now the y don't take the good players, no they take the bullies and the scum. Then they tell you that to oppose any one member is to go against the whole alliance. What would you do?
-
RedDawg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
Das Hyenna certainly did. The only reason they didn't is because u made them denounce me, LoL. I can't even type that without felling silly. How did u have the '.....' to even demand that?We could have destroyed them like the evil people u claim us to be. But that didn't happen.. I didn't even cap a turf. Grow up man. Ur a good player who is better than this.
-
SCARS MURDA wrote:
call them bullies? Remember I said you were a big player. Would you fight with words?👿Belial wrote:
call them bullies I guessLet me ask a hypothetical question. Let's just say you're a very strong player in a largely independant state. Now this state is just outside of the 1000 mile range of another state with a highly dissreputable alliance. Ok now this alliance starts recruiting in your state. Now the y don't take the good players, no they take the bullies and the scum. Then they tell you that to oppose any one member is to go against the whole alliance. What would you do?
-
Same question to alliance members
-
So it was two players...no now it's just das....ohh wait... Come on man come back to playing the game. It's more fun when I can beat on u instead of just reading ur posts.
-
RedDawg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
$$.I believe we attacked ur friends, psi, because u had 5 v's on a guy who helped us attack you. We made peace with them shortly after. Why do you insist on so much drama. U were in 3 of the v's personally with your mules. How sad that u left the game like this!
-
expanding an alliance across the nation helps to find other wars, because we are very limited to an emmediate area we are in. there is nothing wrong with expanding, it allows for more action in this type of game.
just because some of you don't like it, or think its not necessary, doesnt make it fact.
without friends all over the US, there would be very few wars actually going on, unless you wanted to fight your friends.
-
T e ✯ a S wrote:
but when such a group claims to be the good guys when in reality they are just trying to expand that just makes them liars. I have no problem with alliances trying to expand and making wars. But let's be honest. They shouldn't call themselves the goodguys when they attempt to take out good players for selfish reasons. To paraphrase my hypothetical alliance above I think mist would agree that such a group is scum at best and even worse if they claim to be the good guys.expanding an alliance across the nation helps to find other wars, because we are very limited to an emmediate area we are in. there is nothing wrong with expanding, it allows for more action in this type of game.
just because some of you don't like it, or think its not necessary, doesnt make it fact.
without friends all over the US, there would be very few wars actually going on, unless you wanted to fight your friends.
-
👿Belial but when such a group claims to be the good guys when in reality they are just trying to expand that just makes them liars. I have no problem with alliances trying to expand and making wars. But let's be honest. They shouldn't call themselves the goodguys when they attempt to take out good players for selfish reasons. To paraphrase my hypothetical alliance above I think mist would agree that such a group is scum at best and even worse if they claim to be the good guys.
Tell me who you mean. Name names so that I might defend myself. -
bullying is bullying no matter how you look at it. expanding, and fighting people of like size is completely fine.
everyone talks about peace in this game, with peace it wouldn't be TURF WARS.
while people like to fight the people around them, Gc3 likes to find people to fight all over, spread our love.
expanding and bullying are not the same. we expand, and have yet to actually bully. warring is not bullying, as bella said, she has the same stats as me so how is it bullying??
-
Is there ever good or bad in war? Trust me I'm use to crew wars no biggie. What I'm not use to is ppl finding excuses to make a war. Or ppl trying to make others look like shit to justify something. This game is different from most and the ppl who started from the start have a advantage. I just don't like manipulation of the truth or egos that don't wanna see ppl come up. This is not just happening stateside. I've heard of alot of drama in the UK. If ppl have to pretend to be friends with a crew just to play the game or reset because you get capped that's bs. I'm thinking Nick needs to change fight list to level fighters to expand globally. Then maybe ppl wouldn't get or feel bullied so much.
-
i find that people dont like the fact that someone is strong, with or without friends.
Gc3 has around 14 solid players, TW has im
guessing 20k plus people on it. why hate the 14? -
I don't hate gc3 I actually like you. Anyways I just heard some sh*t that's happening in UK :)
-
T e ✯ a S wrote:
yes but mist generally sucg wars only hurt smaller players. Take me for an example. Lets say i got in such a war. Lets say i was outclassed. Now i no longer talk about my stats in public but lets just say my turf limit is pretty high and i have billions. Are you going to be able to take me out? It's actually not even possible as brown note can attest to. The only players who would get hurt would be the smaller ones.bullying is bullying no matter how you look at it. expanding, and fighting people of like size is completely fine.
everyone talks about peace in this game, with peace it wouldn't be TURF WARS.
while people like to fight the people around them, Gc3 likes to find people to fight all over, spread our love.
expanding and bullying are not the same. we expand, and have yet to actually bully. warring is not bullying, as bella said, she has the same stats as me so how is it bullying??
-
T e ✯ a S wrote:
For me, it's all about how the alliance is used. I think alliances should remain local. If they have isasues across state lines, the work with that local alliance.i find that people dont like the fact that someone is strong, with or without friends.
Gc3 has around 14 solid players, TW has im
guessing 20k plus people on it. why hate the 14?I remember in the beginning seeing a statement by CMS that their goal is to control the entire US.
-
ANd I just feel that alliances shouold eb more about Defense than Offense.
-
TheCoconutMafia wrote:
or at least be fully honest if they're about offense. An evil alliance would be verycool I thinkANd I just feel that alliances shouold eb more about Defense than Offense.
-
TheCoconutMafia wrote:
That is not entirely accurate. While I do admit to wanting to have influence in major cities throughout the country, I fully intend to consult state authorities as to our intentions for that state. "control" means different things to different people.T e ✯ a S wrote:
For me, it's all about how the alliance is used. I think alliances should remain local. If they have isasues across state lines, the work with that local alliance.i find that people dont like the fact that someone is strong, with or without friends.
Gc3 has around 14 solid players, TW has im
guessing 20k plus people on it. why hate the 14?I remember in the beginning seeing a statement by CMS that their goal is to control the entire US.
-
Again, our reputation with 99% of the turf war community is positive. At least among mobsters who have interacted with us personally.
-
Every player in this game is indestructable, but... I could retire, and claim that some evil selfish bastard "took me out". You know, pretend to be a victim. People love to do that around here.
-
Brown Note👊🔨💀 wrote:
not entirely true. Every player who puts cash into this game is indestructable. I've seen many players put hopelessly into negative cash.Every player in this game is indestructable, but... I could retire, and claim that some evil selfish bastard "took me out". You know, pretend to be a victim. People love to do that around here.
-
👿Belial wrote:
Ask thug. At some point, you can't attack them anymore, and you can sell off upkeep and survive. You can only break will, not characters.Brown Note👊🔨💀 wrote:
not entirely true. Every player who puts cash into this game is indestructable. I've seen many players put hopelessly into negative cash.Every player in this game is indestructable, but... I could retire, and claim that some evil selfish bastard "took me out". You know, pretend to be a victim. People love to do that around here.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
http://turfwarsapp.com/forum/43/11559627/2I never denied sayingbthat one of our goals is to control the United States. By controlling the US I mean that we can hit anyone in it when necessary. Make of it what you want. Makes no difference to me. I have said nothing privately that I will not say publicly so whatever. 👊🔨💀
-
TheCoconutMafia wrote:
Your point is what? I have clarified that statement already. Again, our actions have proven that we play well with others. You're position isn't holding water here.Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
http://turfwarsapp.com/forum/43/11559627/2I never denied sayingbthat one of our goals is to control the United States. By controlling the US I mean that we can hit anyone in it when necessary. Make of it what you want. Makes no difference to me. I have said nothing privately that I will not say publicly so whatever. 👊🔨💀
-
My point is that your current statement seems contradictory to the earlier statements. This is going back to the beginning of the alliances. I also recall talk at that time of "groups" of players squashing and killing anyone that tried to come into their areas.
I understand a lot has changed since then, so I will take you at your word, and take your current statements to be representative of the CMS. My apologies to you and your organization.
-
Bore off mafia moron! I would kick ur sorry ass from dusk till dawn if u weren't 1000 miles away!
-
Consider yourself lucky your insulated by two oceans and a continent.
-
You mean allied forces back in world war ii blah blah blah then Sarge robson blah blah blahand we almost died rah rah rah killed all the Nazis rah rah and the japs surrenered.
-
You know what I want to see? A war BETWEEN alliances. Because I never see that. It's mostly, oh, we're in an alliance with this alliance, blah blah blah...etc. All the alliances are just forming a single alliance pretty much.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC