Stealing turf...

Forums › General Discussion › Stealing turf...

« Prev 12Next »

Brown🎵Note May 9, 2012

༒ᏴᏌᎠᏩᎥᎬ༒ wrote:
jewelsJH wrote:
Uhm why not cap Inactive turf?

Hurts the local economy. You and everybody else (locally) income will go down.
Not always. Most cities are so over-populated, turf incomes are maxed out even if half the players disappear.
Capping and tearing down inactive turf can make planting cheaper and make room for new players to get established where they live.

Of course, you should make sure it's actually beneficial...

I don't like bandwagons.
Amish Hitman May 9, 2012

Bandwagon hater. How else am I suppose to move my 18 kids and wife?
🎀ăღɞɛȓ🎀 May 9, 2012

Amish Hitman wrote:
Bandwagon hater. How else am I suppose to move my 18 kids and wife?

Get them each their own horse. 😉
Admiral May May 9, 2012

I usually protect inactives and have never capped one. They help boost my income and help the entire economy of the city. I hope all agree with me on this and will save the inactives!
★Λubergine★ May 9, 2012

fun6754 wrote:
Demacia wrote:
What if there are inactive turfs with 100+ influence

Then I think of course take it. :P most likely no one can tax it so why not?
Why couldn't anyone tax turf at 100 inf? Max is 138 inf.
Amish Hitman May 9, 2012

I can get not capping a 100 inf turf in a rural area because it will lower the overall income but in populated areas. It's mine
Primo Loco May 9, 2012

ad_BL6 wrote:
fun6754 wrote:
I once found a inactive with all 86 inf. turf. You can guess what happened to him.😜

Well ur an idiot!
Most, if not all, the newer generation players are 😒 they think it helps them to cap but it does more damage
You Mad Bro™ May 9, 2012

Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote:
Why is it that asking if it's ok to take turf in a game called Turf WARS is the new trend. Yes it's ok, no we don't care if you do it. Just don't come crying to GD if the actions have unforeseen consequences.

👍👍👍
☣ 🎸ӈɪƖƖßıƖƖγ🎸☣ May 9, 2012

Steal the turf and when they whine send them a walmy bomb.

« Prev 12Next »