DEBATE: What would you rather have?
Forums › General Discussion › DEBATE: What would you rather have?-
rojo2017 wrote:
Like I said. You would need an army. A totalitarian gov would have one. Anyone who has bigger and better stuff than me wouldn't need my stuff.Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
But what about the people with bigger guns, their is alwase a bigger gun.rojo2017 wrote:
Those are zombies in a video game. Not people in rl. I don't think you understand. We're talking about 30 guys with assault rifles, shotguns, high power rifles (including a berett .50 cal) and homemade high explosives.ང༐བℵཇ wrote:
SnippedTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
Snippedsnipped
-
💀Niccoló M.💀 wrote:
Well it's different you see, on a shooting range you are shooting paper and on Facebook it doesn't matter, in real life hanging a head from the front of your property with a bullet through the forehead makes a...statement so to say, lolTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
You pick anarchy so you can use guns and show ur a good shot? Why not just go to a gun range and post your targets u shot on face book? Same thing right? I choose love over anarchy any day. Fornication beats damnation!I pick anarchy. I have lots of guns, lots of friends with lots of guns, and my folks have an easily fortifiable house with a windmill and a lake. And I'm a damn good shot. It would take an army.
-
Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
Youre not getting the point. If 10 people came at you you would most likely lose. And they could still scavenge your ammo. Your treating this like they have pea shooters and can just go to Walmart for their stuffrojo2017 wrote:
Like I said. You would need an army. A totalitarian gov would have one. Anyone who has bigger and better stuff than me wouldn't need my stuff.Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
But what about the people with bigger guns, their is alwase a bigger gun.rojo2017 wrote:
Snippedང༐བℵཇ wrote:
SnippedTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
Snippedsnipped
-
I want the dictatorship just as long as the dictator is nick
-
hollywood9 wrote:
It would only be more frightening though, because nick barley ever speaks on the forum. And you would have no idea what he likes or disslikes and it wold be easier to be kills and not know what you did.I want the dictatorship just as long as the dictator is nick
-
ང༐བℵཇ wrote:
Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
And thay wold take your fortified house.rojo2017 wrote:
Youre not getting the point. If 10 people came at you you would most likely lose. And they could still scavenge your ammo. Your treating this like they have pea shooters and can just go to Walmart for their stuffTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
rojo2017 wrote:
Snippedང༐བℵཇ wrote:
SnippedTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
Snippedsnipped
Like I said. You would need an army. A totalitarian gov would have one. Anyone who has bigger and better stuff than me wouldn't need my stuff.
-
hollywood9 wrote:
I want the dictatorship just as long as the dictator is nick
Would that make it a
"nick-tatorship"? -
ང༐བℵཇ wrote:
10 people running across 300 yards of flat, open land with 30 plus people firing at them with high powered rifles and assault rifles, that's just target practice.Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
Youre not getting the point. If 10 people came at you you would most likely lose. And they could still scavenge your ammo. Your treating this like they have pea shooters and can just go to Walmart for their stuffrojo2017 wrote:
SnippedTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
Snippedrojo2017 wrote:
Snippedང༐བℵཇ wrote:
SnippedTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
Snippedsnipped
-
Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
ང༐བℵཇ wrote:
No, thay most likely won't be running, thay will probably have a car with makeshift armor on it.Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
rojo2017 wrote:
SnippedTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
Snippedrojo2017 wrote:
Snippedང༐བℵཇ wrote:
SnippedTonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
Snippedsnipped
10 people running across 300 yards of flat, open land with 30 plus people firing at them with high powered rifles and assault rifles, that's just target practice.
-
I have to start this new thing because I couldn't make my point under the character limit.
you're treatin this like you cant be ambushed, not factoring in reload time, and armor they may have, vehicles, and their weapons. the snipers could fire at you, then while you take cover, RPGs can shoot at the house, makeshift grenades or fireworks as well, then there is smoke bombs, fire, and plenty of other things, such as blast radius. -
ང༐བℵཇ wrote:
A berett .50 can pop the engine block of a tank. So makeshift armor isn't a problem. RPGs aren't exactly laying around out here, and I'd like to see someone throw a grenade that far. I'm telling u, even if they find the place, they would be dead before they even knew there were people there.I have to start this new thing because I couldn't make my point under the character limit.
you're treatin this like you cant be ambushed, not factoring in reload time, and armor they may have, vehicles, and their weapons. the snipers could fire at you, then while you take cover, RPGs can shoot at the house, makeshift grenades or fireworks as well, then there is smoke bombs, fire, and plenty of other things, such as blast radius. -
Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
What, are you going to have some big security system? What about camouflage? Scavengers or even a band or raiders/mercenarys could find an army base and take weapons or supplies. We would all like to think we are superheroes in this situation.ང༐བℵཇ wrote:
A berett .50 can pop the engine block of a tank. So makeshift armor isn't a problem. RPGs aren't exactly laying around out here, and I'd like to see someone throw a grenade that far. I'm telling u, even if they find the place, they would be dead before they even knew there were people there. -
ང༐བℵཇ wrote:
Just need people to keep watch. We all have dogs. The only military base we have around here is McConnell afb, and you can't just hop in a fighter jet and know how to use it. And camo only works with sufficient concealment. All we gotta do is mow the grass.Tonytlj add:TLJ wrote:
What, are you going to have some big security system? What about camouflage? Scavengers or even a band or raiders/mercenarys could find an army base and take weapons or supplies. We would all like to think we are superheroes in this situation.ང༐བℵཇ wrote:
A berett .50 can pop the engine block of a tank. So makeshift armor isn't a problem. RPGs aren't exactly laying around out here, and I'd like to see someone throw a grenade that far. I'm telling u, even if they find the place, they would be dead before they even knew there were people there. -
I would want the world with no leadership cuz then I'd just be a drug lord. There's no need to rape women when they want to fuck you in exchange for drugs
-
YOU wrote:
YOU wrote:
Add: TLJ wrote:
Just need people to keep watch. We all have dogs. The only military base we have around here is McConnell afb, and you can't just hop in a fighter jet and know how to use it. And camo only works with sufficient concealment. All we gotta do is mow the grass.
What if the dogs get shot and the lookouts go crazy and shoot you and eachother or decide to leave you?
-
Who ever is arguing with Tony obviously has shit for brains. From the sound of his place, if there was anarchy, Id like to be there.
-
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
But in anarchy you can't trust anyone, not even your family so just having some friends with big guns sounds like someone their will figure out, we have a lit of amo, guns, and a well fortified base. Why don't I just kill them for all of it.Who ever is arguing with Tony obviously has shit for brains. From the sound of his place, if there was anarchy, Id like to be there.
-
I go with #2 cause now I can do it with my GF and no one to stop us
-
Agent XX3 wrote:
You can do that on either and on #2 someone cold just break in and kill both of you, or watch you.I go with #2 cause now I can do it with my GF and no one to stop us
-
rojo2017 wrote:
But the government is watching our every move so if 2 10 year olds are doin it of course there going to stop upAgent XX3 wrote:
You can do that on either and on #2 someone cold just break in and kill both of you, or watch you.I go with #2 cause now I can do it with my GF and no one to stop us
-
rojo2017 wrote:
That is stupidity! You can have a million guns, without the men to arm them you have fuck all. Why would you kill someone who, even if they wouldn't die for you, is shooting at the same guys you are shooting at?There is strength in numbers. If someone killed one of the other people who was guarding the same place that tey were guarding, it makes it easier to invade.TheNewfieBullet wrote:
But in anarchy you can't trust anyone, not even your family so just having some friends with big guns sounds like someone their will figure out, we have a lit of amo, guns, and a well fortified base. Why don't I just kill them for all of it.Who ever is arguing with Tony obviously has shit for brains. From the sound of his place, if there was anarchy, Id like to be there.
-
Agent XX3 wrote:
That's just wrong, in my belief.rojo2017 wrote:
But the government is watching our every move so if 2 10 year olds are doin it of course there going to stop upAgent XX3 wrote:
You can do that on either and on #2 someone cold just break in and kill both of you, or watch you.I go with #2 cause now I can do it with my GF and no one to stop us
-
Agent XX3 wrote:
I'm sure you could squeeze Ina nice hug without your parents catching you. Maybe, if you are daredevils, a peck on the cheek.rojo2017 wrote:
But the government is watching our every move so if 2 10 year olds are doin it of course there going to stop upAgent XX3 wrote:
You can do that on either and on #2 someone cold just break in and kill both of you, or watch you.I go with #2 cause now I can do it with my GF and no one to stop us
-
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
That would defy the whole idea of anarchy. You all seem to think his house thing is some impenetrable fortress with laserbeams and an automated missle defense system and 15 feet think titanium walls. It's a house. Fortified with what little wood or metal they can find. A couple Rpg blasts could blow at least a hole in it and why would you team up with someone when you can kill them and then take their base and supplies for themselvesrojo2017 wrote:
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
-
rojo2017 wrote:
What ever IDCAgent XX3 wrote:
That's just wrong, in my belief.rojo2017 wrote:
But the government is watching our every move so if 2 10 year olds are doin it of course there going to stop upAgent XX3 wrote:
You can do that on either and on #2 someone cold just break in and kill both of you, or watch you.I go with #2 cause now I can do it with my GF and no one to stop us
-
So I take it that I have debunked your theory?
-
ང༐བℵཇ wrote:
Nope. I wrote like two paragraphs but I lost it so I kinda gave up.So I take it that I have debunked your theory?
-
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
Not yOu the other guyང༐བℵཇ wrote:
Nope. I wrote like two paragraphs but I lost it so I kinda gave up.So I take it that I have debunked your theory?
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC